Recovery From Object Substitution Masking Induced by Transient Suppression of Visual Motion Processing: A Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1495-1503

  Hirose, Nobuyuki ^a   Kihara, Ken ^a   Mima, Tatsuya ^a   Ueki, Yoshino ^a   Fukuyama, Hidenao ^a   Osaka, Naoyuki ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

object continuity; object substitution masking; transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS); V1; V5 MT+

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN CORTEX; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NERVE CELL INHIBITION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CEREBRAL CORTEX; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; NEURAL INHIBITION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

EID: 38349136848     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1495     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Amassian V.E., Cracco R.Q., Maccabee P.J., Cracco J.B., Rudell A., and Eberle L. Suppression of visual perception by magnetic coil stimulation of human occipital cortex. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 74 (1989) 458-462
2. Amassian V.E., Cracco R.Q., Maccabee P.J., Cracco J.B., Rudell A., and Eberle L. Unmasking human visual perception with the magnetic coil and its relationship to hemispheric asymmetry. Brain Research 605 (1993) 312-316
3. Bar M., Tootell R.B.H., Schacter D.L., Greve D.N., Fischl B., Mendola J.D., et al. Cortical mechanisms specific to explicit visual object recognition. Neuron 29 (2001) 529-535
4. Beckers, G., & Hömberg, V. (1992). Cerebral visual motion blindness: Transitory akinetopsia induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of human area V5. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 249, 173-178.
5. Beckers G., and Zeki S. The consequences of inactivating areas V1 and V5 on visual motion perception. Brain 118 (1995) 49-60
6. Bischof W.F., and Di Lollo V. Motion and metacontrast with simultaneous onset of stimuli. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 12 (1995) 1623-1636
7. Bischof W.F., and Di Lollo V. Psychophysical evidence of a sustained input to directionally selective motion mechanisms. Perception 25 (1996) 65-76
8. Born R.T., and Bradley D.C. Structure and function of visual area MT. Annual Review of Neuroscience 28 (2005) 157-189
9. Boroojerdi B., Prager A., Muellbacher W., and Cohen L.G. Reduction of human visual cortex excitability using 1-Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 54 (2000) 1529-1531
10. Breitmeyer B., Battaglia F., and Weber C. U-shaped backward contour masking during stroboscopic motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2 (1976) 167-173
11. Breitmeyer B., Love R., and Wepman B. Contour suppression during stroboscopic motion and metacontrast. Vision Research 14 (1974) 1451-1456
12. Breitmeyer B.G., and Ogmen H. Recent models and findings in visual backward masking: A comparison, review, and update. Perception & Psychophysics 62 (2000) 1572-1595
13. Breitmeyer B.G., Ro T., and Ogmen H. A comparison of masking by visual and transcranial magnetic stimulation: Implications for the study of conscious and unconscious visual processing. Consciousness and Cognition 13 (2004) 829-843
14. Burr D. Motion smear. Nature 284 (1980) 164-165
15. Burr D.C. Summation of target and mask metacontrast stimuli. Perception 13 (1984) 183-192
16. Chen R., Classen J., Gerloff C., Celnik P., Wassermann E.M., Hallett M., and Cohen L.G. Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 48 (1997) 1398-1403
17. Corthout E., Uttl B., Walsh V., Hallett M., and Cowey A. Timing of activity in early visual cortex as revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuroreport 10 (1999) 2631-2634
18. Di Lollo V., Bischof W.F., and Dixon P. Stimulus-onset asynchrony is not necessary for motion perception or metacontrast masking. Psychological Science 4 (1993) 260-263
19. Di Lollo V., Enns J.T., and Rensink R.A. Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129 (2000) 481-507
20. Dumoulin S., Bittar R., Kabani N.J., Baker Jr. C.L., Le Goualher G., Bruce Pike G., and Evans A.C. A new anatomical landmark for reliable identification of human area V5/MT: A quantitative analysis of sulcal patterning. Cerebral Cortex 10 (2000) 454-463
21. Enns J.T. Object substitution and its relation to other forms of visual masking. Vision Research 44 (2004) 1321-1331
22. Enns J.T., and Di Lollo V. Object substitution: A new form of masking in unattended visual locations. Psychological Science 8 (1997) 135-139
23. Felleman D.J., and Van Essen D.C. Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cerebral Cortex 1 (1991) 1-47
24. Green M.F., Glahn D., Engel S.A., Nuechterlein K.H., Sabb F., Strojwas M., and Cohen M.S. Regional brain activity associated with visual backward masking. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17 (2005) 13-23
25. Grill-Spector K., Kushnir T., Hendler T., and Malach R. The dynamics of object-selective activation correlate with recognition performance in humans. Nature Neuroscience 3 (2000) 837-843
26. Haynes J.D., Driver J., and Rees G. Visibility reflects dynamic changes of effective connectivity between V1 and fusiform cortex. Neuron 46 (2005) 811-821
27. Hilgetag C.C., Théoret H., and Pascual-Leone A. Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced 'virtual lesions' of human parietal cortex. Nature Neuroscience 4 (2001) 953-957
28. Hirose N., Kihara K., Tsubomi H., Mima T., Ueki Y., Fukuyama H., and Osaka N. Involvement of V5/MT+ in object substitution masking: Evidence from repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuroreport 16 (2005) 491-494
29. Hogben J.H., and Di Lollo V. Practice reduces suppression in metacontrast and in apparent motion. Perception & Psychophysics 35 (1984) 441-445
30. Jiang Y., and Chun M.M. Asymmetric object substitution masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 (2001) 895-918
31. Kahan T., and Lichtman A.S. Looking at object substitution masking in depth and motion: Towards a two-object theory of object substitution. Perception & Psychophysics 68 (2006) 437-446
32. Kahneman D. An onset-onset law for one case of apparent motion and metacontrast. Perception & Psychophysics 2 (1967) 577-584
33. Kahneman D., Treisman A., and Gibbs B.J. The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology 24 (1992) 175-219
34. Kaneoke Y., Bundou M., Koyama S., Suzuki H., and Kakigi R. Human cortical area responding to stimuli in apparent motion. Neuroreport 8 (1997) 677-682
35. Kolers P.A., and Pomerantz J.R. Figural change in apparent motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology 87 (1971) 99-108
36. Kosslyn S.M., Pascual-Leone A., Felician O., Camposano S., Keenan J.P., Thompson W.L., et al. The role of area 17 in visual imagery: Convergent evidence from PET and rTMS. Science 284 (1999) 167-170
37. Kourtzi Z., Bülthoff H.H., Erb M., and Grodd W. Object-selective responses in the human motion area MT/MST. Nature Neuroscience 5 (2002) 17-18
38. Lewald J., Meister I.G., Weidemann J., and Töpper R. Involvement of the superior temporal cortex and the occipital cortex in spatial hearing: Evidence from repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16 (2004) 828-838
39. Liu T., Slotnick S.D., and Yantis S. Human MT+ mediates perceptual filling-in during apparent motion. Neuroimage 21 (2004) 1772-1780
40. Lleras A., and Moore C.M. When the target becomes the mask: Using apparent motion to isolate the object-level component of object substitution masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29 (2003) 106-120
41. Matin E. The two-transient (masking) paradigm. Psychological Review 82 (1975) 451-461
42. Maunsell J.H.R. Functional visual streams. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2 (1992) 506-510
43. Maunsell J.H.R., and Van Essen D.C. The connections of the middle temporal visual area (MT) and their relationship to a cortical hierarchy in the macaque monkey. Journal of Neuroscience 3 (1983) 2563-2586
44. Mevorach C., Humphreys G.W., and Shalev L. Attending to local form while ignoring global aspects depends on handedness: Evidence from TMS. Nature Neuroscience 8 (2005) 276-277
45. Mevorach C., Humphreys G.W., and Shalev L. Opposite biases in salience-based selection for the left and right posterior parietal cortex. Nature Neuroscience 9 (2006) 740-742
46. Moore C.M., and Enns J.T. Object updating and the flash-lag effect. Psychological Science 15 (2004) 866-871
47. Moore C.M., and Lleras A. On the role of object representations in substitution masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31 (2005) 1171-1180
48. Neill W.T., Hutchison K.A., and Graves D.F. Masking by object substitution: Dissociation of masking and cuing effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28 (2002) 682-694
49. Paulus W., Korinth S., Wischer S., and Tergau F. Differential inhibition of chromatic and achromatic perception by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human visual cortex. Neuroreport 10 (1999) 1245-1248
50. Ramachandran V.S., and Cobb S. Visual attention modulates metacontrast masking. Nature 373 (1995) 66-68
51. Raymond J.E. Attentional modulation of visual motion perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (2000) 42-50
52. Ro T., Breitmeyer B., Burton P., Singhal N.S., and Lane D. Feedback contributions to visual awareness in human occipital cortex. Current Biology 11 (2003) 1038-1041
53. Robertson E.M., Théoret H., and Pascual-Leone A. Studies in cognition: The problems solved and created by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15 (2003) 948-960
54. Sack A.T., Kohler A., Linden D.E.J., Goebel R., and Muckli L. The temporal characteristics of motion processing in hMT/V5+: Combining fMRI and neuronavigated TMS. Neuroimage 29 (2006) 1326-1335
55. Shelley-Tremblay J., and Mack A. Metacontrast masking and attention. Psychological Science 10 (1999) 508-515
56. Silvanto J., Lavie N., and Walsh V. Double dissociation of V1 and V5/MT activity in visual awareness. Cerebral Cortex 15 (2005) 1736-1741
57. Spencer T.J., and Shuntich R. Evidence for an interruption theory of backward masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology 85 (1970) 198-203
58. Stoper A.E., and Banffy S. Relation of split apparent motion to metacontrast. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3 (1977) 258-277
59. Tata M.S. Attend to it now or lose it forever: Selective attention, metacontrast masking, and object substitution. Perception & Psychophysics 64 (2002) 1028-1038
60. Tata M.S., and Giaschi D.E. Warning: Attending to a mask may be hazardous to your perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11 (2004) 262-268
61. Tse P.U. Neural correlates of transformational apparent motion. Neuroimage 31 (2006) 766-773
62. Watson J.D.G., Myers R., Frackowiak R.S.J., Hajnal J.V., Woods R.P., Mazziotta J.C., et al. Area V5 of the human brain: Evidence from a combined study using positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cerebral Cortex 3 (1993) 79-94
63. Weisstein N., and Growney R.L. Apparent movement and metacontrast: A note on Kahneman's formulation. Perception & Psychophysics 5 (1969) 321-328
64. Whitney D. Motion distorts perceived position without awareness of motion. Current Biology 15 (2005) R324-R326
65. Zeki S., Watson J.D.G., Lueck C.J., Friston K.J., Kennard C., and Frackowiak R.S.J. A direct demonstration of functional specialization in human visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 11 (1991) 641-649
66. Zihl J., von Cramon D., and Mai N. Selective disturbance of movement vision after bilateral brain damage. Brain 106 (1983) 313-340