Object substitution masking interferes with semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials

Psychological Science

Volumn 17, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 1015-1020

  Reiss, Jason E ^a   Hoffman, James E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; HUMAN; MENTAL FUNCTION; METHODOLOGY; PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; READING; REFERENCE VALUE; SEMANTICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AWARENESS; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; HUMANS; MENTAL PROCESSES; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; READING; REFERENCE VALUES; SEMANTICS;

EID: 33845604557     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01820.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Alpern, M. (1953). Metacontrast. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 43, 648-657.
2. Brehaut, J.C., Enns, J.T., & Di Lollo, V. (1999). Visual masking plays two roles in the attentional blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1436-1448.
3. Di Lollo, V., Bischof, W.F., & Dixon, P. (1993). Stimulus-onset asynchrony is not necessary for motion perception or metacontrast masking. Psychological Science, 4, 260-263.
4. Di Lollo, V., Enns, J.T., & Rensink, R.A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of re-entrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 481-507.
5. Enns, J.T., & Di Lollo, V. (1997). Object substitution: A new form of masking in unattended visual locations. Psychological Science, 8, 135-139.
6. Enns, J.T., & Di Lollo, V. (2000). What's new in visual masking? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 345-352.
7. Giesbrecht, B., Bischof, W.F., & Kingstone, A. (2003). Visual masking during the attentional blink: Tests of the object substitution hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 238-258.
8. Giesbrecht, B., & Di Lollo, V. (1998). Beyond the attentional blink: Visual masking by object substitution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1454-1466.
9. Jiang, Y.H., & Chun, M.M. (2001). The spatial gradient of visual masking by object substitution. Vision Research, 41, 3121-3131.
10. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S.A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203-205.
11. Lamme, V.A.F., & Roelfsema, P.R. (2000). The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends in Neurosciences, 23, 571-579.
12. Lamme, V.A.F., Zipser, K., & Spekreijse, H. (2002). Masking interrupts figure-ground signals in V1. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1044-1053.
13. Lleras, A., & Moore, C.M. (2003). When the target becomes the mask: Using apparent motion to isolate the object-level component of object substitution masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 106-120.
14. Luck, S.J., & Hillyard, S.A. (1994). Spatial filtering during visual search: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1000-1014.
15. Luck, S.J., Vogel, E.K., & Shapiro, K.L. (1996). Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink. Nature, 383, 616-618.
16. Masson, M.E.J., & Loftus, G.R. (2003). Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 203-220.
17. Moore, C.M., & Lleras, A. (2005). On the role of object representations in substitution masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1171-1180.
18. Neill, W.T., Hutchison, K.A., & Graves, D.F. (2002). Masking by object substitution: Dissociation of masking and cuing effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 682-694.
19. Raymond, J.E., Shapiro, K.L., & Arnell, K.M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849-860.
20. Rolke, B., Heil, M., Streb, J., & Hennighausen, E. (2001). Missed prime words within the attentional blink evoke an N400 semantic priming effect. Psychophysiology, 38, 165-174.
21. Shapiro, K., Driver, J., Ward, R., & Sorensen, R.E. (1997). Priming from the attentional blink: A failure to extract visual tokens but not visual types. Psychological Science, 8, 95-100.
22. Tucker, D.M. (1993). Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: The Geodesic Sensor Net. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 87, 154-163.
23. Turvey, M.T. (1973). Peripheral and central processes in vision: Inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli. Psychological Review, 80, 1-52.
24. Vogel, E.K., Luck, S.J., & Shapiro, K.L. (1998). Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1656-1674.
25. Woodman, G.F., & Luck, S.J. (2003). Dissociations among attention, perception and awareness during object-substitution masking. Psychological Science, 14, 605-611.