A/T mutagenesis in hypermutated immunoglobulin genes strongly depends on PCNAK164 modification

Journal of Experimental Medicine

Volumn 204, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1989-1998

  Langerak, Petra ^a   Nygren, Anders O H ^b   Krijger, Peter H L ^a   Van Den Berk, Paul C M ^a   Jacobs, Heinz ^a  

^a NETHERLANDS CANCER INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

^b Microbiology Research Centre Holland   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYCLINE; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE ETA; IMMUNOGLOBULIN; MUTANT PROTEIN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; B LYMPHOCYTE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GENE MUTATION; MALE; MISMATCH REPAIR; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; MOUSE; MUTAGENESIS; MUTATION RATE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN MODIFICATION;

ADENINE; ANIMALS; B-LYMPHOCYTES; CELL PROLIFERATION; CYTOSINE; DNA-DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HOMOZYGOTE; IMMUNOGLOBULINS; MICE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MUTAGENESIS; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN; UBIQUITIN;

EID: 34547797940     PISSN: 00221007     EISSN: 00221007     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20070902     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Chaudhuri, J., and F.W. Alt. 2004. Class-switch recombination: interplay of transcription, DNA deamination and DNA repair. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 4:541-552.
2. Rajewsky, K. 1996. Clonal selection and learning in the antibody system. Nature. 381:751-758.
3. Muramatsu, M., V.S. Sankaranand, S. Anant, M. Sugai, K. Kinoshita, N.O. Davidson, and T. Honjo. 1999. Specific expression of activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), a novel member of the RNA-editing deaminase family in germinal center B cells. J. Biol. Chem. 274:18470-18476.
4. Casali, P., Z. Pal, Z. Xu, and H. Zan. 2006. DNA repair in antibody somatic hypermutation. Trends Immunol. 27:313-321.
5. Neuberger, M.S., R.S. Harris, J. Di Noia, and S.K. Petersen-Mahrt. 2003. Immunity through DNA deamination. Trends Biochem. Sci. 28:305-312.
6. Rada, C., G.T. Williams, H. Nilsen, D.E. Barnes, T. Lindahl, and M.S. Neuberger. 2002. Immunoglobulin isotype switching is inhibited and somatic hypermutation perturbed in UNG-deficient mice. Curr. Biol. 12:1748-1755.
7. Wilson, T.M., A. Vaisman, S.A. Martomo, P. Sullivan, L. Lan, F. Hanaoka, A. Yasui, R. Woodgate, and P.J. Gearhart. 2005. MSH2-MSH6 stimulates DNA polymerase η, suggesting a role for A:T mutations in antibody genes. J. Exp. Med. 201:637-645.
8. Rada, C., M.R. Ehrenstein, M.S. Neuberger, and C. Milstein. 1998. Hot spot focusing of somatic hypermutation in MSH2-deficient mice suggests two stages of mutational targeting. Immunity. 9:135-141.
9. Jacobs, H., Y. Fukita, G.T. van der Horst, J. de Boer, G. Weeda, J. Essers, N. de Wind, B.P. Engelward, L. Samson, S. Verbeek, et al. 1998. Hypermutation of immunoglobulin genes in memory B cells of DNA repair-deficient mice. J. Exp. Med. 187:1735-1743.
10. Wiesendanger, M., B. Kneitz, W. Edelmann, and M.D. Scharff. 2000. Somatic hypermutation in MutS homologue (MSH)3-, MSH6-, and MSH3/MSH6-deficient mice reveals a role for the MSH2-MSH6 heterodimer in modulating the base substitution pattern. J. Exp. Med. 191:579-584.
11. Shen, H.M., A. Tanaka, G. Bozek, D. Nicolae, and U. Storb. 2006. Somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination in Msh6(-/-) Ung(-/-) double-knockout mice. J. Immunol. 177:5386-5392.
12. Rada, C., J.M. Di Noia, and M.S. Neuberger. 2004. Mismatch recognition and uracil excision provide complementary paths to both Ig switching and the A/T-focused phase of somatic mutation. Mol. Cell. 16:163-171.
13. Kunz, B.A., A.F. Straffon, and E.J. Vonarx. 2000. DNA damage-induced mutation: tolerance via translesion synthesis. Mutat. Res. 451:169-185.
14. Watts, F.Z. 2006. Sumoylation of PCNA: wrestling with recombination at stalled replication forks. DNA Repair (Amst.). 5:399-403.
15. Motegi, A., R. Sood, H. Moinova, S.D. Markowitz, P.P. Liu, and K. Myung. 2006. Human SHPRH suppresses genomic instability through proliferating cell nuclear antigen polyubiquitination. J. Cell Biol. 175:703-708.
16. Franko, J., C. Ashley, and W. Xiao. 2001. Molecular cloning and functional characterization of two murine cDNAs which encode Ubc variants involved in DNA repair and mutagenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1519:70-77.
17. Jansen, J.G., and N. de Wind. 2003. Biological functions of translesion synthesis proteins in vertebrates. DNA Repair (Amst.). 2:1075-1085.
18. Chiu, R.K., J. Brun, C. Ramaekers, J. Theys, L. Weng, P. Lambin, D.A. Gray, and B.G. Wouters. 2006. Lysine 63-polyubiquitination guards against translesion synthesis-induced mutations. PLoS Genet. 2:e116.
19. Xiao, W., B.L. Chow, S. Broomfield, and M. Hanna. 2000. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD6 group is composed of an error-prone and two error-free postreplication repair pathways. Genetics. 155:1633-1641.
20. Hoege, C., B. Pfander, G.L. Moldovan, G. Pyrowolakis, and S. Jentsch. 2002. RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature. 419:135-141.
21. Plosky, B.S., and R. Woodgate. 2004. Switching from high-fidelity replicases to low-fidelity lesion-bypass polymerases. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 14:113-119.
22. Prakash, S., R.E. Johnson, and L. Prakash. 2005. Eukaryotic translesion synthesis DNA polymerases: specificity of structure and function. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 74:317-353.
23. Maga, G., and U. Hubscher. 2003. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA): a dancer with many partners. J. Cell Sci. 116:3051-3060.
24. Bienko, M., C.M. Green, N. Crosetto, F. Rudolf, G. Zapart, B. Coull, P. Kannouche, G. Wider, M. Peter, A.R. Lehmann, et al. 2005. Ubiquitin-binding domains in Y-family polymerases regulate translesion synthesis. Science. 310:1821-1824.
25. Garg, P., and P.M. Burgers. 2005. Ubiquitinated proliferating cell nuclear antigen activates translesion DNA polymerases eta and REV1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 102:18361-18366.
26. Parker, J.L., A.B. Bielen, I. Dikic, and H.D. Ulrich. 2007. Contributions of ubiquitin- and PCNA-binding domains to the activity of polymerase eta in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:881-889.
27. Guo, C., T.S. Tang, M. Bienko, J.L. Parker, A.B. Bielen, E. Sonoda, S. Takeda, H.D. Ulrich, I. Dikic, and E.C. Friedberg. 2006. Ubiquitin-binding motifs in REV1 protein are required for its role in the tolerance of DNA damage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:8892-8900.
28. Haracska, L., I. Unk, L. Prakash, and S. Prakash. 2006. Ubiquitylation of yeast proliferating cell nuclear antigen and its implications for translesion DNA synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103:6477-6482.
29. Jansen, J.G., P. Langerak, A. Tsaalbi-Shtylik, P. van den Berk, H. Jacobs, and N. de Wind. 2006. Strand-biased defect in C/G transversions in hypermutating immunoglobulin genes in Rev1-deficient mice. J. Exp. Med. 203:319-323.
30. Ross, A.L., and J.E. Sale. 2006. The catalytic activity of REV1 is employed during immunoglobulin gene diversification in DT40. Mol. Immunol. 43:1587-1594.
31. Arakawa, H., G.L. Moldovan, H. Saribasak, N.N. Saribasak, S. Jentsch, and J.M. Buerstedde. 2006. A role for PCNA ubiquitination in immunoglobulin hypermutation. PLoS Biol. 4:e366.
32. Zan, H., A. Komori, Z. Li, A. Cerutti, A. Schaffer, M.F. Flajnik, M. Diaz, and P. Casali. 2001. The translesion DNA polymerase zeta plays a major role in Ig and bcl-6 somatic hypermutation. Immunity. 14:643-653.
33. Diaz, M., L.K. Verkoczy, M.F. Flajnik, and N.R. Klinman. 2001. Decreased frequency of somatic hypermutation and impaired affinity maturation but intact germinal center formation in mice expressing antisense RNA to DNA polymerase zeta. J. Immunol. 167:327-335.
34. Zeng, X., D.B. Winter, C. Kasmer, K.H. Kraemer, A.R. Lehmann, and P.J. Gearhart. 2001. DNA polymerase eta is an A-T mutator in somatic hypermutation of immunoglobulin variable genes. Nat. Immunol. 2:537-541.
35. Delbos, F., A. De Smet, A. Faili, S. Aoufouchi, J.C. Weill, and C.A. Reynaud. 2005. Contribution of DNA polymerase η to immunoglobulin gene hypermutation in the mouse. J. Exp. Med. 201:1191-1196.
36. Langerak, P., A.O. Nygren, J.P. Schouten, and H. Jacobs. 2005. Rapid and quantitative detection of homologous and non-homologous recombination events using three oligonucleotide MLPA. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:e188.
37. Capecchi, M.R. 1989. Altering the genome by homologous recombination. Science. 244:1288-1292.
38. Friedberg, E.C., P.L. Fischhaber, and C. Kisker. 2001. Error-prone DNA polymerases: novel structures and the benefits of infidelity. Cell. 107:9-12.
39. Kannouche, P.L., J. Wing, and A.R. Lehmann. 2004. Interaction of human DNA polymerase eta with monoubiquitinated PCNA: a possible mechanism for the polymerase switch in response to DNA damage. Mol. Cell. 14:491-500.
40. Watanabe, K., S. Tateishi, M. Kawasuji, T. Tsurimoto, H. Inoue, and M. Yamaizumi. 2004. Rad18 guides poleta to replication stalling sites through physical interaction and PCNA monoubiquitination. EMBO J. 23:3886-3896.
41. Plosky, B.S., A.E. Vidal, A.R. Fernandez de Henestrosa, M.P. McLenigan, J.P. McDonald, S. Mead, and R. Woodgate. 2006. Controlling the subcellular localization of DNA polymerases iota and eta via interactions with ubiquitin. EMBO J. 25:2847-2855.
42. Bachl, J., and M. Wabl. 1996. An immunoglobulin mutator that targets G.C base pairs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:851-855.
43. Woo, C.J., A. Martin, and M.D. Scharff. 2003. Induction of somatic hypermutation is associated with modifications in immunoglobulin variable region chromatin. Immunity. 19:479-489.
44. Zan, H., A. Cerutti, P. Dramitinos, A. Schaffer, Z. Li, and P. Casali. 1999. Induction of Ig somatic hypermutation and class switching in a human monoclonal IgM+ IgD+ B cell line in vitro: definition of the requirements and modalities of hypermutation. J. Immunol. 162:3437-3447.
45. Sale, J.E., and M.S. Neuberger. 1998. TdT-accessible breaks are scattered over the immunoglobulin V domain in a constitutively hypermutating B cell line. Immunity. 9:859-869.
46. Guo, C., E. Sonoda, T.S. Tang, J.L. Parker, A.B. Bielen, S. Takeda, H.D. Ulrich, and E.C. Friedberg. 2006. REV1 protein interacts with PCNA: significance of the REV1 BRCT domain in vitro and in vivo. Mol. Cell. 23:265-271.
47. Majka, J., and P.M. Burgers. 2004. The PCNA-RFC families of DNA clamps and clamp loaders. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 78:227-260.
48. Sabbioneda, S., B.K. Minesinger, M. Giannattasio, P. Plevani, M. Muzi-Falconi, and S. Jinks-Robertson. 2005. The 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp physically interacts with polzeta and is partially required for spontaneous polzeta-dependent mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 280:38657-38665.
49. Kai, M., and T.S. Wang. 2003. Checkpoint activation regulates mutagenic translesion synthesis. Genes Dev. 17:64-76.
50. Pfander, B., G.L. Moldovan, M. Sacher, C. Hoege, and S. Jentsch. 2005. SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase. Nature. 436:428-433.
51. Ulrich, H.D. 2005. The RAD6 pathway: control of DNA damage bypass and mutagenesis by ubiquitin and SUMO. ChemBioChem. 6:1735-1743.
52. Akbari, M., M. Otterlei, J. Pena-Diaz, P.A. Aas, B. Kavli, N.B. Liabakk, L. Hagen, K. Imai, A. Durandy, G. Slupphaug, and H.E. Krokan. 2004. Repair of U/G and U/A in DNA by UNG2-associated repair complexes takes place predominantly by short-patch repair both in proliferating and growth-arrested cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:5486-5498.
53. Thompson, S., A.R. Clarke, A.M. Pow, M.L. Hooper, and D.W. Melton. 1989. Germ line transmission and expression of a corrected HPRT gene produced by gene targeting in embryonic stem cells. Cell. 56:313-321.
54. Eldering, E., C.A. Spek, H.L. Aberson, A. Grummels, I.A. Derks, A.F. de Vos, C.J. McElgunn, and J.P. Schouten. 2003. Expression profiling via novel multiplex assay allows rapid assessment of gene regulation in defined signalling pathways. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:e153.
55. Jolly, C.J., N. Klix, and M.S. Neuberger. 1997. Rapid methods for the analysis of immunoglobulin gene hypermutation: application to transgenic and gene targeted mice. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:1913-1919.
56. Schrader, C.E., W. Edelmann, R. Kucherlapati, and J. Stavnezer. 1999. Reduced isotype switching in splenic B cells from mice deficient in mismatch repair enzymes. J. Exp. Med. 190:323-330.