Object Trimming: When Masking Dots Alter Rather Than Replace Target Representations

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 88-102

  Kahan, Todd A ^a   Enns, James T ^b  

^a BATES COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ATTENTION; HUMANS; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 76049107685     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0016466     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Atchley P., Grobe J., and Fields L.M. The effect of smoking on sensory and attentional masking. Perception & Psychophysics 64 (2002) 328-336
2. Breitmeyer B.G., and Ogmen H. Recent models and findings in visual backward masking: A comparison, review, and update. Perception & Psychophysics 62 (2000) 1572-1595
3. Burns B.D., and Pritchard R. Geometrical illusions and the response of neurones in the cat's visual cortex to angle patterns. Journal of Physiology 213 (1971) 599-616
4. Cressman E.K., Franks I.M., Enns J.T., and Chua R. On-line control of pointing is modified by unseen visual shapes. Consciousness and Cognition 16 (2007) 265-275
5. Di Lollo V., Enns J.T., and Rensink R.A. Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129 (2000) 481-507
6. Enns J.T. Visual binding in the standing wave illusion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9 (2002) 489-496
7. Enns J.T., and Di Lollo V. Object substitution: A new form of masking in unattended visual locations. Psychological Science 8 (1997) 135-139
8. Enns J.T., and Di Lollo V. What's new in visual masking?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (2000) 345-352
9. Enns J.T., Lleras A., and Moore C.M. Object updating: A force for perceptual continuity and scene stability in human vision. In: Nijhawan R. (Ed). Problems of space and time in perception and action (2010), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA 503-520
10. Feldman J. What is a visual object?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (2003) 252-256
11. Francis G., and Hermens F. Comment on "Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes" (Di Lollo, Enns, & Rensink, 2000). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 131 (2002) 590-593
12. Gellatly A., Pilling M., Cole G., and Skarratt P. What is being masked in object substitution masking?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32 (2006) 1422-1435
13. Herzog M.H., and Kosch C. Seeing properties of an invisible element: Feature inheritance and shine-through. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 98 (2001) 4271-4275
14. Jiang Y., and Chun M.M. Asymmetric object substitution masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 (2001) 895-918
15. Kahan T.A., and Lichtman A.S. Looking at object substitution masking in depth and motion: Towards a two-object theory of object substitution. Perception & Psychophysics 68 (2006) 437-446
16. Kahan T.A., and Mathis K.M. Gestalt grouping and common onset masking. Perception & Psychophysics 64 (2002) 1248-1259
17. Koffka K. Principles of Gestalt psychology (1935), Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc, New York
18. Kraut R., Olson J., Banaji M., Bruckman A., Cohen J., and Couper M. Psychological research online: Report of the board of scientific affairs' advisory group on the conduct of research on the Internet. American Psychologist 59 (2004) 105-117
19. Lehmkuhle S., and Fox R. Effect of depth separation on metacontrast masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 6 (1980) 605-621
20. Lleras A., and Moore C.M. When the target becomes the mask: Using apparent motion to isolate the object-level component of substitution masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29 (2003) 106-120
21. McGraw K.O., Tew M.D., and Williams J.E. The integrity of Web-based experiments: Can you trust the data?. Psychological Science 11 (2000) 502-506
22. Moore C.M., and Lleras A. Object-token individuation protects targets from object substitution masking. Journal of Vision 3 (2003) 577a
23. Moore C.M., and Lleras A. On the role of object representations in substitution masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31 (2005) 1171-1180
24. Neill W.T., Hutchison K.A., and Graves D.F. Masking by object substitution: Dissociation of masking and cuing effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28 (2002) 682-694
25. Oyama T., Simizu M., and Tozawa J. Effects of similarity on apparent motion and perceptual grouping. Perception 28 (1999) 739-748
26. Ramachandran V.S., and Anstis S.M. Perceptual organization in multistable apparent motion. Perception 14 (1985) 135-143
27. Schneider W., Eschman A., and Zuccolotto A. E-Prime user's guide (2002), Psychology Software Tools Inc, Pittsburgh, PA
28. Schneider W., Eschman A., and Zuccolotto A. E-Prime reference guide (2002), Psychology Software Tools Inc, Pittsburgh, PA
29. Sherrick M.F., and Dember W.N. Completeness and spatial distribution of mask contours as factors in visual backward masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (1970) 179-180
30. Sigman M., Sackur J., Del Cul A., and Dehaene S. Illusory displacement due to object substitution near the consciousness threshold. Journal of Vision 8 (2008) 1-10
31. Suzuki S., and Cavanagh P. A shape-contrast effect for briefly presented stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 1315-1341
32. von Schiller P. Stroboskopische alternativversuche. Psychologische Forschung 17 (1933) 179-214
33. Werner H. Studies on contour: Qualitative analyses. American Journal of Psychology 47 (1935) 40-64
34. Yantis S., and Nakama T. Visual interactions in the path of apparent motion. Nature Neuroscience 1 (1998) 508-512