Event-related brain potentials reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension

Psychophysiology

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 235-248

  Van Berkum, Jos J A ^a,b,c   Brown, Colin M ^b   Hagoort, Peter ^b,c   Zwitserlood, Pienie ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Anaphoric processing; Brain imaging; Discourse context; Referential ERP effect; Sentence processing; Spoken language comprehension

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMBIGUITY; ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS;

EID: 0037339504     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1469-8986.00025     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Altmann, G. T. M. (1988). Ambiguity, parsing strategies, and computational models. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3(2), 73-97.
2. Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73, 247-264.
3. Arnold, J. E., Eisenband, J. G., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Trueswell, J. C. (2000). The rapid use of gender information: Evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking. Cognition, 76, B14-B26.
4. Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (2000). On the electrophysiology of language comprehension: Implications for the human language system. In M. W. Crocker, M. Pickering, & C. Clifton, Jr. (Eds.), Architectures and mechanisms for language processing pp (213-237). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Brown, C. M., Hagoort, P., & Kutas, M. (2000). Postlexical integration processes in language comprehension: Evidence from brain-imaging research. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (pp. 881-895). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Brown, C. M., Van Berkum, J. J. A., & Hagoort, P. (2000). Discourse before gender: An event-related brain potential study on the interplay of semantic and syntactic information during spoken-language understanding. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 53-68.
7. Crain, S., & Steedman, M. (1985). On not being led up the garden path: The use of context by the psychological parser. In D. R. Dowty, L. Karttunen, & A. M. N. Zwicky (Eds.), Natural language parsing (pp. 320-358). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8. Corbett, A. T. (1984). Pronominal adjectives and the disambiguation of anaphoric nouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 683-695.
9. Dahan, D., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Chambers, C. G. (2002). Accent and reference resolution in spoken-language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 292-314.
10. Donaldson, D. I., & Rugg, M. D. (1999). Event-related potential studies of associative recognition and recall: Electrophysiological evidence for context dependent retrieval processes. Cognitive Brain Research, 8, 1-16.
11. Eberhard, K., Spivey-Knowlton, M., Sedivy, J., & Tanenhaus, M. (1995). Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language processing in natural contexts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 409-436.
12. Federmeier, K. D., McLennan, D. B., De Ochoa, E., & Kutas, M. K. (2002). The impact of semantic memory organization and sentence context information on spoken language processing by younger and older adults: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 39, 133-146.
13. Ferreira, F., & Clifton, C., Jr. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 348-368.
14. Fiebach, C. J., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Syntactic working memory and the establishment of filler-gap dependencies: Insights from ERPs and fMRI. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 321-338.
15. Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (1996). Construal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Friederici, A. D. (1998). The neurobiology of language comprehension. In A. D. Friederici (Ed.), Language comprehension: A biological perspective (pp. 263-301). Berlin: Springer.
17. Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A., & Mecklinger, A. (1996). Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: Early and late event-related brain potential effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1219-1248.
18. Garnham, A. (2001). Mental models and the interpretation of anaphora. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
19. Garrod, S., & Terras, M. (2000). The contribution of lexical and situational knowledge to resolving discourse roles: Bonding and resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 526-544.
20. Garrod, S. C., & Sanford, A. J. (1994). Resolving sentences in discourse context: How discourse representation affects language understanding. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 675-698). New York: Academic Press.
21. Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 1-76.
22. Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1994). Brain responses to lexicalambiguity resolution and parsing. In C. Clifton, Jr., L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 45-80). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2000a). ERP effects of listening to speech: Semantic ERP effects. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1518-1530.
24. Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2000b). ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: The P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1531-1549.
25. Hagoort, P., Brown, C. M., & Groothusen, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing, Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 439-483.
26. Hagoort, P., Brown, C. M., & Osterhout, L. (1999). The neurocognition of syntactic processing. In C. M. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 273-316). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Jackendoff, R. (1999). The representational structures of the language faculty and their interactions. In C. M. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 37-79). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Jongman, A. (1998). Effects of vowel length and syllabic structure on segment duration in Dutch. Journal of Phonetics, 26, 207-222.
29. Kempen, G. A. M. (2001). Human grammatical coding. Manuscript.
30. King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1995). Who did what and when? Using word-and clause-level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 376-395.
31. Kluender, R., & Kutas, M. (1993). Bridging the gap: Evidence from ERPs on the processing of unbounded dependencies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 196-214.
32. Kutas, M. (1993). In the company of other words: Electrophysiological evidence for single-word and sentence context effects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 533-572.
33. Kutas, M. (1997). Views on how the electrical activity that the brain generates reflects the functions of different language structures. Psychophysiology, 34, 383-398.
34. Kutas, M., Federmeier, K. D., Coulson, S., King, J. W., & Münte, T. F. (2000). Language. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (pp. 576-601). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203-205.
36. Kutas, M., & Van Petten, C. K. (1994). Psycholinguistics electrified: Event-related brain potential investigations. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 83-143). New York: Academic Press.
37. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Levine, W. H., Guzman, A. E., & Klin, C. M. (2000). When anaphor resolution fails. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 594-617.
39. MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676-703.
40. Mitchell, D. C., Cuetos, F., Corley, M. M. B., & Brysbaert, M. (1995). Exposure-based models of human parsing: Evidence for the use of coarse-grained (nonlexical) statistical records. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 469-488.
41. Müller, H. M., King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1997). Event-related potentials elicited by spoken relative clauses. Cognitive Brain Research, 5, 193-203.
42. Münte, T. F., Schiltz, K., & Kutas, M. (1998). When temporal terms belie conceptual order. Nature, 395, 71-74.
43. Myers, J. L., & O'Brien, E. J. (1998). Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26, 131-157.
44. Neville, H., Nicol, J. L., Barss, A., Forster, K. I., & Garrett, M. F. (1991). Syntactically based sentence processing classes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 151-165.
45. Osterhout, L., Bersick, M., & McLaughlin, J. (1997). Brain potentials reflect violations of gender stereotypes. Memory and Cognition, 25, 273-285.
46. Osterhout, L., & Hagoort, P. H. (1999). A superficial resemblance does not necessarily mean you are part of the family: Counterarguments to Coulson, King, and Kutas (1998) in the P600/SPS-P300 debate. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 1-14.
47. Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 785-806.
48. Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1993). Event-related potentials and syntactic anomaly: Evidence of anomaly detection during the perception of continuous speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 413-437.
49. Osterhout, L., & Mobley, L. A. (1995). Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 739-773.
50. Perfetti, C. A., & Britt, M. A. (1995). Where do propositions come from? In C. A. Weaver, S. Mannes, & C. R. Fletcher (Eds.). Discourse comprehension (pp. 11-34). Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. London/New York: Penguin.
52. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
53. Röler. F., Heil, M., & Glowalla, U. (1993). Monitoring retrieval from long-term memory by slow event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 30, 170-182.
54. Rösler, F., Heil, M., & Röder, B. (1997). Slow negative brain potentials as reflections of specific modular resources of cognition. Biological Psychology, 45, 109-141.
55. Rösler, F., Pechmann, T., Streb, J., Röder, B., & Hennighausen, E. (1998). Parsing of sentences in a language with varying word order: Word-by-word variations of processing demands are revealed by event-related brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 150-176.
56. Rugg, M. D., & Allan, K. (2000). Memory retrieval: An electrophysiological perspective. In M. D. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (pp. 805-816). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57. Salverda, A. P., Dahan, D., & McQueen, J. M. (2002). The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension. Manuscript submitted for publication.
58. Sanford, A. J. (1985). Aspects of pronoun interpretation: Evaluation of search formulations of inference. In G. Rickheit & H. Strohner (Eds.), Inferences in text processing (pp. 183-204). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
59. Schmitt, B. M., Lamers, M. J. A., & Münte, T. F. (in press). Electrophysiological estimates of biological and syntactic gender violation during pronoun. Cognitive Brain Research.
60. Sedivy, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., Chambers, C. G., & Carlson, G. N. (1999). Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation. Cognition, 71, 109-147.
61. Streb, J., Rösler, F., & Hennighausen, E. (1999). Event-related responses to pronoun and proper name anaphors in parallel and nonparallel discourse structures. Brain and Language, 70, 273-286.
62. Tanenhaus, M. K., & Trueswell, C. (1995). Sentence comprehension. In J. L. Miller, & P. D. Eimas (Eds.), Speech, language, and communication (pp. 217-262). San Diego: Academic Press.
63. Van Berkum, J. J. A. (1999). Establishing reference in language comprehension. In V. Van Geenhoven, & W. Warner (Eds.), Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics Annual Report 1999 (pp. 35-37). Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
64. Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (1999a). Early referential context effects in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 147-182.
65. Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (1999b). When does gender constrain parsing? Evidence from ERPs. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 555-571.
66. Van Berkum, J. J. A., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1999). Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 11, 657-671.
67. Van, Berkum J. J. A., Kooijman, V., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., & Hagoort, P. (2002). Do listeners use discourse-level information to predict upcoming words in an unfolding sentence? An ERP study. Presented at the 9th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society (CNS-2002), San Francisco, April 14-16.
68. Van Berkum, J. J. A., Zwitserlood, P., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (in press). When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect. Cognitive Brain Research.
69. Van den Brink, D., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (2001). Electrophysiological evidence for early contextual influences during spoken-word recognition: N200 versus N400 Effects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 967-985.
70. Van Petten, C., Coulson, S., Rubin, S., Plante, E., & Parks, M. (1999). Time course of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 394-417.
71. Vos, S. H., Gunter, T. C., Kolk, H. H. J., & Mulder, G. (2001). Working memory constraints on syntactic processing: An electrophysiological investigation. Psychophysiology, 38, 41-63.