From lipid second messengers to molecular motors: Microtubule-organizing center reorientation in T cells

Immunological Reviews

Volumn 256, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 95-106

  Huse, Morgan ^a   Le Floc'h, Audrey ^a   Liu, Xin ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Lipid mediators; Protein kinases and phosphatases; Signal transduction; Signaling proteins; T cells; T cell receptors

Indexed keywords

CASEIN KINASE I; CYTOCHROME C; DIACYLGLYCEROL; DYNEIN ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; F ACTIN; IMMUNOGLOBULIN ENHANCER BINDING PROTEIN; INTERCELLULAR ADHESION MOLECULE 1; LIPID; LYMPHOCYTE FUNCTION ASSOCIATED ANTIGEN 1; MOLECULAR MOTOR; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEX; MYOSIN II; PHOSPHOLIPASE C GAMMA; PROTEIN KINASE C; PROTEIN KINASE C EPSILON; PROTEIN KINASE C IOTA; PROTEIN KINASE LCK; PROTEIN KINASE ZAP 70; STATHMIN;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BIOSENSOR; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL SURFACE; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CONJUGATION; CYTOSKELETON; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING; MICROTUBULE; MICROTUBULE ORGANIZING CENTER; NATURAL KILLER CELL; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PHOTOACTIVATION; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CROSS LINKING; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SECOND MESSENGER; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SYNAPTIC MEMBRANE; T LYMPHOCYTE; T LYMPHOCYTE ACTIVATION; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION;

LIPID MEDIATORS; PROTEIN KINASES AND PHOSPHATASES; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SIGNALING PROTEINS; T CELLS; T-CELL RECEPTORS;

ANIMALS; DIGLYCERIDES; DYNEINS; HUMANS; ISOENZYMES; LIPIDS; MICROTUBULE-ORGANIZING CENTER; MYOSIN TYPE II; PROTEIN KINASE C; SECOND MESSENGER SYSTEMS; T-LYMPHOCYTES;

EID: 84885354654     PISSN: 01052896     EISSN: 1600065X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/imr.12116     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. Grakoui A, et al. The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. Science 1999;285:221-227.
2. Monks CR, Freiberg BA, Kupfer H, Sciaky N, Kupfer A. Three-dimensional segregation of supramolecular activation clusters in T cells. Nature 1998;395:82-86.
3. Lee KH, et al. The immunological synapse balances T cell receptor signaling and degradation. Science 2003;302:1218-1222.
4. Lee KH, Holdorf AD, Dustin ML, Chan AC, Allen PM, Shaw AS. T cell receptor signaling precedes immunological synapse formation. Science 2002;295:1539-1542.
5. Dustin ML, Chakraborty AK, Shaw AS. Understanding the structure and function of the immunological synapse. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2010;2:a002311.
6. Lettau M, et al. The adaptor protein Nck interacts with Fas ligand: guiding the death factor to the cytotoxic immunological synapse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:5911-5916.
7. Boisvert J, Edmondson S, Krummel MF. Immunological synapse formation licenses CD40-CD40L accumulations at T-APC contact sites. J Immunol 2004;173:3647-3652.
8. Huse M, Quann EJ, Davis MM. Shouts, whispers, and the kiss of death: directional secretion in T cells. Nat Immunol 2008;9:1105-1111.
9. Stinchcombe JC, Griffiths GM. Secretory mechanisms in cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2007;23:495-517.
10. Chang JT, et al. Asymmetric T lymphocyte division in the initiation of adaptive immune responses. Science 2007;315:1687-1691.
11. Oliaro J, et al. Asymmetric cell division of T cells upon antigen presentation uses multiple conserved mechanisms. J Immunol 2010;185:367-375.
12. Kupfer A, Dennert G. Reorientation of the microtubule-organizing center and the Golgi apparatus in cloned cytotoxic lymphocytes triggered by binding to lysable target cells. J Immunol 1984;133:2762-2766.
13. Kupfer A, Dennert G, Singer SJ. Polarization of the Golgi apparatus and the microtubule-organizing center within cloned natural killer cells bound to their targets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1983;80:7224-7228.
14. Geiger B, Rosen D, Berke G. Spatial relationships of microtubule-organizing centers and the contact area of cytotoxic T lymphocytes and target cells. J Cell Biol 1982;95:137-143.
15. Huse M. Microtubule-organizing center polarity and the immunological synapse: protein kinase C and beyond. Front Immunol 2012;3: Article 235.
16. Beal AM, et al. Kinetics of early T cell receptor signaling regulate the pathway of lytic granule delivery to the secretory domain. Immunity 2009;31:632-642.
17. Bunnell SC, Kapoor V, Trible RP, Zhang W, Samelson LE. Dynamic actin polymerization drives T cell receptor-induced spreading: a role for the signal transduction adaptor LAT. Immunity 2001;14:315-329.
18. Sims TN, et al. Opposing effects of PKCtheta and WASp on symmetry breaking and relocation of the immunological synapse. Cell 2007;129:773-785.
19. Stinchcombe JC, Majorovits E, Bossi G, Fuller S, Griffiths GM. Centrosome polarization delivers secretory granules to the immunological synapse. Nature 2006;443:462-465.
20. Brown AC, et al. Remodelling of cortical actin where lytic granules dock at natural killer cell immune synapses revealed by super-resolution microscopy. PLoS Biol 2011;9:e1001152.
21. Rak GD, Mace EM, Banerjee PP, Svitkina T, Orange JS. Natural killer cell lytic granule secretion occurs through a pervasive actin network at the immune synapse. PLoS Biol 2011;9:e1001151.
22. Kupfer A, Mosmann TR, Kupfer H. Polarized expression of cytokines in cell conjugates of helper T cells and splenic B cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991;88:775-779.
23. Sedwick CE, Morgan MM, Jusino L, Cannon JL, Miller J, Burkhardt JK. TCR, LFA-1, and CD28 play unique and complementary roles in signaling T cell cytoskeletal reorganization. J Immunol 1999;162:1367-1375.
24. Kuhne MR, et al. Linker for activation of T cells, zeta-associated protein-70, and Src homology 2 domain-containing leukocyte protein-76 are required for TCR-induced microtubule-organizing center polarization. J Immunol 2003;171:860-866.
25. Lowin-Kropf B, Shapiro VS, Weiss A. Cytoskeletal polarization of T cells is regulated by an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif-dependent mechanism. J Cell Biol 1998;140:861-871.
26. DeMond AL, Starr T, Dustin ML, Groves JT. Control of antigen presentation with a photoreleasable agonist peptide. J Am Chem Soc 2006;128:15354-15355.
27. Huse M, et al. Spatial and temporal dynamics of T cell receptor signaling with a photoactivatable agonist. Immunity 2007;27:76-88.
28. Quann EJ, Merino E, Furuta T, Huse M. Localized diacylglycerol drives the polarization of the microtubule-organizing center in T cells. Nat Immunol 2009;10:627-635.
29. Huse M. The T-cell-receptor signaling network. J Cell Sci 2009;122:1269-1273.
30. Lin J, Weiss A. T cell receptor signalling. J Cell Sci 2001;114:243-244.
31. Spitaler M, Emslie E, Wood CD, Cantrell D. Diacylglycerol and protein kinase D localization during T lymphocyte activation. Immunity 2006;24:535-546.
32. Kupfer A, Dennert G, Singer SJ. The reorientation of the Golgi apparatus and the microtubule-organizing center in the cytotoxic effector cell is a prerequisite in the lysis of bound target cells. J Mol Cell Immunol 1985;2:37-49.
33. Suzuki AZ, et al. Coumarin-4-ylmethoxycarbonyls as phototriggers for alcohols and phenols. Organic Lett 2003;5:4867-4870.
34. Swaney KF, Huang CH, Devreotes PN. Eukaryotic chemotaxis: a network of signaling pathways controls motility, directional sensing, and polarity. Annu Rev Biophys 2010;39:265-289.
35. Zhong XP, Guo R, Zhou H, Liu C, Wan CK. Diacylglycerol kinases in immune cell function and self-tolerance. Immunol Rev 2008;224:249-264.
36. Olenchock BA, et al. Disruption of diacylglycerol metabolism impairs the induction of T cell anergy. Nat Immunol 2006;7:1174-1181.
37. Zhong XP, et al. Enhanced T cell responses due to diacylglycerol kinase zeta deficiency. Nat Immunol 2003;4:882-890.
38. Newton AC. Protein kinase C: poised to signal. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2010;298:E395-402.
39. Quann EJ, Liu X, Altan-Bonnet G, Huse M. A cascade of protein kinase C isozymes promotes cytoskeletal polarization in T cells. Nat Immunol 2011;12:647-654.
40. Manicassamy S, Gupta S, Sun Z. Selective function of PKC-theta in T cells. Cell Mol Immunol 2006;3:263-270.
41. Monks CR, Kupfer H, Tamir I, Barlow A, Kupfer A. Selective modulation of protein kinase C-theta during T-cell activation. Nature 1997;385:83-86.
42. Gruber T, Thuille N, Hermann-Kleiter N, Leitges M, Baier G. Protein kinase Cepsilon is dispensable for TCR/CD3-signaling. Mol Immunol 2005;42:305-310.
43. Hodge CW, et al. Supersensitivity to allosteric GABA(A) receptor modulators and alcohol in mice lacking PKCepsilon. Nat Neurosci 1999;2:997-1002.
44. Lee AM, Messing RO. Protein kinase C epsilon modulates nicotine consumption and dopamine reward signals in the nucleus accumbens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108:16080-16085.
45. Olive MF, Mehmert KK, Nannini MA, Camarini R, Messing RO, Hodge CW. Reduced ethanol withdrawal severity and altered withdrawal-induced c-fos expression in various brain regions of mice lacking protein kinase C-epsilon. Neuroscience 2001;103:171-179.
46. Chida K, et al. Disruption of protein kinase Ceta results in impairment of wound healing and enhancement of tumor formation in mouse skin carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 2003;63:2404-2408.
47. Fu G, et al. Protein kinase C eta is required for T cell activation and homeostatic proliferation. Sci Signal 2011;4:ra84.
48. Melowic HR, et al. Mechanism of diacylglycerol-induced membrane targeting and activation of protein kinase Ctheta. J Biol Chem 2007;282:21467-21476.
49. Stahelin RV, et al. Diacylglycerol-induced membrane targeting and activation of protein kinase Cepsilon: mechanistic differences between protein kinases Cdelta and Cepsilon. J Biol Chem 2005;280:19784-19793.
50. Stahelin RV, et al. Mechanism of diacylglycerol-induced membrane targeting and activation of protein kinase Cdelta. J Biol Chem 2004;279:29501-29512.
51. Colon-Gonzalez F, Kazanietz MG. C1 domains exposed: from diacylglycerol binding to protein-protein interactions. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006;1761:827-837.
52. Kashiwagi K, Shirai Y, Kuriyama M, Sakai N, Saito N. Importance of C1B domain for lipid messenger-induced targeting of protein kinase C. J Biol Chem 2002;277:18037-18045.
53. Benes CH, Wu N, Elia AE, Dharia T, Cantley LC, Soltoff SP. The C2 domain of PKCdelta is a phosphotyrosine binding domain. Cell 2005;121:271-280.
54. Stahelin RV, et al. Protein kinase Ctheta C2 domain is a phosphotyrosine binding module that plays a key role in its activation. J Biol Chem 2012;287:30518-30528.
55. Merino E, et al. Protein kinase C-theta clustering at immunological synapses amplifies effector responses in NK cells. J Immunol 2012;189:4859-4869.
56. Kong KF, Yokosuka T, Canonigo-Balancio AJ, Isakov N, Saito T, Altman A. A motif in the V3 domain of the kinase PKC-theta determines its localization in the immunological synapse and functions in T cells via association with CD28. Nat Immunol 2011;12:1105-1112.
57. Etienne-Manneville S, Hall A. Cell polarity: Par6, aPKC and cytoskeletal crosstalk. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2003;15:67-72.
58. Li R, Gundersen GG. Beyond polymer polarity: how the cytoskeleton builds a polarized cell. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2008;9:860-873.
59. Etienne-Manneville S. Polarity proteins in migration and invasion. Oncogene 2008;27:6970-6980.
60. Ludford-Menting MJ, et al. A network of PDZ-containing proteins regulates T cell polarity and morphology during migration and immunological synapse formation. Immunity 2005;22:737-748.
61. Bertrand F, et al. Activation of the ancestral polarity regulator protein kinase C zeta at the immunological synapse drives polarization of Th cell secretory machinery toward APCs. J Immunol 2010;185:2887-2894.
62. Lin J, Hou KK, Piwnica-Worms H, Shaw AS. The polarity protein Par1b/EMK/MARK2 regulates T cell receptor-induced microtubule-organizing center polarization. J Immunol 2009;183:1215-1221.
63. Yu CG, Harris TJ. Interactions between the PDZ domains of Bazooka (Par-3) and phosphatidic acid: in vitro characterization and role in epithelial development. Mol Biol Cell 2012;23:3743-3753.
64. Bertrand F, Muller S, Roh KH, Laurent C, Dupre L, Valitutti S. An initial and rapid step of lytic granule secretion precedes microtubule organizing center polarization at the cytotoxic T lymphocyte/target cell synapse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110:6073-6078.
65. Kardon JR, Vale RD. Regulators of the cytoplasmic dynein motor. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009;10:854-865.
66. Combs J, et al. Recruitment of dynein to the Jurkat immunological synapse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:14883-14888.
67. Martin-Cofreces NB, et al. MTOC translocation modulates IS formation and controls sustained T cell signaling. J Cell Biol 2008;182:951-962.
68. Liu X, Kapoor TM, Chen JK, Huse M. Diacylglycerol promotes centrosome polarization in T cells via reciprocal localization of dynein and myosin II. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110:11976-11981.
69. Hashimoto-Tane A, et al. Dynein-driven transport of T cell receptor microclusters regulates immune synapse formation and T cell activation. Immunity 2011;34:919-931.
70. Gomes ER, Jani S, Gundersen GG. Nuclear movement regulated by Cdc42, MRCK, myosin, and actin flow establishes MTOC polarization in migrating cells. Cell 2005;121:451-463.
71. Tsai JW, Bremner KH, Vallee RB. Dual subcellular roles for LIS1 and dynein in radial neuronal migration in live brain tissue. Nat Neurosci 2007;10:970-979.
72. Vicente-Manzanares M, Ma X, Adelstein RS, Horwitz AR. Non-muscle myosin II takes centre stage in cell adhesion and migration. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009;10:778-790.
73. Jacobelli J, Chmura SA, Buxton DB, Davis MM, Krummel MF. A single class II myosin modulates T cell motility and stopping, but not synapse formation. Nat Immunol 2004;5:531-538.
74. Van Haastert PJ, Devreotes PN. Chemotaxis: signalling the way forward. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2004;5:626-634.
75. Fehon RG, McClatchey AI, Bretscher A. Organizing the cell cortex: the role of ERM proteins. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010;11:276-287.
76. Allenspach EJ, et al. ERM-dependent movement of CD43 defines a novel protein complex distal to the immunological synapse. Immunity 2001;15:739-750.
77. Delon J, Kaibuchi K, Germain RN. Exclusion of CD43 from the immunological synapse is mediated by phosphorylation-regulated relocation of the cytoskeletal adaptor moesin. Immunity 2001;15:691-701.
78. Shaffer MH, et al. Ezrin and moesin function together to promote T cell activation. J Immunol 2009;182:1021-1032.
79. Ilani T, Khanna C, Zhou M, Veenstra TD, Bretscher A. Immune synapse formation requires ZAP-70 recruitment by ezrin and CD43 removal by moesin. J Cell Biol 2007;179:733-746.
80. Filbert EL, Le Borgne M, Lin J, Heuser JE, Shaw AS. Stathmin regulates microtubule dynamics and microtubule organizing center polarization in activated T cells. J Immunol 2012;188:5421-5427.
81. Zyss D, Ebrahimi H, Gergely F. Casein kinase I delta controls centrosome positioning during T cell activation. J Cell Biol 2011;195:781-797.
82. Andres-Delgado L, et al. INF2 promotes the formation of detyrosinated microtubules necessary for centrosome reorientation in T cells. J Cell Biol 2012;198:1025-1037.
83. Gomez TS, Kumar K, Medeiros RB, Shimizu Y, Leibson PJ, Billadeau DD. Formins regulate the actin-related protein 2/3 complex-independent polarization of the centrosome to the immunological synapse. Immunity 2007;26:177-190.
84. Chesarone MA, DuPage AG, Goode BL. Unleashing formins to remodel the actin and microtubule cytoskeletons. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010;11:62-74.
85. Eng CH, Huckaba TM, Gundersen GG. The formin mDia regulates GSK3beta through novel PKCs to promote microtubule stabilization but not MTOC reorientation in migrating fibroblasts. Mol Biol Cell 2006;17:5004-5016.
86. Wen Y, et al. EB1 and APC bind to mDia to stabilize microtubules downstream of Rho and promote cell migration. Nat Cell Biol 2004;6:820-830.
87. Bengur AR, Robinson EA, Appella E, Sellers JR. Sequence of the sites phosphorylated by protein kinase C in the smooth muscle myosin light chain. J Biol Chem 1987;262:7613-7617.
88. Ikebe M, Hartshorne DJ, Elzinga M. Phosphorylation of the 20, 000-dalton light chain of smooth muscle myosin by the calcium-activated, phospholipid-dependent protein kinase. Phosphorylation sites and effects of phosphorylation. J Biol Chem 1987;262:9569-9573.
89. Ikebe M, Reardon S. Phosphorylation of bovine platelet myosin by protein kinase C. Biochemistry 1990;29:2713-2720.
90. Komatsu S, Ikebe M. The phosphorylation of myosin II at the Ser1 and Ser2 is critical for normal platelet-derived growth factor induced reorganization of myosin filaments. Mol Biol Cell 2007;18:5081-5090.
91. Babich A, Li S, O'Connor RS, Milone MC, Freedman BD, Burkhardt JK. F-actin polymerization and retrograde flow drive sustained PLCgamma1 signaling during T cell activation. J Cell Biol 2012;197:775-787.
92. Yi J, Wu XS, Crites T, Hammer JA 3rd. Actin retrograde flow and actomyosin II arc contraction drive receptor cluster dynamics at the immunological synapse in Jurkat T cells. Mol Biol Cell 2012;23:834-852.
93. Ilani T, Vasiliver-Shamis G, Vardhana S, Bretscher A, Dustin ML. T cell antigen receptor signaling and immunological synapse stability require myosin IIA. Nat Immunol 2009;10:531-539.
94. Hammer JA 3rd, Burkhardt JK. Controversy and consensus regarding myosin II function at the immunological synapse. Curr Opin Immunol 2013;25:300-306.
95. Wang H, Rudd CE. SKAP-55, SKAP-55-related and ADAP adaptors modulate integrin-mediated immune-cell adhesion. Trends Cell Biol 2008;18:486-493.
96. Chau AH, Walter JM, Gerardin J, Tang C, Lim WA. Designing synthetic regulatory networks capable of self-organizing cell polarization. Cell 2012;151:320-332.
97. Kuhn JR, Poenie M. Dynamic polarization of the microtubule cytoskeleton during CTL-mediated killing. Immunity 2002;16:111-121.
98. Singla V, Reiter JF. The primary cilium as the cell's antenna: signaling at a sensory organelle. Science 2006;313:629-633.
99. Finetti F, et al. Intraflagellar transport is required for polarized recycling of the TCR/CD3 complex to the immune synapse. Nat Cell Biol 2009;11:1332-1339.
100. Wedlich-Soldner R, Altschuler S, Wu L, Li R. Spontaneous cell polarization through actomyosin-based delivery of the Cdc42 GTPase. Science 2003;299:1231-1235.
101. Weiner OD, Neilsen PO, Prestwich GD, Kirschner MW, Cantley LC, Bourne HR. A PtdInsP(3)- and Rho GTPase-mediated positive feedback loop regulates neutrophil polarity. Nat Cell Biol 2002;4:509-513.
102. Depoil D, et al. Immunological synapses are versatile structures enabling selective T cell polarization. Immunity 2005;22:185-194.