The neural integration of speaker and message

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 580-591

  Van Berkum, Jos J A ^a,b,c   Van Den Brink, Danielle ^c,d   Tesink, Cathelijne M J Y ^c,d   Kos, Miriam ^c   Hagoort, Peter ^a,c,e  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^d RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^e RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; MALE; NERVE FUNCTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS; SPEECH; VOICE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; CEREBRAL CORTEX; COMPREHENSION; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REFERENCE VALUES; SEMANTICS; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 41649088691     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20054     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Barr, D. J., & Keysar, B. (2006). Perspective-taking and the coordination of meaning in language use. In M. J. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 901-938). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
2. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Den Haag: Mouton.
3. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Cutler, A., & Clifton, C. E. (1999). Comprehending spoken language: A blueprint of the listener. In C. M. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 123-166). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.
6. Goldinger, S. D. (1996). Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1166-1183.
7. Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Seminar Press.
8. Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1994). Brain responses to lexical-ambiguity resolution and parsing. In C. Clifton, Jr., L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 45-80). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Hagoort, P., Brown, C. M., & Groothusen, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 439-483.
10. Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M. C. M., & Petersson, K. M. (2004). Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 304, 438-440.
11. Hanna, J. E., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2004). Pragmatic effects on reference resolution in a collaborative task: Evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Science, 28, 105-115.
12. Hanna, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Trueswell, J. C. (2003). The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 43-61.
13. Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language. New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Johnson, K. A. (2005). Speaker normalization in speech perception. In D. B. Pisoni & R. E. Remez (Eds.), Handbook of speech perception (pp. 363-389). Oxford: Blackwell.
15. Johnson, K. A., Strand, E. A., & D'imperio, M. (1999). Auditory-visual integration of talker gender in vowel perception. Journal of Phonetics, 24, 359-384.
16. Kempson, R. (2001). Pragmatics: Language and communication. In M. Aronoff & J. Rees-Miller (Eds.), Handbook of linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
17. Kreiman, J., Vanlancker-Sidtis, D., & Gerratt, B. R. (2005). Perception of voice quality. In D. B. Pisoni & R. E. Remez (Eds.), Handbook of speech perception (pp. 338-362). Oxford: Blackwell.
18. Kuperberg, G. R. (2007). Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research, 1146, 23-49.
19. Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 463-470.
20. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203-205.
21. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 161-163.
22. Kutas, M., Van Petten, C., & Kluender, R. (2006). Psycholinguistics electrified II: 1994-2005. In M. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 659-724). New York: Elsevier.
23. Lattner, S., & Friederici, A. D. (2003). Talker's voice and gender stereotype in human auditory sentence processing - evidence from event-related brain potentials. Neuroscience Letters, 339, 191-194.
24. MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676-703.
25. Metzing, C., & Brennan, S. E. (2003). When conceptual pacts are broken: Partner-specific effects in the comprehension of referring expressions. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 201-213.
26. Nieuwland, M. S., Petersson, K. M., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2007). On sense and reference: Examining the functional neuroanatomy of referential processing. Neuroimage, 37, 993-1004.
27. Nieuwland, M. S., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2006). When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1098-1111.
28. Nygaard, L. C. (2005). Perceptual integration of linguistic and non-linguistic properties of speech. In D. B. Pisoni & R. E. Remez (Eds.), Handbook of speech perception (pp. 390-413). Oxford: Blackwell.
29. Nygaard, L. C., & Lunders, E. R. (2002). Resolution of lexical ambiguity by emotional tone of voice. Memory & Cognition, 30, 583-593.
30. Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 785-806.
31. Otten, M., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2007). What makes a discourse constraining? Comparing the effects of discourse message and scenario fit on the discourse-dependent N400 effect. Brain Research, 1153, 166-177.
32. Perry, J. (1997). Indexicals and demonstratives. In C. Wright & R. Hale (Eds.), Companion to the philosophy of language (pp. 586-612). Oxford: Blackwell.
33. Remez, R. E., Rubin, P. E., Nygaard, L. C., & Howell, W. A. (1987). Perceptual normalization of vowels produced by sinusoidal voices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 40-61.
34. Rubin, D. (1992). Nonlanguage factors affecting undergraduates' judgements of non-native English speaking teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education, 33, 511-531.
35. Schirmer, A., & Kotz, S. A. (2006). Beyond the right hemisphere: Brain mechanisms mediating vocal emotional processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 24-30.
36. Schirmer, A., Kotz, S. A., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Sex differentiates the role of emotional prosody during word processing. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 228-233.
37. Schirmer, A., Kotz, S. A., & Friederici, A. D. (2005). On the role of attention for the processing of emotions in speech: Sex differences revisited. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 442-452.
38. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
39. St. George, M., Mannes, S., & Hoffman, J. E. (1994). Global semantic expectancy and language comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 70-83.
40. Strand, E. A. (1999). Uncovering the role of gender stereotypes in speech perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18, 86-99.
41. Tanenhaus, M. K., & Trueswell, C. (1995). Sentence comprehension. In J. L. Miller & P. D. Eimas (Eds.), Speech, language, and communication (pp. 217-262). San Diego: Academic Press.
42. Tesink, C., Hagoort, P., Petersson, K., Van Berkum, J. J. A., Van der Gaag, R., Kan, C., et al. (2007). Pragmatic language comprehension in adults with ASD: An fMRI study. Presented at the International Meeting for Autism Research (IMFAR), Seattle, May 3-5.
43. Thomas, E. R. (2002). Sociophonetic applications of speech perception experiments. American Speech, 77, 115-147.
44. Trueswell, J., & Tanenhaus, M. (Eds.) (2005). Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as-product and language-action traditions. Cambridge: MIT Press.
45. Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (1999). Early referential context effects in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 147-182.
46. Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Hagoort, P. (2005). Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 443-467.
47. Van Berkum, J. J. A., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1999). Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 657-671.
48. Van Berkum, J. J. A., Koornneef, A. W., Otten, M., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2007). Establishing reference in language comprehension: An electrophysiological perspective. Brain Research, 1146, 158-171.
49. Van Berkum, J. J. A., Zwitserlood, P., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (2003). When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 701-718.
50. Van den Brink, D., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (2006). The cascaded nature of lexical selection and integration in auditory sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 364-372.
51. Van Petten, C., Coulson, S., Rubin, S., Plante, E., & Parks, M. (1999). Time course of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 394-417.