Implicit semantic perception in object substitution masking

Cognition

Volumn 118, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 130-134

  Goodhew, Stephanie C ^a   Visser, Troy A W ^a   Lipp, Ottmar V ^a   Dux, Paul E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Consciousness; Object substitution masking; Semantic priming

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MASKING; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; CONSCIOUSNESS; MENTAL FUNCTION; PERCEPTION; VISION;

CONSCIOUSNESS; HUMANS; MENTAL PROCESSES; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; SEMANTICS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 79952803157     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.013     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Breitmeyer B.G., Koc A., Ogmen H., Ziegler R. Functional hierarchies of nonconscious visual processing. Vision Research 2008, 48:1509-1513.
2. Chakravarthi R., Cavanagh P. Recovery of a crowded object by masking the flankers: Determining the locus of feature integration. Journal of Vision 2009, 9:1-9.
3. Chen Z., Treisman A. Implicit perception and level of processing in object-substitution masking. Psychological Science 2009, 20:560-567.
4. Costello P., Jiang Y., Baartman B., McGlennen K., He S. Semantic subword priming during binocular suppression. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal 2009, 18:375-382.
5. Di Lollo V., Enns J.T., Rensink R.A. Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2000, 129:481-507.
6. Eimer M., Schlaghecken F. Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:1737-1747.
7. Enns J.T., Di Lollo V. Object substitution: A new form of masking in unattended visual locations. Psychological Science 1997, 8:135-139.
8. Huckauf A., Knops A., Nuerk H.C., Willmes K. Semantic processing of crowded stimuli?. Psychological Research 2008, 72:648-656.
9. Kim C.Y., Blake R. Psychophysical magic: Rendering the visible 'invisible'. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005, 9:381-388.
10. Kiss M., Van Velzen J., Eimer M. The N2pc components and its links to attention shifts and spatially selective visual processing. Psychophysiology 2008, 45:240-249.
11. Koch C. The quest for consciousness: A neurobiological approach 2004, Roberts and Company Publishers, Englewood.
12. Kutas M., Hillyard S.A. Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 1980, 207:203-205.
13. Luck S.J., Vogel E.K., Shapiro K.L. Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink. Nature 1996, 383:616-618.
14. MacLeod C. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin 1991, 109:163-203.
15. Reiss J.E., Hoffman J.E. Object substitution masking interferes with semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Psychological Science 2006, 17:1015-1020.
16. Shelley-Tremblay J., Mack A. Metacontrast masking and attention. Psychological Science 1999, 10:508-515.
17. van den Bussche E., Notebaert K., Reynvoet B. Masked primes can be genuinely semantically processed: A picture prime study. Experimental Psychology 2009, 56:295-300.
18. Woodman G.F., Luck S.J. Dissociations among attention, perception, and awareness during object-substitution masking. Psychological Science 2003, 14:605-611.