DNA resection proteins Sgs1 and Exo1 are required for G1 checkpoint activation in budding yeast

DNA Repair

Volumn 12, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 751-760

  Balogun, Fiyinfolu O ^a   Truman, Andrew W ^a   Kron, Stephen J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Checkpoint activation; DNA damage; DNA resection; Exo1; G1; Sgs1; Yeast

Indexed keywords

CHECKPOINT KINASE 2; DEOXYRIBONUCLEOPROTEIN; DNA RESECTION PROTEIN; EXO1 PROTEIN; HISTONE H2A; RNR3 PROTEIN; SGS1 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BUDDING; CELL CYCLE ARREST; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE CHECKPOINT; DNA MODIFICATION; DNA REPAIR; DNA RESECTION; FUNGAL STRAIN; G1 PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; HISTONE PHOSPHORYLATION; IONIZING RADIATION; NONHUMAN; PHOSPHORYLATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; YEAST;

CHECKPOINT ACTIVATION; DNA DAMAGE; DNA RESECTION; EXO1; G1; SGS1; YEAST;

CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA DAMAGE; DNA END-JOINING REPAIR; DNA, FUNGAL; EXODEOXYRIBONUCLEASES; G1 PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINTS; HISTONES; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; RECQ HELICASES; REPLICATION PROTEIN A; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 84880952894     PISSN: 15687864     EISSN: 15687856     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Ciccia A., Elledge S.J. The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Mol. Cell 2010, 40(2):179-204.
2. Su T.T. Cellular responses to DNA damage: one signal, multiple choices. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2006, 40:187-208.
3. Bennett C.B., et al. Lethality induced by a single site-specific double-strand break in a dispensable yeast plasmid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1993, 90(12):5613-5617.
4. Elledge S.J. Cell cycle checkpoints: preventing an identity crisis. Science 1996, 274(5293):1664-1672.
5. Hartwell L.H., Weinert T.A. Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events. Science 1989, 246(4930):629-634.
6. Harrison J.C., Haber J.E. Surviving the breakup: the DNA damage checkpoint. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2006, 40:209-235.
7. Siede W., Friedberg A.S., Friedberg E.C. RAD9-dependent G1 arrest defines a second checkpoint for damaged DNA in the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1993, 90(17):7985-7989.
8. Weinert T.A., Hartwell L.H. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 1988, 241(4863):317-322.
9. Zierhut C., Diffley J.F. Break dosage, cell cycle stage and DNA replication influence DNA double strand break response. EMBO J. 2008, 27(13):1875-1885.
10. Paulovich A.G., Hartwell L.H. A checkpoint regulates the rate of progression through S phase in S. cerevisiae in response to DNA damage. Cell 1995, 82(5):841-847.
11. Finn K., Lowndes N.F., Grenon M. Eukaryotic DNA damage checkpoint activation in response to double-strand breaks. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2012, 69(9):1447-1473.
12. Rupnik A., Lowndes N.F., Grenon M. MRN and the race to the break. Chromosoma 2013, 119(2):115-135.
13. van den Bosch M., Bree R.T., Lowndes N.F. The MRN complex: coordinating and mediating the response to broken chromosomes. EMBO Rep. 2003, 4(9):844-849.
14. Mimitou E.P., Symington L.S. Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 2008, 455(7214):770-774.
15. Zhu Z., et al. Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell 2008, 134(6):981-994.
16. Nicolette M.L., et al. Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 and Sae2 promote 5' strand resection of DNA double-strand breaks. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013, 17(12):1478-1485.
17. Gravel S., et al. DNA helicases Sgs1 and BLM promote DNA double-strand break resection. Genes Dev. 2008, 22(20):2767-2772.
18. Majka J., et al. Replication protein A directs loading of the DNA damage checkpoint clamp to 5'-DNA junctions. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281(38):27855-27861.
19. Zou L., Liu D., Elledge S.J. Replication protein A-mediated recruitment and activation of Rad17 complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003, 100(24):13827-13832.
20. Majka J., Niedziela-Majka A., Burgers P.M. The checkpoint clamp activates Mec1 kinase during initiation of the DNA damage checkpoint. Mol. Cell 2006, 24(6):891-901.
21. Dubrana K., et al. The processing of double-strand breaks and binding of single-strand-binding proteins RPA and Rad51 modulate the formation of ATR-kinase foci in yeast. J. Cell Sci. 2007, 120(Pt 23):4209-4220.
22. Nakada D., Matsumoto K., Sugimoto K. ATM-related Tel1 associates with double-strand breaks through an Xrs2-dependent mechanism. Genes Dev. 2003, 17(16):1957-1962.
23. Fukunaga K., et al. Activation of protein kinase Tel1 through recognition of protein-bound DNA ends. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2013, 31(10):1959-1971.
24. Downs J.A., Lowndes N.F., Jackson S.P. A role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae histone H2A in DNA repair. Nature 2000, 408(6815):1001-1004.
25. Foster E.R., Downs J.A. Histone H2A phosphorylation in DNA double-strand break repair. FEBS J. 2005, 272(13):3231-3240.
26. Javaheri A., et al. Yeast G1 DNA damage checkpoint regulation by H2A phosphorylation is independent of chromatin remodeling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006, 103(37):13771-13776.
27. Downs J.A., et al. Binding of chromatin-modifying activities to phosphorylated histone H2A at DNA damage sites. Mol. Cell 2004, 16(6):979-990.
28. Shroff R., et al. Distribution and dynamics of chromatin modification induced by a defined DNA double-strand break. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14(19):1703-1711.
29. Humpal S.E., Robinson D.A., Krebs J.E. Marks to stop the clock: histone modifications and checkpoint regulation in the DNA damage response. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2009, 87(1):243-253.
30. Wysocki R., et al. Role of Dot1-dependent histone H3 methylation in G1 and S phase DNA damage checkpoint functions of Rad9. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005, 25(19):8430-8443.
31. Emili A. MEC1-dependent phosphorylation of Rad9p in response to DNA damage. Mol. Cell 1998, 2(2):183-189.
32. Schwartz M.F., et al. Rad9 phosphorylation sites couple Rad53 to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA damage checkpoint. Mol. Cell 2002, 9(5):1055-1065.
33. Sweeney F.D., et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad9 acts as a Mec1 adaptor to allow Rad53 activation. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15(15):1364-1375.
34. Gerald J.N., Benjamin J.M., Kron S.J. Robust G1 checkpoint arrest in budding yeast: dependence on DNA damage signaling and repair. J. Cell Sci. 2002, 115(Pt 8):1749-1757.
35. Siede W., et al. Characterization of G1 checkpoint control in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae following exposure to DNA-damaging agents. Genetics 1994, 138(2):271-281.
36. Ira G., et al. DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 2004, 431(7011):1011-1017.
37. Clerici M., et al. A Tel1/MRX-dependent checkpoint inhibits the metaphase-to-anaphase transition after UV irradiation in the absence of Mec1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004, 24(23):10126-10144.
38. Barlow J.H., Lisby M., Rothstein R. Differential regulation of the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks in G1. Mol. Cell 2008, 30(1):73-85.
39. Siede W., et al. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae MEC1 gene, which encodes a homolog of the human ATM gene product, is required for G1 arrest following radiation treatment. J. Bacteriol. 1996, 178(19):5841-5843.
40. Gietz D., et al. Improved method for high efficiency transformation of intact yeast cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20(6):1425.
41. Gietz R.D., et al. Studies on the transformation of intact yeast cells by the LiAc/SS-DNA/PEG procedure. Yeast 1995, 11(4):355-360.
42. Schiestl R.H., Gietz R.D. High efficiency transformation of intact yeast cells using single stranded nucleic acids as a carrier. Curr. Genet. 1989, 16(5-6):339-346.
43. Longtine M.S., et al. Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 1998, 14(10):953-961.
44. Zhou Z., Elledge S.J. Isolation of crt mutants constitutive for transcription of the DNA damage inducible gene RNR3 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 1992, 131(4):851-866.
45. Amberg D.C., et al. Methods in Yeast Genetics: A Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Course Manual 2005, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, xvii, 230 p.
46. Gallego C., et al. The Cln3 cyclin is down-regulated by translational repression and degradation during the G1 arrest caused by nitrogen deprivation in budding yeast. EMBO J. 1997, 16(23):7196-7206.
47. Cahill D., Connor B., Carney J.P. Mechanisms of eukaryotic DNA double strand break repair. Front. Biosci. 2006, 11:1958-1976.
48. Daley J.M., et al. Nonhomologous end joining in yeast. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2005, 39:431-451.
49. Moore J.K., Haber J.E. Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1996, 16(5):2164-2173.
50. Lu J., et al. Human homologues of yeast helicase. Nature 1996, 383(6602):678-679.
51. Bjergbaek L., et al. Mechanistically distinct roles for Sgs1p in checkpoint activation and replication fork maintenance. EMBO J. 2005, 24(2):405-417.
52. Vidanes G.M., Bonilla C.Y., Toczyski D.P. Complicated tails: histone modifications and the DNA damage response. Cell 2005, 121(7):973-976.
53. Nakamura T.M., et al. Histone H2A phosphorylation controls Crb2 recruitment at DNA breaks, maintains checkpoint arrest, and influences DNA repair in fission yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004, 24(14):6215-6230.
54. Lee S.J., Duong J.K., Stern D.F. A Ddc2-Rad53 fusion protein can bypass the requirements for RAD9 and MRC1 in Rad53 activation. Mol. Biol. Cell 2004, 15(12):5443-5455.
55. Zou L., Elledge S.J. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 2003, 300(5625):1542-1548.
56. Lee S.E., et al. The Saccharomyces recombination protein Tid1p is required for adaptation from G2/M arrest induced by a double-strand break. Curr. Biol. 2001, 11(13):1053-1057.
57. Nnakwe C.C. Chromatin Dynamics in the DNA Damage Response 2009, 190. The University of Chicago, IL, United States.
58. Pellicioli A., et al. Regulation of Saccharomyces Rad53 checkpoint kinase during adaptation from DNA damage-induced G2/M arrest. Mol. Cell 2001, 7(2):293-300.
59. Sanchez Y., et al. Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM-like kinases MEC1 and TEL1 in yeast cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Science 1996, 271(5247):357-360.
60. Mendenhall M.D., Hodge A.E. Regulation of Cdc28 cyclin-dependent protein kinase activity during the cell cycle of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1998, 62(4):1191-1243.
61. Giannattasio M., et al. Exo1 competes with repair synthesis, converts NER intermediates to long ssDNA gaps, and promotes checkpoint activation. Mol. Cell 2010, 40(1):50-62.
62. Nnakwe C.C., et al. Dissection of Rad9 BRCT domain function in the mitotic checkpoint response to telomere uncapping. DNA Repair 2009, 8(12):1452-1461.
63. Wysocki R., et al. CDK Pho85 targets CDK inhibitor Sic1 to relieve yeast G1 checkpoint arrest after DNA damage. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2006, 13(10):908-914.
64. Frank-Vaillant M., Marcand S. Transient stability of DNA ends allows nonhomologous end joining to precede homologous recombination. Mol. Cell 2002, 10(5):1189-1199.
65. Thomas B.J., Rothstein R. Elevated recombination rates in transcriptionally active DNA. Cell 1989, 56(4):619-630.
66. Soriano-Carot M., Bano M.C., Igual J.C. The yeast mitogen-activated protein kinase Slt2 is involved in the cellular response to genotoxic stress. Cell Division 2012, 7:1.
67. Belanger K.D., et al. The karyopherin Kap95 and the C-termini of Rfa1, Rfa2, and Rfa3 are necessary for efficient nuclear import of functional RPA complex proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Cell Biol. 2011, 30(9):641-651.