Perceptual consciousness overflows cognitive access

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 15, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 567-575

  Block, Ned ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX SCENES;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

COGNITION; CONFLICT; CONSCIOUSNESS; ILLUSION; IMAGERY; PERCEPTION; REVIEW; SHORT TERM MEMORY; VISUAL MEMORY; WORKING MEMORY;

AWARENESS; COGNITION; CONSCIOUSNESS; HUMANS; PERCEPTION; UNCONSCIOUS (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 81955165139     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.001     Document Type: Review

References (81)

1. Block N. On a confusion about a function of consciousness. Behav. Brain Sci. 1995, 18:227-247.
2. Block N. Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience. Behav. Brain Sci. 2007, 30:481-548.
3. Block N. Consciousness and cognitive access. Proc. Aristot. Soc. 2008, 108:289-317.
4. Lamme V. Why visual attention and awareness are different. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2003, 7:12-18.
5. Lamme V. Separate neural definitions of visual consciousness and visual attention: a case for phenomenal awareness. Neural Netw. 2004, 17:861-872.
6. Lamme V. Towards a true neural stance on consciousness. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2006, 10:494-501.
7. Sperling G. The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychol. Monogr. 1960, 74:1-29.
8. Sligte I.G., et al. Are there multiple visual short-term memory stores?. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e1699.
9. Sligte I.G., et al. V4 activity predicts the strength of visual short-term memory representations. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:7432-7438.
10. Coltheart M. Iconic memory and visible persistence. Percept. Psychophys. 1980, 27:183-228.
11. Tye M. Attention, Seeing and Change Blindness. Philos. Issues 2010, 20.
12. Rensink R.A., et al. To see or not to see: the need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychol. Sci. 1997, 8:368-373.
13. O'Regan J.K., Noe A. A sensorimotor approach to vision and visual consciousness. Behav. Brain Sci. 2001, 24:883-975.
14. Simons D., Rensink R. Change blindness: past, present and future. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2005, 9:16-20.
15. Noë A. Action in Perception 2004, MIT Press.
16. Block N. Paradox and cross purposes in recent work on consciousness. Cognition 2001, 79:197-220.
17. Block N. Functionalism, Consciousness and Representation 2007, MIT Press.
18. Dretske F. Change blindness. Philos. Stud. 2004, 120:1-18.
19. Dretske F. What change blindness teaches about consciousness. Philos. Perspect. 2007, 21:215-230.
20. Gill N.F., Dallenbach K.M. A preliminary study of the range of attention. Am. J. Psychol. 1926, 37:247-256.
21. Dallenbach K.M. Attributive vs cognitive clearness. J. Exp. Psychol. 1920, 3:183-230.
22. James W. Principles of psychology 1890, Henry Holt.
23. Sperling G. Why we need iconic memory. Behav. Brain Sci. 1983, 6:37-39.
24. Thomas N. Are theories of imagery theories of imagination?. Cogn. Sci. 1999, 23:207-245.
25. Dehaene S., et al. Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2006, 10:204-211.
26. O'Regan J.K. Why red doesn't sound like a bell: understanding the feel of consciousness 2011, Oxford University Press.
27. de Gardelle V., et al. Perceptual illusions in brief visual presentations. Conscious. Cogn. 2009, 18:569-577.
28. Kouider S., et al. How rich is consciousness? The partial awareness hypothesis. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2010, 14:301-307.
29. Cohen M.A., Dennett D. Consciousness cannot be separated from function. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2011, 15:358-364.
30. Stazicker J. Attention, visual consciousness and indeterminacy. Mind Lang. 2011, 26:156-184.
31. Phillips I.B. Perception and iconic memory: what Sperling doesn't show. Mind Lang. 2011, 26:381-411.
32. Phillips I.B. Attention and iconic memory. Attention: philosophical and psychological essays 2011, 204-227. Oxford University Press. C. Mole (Ed.).
33. Lau H., Rosenthal D. Empirical support for higher-order theories of conscious awareness. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2011, 15:365-373.
34. Brown R. The myth of phenomenological overflow. Conscious. Cogn. 2011, 10.1016/j.concog.2011.06.005.
35. Rahnev D., et al. Attention induces conservative subjective biases in visual perception. Nat. Neurosci. 2011, 10.1038/nn.2948.
36. Sligte I.G., et al. Detailed sensory memory, sloppy working memory. Front. Psychol. 2010, 1:1-10.
37. Vandenbroucke A.R.E., et al. Manipulations of attention dissociate fragile visual short-term memory from visual working memory. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:1559-1568.
38. Makovski T., et al. Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cogn. 2008, 34:369-380.
39. Lepsien J., et al. Directing spatial attention in mental representations: interactions between attentional orienting and working memory load. Neuroimage 2005, 26:733-743.
40. Lepsien J., Nobre A.C. Attentional modulation of object representations in working memory. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17:2072-2083.
41. Brockmole J.R., et al. Temporal integration between visual images and visual percepts. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 2002, 28:315-334.
42. Lewis K., et al. Integrating images and percepts: new evidence for depictive representation. Psychol. Res. 2011, 75:259-271.
43. Naccache L., Dehaene S. Reportability and illusions of phenomenality in the light of the global neuronal workspace model. Behav. Brain Sci. 2007, 30:518-519.
44. Grush R. A plug for generic phenomenology. Behav. Brain Sci. 2007, 30:504-505.
45. Levine J. Two kinds of access. Behav. Brain Sci. 2007, 30:514-515.
46. Papineau D. Reuniting (scene) phenomenology with (scene) access. Behav. Brain Sci. 2007, 30:521.
47. Sergent C., Rees G. Conscious access overflows overt report. Behav. Brain Sci. 2007, 30:523-524.
48. Burge T. Psychology supports independence of phenomenal consciousness. Behav. Brain Sci. 2007, 30:500-501.
49. Byrne A., et al. Do we see more than we can access?. Behav. Brain Sci. 2007, 30:501-502.
50. Kouider S., et al. Partial awareness and the illusion of phenomenal consciousness. Behav. Brain Sci. 2007, 30:510-511.
51. Alvarez G., Oliva A. The representation of simple ensemble visual features outside the focus of attentiion. Psychol. Sci. 2008, 19:392-398.
52. Block N. Overflow, access and attention. Behav. Brain Sci. 2007, 30:530-542.
53. Baars B. A Cognitive theory of consciousness 1988, Cambridge University Press.
54. Pelli D., et al. Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: distinguishing feature integration from detection. J. Vis. 2004, 4:1136-1169.
55. Griffin I.C., Nobre A.C. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2003, 15:1176-1194.
56. Landman R., et al. Large capacity storage of integrated objects before change blindness. Vis. Res. 2003, 43:149-164.
57. Makovski T., Jiang Y.V. Distributing versus focusing attention in visual short-term memory. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2007, 14:1072-1078.
58. Adelson E.H. Iconic storage: the role of rods. Science 1978, 201:544-546.
59. Curtis C., D'Esposito M. Persistent activity in the prefrontal cortex during working memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2003, 7:415-423.
60. Sligte I.G., et al. Magnetic stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex dissociates fragile visual short tem memory from visual working memory. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:1578-1588.
61. Hassin R., et al. Implicit working memory. Conscious. Cogn. 2009, 18:665-678.
62. Soto D., et al. Working memory without consciousness. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21.
63. Cowan N., et al. The legend of the magical number seven. Tall Tales about the brain: things we think we know about the mind, but ain't so 2007, 45-59. Oxford University Press. S. Della Sala (Ed.).
64. Luck S.J., Vogel E.K. The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature 1997, 390:279-281.
65. Hauser M., et al. Spontaneous number representation in semi-free ranging rhesus monkeys. Proc. R. Soc. London: Biol. Sci. 2000, 267:829-833.
66. Wood J., et al. Free-ranging rhesus monkeys spontaneously individuate and enumerate small numbers of non-solid portions. Cognition 2008, 106:207-221.
67. Feigenson L., et al. The representations underlying infants' choice of more: Object files vs. analog magnitudes. Psychol. Sci. 2002, 13:150-156.
68. Feigenson L., Carey S. Tracking individuals via object files: evidence from infants' manual search. Dev. Sci. 2003, 6:568-584.
69. Gross H.J., et al. Number-based visual generalization in the honeybee. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:1-9.
70. Saults J.S., Cowan N. A central capacity limit to the simultaneous storage of visual and auditory arrays in working memory. J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen. 2007, 136:663-684.
71. Luck S.J. Visual short-term memory. Visual memory 2008, 43-85. Oxford University Press. S.J. Luck, A. Hollingworth (Eds.).
72. Vogel E.K., et al. Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 2001, 27:92-114.
73. Zhang W., Luck S.J. Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory. Nature 2008, 453:233-237.
74. Awh E., et al. Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of complexity. Psychol. Sci. 2007, 12:329-334.
75. Wilken P., Ma W.J. A detection theory account of change detection. J. Vis. 2004, 4:1120-1135.
76. Bays P.M., et al. Storage and binding of object features in visual working memory. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:1622-1631.
77. Alvarez G., Cavanagh P. The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. Psychol. Sci. 2004, 15:106-111.
78. Zosh J.M., Feigenson L. Beyond 'what' and 'how many': capacity, complexity and resolution of infants' object representations. The origins of object knowledge 2009, 25-51. Oxford University Press. L. Santos, B. Hood (Eds.).
79. Brady T.F., et al. A review of visual memory capacity: beyond individual items and toward structured representations. J. Vis. 2011, 11:1-34.
80. Wheeler M., Treisman A. Binding in short-term visual memory. J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen. 2002, 131:48-64.
81. Kosslyn S.M., et al. The Case for Mental Imagery 2006, Oxford University Press.