TET enzymes, TDG and the dynamics of DNA demethylation

Nature

Volumn 502, Issue 7472, 2013, Pages 472-479

  Kohli, Rahul M ^a   Zhang, Yi ^b,c,d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^e HARVARD STEM CELL INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

5 CARBOXYLCYTOSINE; 5 FORMYLCYTOSINE; 5 HYDROXYMETHYLCYTOSINE; 5 HYDROXYMETHYLURACIL; 5 METHYLCYTOSINE; BINDING PROTEIN; CYTOSINE; ENZYME; ISOCITRATE DEHYDROGENASE 1; ISOCITRATE DEHYDROGENASE 2; METHYL BINDING DOMAIN PROTEIN 4; S ADENOSYLMETHIONINE; TEN ELEVEN TRANSLOCATION 1 ENZYME; TEN ELEVEN TRANSLOCATION 2 ENZYME; TEN ELEVEN TRANSLOCATION 3 ENZYME; TEN ELEVEN TRANSLOCATION ENZYME; THYMINE DNA GLYCOSYLASE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

DNA; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME; METHYLATION; TRANSLOCATION;

CARCINOGENESIS; DNA DEMETHYLATION; DNA METHYLATION; DNA MODIFICATION; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; EXCISION REPAIR; GENE MUTATION; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; OXIDATION; PREIMPLANTATION EMBRYO; PRIMORDIAL GERM CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGULATORY MECHANISM; REVIEW; SOMATIC CELL GENETICS; ZYGOTE;

5-METHYLCYTOSINE; ANIMALS; BLASTOCYST; CYTOSINE; DNA METHYLATION; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; OXIDATION-REDUCTION; THYMINE DNA GLYCOSYLASE;

EID: 84886860116     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature12750     Document Type: Review

References (104)

1. Goll, M. G. & Bestor, T. H. Eukaryotic cytosine methyltransferases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 74, 481-514 (2005).
2. Klose, R. J. & Bird, A. P. Genomic DNA methylation: the mark and its mediators. Trends Biochem. Sci. 31, 89-97 (2006).
3. Bestor, T. H. & Bourc'his, D. Transposon silencing and imprint establishment in mammalian germ cells. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 69, 381-387 (2004).
4. Jaenisch, R. & Bird, A. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nature Genet. 33 (suppl.), 245-254 (2003).
5. Wu, S. C. & Zhang, Y. Active DNA demethylation: many roads lead to Rome. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 607-620 (2010).
6. Ooi, S. K. & Bestor, T. H. The colorful history of active DNA demethylation. Cell 133, 1145-1148 (2008).
7. Surani, M. A. & Hajkova, P. Epigenetic reprogramming of mouse germ cells toward totipotency. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 75, 211-218 (2010).
8. Jenkins, T. G. & Carrell, D. T. Dynamic alterations in the paternal epigenetic landscape following fertilization. Front. Genet. 3, 143 (2012).
9. Mayer, W., Niveleau, A., Walter, J., Fundele, R. & Haaf, T. Demethylation of the zygotic paternal genome. Nature 403, 501-502 (2000).
10. Oswald, J. et al. Active demethylation of the paternal genome in the mouse zygote. Curr. Biol. 10, 475-478 (2000).
11. Hackett, J. A., Zylicz, J. J. & Surani, M. A. Parallel mechanisms of epigenetic reprogramming in the germline. Trends Genet. 28, 164-174 (2012).
12. Kangaspeska, S. et al. Transient cyclical methylation of promoter DNA. Nature 452, 112-115 (2008).
13. Métivier, R. et al. Cyclical DNA methylation of a transcriptionally active promoter. Nature 452, 45-50 (2008).
14. Thillainadesan, G. et al. TGF-β-dependent active demethylation and expression of the p15ink4b tumor suppressor are impaired by the ZNF217/CoREST complex. Mol. Cell 46, 636-649 (2012).
15. Bhutani, N., Burns, D. M. & Blau, H. M. DNA demethylation dynamics. Cell 146, 866-872 (2011).
16. Nabel, C. S., Manning, S. A. & Kohli, R. M. The curious chemical biology of cytosine: deamination, methylation, and oxidation as modulators of genomic potential. ACS Chem. Biol. 7, 20-30 (2012).
17. Tahiliani, M. et al. Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science 324, 930-935 (2009).
18. Ito, S. et al. Role of Tet proteins in 5mC to 5hmC conversion, ES-cell self-renewal and inner cell mass specification. Nature 466, 1129-1133 (2010).
19. Kriaucionis, S. & Heintz, N. The nuclear DNA base 5-hydroxymethylcytosine is present in Purkinje neurons and the brain. Science 324, 929-930 (2009).
20. Borst, P. & Sabatini, R. Base J: discovery, biosynthesis, and possible functions. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 62, 235-251 (2008).
21. Liu, C. K., Hsu, C. A. & Abbott, M. T. Catalysis of three sequential dioxygenase reactions by thymine 7-hydroxylase. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 159, 180-187 (1973).
22. Smiley, J. A., Kundracik, M., Landfried, D. A., Barnes, V. R. S. & Axhemi, A. A. Genes of the thymidine salvage pathway: thymine-7-hydroxylase from a Rhodotorula glutinis cDNA library and iso-orotate decarboxylase from Neurospora crassa. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1723, 256-264 (2005).
23. Iyer, L. M., Tahiliani, M., Rao, A. & Aravind, L. Prediction of novel families of enzymes involved in oxidative and other complex modifications of bases in nucleic acids. Cell Cycle 8, 1698-1710 (2009).
24. Ono, R. et al. LCX, leukemia-associated protein with a CXXC domain, is fused to MLL in acute myeloid leukemia with trilineage dysplasia having t(10;11) (q22;q23). Cancer Res. 62, 4075-4080 (2002).
25. Penn, N. W., Suwalski, R., O'Riley, C., Bojanowski, K. & Yura, R. The presence of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in animal deoxyribonucleic acid. Biochem. J. 126, 781-790 (1972).
26. Globisch, D. et al. Tissue distribution of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine and search for active demethylation intermediates. PLoS ONE 5, e15367 (2010).
27. Song, C. X. et al. Selective chemical labeling reveals the genome-wide distribution of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Nature Biotechnol. 29, 68-72 (2011).
28. Ito, S. et al. Tet proteins can convert 5-methylcytosine to 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine. Science 333, 1300-1303 (2011).
29. He, Y. F. et al. Tet-mediated formation of 5-carboxylcytosine and its excision by TDG in mammalian DNA. Science 333, 1303-1307 (2011).
30. Williams, R. T. & Wang, Y. A density functional theory study on the kinetics and thermodynamics of N-glycosidic bond cleavage in 5-substituted 2́-deoxycytidines. Biochemistry 51, 6458-6462 (2012).
31. Hashimoto, H., Zhang, X. & Cheng, X. Selective excision of 5-carboxylcytosine by a thymine DNA glycosylase mutant. J. Mol. Biol. 425, 971-976 (2013).
32. Loenarz, C. & Schofield, C. J. Physiological and biochemical aspects of hydroxylations and demethylations catalyzed by human 2-oxoglutarate oxygenases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 36, 7-18 (2011).
33. Xu, Y. et al. Tet3 CXXC domain and dioxygenase activity cooperatively regulate key genes for Xenopus eye and neural development. Cell 151, 1200-1213 (2012).
34. Zhang, H. et al. TET1 is a DNA-binding protein that modulates DNA methylation and gene transcription via hydroxylation of 5-methylcytosine. Cell Res. 20, 1390-1393 (2010).
35. Ko, M. et al. Modulation of TET2 expression and 5-methylcytosine oxidation by the CXXC domain protein IDAX. Nature 497, 122-126 (2013).
36. Schiesser, S. et al. Mechanism and stem-cell activity of 5-carboxycytosine decarboxylation determined by isotope tracing. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn Engl. 51, 6516-6520 (2012).
37. Liutkeviciute, Z., Lukinavicius, G., Masevicius, V., Daujotyte, D. & Klimasauskas, S. Cytosine-5-methyltransferases add aldehydes to DNA. Nature Chem. Biol. 5, 400-402 (2009).
38. Niehrs, C. & Schafer, A. Active DNA demethylation by Gadd45 and DNA repair. Trends Cell Biol. 22, 220-227 (2012).
39. Ma, D. K., Guo, J. U., Ming, G. L. & Song, H. DNA excision repair proteins and Gadd45 as molecular players for active DNA demethylation. Cell Cycle 8, 1526-1531 (2009).
40. Fromme, J. C. & Verdine, G. L. Base excision repair. Adv. Protein Chem. 69, 1-41 (2004).
41. Hajkova, P. et al. Genome-wide reprogramming in the mouse germ line entails the base excision repair pathway. Science 329, 78-82 (2010).
42. Gehring, M., Reik, W. & Henikoff, S. DNA demethylation by DNA repair. Trends Genet. 25, 82-90 (2009).
43. Wossidlo, M. et al. Dynamic link of DNA demethylation, DNA strand breaks and repair in mouse zygotes. EMBO J. 29, 1877-1888 (2010).
44. Zhu, J. K. Active DNA demethylation mediated by DNA glycosylases. Annu. Rev. Genet. 43, 143-166 (2009).
45. Dalton, S. R. & Bellacosa, A. DNA demethylation by TDG. Epigenomics 4, 459-467 (2012).
46. Cortázar, D. et al. Embryonic lethal phenotype reveals a function of TDG in maintaining epigenetic stability. Nature 470, 419-423 (2011).
47. Cortellino, S. et al. Thymine DNA glycosylase is essential for active DNA demethylation by linked deamination-base excision repair. Cell 146, 67-79 (2011).
48. Cortázar, D., Kunz, C., Saito, Y., Steinacher, R. & Schar, P. The enigmatic thymine DNA glycosylase. DNA Repair (Amst.) 6, 489-504 (2007).
49. Guo, J. U., Su, Y., Zhong, C., Ming, G. L. & Song, H. Hydroxylation of 5-methylcytosine by TET1 promotes active DNA demethylation in the adult brain. Cell 145, 423-434 (2011).
50. Bhutani, N. et al. Reprogramming towards pluripotency requires AID-dependent DNA demethylation. Nature 463, 1042-1047 (2010).
51. Popp, C. et al. Genome-wide erasure of DNA methylation in mouse primordial germ cells is affected by AID deficiency. Nature 463, 1101-1105 (2010).
52. Kumar, R. et al. AID stabilizes stem-cell phenotype by removing epigenetic memory of pluripotency genes. Nature 500, 89-92 (2013).
53. Rai, K. et al. DNA demethylation in zebrafish involves the coupling of a deaminase, a glycosylase, and gadd45. Cell 135, 1201-1212 (2008).
54. Barreto, G. et al. Gadd45a promotes epigenetic gene activation by repair-mediated DNA demethylation. Nature 445, 671-675 (2007).
55. Jin, S. G., Guo, C. & Pfeifer, G. P. GADD45A does not promote DNA demethylation. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000013 (2008).
56. Wong, E. et al. Mbd4 inactivation increases C-T transition mutations and promotes gastrointestinal tumor formation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 14937-14942 (2002).
57. Nabel, C. S. et al. AID/APOBEC deaminases disfavor modified cytosines implicated in DNA demethylation. Nature Chem. Biol. 8, 751-758 (2012).
58. Rangam, G., Schmitz, K. M., Cobb, A. J. & Petersen-Mahrt, S. K. AID enzymatic activity is inversely proportional to the size of cytosine C5 orbital cloud. PLoS ONE 7, e43279 (2012).
59. Bennett, M. T. et al. Specificity of human thymine DNA glycosylase depends on N-glycosidic bond stability. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 12510-12519 (2006).
60. Maiti, A. & Drohat, A. C. Thymine DNA glycosylase can rapidly excise 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine: potential implications for active demethylation of CpG sites. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 35334-35338 (2011).
61. Zhang, L. et al. Thymine DNA glycosylase specifically recognizes 5-carboxylcytosine-modified DNA. Nature Chem. Biol. 8, 328-330 (2012).
62. Gu, T. P. et al. The role of Tet3 DNA dioxygenase in epigenetic reprogramming by oocytes. Nature 477, 606-610 (2011).
63. Inoue, A. & Zhang, Y. Replication-dependent loss of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mouse preimplantation embryos. Science 334, 194 (2011).
64. Iqbal, K., Jin, S. G., Pfeifer, G. P. & Szabo, P. E. Reprogramming of the paternal genome upon fertilization involves genome-wide oxidation of 5-methylcytosine. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 3642-3647 (2011).
65. Wossidlo, M. et al. 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine in the mammalian zygote is linked with epigenetic reprogramming. Nature Commun. 2, 241 (2011).
66. Inoue, A., Shen, L., Dai, Q., He, C. & Zhang, Y. Generation and replication-dependent dilution of 5fC and 5caC during mouse preimplantation development. Cell Res. 21, 1670-1676 (2011).
67. Smith, Z. D. et al. A unique regulatory phase of DNA methylation in the early mammalian embryo. Nature 484, 339-344 (2012).
68. Nakamura, T. et al. PGC7 binds histone H3K9me2 to protect against conversion of 5mC to 5hmC in early embryos. Nature 486, 415-419 (2012).
69. Hackett, J. A. et al. Germline DNA demethylation dynamics and imprint erasure through 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Science 339, 448-452 (2013).
70. Seisenberger, S. et al. The dynamics of genome-wide DNA methylation reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells. Mol. Cell 48, 849-862 (2012).
71. Yamaguchi, S. et al. Dynamics of 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine during germ cell reprogramming. Cell Res. 23, 329-339 (2013).
72. Kagiwada, S., Kurimoto, K., Hirota, T., Yamaji, M. & Saitou, M. Replication-coupled passive DNA demethylation for the erasure of genome imprints in mice. EMBO J. 32, 340-353 (2013).
73. Yamaguchi, S. et al. Tet1 controls meiosis by regulating meiotic gene expression. Nature 492, 443-447 (2012).
74. Dawlaty, M. M. et al. Tet1 is dispensable for maintaining pluripotency and its loss is compatible with embryonic and postnatal development. Cell Stem Cell 9, 166-175 (2011).
75. Vincent, J. J. et al. Stage-specific roles for Tet1 and Tet2 in DNA demethylation in primordial germ cells. Cell Stem Cell 12, 470-478 (2013).
76. Li, Z. et al. Deletion of Tet2 in mice leads to dysregulated hematopoietic stem cells and subsequent development of myeloid malignancies. Blood 118, 4509-4518 (2011).
77. Moran-Crusio, K. et al. Tet2 loss leads to increased hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and myeloid transformation. Cancer Cell 20, 11-24 (2011).
78. Quivoron, C. et al. TET2 inactivation results in pleiotropic hematopoietic abnormalities in mouse and is a recurrent event during human lymphomagenesis. Cancer Cell 20, 25-38 (2011).
79. Dawlaty, M. M. et al. Combined deficiency of Tet1 and Tet2 causes epigenetic abnormalities but is compatible with postnatal development. Dev. Cell 24, 310-323 (2013).
80. Koh, K. P. et al. Tet1 and Tet2 regulate 5-hydroxymethylcytosine production and cell lineage specification in mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 8, 200-213 (2011).
81. Wu, H. et al. Dual functions of Tet1 in transcriptional regulation in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature 473, 389-393 (2011).
82. Freudenberg, J. M. et al. Acute depletion of Tet1-dependent 5-hydroxymethylcytosine levels impairs LIF/Stat3 signaling and results in loss of embryonic stem cell identity. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 3364-3377 (2012).
83. Williams, K. et al. TET1 and hydroxymethylcytosine in transcription and DNA methylation fidelity. Nature 473, 343-348 (2011).
84. Song, C. X., Yi, C. & He, C. Mapping recently identified nucleotide variants in the genome and transcriptome. Nature Biotechnol. 30, 1107-1116 (2012).
85. Shen, L. et al. Genome-wide analysis reveals TET-and TDG-dependent 5-methylcytosine oxidation dynamics. Cell 153, 692-706 (2013).
86. Song, C. X. et al. Genome-wide profiling of 5-formylcytosine reveals its roles in epigenetic priming. Cell 153, 678-691 (2013).
87. Apostolou, E. & Hochedlinger, K. Chromatin dynamics during somatic cell reprogramming. Nature 502, 462-471 (2013).
88. Doege, C. A. et al. Early-stage epigenetic modification during somatic cell reprogramming by Parp1 and Tet2. Nature 488, 652-655 (2012).
89. Costa, Y. et al. NANOG-dependent function of TET1 and TET2 in establishment of pluripotency. Nature 495, 370-374 (2013).
90. Gao, Y. et al. Replacement of Oct4 by Tet1 during iPSC induction reveals an important role of DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation in reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 12, 453-469 (2013).
91. Piccolo, F. M. et al. Different roles for Tet1 and Tet2 proteins in reprogramming-mediated erasure of imprints induced by EGC fusion. Mol. Cell 49, 1023-1033 (2013).
92. Baylin, S. B. & Jones, P. A. A decade of exploring the cancer epigenome-biological and translational implications. Nature Rev. Cancer 11, 726-734 (2011).
93. Cimmino, L., Abdel-Wahab, O., Levine, R. L. & Aifantis, I. TET family proteins and their role in stem cell differentiation and transformation. Cell Stem Cell 9, 193-204 (2011).
94. Delhommeau, F. et al. Mutation in TET2 in myeloid cancers. N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 2289-2301 (2009).
95. Langemeijer, S. M. et al. Acquired mutations in TET2 are common in myelodysplastic syndromes. Nature Genet. 41, 838-842 (2009).
96. Quintás-Cardama, A., Santos, F. P. & Garcia-Manero, G. Therapy with azanucleosides for myelodysplastic syndromes. Nature Rev. Clin. Oncol. 7, 433-444 (2010).
97. Ko, M. et al. Ten-eleven-translocation 2 (TET2) negatively regulates homeostasis and differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells in mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 14566-14571 (2011).
98. Yang, H. et al. Tumor development is associated with decrease of TET gene expression and 5-methylcytosine hydroxylation. Oncogene 32, 663-669 (2013).
99. Ko, M. et al. Impaired hydroxylation of 5-methylcytosine in myeloid cancers with mutant TET2. Nature 468, 839-843 (2010).
100. Figueroa, M. E. et al. Leukemic IDH1 and IDH2 mutations result in a hypermethylation phenotype, disrupt TET2 function, and impair hematopoietic differentiation. Cancer Cell 18, 553-567 (2010).
101. Xu, W. et al. Oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate is a competitive inhibitor of α-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases. Cancer Cell 19, 17-30 (2011).
102. Losman, J. A. et al. (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate is sufficient to promote leukemogenesis and its effects are reversible. Science 339, 1621-1625 (2013).
103. Spruijt, C. G. et al. Dynamic readers for 5-(hydroxy)methylcytosine and its oxidized derivatives. Cell 152, 1146-1159 (2013).
104. Mellén, M., Ayata, P., Dewell, S., Kriaucionis, S. & Heintz, N. MeCP2 binds to 5hmC enriched within active genes and accessible chromatin in the nervous system. Cell 151, 1417-1430 (2012).