The cascaded nature of lexical selection and integration in auditory sentence processing

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 364-372

  Van Den Brink, Daniëlle ^a   Brown, Colin M ^a   Hagoort, Peter ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Auditory sentence processing; Event related potentials; Lexical selection; N400; Semantics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE TEST; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; STATISTICS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE TESTS; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; REACTION TIME; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 33645744493     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.364     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
2. Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (1993). The processing nature of the N400: Evidence from masked priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 34-44.
3. Connolly, J. F., & Phillips, N. A. (1994). Event-related potential components reflect phonological and semantic processing of the terminal word of spoken sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 256-266.
4. Connolly, J. F., Phillips, N. A., Stewart, S. H., & Brake, W. G. (1992). Event-related potential sensitivity to acoustic and semantic properties of terminal words in sentences. Brain and Language, 43, 1-18.
5. Connolly, J. F., Stewart, S. H., & Phillips, N. A. (1990). The effects of processing requirements on neuropsychological responses to spoken sentences. Brain and Language, 39, 302-318.
6. DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1117-1121.
7. Goldinger, S. D., Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1989). Priming lexical neighbours of spoken words: Effects of competition and inhibition. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 501-518.
8. Goldinger, S. D., Luce, P. A., Pisoni, D. B., & Marcario, J. K. (1992). Form-based priming in spoken word recognition: The roles of competition and bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1211-1238.
9. Grosjean, F. (1980). Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 267-283.
10. Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2000). ERP effects of listening to speech: Semantic ERP effects. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1518-1530.
11. Holcomb, P. J. (1993). Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: Implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. Psychophysiology, 30, 47-61.
12. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980, January 11). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203-205.
13. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. In U. H. Frauenfelder & L. K. Tyler (Eds.). Spoken word recognition (pp. 71-102). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29-63.
15. Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (1990). Designing and analyzing data. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
16. McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
17. McQueen, J. M., Norris, D., & Cutler, A. (1994). Competition in spoken word recognition: Spotting words in other words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 621-638.
18. Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165-178.
19. Norris, D. (1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189-234.
20. Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (1995). Competition and segmentation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1209-1228.
21. Salasoo, A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1985). Interaction of knowledge sources in spoken word identification. Journal, of Memory and Language, 24, 210-231.
22. Sanders, L. D., & Neville, H. J. (2003). An ERP study of continuous speech processing: I. Segmentation, semantics, and syntax in native speakers. Cognitive Brain Research, 15, 228-240.
23. Tyler, K., & Wessels, J. (1983). Quantifying contextual contributions to word recognition processes. Perception & Psychophysics, 34, 409-420.
24. Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Hagoort, P. (2005). Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 443-467.
25. Van Berkum, J. J. A., Zwitserlood, P., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2003). When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 701-718.
26. van den Brink, D., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (2001). Electrophysiological evidence for early contextual influences during spoken-word recognition: N200 versus N400 effects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 967-985.
27. van den Brink, D., & Hagoort, P. (2004). The influence of semantic and syntactic context constraints on lexical selection and integration in spoken-word comprehension as revealed by ERPs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1068-1084.
28. Van Petten, C., Coulson, S., Rubin, S., Plante, E., & Parks, M. (1999). Time course of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 394-417.
29. Wicha, N. Y. Y., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2004). Anticipating words and their gender: An event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1272-1288.
30. Zwitserlood, P. (1989). The locus of effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing. Cognition, 32, 25-64.