Looking at object-substitution masking in depth and motion: Toward a two-object theory of object substitution

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 68, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 437-446

  Kahan, Todd A ^a   Lichtman, Andrea S ^a  

^a BATES COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; VISION;

ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33748357286     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193688     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. BREITMEYER, B. G. (1984). Visual masking: An integrative approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. BREITMEYER, B. G., & OGMEN, H. (2000). Recent models and findings in visual backward masking: A comparison, review, and update. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1572-1595.
3. DI LOLLO, V., ENNS, J. T., & RENSINK, R. A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 481-507.
4. ENNS, J. T., & DI LOLLO, V. (1997). Object substitution: A new form of masking in unattended visual locations. Psychological Science, 8, 135-139.
5. ENNS, J. T., & DI LOLLO, V. (2000). What's new in visual masking? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 345-352.
6. FRANCONERI, S. L., & SIMONS, D. J. (2003). Moving and looming stimuli capture attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 999-1010.
7. HE, Z. J., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1994). Apparent motion determined by surface layout not by disparity of three-dimensional distance. Nature, 367, 173-175.
8. KAHAN, T. A., & MATHIS, K. M. (2002). Gestalt grouping and common onset masking. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1248-1259.
9. KAHNEMAN, D., TREISMAN, A., & GIBBS, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
10. KRAUT, R., OLSON, J., BANAJI, M., BRUCKMAN, A., COHEN, J., & COUPER, M. (2004). Psychological research online: Report of the board of scientific affairs' advisory group on the conduct of research on the Internet. American Psychologist, 59, 105-117.
11. LLERAS, A., & MOORE, C. M. (2003). When the target becomes the mask: Using apparent motion to isolate the object-level component of object substitution masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 106-120.
12. MCGRAW, K. O., TEW, M. D., & WILLIAMS, J. E. (2000). The integrity of Web-delivered experiments: Can you trust the data? Psychological Science, 11, 502-506.
13. MOORE, C. M., & ENNS, J. T. (2004). Object updating and the flash-lag effect. Psychological Science, 15, 866-871.
14. MOORE, C. M., & LLERAS, A. (2005). On the role of object representations in substitution masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 1170-1180.
15. NEILL, W. T., HUTCHISON, K. A., & GRAVES, D. F. (2002). Masking by object substitution: Dissociation of masking and cuing effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 682-694.
16. SCHNEIDER, W., ESCHMAN, A., & ZUCCOLOTTO, A. (2002a). E-Prime reference guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
17. SCHNEIDER, W., ESCHMAN, A., & ZUCCOLOTTO, A. (2002b). E-Prime user's guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.