Warning: Attending to a mask may be hazardous to your perception

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 262-268

  Tata, Matthew S ^a,b   Giaschi, Deborah E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LETHBRIDGE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; VISION;

ATTENTION; CUES; HUMANS; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 4644285729     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196568     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. AVERBACH, E., & CORIELL, A. S. (1961). Short-term memory in vision. Bell System Technical Journal, 40, 309-328.
2. BREITMEYER, B. G. (1984). Visual masking: An integrative approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. BREITMEYER, B. G., & GANZ, L. (1976). Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing. Psychological Review, 83, 1-36.
4. DI LOLLO, V., ENNS, J. T., & RENSINK, R. A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: Psychophysics of reentrant pathways. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 481-507.
5. ENNS, J. T., & DI LOLLO, V. (1997). Object substitution: A new form of masking in unattended visual locations. Psychological Science, 8, 135-139.
6. ENNS, J. T., & DI LOLLO, V. (2000). What's now in visual masking? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 345-352.
7. MACK, A., & ROCK, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. NEILL, W. T., HUTCHISON, K. A., & GRAVES, D. F. (2002). Masking by object substitution: Dissociation of masking and cuing effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 682-694.
9. RAMACHANDRAN, V. I., & COBB, S. (1995). Visual attention modulates metacontrast masking. Nature, 373, 66-68.
10. RAYMOND, J. E., SHAPIRO, K. L., & ARNELL, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 849-860.
11. RENSINK, R. A., O'REGAN, J. K., & CLARK, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368-373.
12. SHELLEY-TREMBLAY, J., & MACK, A. (1999). Metacontrast masking and attention. Psychological Science, 10, 508-515,
13. SIMONS, D. J., & LEVIN, D. T. (1998). Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 644-649.
14. SPENCER, T. J., & SHUNTICH, R. (1970). Evidence for an interruption theory of backward masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 85, 198-203.
15. TATA, M. S. (2002). Attend to it now or lose it forever: Selective attention, metacontrast masking, and object substitution. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1028-1038.
16. TATA, M., & GIASCHI, D. (1999). Selective attention to the mask modulates object substitution masking. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 40, S806.
17. TREISMAN, A. M., & GELADE, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
18. UTTAL, W. R. (1970). On the physiological basis of masking with dotted visual noise. Perception & Psycoaphysics, 7, 321-327.
19. YANTIS, S., & JOHNSON, D. N. (1990). Mechanisms of attentional priority. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 812-825.
20. YANTIS, S., & JONIDES, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 601-620.