Delayed reentrant processing impairs visual awareness: An object-substitution-masking study

Psychological Science

Volumn 21, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1242-1247

  Dux, Paul E ^a   Visser, Troy A W ^a   Goodhew, Stephanie C ^a   Lipp, Ottmar V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

consciousness; dual task; object substitution masking; temporal attention

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AWARENESS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ATTENTION; AWARENESS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 78649844275     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0956797610379866     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bouvier, S., & Treisman, A. (2010). Visual feature binding requires reentry. Psychological Science, 21, 200-204.
2. Breitmeyer, B.G. (1984). Visual masking: An integrative approach. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
3. Breitmeyer, B.G., & Öǧmen, H. (2006). Visual masking: Time slices through conscious and unconscious vision (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Chun, M.M. (1997). Temporal binding errors are redistributed by the attentional blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1191-1199.
5. Crick, F., & Koch, C. (1990). Towards a neurobiological theory of consciousness. Seminars in the Neurosciences, 2, 263-275.
6. Dehaene, S., Sergent, C., & Changeux, J.-P. (2003). A neuronal network model linking subjective reports and objective physiological data during conscious perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 100, 8520-8525.
7. Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., & Tsivkin, S. (1999). Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. Science, 284, 970-974.
8. Dell'Acqua, R., Pascali, A., Jolicoeur, P., & Sessa, P. (2003). Four-dot masking produces the attentional blink. Vision Research, 43, 1907-1913.
9. Di Lollo, V., Enns, J.T., & Rensink, R.A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 481-507.
10. Eger, E., Henson, R., Driver, J., & Dolan, R.J. (2004). BOLD repetition decreases in object-responsive ventral visual areas depend on spatial attention. Journal of Neurophysiology, 92, 1241-1247.
11. Enns, J.T., & Di Lollo, V. (1997). Object substitution: A new form of masking in unattended visual locations. Psychological Science, 8, 135-139.
12. Giesbrecht, B., Bischof, W.F., & Kingstone, A. (2003). Visual masking during the attentional blink: Tests of the object substitution hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 238-258.
13. Goodhew, S.C., Visser, T.A.W., Lipp, O.V., & Dux, P.E. (in press). Competing for consciousness: Prolonged mask exposure reduces object substitution masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
14. Hirose, N., Kihara, K., Mima, T., Ueki, Y., Fukuyama, H., & Osaka, N. (2007). Recovery from object substitution masking induced by transient suppression of visual motion processing: A repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1495-1503.
15. Hubel, D.H., & Wiesel, T.N. (1977). Functional architecture of macaque visual cortex. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 198, 1-59.
16. Kahneman, D. (1968). Method, findings, and theory in studies of visual masking. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 404-425.
17. Lachter, J., Forster, K.I., & Ruthruff, E. (2004). Forty-fve years after Broadbent (1958): Still no identification without attention. Psychological Review, 111, 880-913.
18. Lamme, V.A.F., & Roelfsema, P.R. (2000). The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends in Neurosciences, 23, 571-579.
19. Lamme, V.A.F., Supèr, H., & Spekreijse, H. (1998). Feedforward, horizontal, and feedback processing in the visual cortex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 8, 529-535.
20. Luck, S.J., Vogel, E.K., & Shapiro, K.L. (1996). Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink. Nature, 383, 616-618.
21. Maki, W.S., Frigen, K., & Paulson, K. (1997). Associative priming by targets and distractors during rapid serial visual presentation: Does word meaning survive the attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1014-1034.
22. Marois, R., Yi, D.J., & Chun, M.M. (2004). The neural fate of consciously perceived and missed events in the attentional blink. Neuron, 41, 465-472.
23. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.
24. Maunsell, J.H., & van Essen, D.C. (1983). The connections of the middle temporal visual area (MT) and their relationship to a cortical hierarchy in the macaque monkey. Journal of Neuroscience, 3, 2563-2586.
25. Mignard, M., & Malpeli, J.G. (1991). Paths of information flow through visual cortex. Science, 251, 1249-1251.
26. Miller, E.K., & Cohen, J.D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167-202.
27. Most, S.B., Simons, D.J., Scholl, B.J., Jimenez, R., Clifford, E., & Chabris, C.F. (2001). How not to be seen: The contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness. Psychological Science, 12, 9-17.
28. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244.
29. Raymond, J.E., Shapiro, K.L., & Arnell, K.M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849-860.