High-level student modeling with machine learning

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1839, Issue , 2000, Pages 584-593

  Beck, Joseph E ^a   Woolf, Beverly Park ^a  

^a Biologically Inspired Neural and Dynamical Systems Laboratory   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; FORECASTING; INTELLIGENT VEHICLE HIGHWAY SYSTEMS; MACHINE LEARNING;

INTELLIGENT TUTORS; LEARNING AGENTS; MACHINE LEARNING AGENTS; STUDENT BEHAVIOR; STUDENT MODELING;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84944317270     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45108-0_62     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. J. Anderson. Rules of the Mind. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1993.
2. I. Arroyo, J. E. Beck, K. Schultz, and Woolf. Piagetian psychology in intelligent tutoring systems. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1999.
3. Carole R. Beal, Beverly P. Woolf, Joseph Beck, Ivon Arroyo, Klaus Schultz, and David M. Hart. Gaining confidence in mathematics: Instructional technology for girls. In Proceedings of International Conference on Mathematics/Science Education and Technology, 2000.
4. J. E. Beck, M. Stern, and B.P. Woolf. Using the student model to control problem difficulty. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on User Modeling, pages 277–288, 1997.
5. J. E. Beck and B. P. Woolf. Using a learning agent with a student model. In Proceedings Third International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 1998.
6. Joseph E. Beck and Beverly P. Woolf. Learning to teach: A machine learning architecture for making teaching decisions. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2000.
7. Bark Cheung Chiu and Geoffrey I. Webb.: Using decision trees for agent modeling: Improving prediction performance. User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction, 8(1-2):131–152, 1998.
8. A. S. Gertner, C. Conati, and K. VanLehn.: Procedural help in ANDES: Generating hints using a Bayesian network student model. In Fifteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 106–111, 1998.
9. K. R. Koedinger, J. R. Anderson, W. H. Hadley, and M. A. Mark.: Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8:30–43, 1997.
10. Thomas N. Meyer, Todd M. Miller, Kurt Steuck, and Monika Kretschmer. A multi-year large-scale field study of a learner controlled intelligent tutoring system. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pages 191–198, 1999.
11. M. Quafafou, A. Mekaouche, and H.S. Nwana. Multiviews learning and intelligent tutoring systems. In Proceedings of SeventhWorld Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1995.
12. J.A. Self. Bypassing the intractable problem of student modelling. In C. Frasson and G. Gauthier, editors, Intelligent Tutoring Systems: at the Crossroads of Artificial Intelligence and Education, pages 107–123, Norwood, NJ, 1990.
13. R.S. Sutton and A.G. Barto. An Introduction to Reinforcement Learning. MIT Press, 1998.
14. K. VanLehn, S. Ohlsson, and R. Nason.: Applications of simulated students: An exploration. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 5(2):135–175, 1994.