Simultaneous in vitro characterisation of DNA deaminase function and associated DNA repair pathways

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 12, 2013, Pages

  Franchini, Don Marc ^a,b   Incorvaia, Elisabetta ^a   Rangam, Gopinath ^a,b   Coker, Heather A ^b,c   Petersen Mahrt, Svend K ^a,b  

^a FIRC INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY   (Italy)

^b London Research Institute   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATION INDUCED CYTIDINE DEAMINASE; DNA; HYBRID PROTEIN; NATURAL PRODUCT; RECOMBINANT PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR GAL4;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEAMINATION; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA SUPERCOILING; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME ANALYSIS; IN VITRO STUDY; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING; PLASMID; PROTEIN DNA BINDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN TARGETING; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

ANIMALS; BIOTINYLATION; CELL EXTRACTS; CYTIDINE DEAMINASE; DNA; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA-DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; HUMANS; OVUM; PLASMIDS; XENOPUS;

EID: 84891913375     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082097     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Friedberg EC (2006) DNA repair and mutagenesis. Washington, D.C.: ASM Press. xxix, 1118 p. p.
2. Lindahl T (1993) Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA. Nature 362: 709-715. (Pubitemid 23125973)
3. Muramatsu M, Kinoshita K, Fagarasan S, Yamada S, Shinkai Y, et al. (2000) Class switch recombination and hypermutation require activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), a potential RNA editing enzyme. Cell 102: 553-563.
4. Revy P, Muto T, Levy Y, Geissmann F, Plebani A, et al. (2000) Activationinduced cytidine deaminase (AID) deficiency causes the autosomal recessive form of the Hyper-IgM syndrome (HIGM2). Cell 102: 565-575.
5. Petersen-Mahrt S (2005) DNA deamination in immunity. Immunol Rev 203: 80-97. (Pubitemid 40179695)
6. Liu M, Duke JL, Richter DJ, Vinuesa CG, Goodnow CC, et al. (2008) Two levels of protection for the B cell genome during somatic hypermutation. Nature 451: 841-845. (Pubitemid 351253166)
7. Carbone A, Fioretti FM, Fucci L, Ausio J, Piscopo M (2012) High efficiency method to obtain supercoiled DNA with a commercial plasmid purification kit. Acta biochimica Polonica 59: 275-278.
8. Morgan HD, Dean W, Coker HA, Reik W, Petersen-Mahrt SK (2004) Activation-induced cytidine deaminase deaminates 5-methylcytosine in DNA and is expressed in pluripotent tissues: implications for epigenetic reprogramming. J Biol Chem 279: 52353-52360. (Pubitemid 39656611)
9. Coker HA, Morgan HD, Petersen-Mahrt SK (2006) Genetic and in vitro assays of DNA deamination. Methods in Enzymology 408: 156-170.
10. Trenz K, Errico A, Costanzo V (2008) Plx1 is required for chromosomal DNA replication under stressful conditions. EMBO J 27: 876-885. (Pubitemid 351417175)
11. Punchihewa C, Inoue A, Hishiki A, Fujikawa Y, Connelly M, et al. (2012) Identification of small molecule proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) inhibitor that disrupts interactions with PIP-box proteins and inhibits DNA replication. Journal of Biological Chemistry 287: 14289-14300.
12. Coker HA, Petersen-Mahrt SK (2007) The nuclear DNA deaminase AID functions distributively whereas cytoplasmic APOBEC3G has a processive mode of action. DNA Repair (Amst) 6: 235-243. (Pubitemid 46074495)
13. Rangam G, Schmitz KM, Cobb AJ, Petersen-Mahrt SK (2012) AID enzymatic activity is inversely proportional to the size of cytosine C5 orbital cloud. PLoS One 7: e43279.
14. Shen HM, Storb U (2004) Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) can target both DNA strands when the DNA is supercoiled. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 12997-13002. (Pubitemid 39167572)
15. Garner E, Costanzo V (2009) Studying the DNA damage response using in vitro model systems. DNA Repair (Amst) 8: 1025-1037.
16. Mattoccia E, Attardi DG, Tocchini-Valentini GP (1976) DNA-relaxing activity and endonuclease activity in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 73: 4551-4554. (Pubitemid 8013938)
17. Chelico L, Pham P, Goodman MF (2009) Stochastic properties of processive cytidine DNA deaminases AID and APOBEC3G. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364: 583-593.
18. Jacobs AL, Schär P (2012) DNA glycosylases: in DNA repair and beyond. Chromosoma 121: 1-20.
19. Karran P, Cone R, Friedberg EC (1981) Specificity of the bacteriophage PBS2 induced inhibitor of uracil-DNA glycosylase. Biochemistry 20: 6092-6096. (Pubitemid 12217930)
20. Di Noia JM, Neuberger MS (2007) Molecular mechanisms of antibody somatic hypermutation. Annu Rev Biochem 76: 1-22.
21. Di Noia JM, Rada C, Neuberger MS (2006) SMUG1 is able to excise uracil from immunoglobulin genes: insight into mutation versus repair. The EMBO Journal 25: 585-595. (Pubitemid 43237665)
22. Ulrich HD (2009) Regulating post-translational modifications of the eukaryotic replication clamp PCNA. DNA Repair (Amst) 8: 461-469.
23. Moldovan G-L, Pfander B, Jentsch S (2007) PCNA, the maestro of the replication fork. Cell 129: 665-679. (Pubitemid 46802385)
24. Peña-Diaz J, Bregenhorn S, Ghodgaonkar M, Follonier C, Artola-Borán M, et al. (2012) Noncanonical mismatch repair as a source of genomic instability in human cells. Mol Cell 47: 669-680.
25. Schanz S, Castor D, Fischer F, Jiricny J (2009) Interference of mismatch and base excision repair during the processing of adjacent U/G mispairs may play a key role in somatic hypermutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 5593-5598.
26. Besmer E, Market E, Papavasiliou F (2006) The Transcription Elongation Complex Directs Activation-Induced Cytidine Deaminase-Mediated DNA Deamination. Molecular and cellular biology 26: 4378.
27. Pham P, Bransteitter R, Petruska J, Goodman MF (2003) Processive AIDcatalysed cytosine deamination on single-stranded DNA simulates somatic hypermutation. Nature 424: 103-107. (Pubitemid 36834850)
28. Sohail A, Klapacz J, Samaranayake M, Ullah A, Bhagwat AS (2003) Human activation-induced cytidine deaminase causes transcription-dependent, strandbiased C to U deaminations. Nucleic Acids Research 31: 2990-2994. (Pubitemid 37441756)
29. Pham P, Zhang K, Goodman MF (2008) Hypermutation at A/T sites during G.U mismatch repair in vitro by human B-cell lysates. J Biol Chem 283: 31754-31762.
30. Langerak P, Nygren AOH, Krijger PHL, van den Berk PCM, Jacobs H (2007) A/T mutagenesis in hypermutated immunoglobulin genes strongly depends on PCNAK164 modification. J Exp Med 204: 1989-1998. (Pubitemid 47236332)
31. Roa S, Avdievich E, Peled JU, MacCarthy T, Werling U, et al. (2008) Ubiquitylated PCNA plays a role in somatic hypermutation and class-switch recombination and is required for meiotic progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 16248-16253.
32. Di Noia J, Neuberger MS (2002) Altering the pathway of immunoglobulin hypermutation by inhibiting uracil-DNA glycosylase. Nature 419: 43-48. (Pubitemid 34987864)
33. Rada C, Williams GT, Nilsen H, Barnes DE, Lindahl T, et al. (2002) Immunoglobulin isotype switching is inhibited and somatic hypermutation perturbed in UNG-deficient mice. Curr Biol. pp. 1748-1755. (Pubitemid 35169790)
34. Jacobs H, Fukita Y, van der Horst GTJ, de Boer J, Weeda G, et al. (1998) Hypermutation of immunoglobulin genes in memory B cells of DNA repairdeficient mice. J Exp Med 187: 1735-1743.
35. Rada C, Ehrenstein MR, Neuberger MS, Milstein C (1998) Hot spot focusing of somatic hypermutation in MSH2-deficient mice suggests two stages of mutational targeting. Immunity 9: 135-141. (Pubitemid 28361302)
36. Ehrenstein MR, Neuberger MS (1999) Deficiency in Msh2 affects the efficiency and local sequence specificity of immunoglobulin class-switch recombination: parallels with somatic hypermutation. Embo J 18: 3484-3490. (Pubitemid 29276593)
37. Rada C, Williams GT, Nilsen H, Barnes DE, Lindahl T, et al. (2002) Immunoglobulin isotype switching is inhibited and somatic hypermutation perturbed in UNG-deficient mice. Curr Biol 12: 1748-1755. (Pubitemid 35169790)
38. Li Z, Scherer SJ, Ronai D, Iglesias-Ussel MD, Peled JU, et al. (2004) Examination of Msh6- and Msh3-deficient Mice in Class Switching Reveals Overlapping and Distinct Roles of MutS Homologues in Antibody Diversification. J Exp Med 200: 47-59. (Pubitemid 38924727)
39. Martomo SA, Yang WW, Gearhart PJ (2004) A role for msh6 but not msh3 in somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination. J Exp Med 200: 61-68. (Pubitemid 38924728)
40. Xue K, Rada C, Neuberger MS (2006) The in vivo pattern of AID targeting to immunoglobulin switch regions deduced from mutation spectra in msh2-/- ung-/- mice. The Journal of experimental medicine 203: 2085-2094. (Pubitemid 44352230)
41. Gaillard PH, Martini EM, Kaufman PD, Stillman B, Moustacchi E, et al. (1996) Chromatin assembly coupled to DNA repair: a new role for chromatin assembly factor I. Cell 86: 887-896. (Pubitemid 26336793)
42. Schmitz K-M, Petersen-Mahrt SK (2012) AIDing the immune system-DIAbolic in cancer. Semin Immunol 24: 241-245.
43. Pavri R, Gazumyan A, Jankovic M, Di Virgilio M, Klein I, et al. (2010) Activation-induced cytidine deaminase targets DNA at sites of RNA polymerase II stalling by interaction with Spt5. Cell 143: 122-133.
44. Willmann KL, Milosevic S, Pauklin S, Schmitz KM, Rangam G, et al. (2012) A role for the RNA pol II-associated PAF complex in AID-induced immune diversification. The Journal of experimental medicine 209: 2099-2111.