Modelling of structural flexiblity in multibody railroad vehicle systems

Vehicle System Dynamics

Volumn 51, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1027-1058

  Escalona, José L ^a   Sugiyama, Hiroyuki ^b   Shabana, Ahmed A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

^b University of Iowa   (United States)

^c University of Illinois at Chicago   (United States)

Author keywords

flexibility; rail

Indexed keywords

ABSOLUTE NODAL COORDINATE FORMULATION; BOUNDARY ELEMENTS METHOD; DISCRETE ELEMENTS METHOD; FINITE-ELEMENT MODELS; FLEXIBILITY; SEMI-ANALYTICAL APPROACHES; STRUCTURAL FLEXIBILITIES; WHEEL-RAIL CONTACT FORCES;

ACCIDENTS; BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD; CRASHWORTHINESS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; RAILROADS; RAILS; STRESS ANALYSIS; VEHICLES; VIBRATIONS (MECHANICAL);

AUTOMOBILE BODIES;

EID: 84880249176     PISSN: 00423114     EISSN: 17445159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2013.786835     Document Type: Article

References (138)

1. A.H.Wickens, Fundamentals of Rail Vehicle Dynamics. Guidance and Stability, Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers, Lisse, Netherlands, 2003.
2. D. Boockock, Steady state motion of railway vehicles on curved track, J.Mech. Eng. Sci. 11 (1969), pp. 556-566.
3. D.E. Newland, Steering a flexible railway truck on curved track, J. Eng. Ind. 91 (1969), pp. 908-918.
4. S. Bruni, J. Viñolas, M. Berg, O. Polach, and S. Stichel, Modelling of suspension components in a rail vehicle dynamics context, Veh. Syst. Dyn. 49(7) (2011), pp. 1021-1072.
5. K.V. Garg and R.V. Dukkipati, Dynamics of Railway Vehicle Systems, Academic Press, NewYork, 1984.
6. C. Huang, J. Zeng, and R. Luo, Vibration suppression of lightweight high speed carbody structure, Proceedings of International Symposium on Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and Tracks (22th IAVSD), Manchester, 14-19 August, 2011.
7. J. García de Jalón and E. Bayo, Kinematic and Dynamic Simulation of Multibody Systems-The Real-Time Challenge, Springer, NewYork, 1993.
8. A.A. Shabana, Dynamics of Multibody Systems, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005.
9. S.P. Timoshenko and B.F. Langer, Stresses in railroad track, ASME Trans. 54 (1932), pp. 2772-2793.
10. L. Fryba,Vibration of Solids and Structures UnderMoving Loads, Nordhoff International Publishing, Groningen, The Netherlands, 1972.
11. S. Müller, T. Krzyzynski, and H. Ilias, Comparison of semi-analytical methods of analyzing periodic structures under moving load, Veh. Syst. Dyn. 24(Suppl.) (1995), pp. 325-339.
12. T. Tomioka and T. Takigami, Reduction of bending vibration in railway vehicle carbodies using carbody-bogie dynamic interaction, Veh. Syst. Dyn. 48 (2010), pp. 467-486.
13. M. Gerardin and A. Cardona, Flexible Multibody. Dynamics: A Finite Element Approach, John Wiley & Sons Publishing House, Chichester, 2001.
14. R.R. Craig and C.C. Bampton, Coupling of substructures for dynamic analysis, AIAA J. 6(7) (1968), pp. 1313-1319.
15. J. Fehr and P. Eberhard, Error-controlled model reduction in flexible multibody dynamics, ASME J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 5(3) (2010), p. 031005.
16. W.S.Yoo and E.J. Haug, Dynamics of flexible mechanical systems using vibration and static correction modes, J. Mech. Trans. Autom. Des. 108 (1986), pp. 315-322.
17. Chamorro, J.L. Escalona, and González, An approach for modeling long flexible bodies with application to railroad dynamics, Multibody Syst. Dyn. 26 (2011), pp. 135-152.
18. P.F. Carlbom, Combining MBS with FEM for rail vehicle dynamics analysis, Multibody Syst. Dyn. 6 (2001), pp. 291-300. (Pubitemid 33638359)
19. ORE, Question 153B. Application of the ISO 2631 standard to railway vehicles, Final Report, The Union, Utrecht, Netherlands, 1989.
20. H. Claus and W. Schiehlen, Modeling and simulation of railway bogie structural vibrations, Veh. Syst. Dyn. 29(Suppl.) (1998), pp. 538-552. (Pubitemid 128649960)
21. T. Meinders, Modeling of a railway wheelset as a rotating elastic multibody system, Mach. Dyn. Probl. 20 (1998), pp. 209-219.
22. A. Pacchioni, R.M. Goodall, and S. Bruni, Active suspension for a two-axle railway vehicle, Veh. Syst. Dyn. 48(Suppl.) (2010), pp. 105-120.
23. G. De Pasquale, A. Somà, and N. Zampieri, Design, simulation and testing of energy harvesters with magnetic suspensions for the generation of electricity form freight train vibrations, ASME J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 7 (2012), pp. 04101119.
24. T. Tomioka, T. Takigami, and K.I. Aida, Damping effect by passengers on flexural vibrations of railway vehicle carbody and basic study to simulate the effect with simple substitutions, Proceedings of Proceedings of International Symposium on Dynamics ofVehicles on Roads and Tracks (22th IAVSD), Manchester, 14-19 August, 2011.
25. O. Polach and I. Kaiser, Comparison of methods analyzing bifurcation and hunting of complex rail vehicle models, ASME J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 7 (2012), pp. 04100518.
26. J.L. Escalona, R. Chamorro, and R. Recuero, Description of methods for the eigenvalue analysis of railroad vehicles including track flexibility, ASME J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 7 (2012), pp. 04100919.
27. I. Kaiser and K. Popp, Modeling and simulation of the mid-frequency behavior of an elastic bogie, in System Dynamics and Long Term Behavior of Railway Vehicles, Track and Subgrade, K. Popp andW. Schiehlen, eds., Springer, Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, NewYork, 2002.
28. I. Kaiser, Refining the modeling of vehicle-track interaction, Veh. Syst. Dyn. 50(Suppl.) (2012), pp. 229-243.
29. W. Zhai and K.Wang, Lateral hunting stability of railway vehicles running on elastic track structures, ASME J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 5 (2006), pp. 0410091-0410099.
30. E. Di Gialleonardo, F. Braghin, and S. Bruni, The influence of track modelling options on the simulation of rail vehicle dynamics, J. Sound Vib. 331 (2012), pp. 4246-4258.
31. C. Rathod, R. Chamorro, J.L. Escalona, M. El-Sibaie, and A.A. Shabana, Validation of three-dimensional multibody system approach for modelling track flexibility, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. K, J. Multi-Body Dyn. 223 (2009), pp. 269-282.
32. E.Winkler, Vortäge über eisenbahnbau, Heft 1, 2. H. Dominicus, Prag, 1867.
33. J.C.O. Nielsen and A. Igeland, Vertical dynamic interaction between train and track: Influence of wheel and track imperfections, J. Sound Vib. 187(5) (1995), pp. 825-839.
34. A. Lundqvist and T. Dahlberg, Load impact on railway track due to unsupported sleepers, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. F, J. Rail Rapid Transit 219 (2005), pp. 67-77. (Pubitemid 41107960)
35. A.M. Recuero, J.L. Escalona, and A.A. Shabana, Finite-element analysis of unsupported sleepers using threedimensional wheel-rail contact formulation, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. K, J. Multi-Body Dyn. 225 (2011), pp. 1531-1565.
36. P. Galvín, A. Romero, and J. Domínguez, Fully three-dimensional analysis of high-speed train-track-soilstructure dynamic interaction, J. Sound Vib. 329 (2010), pp. 5147-5163.
37. H. Claus and W. Schiehlen, Symbolic-numeric analysis of flexible multibody systems, Mech. Struct. Mach. 30 (2002), pp. 1-30. (Pubitemid 34180811)
38. J. Martínez-Casas, L. Mazzola, L. Baeza, and S. Bruni, Numerical estimation of stresses in railway axles using flexible train-track interaction models, Int. J. Fatigue 47 (2013), pp. 18-30.
39. P. Antolín, J.M. Goicolea, J. Oliva, and M.A. Astiz, Non-linear train-bridge lateral interaction using simplified wheel-rail contact method with a finite element framework, ASME J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 7 (2012), pp. 04101419.
40. A.A. Shabana, R. Chamorro, and C. Rathod, A multibody system approach for finite element modeling of rail flexibility in railroad vehicle applications, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. K, J. Multi-Body Dyn. 222 (2008), pp. 1-15. (Pubitemid 351416400)
41. J.J. Kalker, Three-Dimensional Elastic Bodies in Rolling Contact, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 1990.
42. L. Ling, X. Xiao, and X. Jin, Study on derailment mechanism and safety operation area of high-speed trains under earthquake, ASME J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 7 (2012), pp. 041001114.
43. A.A. Shabana, Nadal's formula and high speed rail derailments, ASME J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 7 (2012), pp. 04100318.
44. S.Yamashita and H. Sugiyama, Numerical procedure for dynamics simulation of two-point wheel/rail contact and flange climb derailment of railroad vehicles, ASME J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 7 (2012), pp. 04101217.
45. A.A. Shabana, K.E. Zaazaa, J.L. Escalona, and J.R. Sany, Development of elastic force model for wheel/rail contact problems, J. Sound Vib. 269 (2004), pp. 295-325.
46. R. Chamorro, Simulación dinámica del movimiento de vehículos ferroviarios en vías deformables, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Seville, Seville, 2011.
47. M. Ignesti, L. Marini, E. Meli, and A. Rindi, Development of a model for the prediction of wheel and rail wear in the railway field, ASME J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 7 (2012), pp. 041004114.
48. T. Meinders and P. Meinke, Rotor dynamics and irregular wear of elastic wheelsets, in Lecture Notes in Applied Mechanics, K. Popp andW. Schiehlen, eds., Vol. 6, Springer, Berlin, 2003, pp. 133-152.
49. M.S. Pereira, J.A.C.Ambrósio, and J.P. Dias, Crashworthiness analysis and design using rigid-flexible multibody dynamics with application to train vehicles, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 40 (1997), pp. 6556-6587.
50. J.P. Dias and M.S. Pereira, Multicriteria optimization of train structures for crashworthiness, in Advances in Computational Multibody Systems (Computational Methods in Applied Sciences), J. Ambrosio, ed., Vol. 2, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2005, pp. 295-317.
51. R.Wehage and E.J. Haug, Generalized coordinate partitioning for dimension reduction in analysis of constrained mechanical systems, ASME, J. Mech. Des. 104 (1982), pp. 247-255.
52. A.A. Shabana, K.E. Zaazaa, and H. Sugiyama, Railroad Vehicle Dynamics: A Computational Approach, Taylor & Francis (CRC), Boca Raton, FL, 2008.
53. W. Kortum, Analysis of railway vehicle system dynamics with the multibody approach MEDYNA,ASME/IEEE Joint Rail Conference, 1, IEEE, 1990, pp. 57-63.
54. A.M. Recuero, J.L. Escalona, and R. Chamorro, A dynamic formulation for railroad vehicles using trajectory coordinates, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Railway Technolog, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 2012.
55. R.J. Guyan, Reduction of stiffness and mass matrices, AIAA J. 3(2) (1965), p. 380.
56. Z. Bai, Krylov subspace techniques for reduced-order modeling of large-scale dynamical systems, Appl. Numer. Math. 43 (2002), pp. 9-44. (Pubitemid 35022895)
57. J.L. Escalona, H.A. Hussien, and A.A. Shabana, Application of the absolute nodal coordinate formulation to multibody system dynamics, J. Sound Vib. 214(5) (1998), pp. 833-851.
58. A.A. Shabana, Application of absolute nodal coordinate formulation geometry to railroad vehicle system dynamics, Int. J. Railw. Technol. 1(1) (2012), pp. 2212-2230.
59. J.H. Seo, S.W. Kim, I.H. Jung, T.W. Park, J.Y.Mok,Y.G. Kim, and J.B. Chai, Dynamic analysis of a pantograph-catenary system using absolute nodal coordinates, Veh. Syst. Dyn. 44 (2006), pp. 615-630.
60. J.H. Seo, H. Sugiyama, and A.A. Shabana, Three-dimensional large deformation analysis of the multibody pantograph/catenary systems, Nonlinear Dyn. 42 (2005), pp. 199-215. Available at http://www.mscsoftware.com/Products/ CAE-Tools/Adams.aspx. (Pubitemid 41456074)
61. M.B. Hamper, A.M. Recuero, J.L. Escalona, and A.A. Shabana, Use of finite element and finite segment methods in modeling rail flexibility: A comparative study,ASME J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 7 (2012), pp. 041007111.
62. P. Galvín and J. Domínguez, Analysis of ground motion due to moving surface loads induced by high speed trains, Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 30 (2007), pp. 931-941. (Pubitemid 47539111)
63. J.A. González and R.A. Abascal, Efficient stress evaluation of stationary viscoelastic rolling contact problems using the boundary element method: Application to viscoelastic coatings, Eng.Anal. Bound. Elem. 30(6) (2006), pp. 426-434. (Pubitemid 43765792)
64. H. Mazhar,T.Heyn, and D. Negrut, A scalable parallel method for large collision detection problems,Multibody Syst. Dyn. 26(1) (2011), pp. 37-55.
65. C. Ergenzinger, R. Seifried, and P. Eberhard, A discrete element model to describe failure of strong rock in uniaxial compression, Granular Matter 13(4) (2011), pp. 341-364.
66. C. Ergenzinger, R. Seifried, and P. Eberhard, A discrete element approach to model breakable railway ballast, ASME J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 7 (2012), pp. 04101018.
67. W.L. Lim and G.R. McDowell, Discrete element modelling of railway ballast, Granular Matter 7(1) (2005), pp. 19-29. (Pubitemid 40496405)
68. S. Lobo-Guerrero and L.E. Vallejo, Discrete element method analysis of railtrack ballast degradation during cyclic loading, Granular Matter 8(3-4) (2006), pp. 195-204. (Pubitemid 44091245)
69. M. Lu and G.R. McDowell, Discrete element modelling of railway ballast under monotonic and cyclic triaxial loading, Geotechnique 60(6) (2010), pp. 459-467.
70. M. Lu and G.R. McDowell, The importance of modelling ballast particle shape in the discrete element method, Granular Matter 9(1-2) (2007), pp. 69-80. (Pubitemid 44836062)
71. P. Grove Thomson and H. True (eds.), Non-smooth problems in vehicle system dynamics. Proceedings of the Euromech 500 Colloquium, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010.
72. R.V. Dukkipati and J.R. Amyot, Computer-Aided Simulation in Railway Dynamics, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 1988.
73. D. Dahlberg, Track dynamics, in Handbook of Railway Vehicle Dynamics, S. Iwnicki, ed., CRC Press, New York, 2006, pp. 143-179.
74. K.L. Knothe and S.L. Grassie, Modelling of railway track and vehicle/track interaction at high frequencies, Veh. Syst. Dyn. 22 (1993), pp. 209-262.
75. K. Popp, H. Kruse, and I. Kaiser, Vehicle-track dynamics in the mid-frequency range,Veh. Syst. Dyn. 31 (1999), pp. 4234-4264.
76. R.V. Dukkipati and R. Dong, Idealized steady state interaction between railway vehicle and track, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. F, J. Rail Rapid Transit 213 (1999), pp. 15-29.
77. E.G. Berggren, X.D. Martin, and J. Spänar, A new approach for the analysis and presentation of vertical track geometry quality and rail roughness,Wear 265 (2008), pp. 1488-1496.
78. J.G. Giménez, Cálculo y optimización del comportamiento dinámico de vehículos ferroviarios, Ph.D. thesis, University of Navarra, San Sebastian, 1979.
79. S.L. Grassie, R.W. Gregory, D. Harrison, and K.L. Johnson, The dynamic response of railway track to high frequency vertical excitation, J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 24(2) (1982), pp. 77-90.
80. T.C. Hempelmann, F. Hiss, K. Knothe, and B. Ripke, The formation of wear patterns on rail tread,Wear 144(12) (1991), pp. 1791-1795.
81. J.T. Kenney, Steady-state vibrations of beams on elastic foundation for moving load, ASME J. Appl. Mech. 76 (1954), pp. 3593-3564.
82. A.D. Kerr, Fundamental of Railway Track Engineering, Simmons Boardman Pub Co., Omaha, 2003.
83. D.J. Thompson, Wheel-rail noise generation: Parts I to V, J. Sound Vib. 161(3) (1993), pp. 3874-3882.
84. S.P. Timoshenko, Method of analysis of statical and dynamical stress in rails, Proceedings of Second International Congress for Applied Mechanics, Zürich, 1926, pp. 407-418.
85. D.G. Duffy, The response of an infinite railway track to a moving, vibrating mass, ASME J. Appl. Mech. 57 (1990), pp. 66-73.
86. S.F. Felszeghy, The Timoshenko beam on an elastic foundation and subject to a moving step load. Part 1: Steady-state response, ASME J. Vib. Acoust. 118 (1996), pp. 277-284. (Pubitemid 126663941)
87. S.F. Felszeghy, The Timoshenko beam on an elastic foundation and subject to a moving step load. Part 2: Transient response, ASME J. Vib. Acoust. 118 (1996), pp. 285-291. (Pubitemid 126663942)
88. O.R. Jaiswal and R.N. Iyengar, Dynamic response of railway tracks to oscillatory moving masses, J. Eng. Mech. 123(7) (1997), pp. 7537-7557.
89. T. Krzyzynski, On continuous modelling in the dynamic interaction problem of a train-track-system,Veh. Syst. Dyn. 24(Suppl.) (1995), pp. 3113-3124.
90. S. Mackertich, The response of an elastically supported infinite Timoshenko beam to a moving vibrating mass, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101(1) (1997), pp. 337-340.
91. S.G. Newton and R.A. Clark, An investigation into the dynamic effects on the track of wheelflats on railway vehicles, J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 21(4) (1979), pp. 2872-2897.
92. S.P. Patil, Response of infinite railroad track to vibrating mass, J. Eng. Mech. 114(4) (1988), pp. 688-703.
93. T.X.Wu and D.J. Thompson, A double Timoshenko beam model for vertical vibration analysis of railway track at high-frequencies, J. Sound Vib. 224(2) (1999), pp. 329-348. (Pubitemid 129550307)
94. C. Andersson and T. Abrahamsson, Simulation of interaction between a train in general motion and track, Veh. Syst. Dyn. 38(6) (2002), pp. 433-455. (Pubitemid 35467986)
95. G. Diana and F. Cheli, A numerical method to define the dynamic behavior of a train running on a deformable structure, Mecanica 23 (1990), pp. 27-42.
96. R. Dong, S. Sankar, and R.V. Dukkipati, A finite element model of a railway track and its application to the wheel flat problem, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. F, J. Rail Rapid Transit 208(16) (1994), pp. 61-72.
97. J. Gómez, E.G. Vadillo, and J. Santamaría, A comprehensive track model for the improvement of corrugation models, J. Sound Vib. 293 (2006), pp. 5225-5234.
98. C.M. Kuo and C.H. Huang, Two approaches of finite-element modelling of ballasted railway track, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135(3) (2009), pp. 4554-4558.
99. L. Mazzola,Y. Bezin, and S. Bruni, Vehicle-track interaction: MB simulation for track loading limits and damage identification, Proceedings of ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Multibody Dynamics 2011, Brussels, Belgium, 2011.
100. T.H.Young and C.Y. Li, Vertical vibration analysis of vehicle/imperfect track systems, Veh. Syst. Dyn. 40(5) (2003), pp. 329-349.
101. J.C.O. Nielsen and T.J.S. Abrahamsson, Coupling of physical and modal components for analysis of moving non-linear dynamic systems on general beam structures, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 33(9) (1992), pp. 1843-1859.
102. W. Zhai, K.Wang, and C. Cai, Fundamentals of vehicle-track coupled dynamics,Veh. Syst. Dyn. 47(11) (2009), pp. 1349-1376.
103. L. Baeza and H. Ouyang,A railway track dynamics model based on modal substructuring and a cyclic boundary condition, J. Sound Vib. 330 (2011), pp. 75-86.
104. L. Baeza, A. Roda, and J.C.O. Nielsen, Railway vehicle/track interaction analysis using modal substructuring approach, J. Sound Vib. 293 (2006), pp. 112-124.
105. T. Dahlberg, Vertical dynamic train/track interaction: Verifying a theoretical model by full-scale experiments, Veh. Syst. Dyn. 24(Suppl.) (1995), pp. 45-57.
106. A. Jaschinski, Multibody simulation of flexible vehicle in interaction with flexible guideways, Veh. Syst. Dyn., 24(Suppl.) (1995), pp. 314-314.
107. K. Knothe and Y. Wu, Gross-Thebing, Simple, semi-analytical models for discrete-continuous railway track and their use for time-domain solutions, Veh. Syst. Dyn. 24(Suppl.) (1995), pp. 3403-3452.
108. E. Tassilly and N.Vincent, A linear model for the corrugation of rails, J. SoundVib. 150 (1991), pp. 254-255.
109. M. Fermér and J.C.O. Nielsen, Vertical interaction between train and track with soft and stiff railpads. Full scale experiment and theory. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. F, J. Rail Rapid Transit 209(1) (1995), pp. 39-47.
110. U. Gerstberger, K. Knothe, andY.Wu, Combined modeling of discretely supported track models and subgrade models, Lecture Notes Appl. Mech. 6 (2003), pp. 247-264.
111. P. Lou, X.G. Zhong, J.F. Tang, and Q.Y. Zeng, Finite element analysis of discretely supported rail subjected to multiple concentrated forces, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. F, J. Rail Rapid Transit 220 (2006), pp. 305-315. (Pubitemid 46600014)
112. A. Roda, Modelo dinámico de la interacción vía-vehículo basado en susbestructuración, Ph.D. thesis, Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica y de Materiales, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, 2006.
113. S.L. Grassie, R.W. Gregory, and K.L. Johnson, The dynamic response of railway track to high frequency lateral excitation, J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 24(2) (1982), pp. 91-95.
114. S.L. Grassie, R.W. Gregory, and K.L. Johnson, The dynamic response of railway track to high frequency longitudinal excitation, J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 24(2) (1982), pp. 97-102.
115. A.K. Mallik, S. Chandra, and A.B. Singh, Steady-state response of an elastically supported infinite beam to a moving load, J. Sound Vib. 291 (2006), pp. 1148-1169. (Pubitemid 43172094)
116. G. Saporito, A. Baroni, M. Bianchini, and M. Romani, Multi-purpose flexible bodies integration into the mutli-body system of a metro-vehicle and experimental validation, Proceedings of International Symposium on Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and Tracks, Manchester, UK, 2011.
117. L. Baeza, J. Fayos, A. Roda, and R. Insa, High frequency railway vehicle-track dynamics through flexible rotating wheelsets, Veh. Syst. Dyn. 46 (2008), pp. 647-659.
118. I. Kaiser and K. Popp, Interaction of elastic wheelsets and elastic rails: Modeling and simulation, Veh. Syst. Dyn. 44(Suppl.) (2006), pp. 9329-9339.
119. B. Kurzeck and M. Hecht, Dynamic simulation of friction-induced vibrations in a light railway bogie while curving compared with measurement results, Veh. Syst. Dyn. 48(Suppl.) (2010), pp. 1211-1238.
120. G. Poetsch, J. Evans, R. Meisinger,W. Kortum,W. Baldauf, A.Veitl, and J.Wallaschek, Pantograph/catenary dynamics and control, Veh. Syst. Dyn. 28 (1997), pp. 1591-1595.
121. T.X.Wu and M.J. Brennan, Basic analytical study of pantograph-catenary system dynamics, Veh. Syst. Dyn. 30 (1998), pp. 4434-4456.
122. T.X.Wu and M.J. Brennan, Dynamic stiffness of a railway overhead wire system and its effect on pantograph-catenary system dynamics, J. Sound Vib. 219 (1999), pp. 483-502. (Pubitemid 129550245)
123. K. Manabe, High-speed contact performance of a catenary-pantograph system, JSME Int. J. 32 (1989), pp. 31-40.
124. M. Arnold and B. Simeon, Pantograph and catenary dynamics: A benchmark problem and its numerical solution, Appl. Numer. Math. 34 (2000), pp. 345-362.
125. A. Collina and S. Bruni, Numerical simulation of pantograph-overhead equipment interaction,Veh. Syst. Dyn. 38 (2002), pp. 261-291.
126. M. Lesser, L. Karlsson, and L. Drugge, An interactive model of a pantograph-catenary system,Veh. Syst. Dyn. 25 (1996), pp. 397-412. (Pubitemid 126715829)
127. A. Carnicero, J.R. Jimenez-Octavio, C. Sanchez-Rebollo, A. Ramos, and M. Such, Influence of track irregularities in the catenary-pantograph dynamic interaction, ASME J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 7 (2012), pp. 04101516.
128. W. Zhang,Y. Liu, and G. Mei, Evaluation of the coupled dynamical response of a pantograph-catenary system: Contact force and stresses, Veh. Syst. Dyn. 44 (2006), pp. 6456-6458.
129. S.P. Jung,Y.G. Kim, J.S. Paik, and T.W. Park, Estimation of dynamic contact force between a pantograph and catenary using the finite element method, ASME J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 7 (2012), pp. 041006113.
130. J. Ambrósio, J. Pombo, M. Pereira, P. Antunes, and A. Mósca, Recent developments in pantograph-catenary interaction modeling and analysis, Int. J. Railw. Technol. 1 (2012), pp. 249-278.
131. A.A. Shabana and J.R. Sany, A survey of rail vehicle track simulations and flexible multibody dynamics, Nonlinear Dyn. 26 (2001), pp. 179-210. (Pubitemid 34058438)
132. J. Gerstmayr and A.A. Shabana, Analysis of thin beams and cables using the absolute nodal co-ordinate formulation, Nonlinear Dyn. 45 (2006), pp. 109-130. (Pubitemid 44048452)
133. H. Sugiyama, J.L. Escalona, and A.A. Shabana, Formulation of three-dimensional joint constraints using the absolute nodal coordinates, Nonlinear Dyn. 31 (2003), pp. 1671-1695.
134. J. Ambrósio, J. Pombo, F. Rauter, and M. Pereira, A memory based communication in the co-simulation of multibody and finite element codes for pantograph-catenary interaction simulation, in Multibody Dynamics, C.L. Bottasso, ed., Springer, Berlin, 2008, pp. 231-252.
135. J. Pombo and J. Ambrósio, Multiple pantograph interaction with catenaries in high-speed trains, ASME J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 7 (2012), pp. 04100818.
136. J. Pombo, J. Ambrósio, M. Pereira, F. Rauter, A. Collina, and A. Facchinetti, Influence of the aerodynamic forces on the pantograph-catenary system for high-speed trains, Veh. Syst. Dyn. 47 (2009), pp. 13271-13347.
137. W.H. Zhang, G.M. Mei, X.J.Wu, and Z.Y. Shen, Hybrid simulation of dynamics for the pantograph-catenary system, Veh. Syst. Dyn. 38 (2002), pp. 393-414.
138. S. Bruni, G. Bucca, A. Collina, and A. Facchinetti, Numerical and hardware-in-the-loop tool for the design of very high speed pantograph-catenary systems, ASME J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 7 (2012), pp. 04101318.