Substituting objects from consciousness: A review of object substitution masking

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 859-877

  Goodhew, Stephanie C ^a,b   Pratt, Jay ^b   Dux, Paul E ^c   Ferber, Susanne ^b,d  

^a The Australian National University   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^d ROTMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Attention; Consciousness; Object substitution masking; Reentrant processing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONSCIOUSNESS; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY;

ATTENTION; CONSCIOUSNESS; HUMANS; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY;

EID: 84887524201     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0400-9     Document Type: Article

References (123)

1. Abrams, R. A., Davoli, C., Du, F., Knapp, W. H., & Paull, D. (2008). Altered vision near the hands. Cognition, 107(3), 1035-1047. doi: 10. 1016/j. cognition. 2007. 09. 006.
2. Alpern, M. (1952). Metacontrast: Historical introduction. American Journal of Optometry, 29, 631-646.
3. Alpern, M. (1953). Metacontrast. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 43, 648-657. doi: 10. 1364/JOSA. 43. 000648.
4. Anstis, S. M. (1980). The perception of apparent movement. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 290(1038), 153-167. doi: 10. 1098/rstb. 1980. 0088.
5. Argyropoulos, I., Gellatly, A., Pilling, M., & Carter, W. (2013). Set size and mask duration do not interact in object-substitution masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. doi: 10. 1037/a0030240.
6. Averbach, E., & Coriell, A. S. (1961). Short-term memory in vision. Bell System Technical Journal, 40, 309-328.
7. Bar, M. (2003). A cortical mechanism for triggering top-down facilitation in object recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(4), 600-609. doi: 10. 1162/089892903321662976.
8. Bar, M., Kassam, K. S., Ghuman, A. S., Boshyan, J., Schmidt, A. M., Dale, A. M., Halgren, E. (2006). Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(2), 449-454. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 0507062103.
9. Baxt, N. (1871). Über die Zeit, welche nötig ist, damit ein Gesichtseindruck zum Bewusstsein kommt und über die Grösse (Extension) der bewussten Wahrnehmung bei einem Gesichtseindrucke von gegebener Dauer. Pflugers Archiv für die Gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere, 4, 325-336.
10. Baxt, N. (1982). On the time necessary for a visual impression to come into consciousness. Psychological Research, 44(1), 1-12. doi: 10. 1007/BF00308551.
11. Bennett, J. D., Lleras, A., Oriet, C., & Enns, J. T. (2007). A negative compatibility effect in priming of emotional faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 908-912. doi: 10. 3758/BF03194120.
12. Bentin, S., Allison, T., Puce, A., Perez, E., & McCarthy, G. (1996). Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(6), 551-565. doi: 10. 1162/jocn. 1996. 8. 6. 551.
13. Binsted, G., Brownwell, K., Vorontsova, Z., Heath, M., & Saucier, D. (2007). Visuomotor system uses target features unavailable to conscious awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(31), 12669-12672. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 0702307104.
14. Block, N. (1995). On a confusion about a function of consciousness. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15(2), 205-206. doi: 10. 1017/S0140525X00038188.
15. Block, N. (2011). Perceptual consciousness overflows cognitive access. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(12), 567-575. doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2011. 11. 001.
16. Born, R. T., & Bradley, D. C. (2005). Structure and function of visual area MT. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 28, 157-189. doi: 10. 1146/annurev. neuro. 26. 041002. 131052.
17. Breitmeyer, B. G., & Ganz, L. (1976). Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing. Psychological Review, 83(1), 1-36. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 83. 1. 1.
18. Breitmeyer, B. G., & Kersey, M. (1981). Backward masking by pattern stimulus onset. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 7(5), 972-977. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 7. 5. 972.
19. Breitmeyer, B. G., & Ögmen, H. (2000). Recent models and findings in visual backward masking: A comparison, review, and update. Perception & Psychophysics, 62(8), 1572-1595. doi: 10. 3758/BF03212157.
20. Breitmeyer, B. G., & Ögmen, H. (2006). Visual masking: Time slices through conscious and unconscious vision (2nd ed.), New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Bridgeman, B. (1971). Metacontrast and lateral inhibition. Psychological Review, 78, 528-539. doi: 10. 1037/h0031782.
22. Bridgeman, B. (1977). A correlational model applied to metacontrast: Reply to Weisstein, Ozog, and Szoc. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 10, 85-88.
23. Bridgeman, B. (2007). Common-onset masking simulated with a distributed-code model. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3(1-2), 33-40. doi: 10. 2478/v10053-008-0012-5.
24. Brockmole, J. R., Irwin, D. E., & Wang, R. F. (2003). The locus of spatial attention during the temporal integration of visual memories and visual percepts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(4), 510-515. doi: 10. 3758/BF03196562.
25. Brockmole, J. R., & Wang, R. F. (2003). Integrating visual images and visual percepts across time and space. Visual Cognition, 10(7), 853-873. doi: 10. 1080/13506280344000121.
26. Brockmole, J. R., Wang, R. F., & Irwin, D. E. (2002). Temporal integration between visual images and visual percepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 28(2), 315-334. doi: 10. 1037//0096-1523. 28. 2. 315.
27. Bullier, J. (2001). Feedback connections and conscious vision. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(9), 369-370. doi: 10. 1016/S1364-6613%2800%2901730-7.
28. Burke, L. (1952). On the tunnel effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 121-138. doi: 10. 1080/17470215208416611.
29. Chakravarthi, R., & Cavanagh, P. (2009). Recovery of a crowded object by masking the flankers: Determining the locus of feature integration. Journal of Vision, 9(10), 1-9.
30. Chen, Z., & Treisman, A. (2009). Implicit perception and level of processing in object-substitution masking. Psychological Science, 20(5), 560-567. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9280. 2009. 02328. x.
31. Cohen, M. A., Cavanagh, P., Chun, M. M., & Nakayama, K. (2012). The attentional requirements of consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(8), 411-417. doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2012. 06. 013.
32. Coltheart, M. (1980). Iconic memory and visible persistence. Perception & Psychophysics, 27(3), 183-228. doi: 10. 3758/BF03204258.
33. Coltheart, M., & Arthur, B. (1972). Evidence for an integration theory of visual masking. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 24(3), 262-269. doi: 10. 1080/14640747208400279.
34. Cudeiro, J., & Sillito, A. M. (2006). Looking back: Corticothalamic feedback and early visual processing. Trends in Neurosciences, 29(6), 298-306. doi: 10. 1016/j. tins. 2006. 05. 002.
35. Derrington, A. M., & Lennie, P. (1984). Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivities of neurones in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the macaque. The Journal of Physiology, 357, 219-240.
36. Di Lollo, V. (1980). Temporal integration in visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 109(1), 75-97. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 109. 1. 75.
37. Di Lollo, V. (2010). Iterative reentrant processing: A conceptual framework for perception and cognition (the blinding problem? No worries, mate). In V. Coltheart (Ed.), Tutorials in visual cognition. New York: Psychology Press.
38. Di Lollo, V. (2012). The feature-binding problem is an ill-posed problem. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(6), 317-321. doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2012. 04. 007.
39. Di Lollo, V., Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 129(4), 481-507. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 129. 4. 481.
40. Di Lollo, V., von Muhlenen, A., Enns, J. T., & Bridgeman, B. (2004). Decoupling stimulus duration from brightness in metacontrast masking: Data and models. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 30(4), 733-745. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 30. 4. 733.
41. Dux, P. E., Visser, T. A. W., Goodhew, S. C., & Lipp, O. V. (2010). Delayed re-entrant processing impairs visual awareness: An object substitution masking study. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1242-1247. doi: 10. 1177/0956797610379866.
42. Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 24(6), 1737-1747. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 24. 6. 1737.
43. Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo, V. (1997). Object substitution: A new form of masking in unattended visual locations. Psychological Science, 8(2), 135-139. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9280. 1997. tb00696. x.
44. Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo, V. (2000). What's new in visual masking? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(9), 345-352. doi: 10. 1016/S1364-6613%2800%2901520-5.
45. Fahrenfort, J. J., Scholte, H. S., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2007). Masking disrupts reentrant processing in human visual cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(9), 1488-1497. doi: 10. 1162/jocn. 2007. 19. 9. 1488.
46. Francis, G. (1997). Cortical dynamics of lateral inhibition: Metacontrast masking. Psychological Review, 104(3), 572-594. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 104. 3. 572.
47. Francis, G., & Hermens, F. (2002). Comment on "Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes" (Di Lollo, Enns, & Rensink, 2000). Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 131(4), 590-593. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 131. 4. 590.
48. Gellatly, A., Pilling, M., Carter, W., & Guest, D. (2010). How does target duration affect object substituion masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 36(5), 1267-1279. doi: 10. 1037/a0018733.
49. Goodale, M. A. (2008). Action without perception in human vision. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25(7-8), 891-919. doi: 10. 1080/02643290801961984.
50. Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15(1), 20-25. doi: 10. 1016/0166-2236%2892%2990344-8.
51. Goodale, M. A., & Westwood, D. A. (2004). An evolving view of duplex vision: Separate but interacting cortical pathways for perception and action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14(2), 203-211. doi: 10. 1016/j. conb. 2004. 03. 002.
52. Goodhew, S. C., Dux, P. E., Lipp, O. V., & Visser, T. A. W. (2012). Understanding recovery from object substitution masking. Cognition, 122(3), 405-415. doi: 10. 1016/j. cognition. 2011. 11. 010.
53. Goodhew, S. C., Gozli, D. G., Ferber, S., & Pratt, J. (in press). Reduced temporal fusion in near-hand space. Psychological Science.
54. Goodhew, S. C., Visser, T. A. W., Lipp, O. V., & Dux, P. E. (2011a). Competing for consciousness: Prolonged mask exposure reduces object substitution masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 37(2), 588-596. doi: 10. 1037/a0018740.
55. Goodhew, S. C., Visser, T. A. W., Lipp, O. V., & Dux, P. E. (2011b). Implicit semantic perception in object substitution masking. Cognition, 118(1), 133-137. doi: 10. 1016/j. cognition. 2010. 10. 013.
56. Gozli, D. G., West, G. L., & Pratt, J. (2012). Hand position alters vision by biasing processing through different visual pathways. Cognition, 124(2), 244-250. doi: 10. 1016/j. cognition. 2012. 04. 008.
57. Green, M., & Odom, J. V. (1986). Correspondence matching in apparent motion: Evidence for three-dimensional spatial representation. Science, 233(4771), 1427-1429. doi: 10. 1126/science. 3749887.
58. Guest, D., Gellatly, A., & Pilling, M. (2011). The effect of spatial competition between object-level representations of target and mask on object substitution masking. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(8), 2528-2541. doi: 10. 3758/s13414-011-0196-5.
59. Guest, D., Gellatly, A., & Pilling, M. (2012). Reduced OSM for long duration targets: Individuation or items loaded into VSTM? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 38(6), 1541-1553. doi: 10. 1037/a0027031.
60. Heath, M., Neely, K. A., Yakimishyn, J., & Binsted, G. (2008). Visuomotor memory is independent of conscious awareness of target features. Experimental Brain Research, 188(4), 517-527. doi: 10. 1007/s00221-008-1385-x.
61. Hein, E., & Moore, C. M. (2012). Spatio-temporal priority revisited: The role of feature identity and similarity for object correspondence in apparent motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 38(4), 975-988. doi: 10. 1037/a0028197.
62. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (1998). Eye movements during scene viewing: An overview. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 269-293). Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.
63. Hirose, N., Kihara, K., Mima, T., Ueki, Y., Fukuyama, H., & Osaka, N. (2007). Recovery from object substitution masking induced by transient suppression of visual motion processing: A repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 33(6), 1495-1503. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 33. 6. 1495.
64. Hirose, N., & Osaka, N. (2009). Object substitution masking induced by illusory masks: Evidence for higher object-level locus of interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 35(4), 931-938. doi: 10. 1037/a0012734.
65. Hogben, J. H., & Di Lollo, V. (1974). Perceptual integration and perceptual segregation of brief visual stimuli. Vision Research, 14(11), 1059-1069. doi: 10. 1016/0042-6989%2874%2990202-8.
66. Hollingworth, A., & Franconeri, S. L. (2009). Object correspondence across brief occlusion is established on the basis of both spatiotemporal and surface feature cues. Cognition, 113(2), 150-166. doi: 10. 1016/j. cognition. 2009. 08. 004.
67. Hollingworth, A., Hyun, J. S., & Zhang, W. (2005). The role of visual short-term memory in empty cell localization. Perception & Psychophysics, 67(8), 1332-1343. doi: 10. 3758/BF03193638.
68. Hubel, D. H. (1963). The visual cortex of the brain. Scientific American, 209(5), 54-63. doi: 10. 1038/scientificamerican1163-54.
69. James, T. W., Culham, J., Humphreys, G. K., Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (2003). Ventral occiptal lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: An fMRI study. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 126(11), 2463-2475. doi: 10. 1093/brain/awg248.
70. Jiang, Y. (2004). Time window from visual images to visual short-term memory: Consolidation or integration? Experimental Psychology, 51(1), 45-51. doi: 10. 1027/1618-3169. 51. 1. 45.
71. Jiang, Y., & Kumar, A. (2004). Visual short-term memory for two sequential arrays: One integrated representation or two separate representations? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(3), 495-500. doi: 10. 3758/BF03196601.
72. Jiang, Y., Kumar, A., & Vickery, T. J. (2005). Integrating sequential arrays in visual short-term memory. Experimental Psychology, 52(1), 39-46. doi: 10. 1027/1618-3169. 52. 1. 39.
73. Kahan, T. A., & Enns, J. T. (2010). Object trimming: When masking dots alter rather than replace target representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 36(1), 88-102. doi: 10. 1037/a0016466.
74. Kahan, T. A., & Lichtman, A. S. (2006). Looking at object-substitution masking in depth and motion: Toward a two-object theory of object substitution. Perception & Psychophysics, 68(3), 437-446. doi: 10. 3758/BF03193688.
75. Kahneman, D. (1967). An onset-onset law for one case of apparent motion and metacontrast. Perception & Psychophyscis, 2(12-A), 577-584. doi: 10. 3758/BF03210272.
76. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24(2), 175-219. doi: 10. 1016/0010-0285%2892%2990007-O.
77. Kim, C. Y., & Blake, R. (2005). Psychophysical magic: Rendering the visible 'invisible'. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(8), 381-388. doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2005. 06. 012.
78. Koch, C., & Tsuchiya, N. (2007). Attention and consciousness: Two distinct brain processes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(1), 16-22. doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2006. 10. 012.
79. Koch, C., & Tsuchiya, N. (2012). Attention and consciousness: Related yet different. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 103-105. doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2011. 11. 012.
80. Kotsoni, E., Csibra, G., Mareschal, D., & Johnson, M. H. (2007). Electrophysiological correlates of common-onset visual masking. Neuropsychologia, 45(10), 2285-2293. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuropsychologia. 2007. 02. 023.
81. Kouider, S., de Gardelle, V., Sackur, J., & Dupoux, E. (2010). How rich is consciousness? The partial awareness hypothesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(7), 301-307. doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2010. 04. 006.
82. Kouider, S., Sackur, J., & de Gardelle, V. (2012). Do we still need phenomenal consciousness? Comment on Block. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(3), 140-141. doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2012. 01. 003.
83. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207(4427), 203-205. doi: 10. 1126/science. 7350657.
84. Lachter, J., & Durgin, F. H. (1999). Metacontrast masking functions: A question of speed? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 25(4), 936-947. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 25. 4. 936.
85. Lamme, V. A. F., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2000). The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends in Neurosciences, 23(11), 571-579. doi: 10. 1016/S0166-2236(00)01657-X.
86. Lamme, V. A. F., Zipser, K., & Spekreijse, H. (2002). Masking interrupts figure-ground signals in V1. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(7), 1044-1053. doi: 10. 1162/089892902320474490.
87. Lleras, A., & Moore, C. M. (2003). When the target becomes the mask: Using apparent motion to isolate the object-level component of object substitution masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 29(1), 106-120. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 29. 1. 106.
88. Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390(6657), 279-281. doi: 10. 1038/36846.
89. Luiga, I., & Bachmann, T. (2008). Luminance processing in object substitution masking. Vision Research, 48(7), 937-945. doi: 10. 1016/j. visres. 2008. 01. 001.
90. Moore, C. M., & Lleras, A. (2005). On the role of object representations in substitution masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 1171-1180. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 31. 6. 1171.
91. Mumford, D. (1991). On the computational architecture of the neocortex: I. The role of the thalamo-cortical loop. Biological Cybernetics, 65(2), 135-145. doi: 10. 1007/BF00202389.
92. Neill, W. T., Hutchison, K. A., & Graves, D. F. (2002). Masking by object substitution: Dissociation of masking and cueing effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 28(3), 682-694. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 28. 3. 682.
93. O'Regan, J. K., Rensink, R. A., & Clark, J. J. (1999). Change-blindness as a result of 'mudsplashes'. Nature, 398(6722), 34-34. doi: 10. 1038/17953.
94. Pascual-Leone, A., & Walsh, V. (2001). Fast backprojections from the motion to the primary visual area necessary for visual awareness. Science, 292(5516), 510-512. doi: 10. 1126/science. 1057099.
95. Pelli, D. G., & Tillman, K. A. (2008). The uncrowded window of object recognition. Nature Neuroscience, 11(10), 1129-1135. doi: 10. 1038/nn. 2187.
96. Pilling, M., & Gellatly, A. (2010). Object substitution masking and the object updating hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(5), 737-742. doi: 10. 3758/PBR. 17. 5. 737.
97. Põder, E. (2013). Attentional gating models of object substitution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. doi: 10. 1037/a0030575.
98. Prime, D. J., Pluchino, P., Eimer, M., Dell'Acqua, R., & Jolicoeur, P. (2011). Object-substitution masking modulates spatial attention deployment and the encoding of information in visual short-term memory. Psychophysiology, 48(5), 687-696. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1469-8986. 2010. 01133. x.
99. Reed, C., Betz, R., Garza, J. P., & Roberts, R. J. (2010). Grab it! Biased attention in functional hand and tool space. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(1), 236-245. doi: 10. 3758/APP. 72. 1. 236.
100. Reed, C., Grubb, J., & Steele, C. (2006). Hands up: Attentional prioritization of space near the hand. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 32(1), 166-177. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 32. 1. 166.
101. Reiss, J. E., & Hoffman, J. E. (2006). Object substitution masking interferes with semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1015-1020. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9280. 2006. 01820. x.
102. Reiss, J. E., & Hoffman, J. E. (2007). Disruption of early face recognition processes by object substitution masking. Visual Cognition, 15(7), 789-798. doi: 10. 1080/13506280701307035.
103. Rensink, R. A., O'Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to percieve changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8(5), 368-373. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9280. 1997. tb00427. x.
104. Richard, A. M., Luck, S. J., & Hollingworth, A. (2008). Establishing object correspondence across eye movements: Flexible use of spatiotemporal and surface information. Cognition, 109(1), 66-88. doi: 10. 1016/j. cognition. 2008. 07. 004.
105. Shapley, R. (1990). Visual sensitivity and parallel retinocortical channels. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 635-658. doi: 10. 1146/annurev. ps. 41. 020190. 003223.
106. Shelley-Tremblay, J., & Mack, A. (1999). Metacontrast masking and attention. Psychological Science, 10(6), 508-515. doi: 10. 1111/1467-9280. 00197.
107. Sherman, S. M., Wilson, J. R., Kaas, J. H., & Webb, S. V. (1976). X- and Y-Cells in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the Owl Monkey (Aotus trivirgatus). Science, 192(4238), 475-477. doi: 10. 1126/science. 816006.
108. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1998). Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(4), 644-649. doi: 10. 3758/BF03208840.
109. Singer, W., & Creutzfeldt, O. D. (1970). Reciprocal lateral inhibition of on- and off-center neurones in the lateral geniculate body of the cat. Experimental Brain Research, 10(3), 311-330. doi: 10. 1007/BF00235054.
110. Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief presentations. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 74(11), 1-29. doi: 10. 1037/h0093759.
111. Tapia, E., & Breitmeyer, B. G. (2011). Visual consciousness revisited: Magnocellular contributions to conscious and nonconscious vision. Psychological Science, 22(7), 934-942. doi: 10. 1177/0956797611413471.
112. Tata, M. S. (2002). Attend to it now or lose it forever: Selective attention, metacontrast masking, and object substitution. Perception & Psychophysics, 64(7), 1028-1038. doi: 10. 3758/BF03194754.
113. Tata, M. S., & Giaschi, D. E. (2004). Warning: Attending to a mask may be hazardous to your perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(2), 262-268. doi: 10. 3758/BF03196568.
114. Weidner, R., Shah, N. J., & Fink, G. R. (2006). The neural basis of perceptual hypothesis generation and testing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(2), 258-266. doi: 10. 1162/jocn. 2006. 18. 2. 258.
115. Weisstein, N. (1968). A Rashevsky-Landahl neural net: Simulation of metacontrast. Psychological Review, 75(6), 494-521.
116. Werner, H. (1935). Studies on counter: I. Qualitative analyses. The American Journal of Psychology, 47, 40-64. doi: 10. 2307/1416707.
117. Wunderlich, K., Schneider, K. A., & Kastner, S. (2005). Neural correlates of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature Neuroscience, 8(11), 1595-1602. doi: 10. 1038/nn1554.
118. Wyatte, D., Curran, T., & O'Reilly, R. (2012). The limits of feedforward vision: Recurrent processing promotes robust object recognition when objects are degraded. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(11), 2248-2261. doi: 10. 1162/jocn_a_00282.
119. Yeshurun, Y., & Carrasco, M. (1998). Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution. Nature, 396(6706), 72-75. doi: 10. 1038/23936.
120. Yeshurun, Y., & Carrasco, M. (1999). Spatial attention improves performance in spatial resolution tasks. Vision Research, 39(2), 293-306. doi: 10. 1016/S0042-6989%2898%2900114-X.
121. Yeshurun, Y., & Carrasco, M. (2008). The effects of transient attention on spatial resolution and the size of the attentional cue. Perception & Psychophysics, 70(1), 104-113. doi: 10. 3758/PP. 70. 1. 104.
122. Zeki, S. (1993). A vision of the brain. Oxford: Blackwell.
123. Zeki, S. (2001). Localization and globalization in conscious vision. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 57-86. doi: 10. 1146/annurev. neuro. 24. 1. 57.