Understanding recovery from object substitution masking

Cognition

Volumn 122, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 405-415

  Goodhew, Stephanie C ^a   Dux, Paul E ^a   Lipp, Ottmar V ^a   Visser, Troy A W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Object substitution masking; Temporal dynamics; Visual masking

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EXPOSURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TIME PERCEPTION; VISION; VISUAL MASKING; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ATTENTION; COMPREHENSION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84855868768     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.11.010     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Alpern M. Metacontrast: Historical review. American Journal of Optometry 1952, 29:631-646.
2. Alpern M. Metacontrast. Journal of the Optical Society of America 1953, 43:648-657.
3. Benjamin L.T.J. A history of psychology: Original sources and contemporary research 2009, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
4. Block N. On a confusion about a function of consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1995, 15:205-206.
5. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 1997, 10:433-436.
6. Breitmeyer B.G., Ganz L. Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing. Psychological Review 1976, 83:1-36.
7. Breitmeyer B.G., Kersey M. Backward masking by pattern stimulus onset. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1981, 7:972-977.
8. Breitmeyer B.G., Ögmen H. Visual masking: Time slices through conscious and unconscious vision 2006, Oxford University Press. 2nd ed.
9. Breitmeyer B.G., Rudd M., Dunn K. Metacontrast investigations of sustained-transient channel inhibitory interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1981, 7:770-779.
10. Bridgeman B. Metacontrast and lateral inhibition. Psychological Review 1971, 78:528-539.
11. Bridgeman B. Distributed sensory code applied to simulations of iconic storage and metacontrast. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 1978, 40:605-623.
12. Bridgeman B. Common-onset masking simulated with a distributed-code model. Advances in Cognitive Psychology 2007, 3:33-40.
13. Broadbent D.E. Perception and communication 1958, Pergamon Press, Elmsford, New York.
14. Brockmole J.R., Wang R.F., Irwin D.E. Temporal integration between visual images and visual percepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28:315-334.
15. Chun M.M., Potter M.C. A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1995, 21:109-127.
16. Coltheart M. Iconic memory and visible persistence. Perception and Psychophysics 1980, 27:183-228.
17. Crick F., Koch C. Consciousness and neuroscience. Cerebral Cortex 1998, 8:97-107.
18. Dember W.N., Purcell D.G. Recovery of masked visual targets by inhibition of the masking stimulus. Science 1967, 157:1335-1336.
19. Di Lollo V. Temporal integration in visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1980, 109:75-97.
20. Di Lollo V., Enns J.T., Rensink R.A. Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2000, 129:481-507.
21. Di Lollo V., Enns J.T., Rensink R.A. Object substitution without reentry?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2002, 131:594-596.
22. Dux P.E., Marois R. How humans search for targets through time: A review of data and theory from the attentional blink. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 2009.
23. Dux P.E., Visser T.A.W., Goodhew S.C., Lipp O.V. Delayed re-entrant processing impairs visual awareness: An object substitution masking study. Psychological Science 2010, 21:1242-1247.
24. Enns J.T., Di Lollo V. Object substitution: A new form of masking in unattended visual locations. Psychological Science 1997, 8:135-139.
25. Flombaum J.K., Scholl B.J. A temporal same-object advantage in the tunnel effect: Facilitated change detection for persisting objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:840-853.
26. Francis G. Cortical dynamics of lateral inhibition: Metacontrast masking. Psychological Review 1997, 104:572-594.
27. Francis G. Quantitative theories of metacontrast masking. Psychological Review 2000, 107:768-785.
28. Francis G., Hermens F. Comment on "Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes" (Di Lollo, Enns, & Rensink, 2000). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2002, 131:590-593.
29. Goodhew S.C., Visser T.A.W., Lipp O.V., Dux P.E. Competing for consciousness: Prolonged mask exposure reduces object substitution masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2011, 37:588-596.
30. Hogben J.H., Di Lollo V. Perceptual integration and perceptual segregation of brief visual stimuli. Vision Research 1974, 14:1059-1069.
31. Hubel D.H., Wiesel T.N. Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex. The Journal of Physiology 1959, 148:574-591.
32. Kaheman D. Method, findings, and theory in studies of visual masking. Psychological Bulletin 1968, 70:404-425.
33. Kahneman D. Attention and effort 1973, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
34. Kahneman D., Treisman A., Gibbs B.J. The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology 1992, 24:175-219.
35. Kastner S., Pinsk M.A. Visual attention as a multilevel selection process. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience 2004, 4:483-500.
36. Koch C. The quest for consciousness: A neurobiological approach 2004, Roberts and Company Publishers, Englewood.
37. Lachter J., Durgin F.H. Metacontrast masking functions: A question of speed?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1999, 25:936-947.
38. Lleras A., Moore C.M. When the target becomes the mask: Using apparent motion to isolate the object-level component of object substitution masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:106-120.
39. Loftus G.R., Irwin D.E. On the relations among different measures of informational and visible persistence. Cognitive Psychology 1998, 35:135-199.
40. Macknik S.L., Livingstone M.S. Neuronal correlates of visibility and invisibility in the primate visual system. Nature Neuroscience 1998, 1:144-149.
41. Makovski T., Sussman R., Jiang Y.H.V. Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:369-380.
42. Moore C.M., Lleras A. On the role of object representations in substitution masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:1171-1180.
43. Neisser U. Cognitive psychology 1967, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
44. Pashler H. Familiarity and the detection of change in visual displays. Perception and Psychophysics 1988, 44:369-378.
45. Phillips W.A. On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory. Perception and Psychophysics 1974, 16:283-290.
46. Ramachandran V.S., Cobb S. Visual attention modulates meta-contrast masking. Nature 1995, 373:66-68.
47. Raymond J.E., Shapiro K.L., Arnell K.M. Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1992, 18:849-860.
48. Robinson D.N. Disinhibition of visually masked stimuli. Science 1966, 154:157-158.
49. Robinson D.N. Visual disinhibition with binocular and interocular presentations. Journal of the Optical Society of America 1968, 58:254-257.
50. Scholl B. Objects and attention 2002, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
51. Shelley-Tremblay J., Mack A. Metacontrast masking and attention. Psychological Science 1999, 10:508-515.
52. Singer W., Bedworth N. Inhibitory interaction between X and Y units in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus. Brain Research 1973, 49:291-307.
53. Singer W., Creutzfeldt O.D. Reciprocal lateral inhibition of on- and off-center neurones in the lateral geniculate body of the cat. Experimental Brain Research 1970, 10:311-330.
54. Sligte I.G., Scholte H.S., Lamme V.A.F. Are there multiple visual short-term memory stores. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e1699.
55. Sligte I.G., Wokke M.E., Tesselaar J.P., Scholte H.S., Lamme V.A.F. Magnetic stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex dissociates fragile visual short-term memory from visual working memory. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:1578-1588.
56. Sperling G. The information available in brief presentations. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 1960, 74:1-29.
57. Weisstein N. A Rashevsky-Landahl neural net: Simulation of metacontrast. Psychological Review 1968, 75:494-521.