ERPs reflect lexical identification in word fragment priming

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 541-552

  Friedrich, Claudia K ^a   Kotz, Sonja A ^a   Friederici, Angela D ^a   Gunter, Thomas C ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH ARTICULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VERBAL MEMORY; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; WORD RECOGNITION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CUES; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; READING; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 2442425378     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/089892904323057281     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 802-814.
2. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, T. V., & Besener, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Domic (Ed.), Attention and performance (Vol. VI, pp. 535-555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Connine, C. M., Titone, D., Deelmann, T., & Blasko, D. (1997). Similarity mapping in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 463-480.
4. Cooper, N., Cutler, A., & Wales, R. (2002). Constraints of lexical stress on lexical access in English: Evidence from native and nonnative listeners. Language and Speech, 45, 207-228.
5. Cutler, A., & Clifton, C. E. (1999). Comprehending spoken language: A blueprint of the listener. In C. M. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 123-166). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Cutler, A., & van Donselaar, W. D. (2001). Voornaam is not (really) a homophone: Lexical prosody and lexical access in Dutch. Language and Speech, 44, 171-195.
7. Doyle, M. C., Rugg, M. D., & Wells, T. (1996). A comparison of the electrophysiological effects of formal and repetition priming. Psychophysiology, 33, 132-147.
8. Dumay, N., Benraiss, A., Barriol, B., Colin, C., Radeau, M., & Besson, M. (2001). Behavioral and electrophysiological study of phonological priming between bisyllabic spoken words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 121-143.
9. Frauenfelder, U. H., & Floccia, C. (1999). The recognition of spoken words. In A. D. Friederici (Ed.), Language comprehension: A biological perspective (pp. 1-40). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
10. Friedrich, C. K., Alter, K., & Kotz, S. A. (2001). An electrophysiological response to different pitch contours in words. NeuroReport, 12, 3189-3191.
11. Gow, D. W., & Gordon, P. (1995). Lexical and prelexical influence on word segmentation: Evidence from priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 344-359.
12. Grosjean, F. (1996). Gating. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 597-604.
13. Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2000). ERP effects of listening to speech: Semantic ERP effects. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1518-1530.
14. Holcomb, P. J., Grainger, J., & O'Rourke, T. (2002). An electrophysiological study of the effects of orthographic neighborhood size on printed word perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 981-950.
15. Keefe, D. E., & Neely, J. H. (1990). Semantic priming in the pronunciation task: The role of prospective prime-generated expectancies. Memory and Cognition, 18, 289-298.
16. Kwantes, P. J., & Mehwort, D. J. K. (1999). Evidence for sequential processing in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 376-381.
17. Lindell, A. K., Nicholls, M. E. R., & Castles, A. E. (2003). The effects of orthographic uniqueness and deviation points on lexical decision: Evidence from unilateral and bilateral-redundant presentations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65A, 287-307.
18. Marslen-Wilson, W. (1990). Activation, competition and frequency in lexical access. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing. Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp.148-172). Cambridge: MIT Press.
19. Marslen-Wilson, W., & Warren, P. (1994). Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: Words, phonemes, and features. Psychological Review, 101, 653-675.
20. McMurray, B., Tanenhaus, M., & Aslin, R. (2002). Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access. Cognition, 86, B33-B42.
21. McQueen, J. M., Norris, D., & Cutler, A. (1994). Competition in spoken word recognition: Spotting words in other words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 621-638.
22. McQueen, J. M., Norris, D., & Cutler, A. (1999). Lexical influence in phonetic decision making: Evidence from subcategorical mismatches. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1363-1389.
23. Münte, T. F., Say, T., Clahsen, H., Schiltz, K., & Kutas, M. (1999). Decomposition of morphologically complex words in English: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 241-253.
24. Neely, J. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264-337). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Neely, J. H., Keefe, D. E., & Ross, K. L. (1989). Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: Roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1003-1019.
26. Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2002). Bias effects in facilitatory phonological priming. Memory and Cognition, 30, 399-411.
27. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-112.
28. Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.), Attention and performance V (pp. 669-682). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
29. Praamstra, P., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Neurophysiological manifestations of phonological processing: Latency variation of a negative ERP component timelocked to phonological mismatch. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 204-219.
30. Pylkkänen, L., Stringfellow, A., & Marantz, A. (2002). Neuromagnetic evidence for the timing of lexical activation: An MEG component sensitive to phonotactic probability but not to neighborhood density. Brain and Language, 81, 666-678.
31. Radeau, M., Morais, J., & Dewier, A. (1989). Phonological priming in spoken word recognition: Task effects. Memory and Cognition, 17, 525-535.
32. Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Münte, T. F., & Clahsen, H. (2002). Morphological priming in Spanish verb forms: An ERP repetition priming study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 443-454.
33. Rugg, M. D. (1984a). Event-related brain potentials and the phonological processing of words and non-words. Neuropsychologia, 22, 435-443.
34. Rugg, M. D. (1984b). Event-related brain potentials in phonological matching tasks. Brain and Language, 23, 225-240.
35. Rugg, M. D., Doyle, M. C., & Wells, T. (1995). Word and nonword repetition within- and across-modality: An event-related potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 209-227.
36. Rugg, M. D., & Nieto-Vegas, M. (1999). Modality-specific effects of immediate word repetition: Electrophysiological evidence. NeuroReport, 10, 2661-2664.
37. Soto-Faraco, S., Sebastian-Galles, N., & Cutler, A. (2001). Segmental and suprasegmental mismatch in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 412-432.
38. Spinelli, E., Segui, J., & Radeau, M. (2001). Phonological priming in spoken word recognition with bisyllabic targets. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 367-392.
39. van den Brink, D., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (2001). Electrophysiological evidence for early contextual influences during spoken-word recognition: N200 versus N400 effects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 967-985.
40. Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 374-408.
41. Zwitserlood, P. (1989). The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing. Cognition, 32, 25-64.
42. Zwitserlood, P. (1996). Form priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 589-596.