Object substitution masking and the object updating hypothesis

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 737-742

  Pilling, Michael ^a   Gellatly, Angus ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ATTENTION; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 78149435122     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.5.737     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Di Lollo, V., Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 481-507. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.129.4.481
2. Enns, J. T., Lleras, A., & Moore, C. M. (2009). Object updating: A force for perceptual continuity and scene stability in human vision. In R. Nijhawan (Ed.), Problems of space and time in perception and action (pp. 503-520). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Forster, S., & Lavie, N. (2008). Attentional capture by entirely irrelevant distractors. Visual Cognition, 16, 200-214. doi:10.1080/13506280701465049
4. Kanwisher, N., & Driver, J. (1992). Objects, attributes, and visual at- tention: Which, what, and where. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 26-31.
5. Kolers, P. A. (1968). Some psychological aspects of pattern recogni- tion. In P. A. Kolers & M. Eden (Eds.), Recognizing patterns. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Lleras, A., & Moore, C. M. (2003). When the target becomes the mask: Using apparent motion to isolate the object-level component of object substitution masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 106-120. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.29.1.106
7. Moore, C. M., & Lleras, A. (2005). On the role of object representations in substitution masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 1171-1180. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1171
8. Neill, W. T., Hutchison, K. A., & Graves, D. F. (2002). Masking by object substitution: Dissociation of masking and cuing effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 682-694. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.28.3.682
9. Sekuler, R. W. (1965). Spatial and temporal determinants of visual backwards masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 401-406. doi:10.1037/h0022202
10. Tata, M. S., & Giaschi, D. E. (2004). Warning: Attending to a mask may be hazardous to your perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Re view, 11, 262-268.