Adaptive educational systems

Adaptive Technologies for Training and Education

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 7-27

  Shute, Valerie J ^a   Zapata Rivera, Diego ^b  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM ALLOYS; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; LEARNING SYSTEMS; STUDENTS;

ADAPTIVE LEARNING; ADAPTIVE LEARNING SYSTEMS; ADAPTIVE TECHNOLOGY; EDUCATIONAL SYSTEMS; FLEXIBLE ENVIRONMENTS; FUTURE APPLICATIONS; LEARNER INFORMATION; PERSONALITY TRAITS;

EDUCATION;

EID: 84887844180     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139049580.004     Document Type: Chapter

References (116)

1. Alexander, P. A., & Judy, J. E. (1988). The interaction of domain-specific and strategic knowledge in academic performance. Review of Educational Research, 58 (4), 375-404.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1993). The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Anderson, J. R., Boyle, C. F., Corbett, A. T., & Lewis, M. (1990). Cognitive modeling and intelligent tutoring. Artificial Intelligence, 42, 7-49.
4. Anderson, J. R, Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 167-207.
5. Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Arroyo, I., Beal, C. R., Murray, T., Walles, R. & Woolf, B. P. (2004). Web-based intelligent multimedia tutoring for high stakes achievement tests. Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 7th International Conference, ITS 2004, Maceiò, Alagoas, Brazil, Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3220 (pp. 468-477). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
7. Arroyo, I., Woolf, B. P., & Beal, C. R. (2006). Addressing cognitive differences and gender during problem solving. Technology, Instruction, Cognition & Learning, 3 (1), 31-63.
8. Azambuja Silveira, R., & Vicari, R. M. (2002). Developing distributed intelligent learning environment with JADE-Java Agents for Distance Education Framework. Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 2363, 105-118.
9. Baker, R. S., & Yacef, K. (2009). The state of educational data mining in 2009: A review and future visions. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 1, 3-17.
10. Beck, J., & Woolf, B. (2000). High-level student modeling with machine learning. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 584-593.
11. Biswas, G., Schwartz, D., Bransford, J., & the Teachable Agent Group at Vanderbilt (TAG-V) (2001). Technology support for complex problem solving: From SAD environments to AI. In K. D. Forbus & P. J. Feltovich (Eds.), Smart machines in education: The coming revolution in educational technology (pp. 71-97). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI/MIT Press.
12. Bredeweg, B., & Forbus, K. (2003). Qualitative modeling in education. AI Magazine, 24 (4), 35-46.
13. Bretzke H., & Vassileva J. (2003) Motivating cooperation in peer-to-peer networks. Proceedings from the User Modeling UM03 Conference (pp. 218-227). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
14. Brooks, R. A. (1999). Cambrian intelligence: The early history of the new AI. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Brusilovsky, P. (1996). Methods and techniques of adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 6 (2-3), 87-129.
16. Brusilovsky, P. (2001). Adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11 (1/2), 87-110.
17. Brusilovsky, P., Sosnovsky, S., & Shcherbinina, O. (2005). User modeling in a distributed e-learning architecture. In L. Ardissono, P. Brna, & A. Mitrovic (Eds.), Proceedings of 10th International User Modeling Conference (pp. 387-391). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
18. Buxton, W. (2006). A directory of sources for input technologies. Retrieved October 3, 2006 from http://www.bill buxton. com/InputSources. html
19. Cassell, J., Nakano, Y., Bickmore, T., Sidner, C., & Rich, C. (2001). Non-verbal cues for discourse structure. Proceedings of the 41 Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics (pp. 106-115), July 17-19, Toulouse, France.
20. Chu, C., & Cohen, I. (2005). Posture and gesture recognition using 3D body shapes decomposition. IEEE Workshop on Vision for Human-Computer Interaction (V4HCI). Retrieved October 2, 2006 from, http://iris.usc.edu/icohen/pdf/Wayne-v4hci05. pdf
21. Conati, C. (2002). Probabilistic assessment of user's emotions in educational games. Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence, 16 (7-8), 555-575.
22. Conati, C. (2006). What to Adapt, and How? Personal communication, May 18, 2006, 1-2.
23. Conati, C., Gertner, A., & VanLehn, K. (2002). Using Bayesian networks to manage uncertainty in student modeling. Journal of User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 12 (4), 371-417.
24. Conati, C., Merten, C., Muldner, K., & Ternes, D. (2005). Exploring eye-tracking to increase bandwidth in user modeling. In Proceedings of UM2005 User Modeling: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference, Edinburgh, UK. Retrieved October 29, 2006 from http://www. cs. ubc. ca/~conati/my-papers/um05-eyetracking-camera. pdf
25. Conchas, G. (2006). The color of success: Race and high achieving urban youth. New York: Teachers College Press.
26. Cook, R., & Kay, J. (1994). The justified user model: A viewable, explained user model. In A. Kobsa, & D. Litman (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on User Modeling UM94 (pp. 145-150). Hyannis, MA: MITRE, UM Inc.
27. Craig, S. D., Graesser, A. C., Sullins, J., & Gholson, B. (2004). Affect and learning: An exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with AutoTutor. Journal of Educational Media, 29 (3), 241-250.
28. Cumming, G., & Self, J. (1989). Collaborative intelligent educational systems. In D. Bierman, J. Breuker, & J. Sandberg (Eds.), Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence and Education (pp. 73-80). Amsterdam: IOS.
29. Desimone, L. (1999). Linking parent involvement with student achievement: Do race and income matter. The Journal of Educational Research, 93 (1), 11-30.
30. Ekman, P. (2003). Emotions revealed: Recognizing faces and feelings to improve communication and emotional life. New York: Henry Holt.
31. Fan, X., & Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13 (1), 1-22.
32. Fink, J., & Kobsa, A. (2000). A review and analysis of commercial user modeling servers for personalization on the world wide web. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 10, 209-249.
33. Frederiksen, J., & White, B. (2002). Conceptualizing and constructing linked models: Creating coherence in complex knowledge systems. In P. Brna, M. Baker, K. Stenning, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), The role of communication in learning to model (pp. 69-96). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Fröschl, C. (2005). User modeling and user profiling in adaptive e-learning systems: An approach for a service-based personalization solution for the research project AdeLE (Adaptive e-Learning with Eye-Tracking). Unpublished master's thesis, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
35. García-Barrios, V. M., Gütl, C., Preis, A., Andrews, K., Pivec, M., Mödritscher, F., Trummer, C. (2004). AdELE: A Framework for Adaptive E-Learning through Eye Tracking. In Proceedings of I-KNOW ’04 (pp. 609-616). Graz, Austria.
36. Glaser, R. (1984). Education and thinking: The role of knowledge. American Psychologist, 39 (2), 93-104.
37. González, G., Angulo, C., López, B., & de la Rosa, J. L. (2005). Smart user models: Modelling the humans in ambient recommender systems. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Decentralized, Agent Based and Social Approaches to User Modelling (DASUM 2005), pp. 11-20.
38. Graesser, A. C., Person, N., Harter, D., & TRG (2001). Teaching tactics and dialog in AutoTutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 257-279.
39. Greer, J., & Brooks, C. (2006). What to Adapt, and How? Personal communication, May 16, 2006, 1-2.
40. Greer, J. E., & McCalla, G. I. (Eds.) (1994). Student Modelling: The Key to Individualized Knowledge-Based Instruction. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
41. Hansen, E. G., & Mislevy, R. J. (2005). Accessibility of computer-based testing for individuals with disabilities and English language learners within a validity framework. In M. Hricko & S. Howell (Eds.), Online assessment and measurement: Foundation, challenges, and issues. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
42. Hansen, E. G., Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., Lee, M. J., & Forer, D. C. (2005). Accessibility of tests for individuals with disabilities within a validity framework. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 33 (1), 107-133.
43. Henze, N., & Nejdl, W. (2003). Logically characterizing adaptive educational hypermedia systems. In Proceedings of the AH 2003-Workshop on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems, Budapest, Hungary.
44. Jameson, A. (1995). Numerical uncertainty management in user and student modeling: An overview of systems and issues. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 5 (3-4), 193-251.
45. Jameson, A. (2006). Challenges and future of learner modeling. Personal communication, May 24, 2006, 1-4.
46. Jameson, A. (2008). Adaptive interfaces and agents. In A. Sears & J. A. Jacko (Eds.), The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications (2nd ed.) (pp. 433-458). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47. Johnson, W. L., & Rickel, J. (1997). Steve: An animated pedagogical agent for procedural training in virtual environments. ACM SIGART Bulletin, 8 (1-4), 16-21.
48. Johnson, W. L., Rickel, J. W., & Lester, J. C. (2000). Animated Pedagogical Agents: Faceto-Face Interaction in Interactive Learning Environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11 (1), 47-78.
49. Johnson. W. L., Beal, C., Fowles-Winkler, A., Narayanan, S., Papachristou, D., Marsella, S., & Vilhjálmsson, H. (2004). Tactical Language Training System: An interim report. Proceedings of Intelligent Tutoring Systems 2004 (ITS 2004). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
50. Kabassi, K., & Virvou, M. (2003). Using web services for personalised web-based learning. Educational Technology & Society, 6 (3), 61-71. Retrieved October 10, 2006 from http://ifets. ieee. org/periodical/6_3/8. html
51. Kanade, T., Cohn, J. F., & Tian, Y. (2000). Comprehensive database for facial expression analysis. Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG’00). Grenoble, France, pp. 46-53.
52. Kapoor, A., & Picard, R. W. (2002). Real-time, fully automatic upper facial feature tracking. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, Washington, DC.
53. Kay, J. (1999). A scrutable user modelling shell for user-adapted interaction. Ph. D. Thesis, Basser Department of Computer Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
54. Kay, J. (2000). Stereotypes, student models and scrutability. In G. Gauthier, G., Frasson, C., & K. VanLehn (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 19-30). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
55. Kay, J. (2006). Challenges and future of learner modeling. Personal communication, June 6, 2006, 1-4.
56. Kettebekov, S., Yeasin, M, & Sharma, R. (2003). Improving continuous gesture recognition with spoken prosody. In IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 565-570.
57. Kinshuk, & Lin, T. (2004). Cognitive profiling towards formal adaptive technologies in Webbased learning communities. International Journal of WWW-based Communities, 1 (1), 103-108.
58. Kobsa, A. 1993. User modeling: Recent work, prospects and hazards. In T. K. M. Schneider-Hufschmidt, & U. Malinowski (Eds.), Adaptive User Interfaces: Principles and Practice (pp. 111-128). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
59. Kobsa, A. (2002). Personalization and international privacy. Communications of the ACM 45 (5), 64-67.
60. Kobsa, A. (2006). Generic user modeling systems and servers. In P. Brusilovsky, A. Kobsa, & W. Neijdl (Eds.), The adaptive web: Methods and strategies of web personalization. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
61. Koedinger, K. R., & Anderson, J. R. (1998). Illustrating principled design: The early evolution of a cognitive tutor for algebra symbolization. Interactive Learning Environments, 5, 161-180.
62. Koedinger, K. R., Anderson, J. R., Hadley, W. H., & Mark, M. A. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 30-43.
63. Leelawong, K., Wang, Y., Biswas, G., Vye, N., & Bransford, J. (2001). Qualitative reasoning techniques to support learning by teaching: The teachable agents project. In G. Biswas (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning, St. Mary's University, San Antonio, TX.
64. Litman, D. J., & Forbes-Riley, K. (2004). Predicting student emotions in computer-human tutoring dialogues. Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) (pp. 351-358). Barcelona, Spain.
65. Matsuda, N., Cohen, W. W., & Koedinger, K. R. (2005). Applying programming by demonstration in an intelligent authoring tool for cognitive tutors. In AAAI Workshop on Human Comprehensible Machine Learning (Technical Report WS-05-04) (pp. 1-8), Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Association.
66. McCalla, G. I. (2004). The ecological approach to the design of e-learning environments: Purpose-based capture and use of information about learners. In T. Anderson & D. Whitelock (Guest Eds.), Journal of Interactive Media in Education, Special Issue on the Educational Semantic Web (pp. 1-23). Retrieved September 22, 2006 from http://www-jime. open. ac. uk/2004/7/mccalla-2004-7. pdf
67. McCalla, G. I. (2006). Challenges and future of learner modeling. Personal communication, May 26, 2006, 1-4.
68. McCalla, G. I., Vassileva, J., Greer, J. E., & Bull, S. (2000). Active learner modeling. In G. Gauthier, C. Frasson, & K. VanLehn (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 53-62). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
69. Merten, C., & Conati, C. (2006). Eye-tracking to model and adapt to user meta-cognition in Intelligent Learning Environments. Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI 06), Sydney, Australia. Retrieved October 31, 2006 from http://www.cs. ubc. ca/~conati/my-papers/IUI06eyetrackingCamera. pdf
70. Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., & Almond, R. G. (2003). On the structure of educational assessments. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 1 (1), 3-62.
71. Mitrovic, A. (2006). What to adapt, and how? Personal communication, May 17, 2006, 1-2.
72. Park, O., & Lee, J. (2004). Adaptive instructional systems. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 651-685). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
73. Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: Networks of plausible inference. San Mateo, CA: Kaufmann.
74. Picard, R. W. (1997). Affective computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
75. Potamianos, A., Narayanan, S., & Riccardi, G. (2005). Adaptive categorical understanding for spoken dialogue systems. In IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 13, 321-329.
76. Project LISTEN (2006). Retrieved October 28, 2006 from http://www.cs. cmu. edu/~listen/
77. Qu, L., Wang N., & Johnson, W. L. (2005). Detecting the learner's motivational states in an interactive learning environment. In C.-K. Looi et al. (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education (pp. 547-554). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
78. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
79. Rich, E. (1979). User modeling via stereotypes. Cognitive Science, 3 (4), 329-354.
80. Rickel, J., & Johnson, W. L. (1997). Intelligent tutoring in virtual reality. In Proceedings of Eighth World Conference on AI in Education (pp. 294-301), Kobe, Japan.
81. Seo, K., Cohen, I., You, S., & Neumann, U. (2004). Face pose estimation system by combining hybrid ICA-SVM learning and re-registration. Asian Conference on Computer Vision (ACCV), Jeju, Korea.
82. Shaw, E., Johnson, W. L., & Ganeshan, R. (1999). Pedagogical agents on the Web. In P roceedings of the Third International Conference on Autonomous Agents (pp. 283-290).
83. Shute, V. J. (2007). Tensions, trends, tools, and technologies: Time for an educational sea change. In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 139-187). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Taylor & Francis Group.
84. Shute, V. J., & Glaser, R. (1990). Large-scale evaluation of an intelligent tutoring system: Smithtown. Interactive Learning Environments, 1, 51-76.
85. Shute, V. J., Glaser, R., & Raghavan, K. (1989). Inference and discovery in an exploratory laboratory. In P. L. Ackerman, R. J. Sternberg, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Learning and individual differences (pp. 279-326). New York: W. H. Freeman.
86. Shute, V. J., Graf, E. A., & Hansen, E. (2005). Designing adaptive, diagnostic math assessments for individuals with and without visual disabilities. In L. PytlikZillig, R. Bruning, & M. Bodvarsson (Eds.), Technology-based education: Bringing researchers and practitioners together (pp. 169-202). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
87. Shute, V. J., Hansen, E. G., & Almond, R. G. (2008). You can’t fatten a hog by weighing it-or can you? Evaluating an assessment for learning system called ACED. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education, 18 (4), 289-316.
88. Shute, V. J., Lajoie, S. P., & Gluck, K. A. (2000). Individualized and group approaches to training. In S. Tobias & J. D. Fletcher (Eds.), Training and retraining: A handbook for business, industry, government, and the military (pp. 171-207). New York: Macmillan.
89. Shute, V. J., & Psotka, J. (1996). Intelligent tutoring systems: Past, present, and future. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 570-600). New York: Macmillan.
90. Shute, V. J., & Regian, J. W. (1993) Principles for evaluating intelligent tutoring systems. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 4 (3), 245-271.
91. Sison, R., & Shimura, M. (1998). Student modeling and machine learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 9, 128-158.
92. Snow, C. E., & Biancarosa, G. (2003). Adolescent literacy and the achievement gap: What do we know and where do we go from here? New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
93. Snow, R. E. (1989). Toward assessment of cognitive and conative structures in learning. Educational Researcher, 18 (9), 8-14.
94. Snow, R. E. (1994). Abilities in academic tasks. In R. J. Sternberg & R. K. Wagner (Eds.), Mind in context: Interactionist perspectives on human intelligence (pp. 3-37). New York: Cambridge University Press.
95. SNOW (2006). Retrieved October 28, 2006 from http://snow. utoronto. ca/technology/
96. Soller, A. (2004). Computational modeling and analysis of knowledge sharing in collaborative distance learning, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 14 (4), 351-381.
97. Stansfield, J., Carr, B., & Goldstein, I. (1976). Wumpus advisor: A first implementation of a program that tutors logical and probabilistic reasoning skills. (Technical Report 381). MIT, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Cambridge, MA.
98. Teasley, S. D., & Rochelle, J. (1993). Constructing a joint problem space: The computer as a tool for sharing knowledge. In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 229-258). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
99. Tobias, S. (1994). Interest, prior knowledge, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 64 (1), 37-54.
100. Trella, M., Carmona, C., & Conejo, R. (2005). MEDEA: An open service-based learning platform for developing intelligent educational systems for the Web. In Proceedings of Workshop on Adaptive Systems for Web based Education at 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 27-34). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
101. VanLehn, K., Lynch, C., Schulze, K., Shapiro, J. A., Shelby, R., Taylor, L., Treacy, D., Weinstein, A., & Wintersgill, M. (2005). The Andes physics tutoring system: Lessons learned. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education, 15 (3), 147-204.
102. Vassileva, J. (1998). DCG +GTE: Dynamic courseware generation with teaching expertise. Instructional Science, 26(3/4), 317-332.
103. Vassileva, J. (2006). What to adapt, and how? Personal communication, May 15, 2006, 1-2.
104. Vassileva, J., McCalla, G. I., & Greer, J. E., (2003). Multi-agent multi-user modeling in I-help. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 13(1-2), 179-210.
105. Vassileva, J., & Wasson, B. (1996). Instructional planning approaches: From tutoring towards free learning. Proceedings of EuroAIED (pp. 1-8). Lisbon, Portugal.
106. Webb, G., Pazzani, M. J., & Billsus, D. (2001). Machine learning for user modeling. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11, 19-29.
107. Wenger, E. (1987). Artificial intelligence and tutoring systems. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
108. Wickens, C. D., & Hollands, J. G. (2000). Engineering psychology and human performance (3rd Ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
109. Winter, M., Brooks, C., & Greer, J. (2005). Towards best practices for semantic web student modelling. In the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2005), July 18-22, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
110. Woolf, B. (2006). What to adapt, and how? Personal communication, May 22, 2006, 1-2.
111. Wright, I. (1997). Emotional agents. PhD thesis, University of Birmingham. Retrieved May 25, 2006 from http://citeseer. ist. psu. edu/wright97emotional. html
112. Yang, M., Zapata-Rivera, D., & Bauer, M. (2006). E-Grammar: An assessment-based learning environment for English grammar. In E. Pearson & P. Bohman (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (pp. 2474-2479). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
113. Yeasin, M., & Bullot, B. (2005). Comparison of linear and non-linear data projection techniques in recognizing universal facial expressions. In Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 5, 3087-3092.
114. Zapata-Rivera, D., & Greer, J. (2000). Inspecting and visualizing distributed Bayesian student models. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 544-553). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
115. Zapata-Rivera, D., & Greer, J. (2004). Inspectable Bayesian student modelling servers in multiagent tutoring systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61(4), 535-563.
116. Zelinsky, A., & Heinzmann, J. (1996). Realtime visual recognition of facial gestures for human-computer interaction. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (pp. 351-356), Killington, VT.