Disruption of early face recognition processes by object substitution masking

Visual Cognition

Volumn 15, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 789-798

  Reiss, Jason ^a   Hoffman, James ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PHENOMENOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 34648843128     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280701307035     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alpern, M. (1953) Metacontrast. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 43, pp. 648-657.
2. Awh, E., Serences, J., Laurey, P., Dhaliwal, H., van der Jagt, T. and Dassonville, P. (2004) Evidence against a central bottleneck during the attentional blink: Multiple channels for configural and featural processing. Cognitive Psychology, 48, pp. 95-126.
3. Bentin, S. and Deouell, L. Y. (2000) Structural encoding and identification in face processing: ERP evidence for separate mechanisms. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, pp. 35-54.
4. Breitmeyer, B. G. (1984) Visual masking: An integrative approach, Oxford University Press, New York
5. Bridgeman, B. (2006) Contributions of lateral inhibition to object substitution masking and attention. Vision Research, 46, pp. 4075-4082.
6. Carlson, T. A., Rauschenberger, R. and Verstraten, F. A. J. No representation without awareness in the lateral occipital cortex. Psychological Science
7. Lollo, V. Di, Bischof, W. F. and Dixon, P. (1993) Stimulus-onset asynchrony is not necessary for motion perception or metacontrast masking. Psychological Science, 4, pp. 260-263.
8. Lollo, V. Di, Enns, J. T. and Rensink, R. A. (2000) Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, pp. 481-507.
9. Fahrenfort, J. J., Scholte, H. S. and Lamme, V. A. F. Masking disrupts reentrant processing in human visual cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
10. Haynes, J. -D., Driver, J. and Rees, G. (2005) Visibility reflects dynamic changes of effective connectivity between V1 and fusiform cortex. Neuron, 46, pp. 811-821.
11. Hershler, O. and Hochstein, S. (2005) At first sight: A high-level pop out effect for faces. Vision Research, 45, pp. 1707-1724.
12. Holmes, A., Winston, J. S. and Eimer, M. (2005) The role of spatial frequency information for ERP components sensitive to faces and emotional facial expression. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, pp. 508-520.
13. Horovitz, S. G., Rossion, B., Skudlarski, P. and Gore, J. C. (2004) Parametric design and correlational analyses help integrating fMRI and electrophysiological data during face processing. Neuroimage, 22, pp. 1587-1595.
14. Itier, R. J. and Taylor, M. J. (2004) Source analysis of the N170 to faces and objects. Neuroreport, 15, pp. 1261-1265.
15. Jiang, Y. H. and Chun, M. M. (2001) The spatial gradient of visual masking by object substitution. Vision Research, 41, pp. 3121-3131.
16. Kanwisher, N. and Yovel, G. (2006) The fusiform face area: A cortical region specialized for the perception of faces. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 361, pp. 2109-2128.
17. Kutas, M. and Hillyard, S. A. (1980) Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, pp. 203-205.
18. Lamme, V. A. F. and Roelfsema, P. R. (2000) The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends in Neurosciences, 23, pp. 571-579.
19. Lamme, V. A. F., Zipser, K. and Spekreijse, H. (2002) Masking interrupts figure-ground signals in V1. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, pp. 1044-1053.
20. Logothetis, N. K. and Sheinberg, D. L. (1996) Visual object recognition. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 19, pp. 577-621.
21. Luck, S. J., Vogel, E. K. and Shapiro, K. L. (1996) Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink. Nature, 383, pp. 616-618.
22. Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L. and Arnell, K. M. (1992) Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, pp. 849-860.
23. Reiss, J. E. and Hoffman, J. E. (2006) Object substitution masking interferes with semantic processing: Evidence from ERPs. Psychological Science, 17, pp. 1015-1020.
24. Rolls, E. T. (2000) Functions of the primate temporal lobe cortical visual areas in invariant visual object and face recognition. Neuron, 27, pp. 205-218.
25. Rossion, B., Joyce, C. A., Cottrell, G. W. and Tarr, M. J. (2003) Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex. Neuroimage, 20, pp. 1609-1624.
26. Sibly, M. (2005) Blitz3D, Blitz Research Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand
27. Tong, F. (2003) Primary visual cortex and visual awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, pp. 219-229.
28. Troje, N. and Bulthoff, H. H. (1996) Face recognition under varying poses: The role of texture and shape. Vision Research, 36, pp. 1761-1771.
29. Turvey, M. T. (1973) Peripheral and central processes in vision: Inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli. Psychological Review, 80, pp. 1-52.
30. Woodman, G. F. and Luck, S. J. (2003) Dissociations among attention, perception and awareness during object-substitution masking. Psychological Science, 14, pp. 605-611.