Dynamic analysis of a pantograph-catenary system using absolute nodal coordinates

Vehicle System Dynamics

Volumn 44, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 615-630

  Seo, Jong Hwi ^a   Kim, Seok Won ^b   Jung, Il Ho ^a   Park, Tae Won ^a   Mok, Jin Yong ^b   Kim, Young Guk ^b   Chai, Jang Bom ^a  

^a Ajou University   (South Korea)

^b Korea Railroad Research Institute   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Absolute nodal coordinates; Catenary; Dynamic stress; Flexible multibody dynamics; High speed train; Overhead line; Pantograph; Sliding joint

Indexed keywords

DYNAMICS; ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLIES TO APPARATUS; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; STRESSES; TRAIN FERRIES;

ABSOLUTE NODAL COORDINATES; CATENARY; DYNAMIC STRESS; FLEXIBLE MULTIBODY DYNAMICS; HIGH-SPEED TRAIN; PANTOGRAPH; SLIDING JOINT;

VEHICLES;

EID: 33745663315     PISSN: 00423114     EISSN: 17445159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00423110500373721     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Wu, T.X., 1996, Analysis and calculation of catenary by FEM. Journal of the Chinese Railway Society, 18(3), 44-49.
2. Vinayagalingam, T., 1983, Computer evaluation of controlled pantographs for current collection from simple catenary overhead equipment at high speed. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, 105, 287-294.
3. Kim, J.S. and Choi, B.D., 1999, A study on the dynamic characteristics of a catenary system, Journal of Korean Society for Noise and Vibmtion Engineering, 9(2), 317-323.
4. Kim, J.W. and Park, I.K., 2003, A modeling and contact force analysis of the catenary-pantograph system for a high-speed rail vehicle. Journal of Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering, 13(6), 474-483.
5. Collina, A. and Bruni, S., 2002, Numerical simulation of pantograph-overhead equipment interaction. Journal of Vehicle System Dynamics, 38(4), 261-291.
6. Lesser, M., 1996, An interactive model of a pantograph-catenary system. Journal of Vehicle System Dynamics, 25, 397-406.
7. Lim, J.S., 1992, Analysis of catenary-pantograph motion by Green's function. Journal of Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers, 16(8), 1438-1445.
8. Kim, Y.H. and Park, Y.K., 1992, Wave propagation characteristics along a catenary with arbitrary boundary conditions. Journal of Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers, 16(11), 2059-2071.
9. Balestrino, A. and Bruno, O., 2000, Innovative solutions for overhead catenary-pantograph system: wire actuated control and observed contact force. Journal of Vehicle System Dynamics, 33, 69-89.
10. Wu, T.X. and Brennan, M.J., 1999, Dynamic stiffness of a railway overhead wire system and its effect on pantograph-catenary system. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 219(3), 483-502.
11. Wu, T.X. and Brennan, M.J., 1998, Basic analytical study of pantograph-catenary system dynamics. Journal of Vehicle System Dynamics, 30, 443-456.
12. Manabe, K., 1989, High-speed contact performance of a catenary-pantograph system. International Journal of Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, 32(2), 31-40.
13. Gasendo-S2 Manual, RTRI (Railway Technical Research Institute in Japan), 1994.
14. Technical Report: Development of Pantograph (Step-2 Year-2), 2001. KRRI (Korea Railroad Research Institute) and KIIT (Korea Institute of Industrial Technology).
15. Shabana, A.A., 1988, Computer implementation of the absolute nodal coordinate formulation for flexible multibody dynamics. Journal of Nonlinear Dynamics, 16, 293-306.
16. Shabana, A.A., 1988, Dynamics of Multibody Systems (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge), pp. 311-323.
17. Escalona, J.L., Hussien, H.A. and Shabana, A.A., 1988, Application of the absolute nodal coordinate formulation to multibody system dynamics. Journal of Nonlinear Dynamics, 16, 293-306.
18. Huebner, K.H. and Thornton, E.A., 1995, The Finite Element Method for Engineers (John Wiley & Sons: New York), pp. 38-54.
19. Yakoub, R.Y. and Shabana, A.A., 1999, Use of Cholesky coordinates and the absolute nodal coordinate formulation in the computer simulation of flexible multibody systems. Journal of Nonlinear Dynamics, 20, 267-282.
20. Haug, E.J., 1989, Computer-Aided Kinematics and Dynamics of Mechanical Systems (Allyn and Bacon: Boston, MA).
21. Nikravesh, P.E., 1988, Computer-Aided Analysis of Mechanical System (Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
22. Takahashi, Y., Shimizu, N. and Suzuki, K., 2002, Introduction of damping matrix into absolute nodal coordinate formulation. Proceedings of The First Asian Conference on Multibody Dynamics (ACMD 2002), pp. 33-40.
23. Yoo, W.S., Lee, S.J. and Sohn, J.H., Comparison of physical experiments and computer simulation with absolute nodal coordinate formulation: large deformation of a thin cantilever beam. Proceedings of the ASME International Conference (DETC 2003/VIB-48307).
24. Sugiyama, H., Escalona, J. and Shabana, A.A., 2003, Formulation of three-dimensional joint constraints using the absolute nodal coordinates. Journal of Nonlinear Dynamics, 31, 167-195.
25. Seo, J.H., Jung, I.H. and Park, T.W., 2004, Dynamic analysis of very flexible cable carrying a moving multibody system. Journal of Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering, 14(2), 150-156.
26. Goetz, A., 1970, Introduction to Differential Geometry (Addison Wesley Publishing Company: Reading, MA).
27. Craig, R.R., 1996, Mechanics of Materials (John Wiley & Sons), pp. 258-265.
28. Mok, J.Y. and Park, C.S., 2003, Relation and vibration trend between the behavior of the pantograph vs. the vehicle running speed in korean high-speed train. Proceedings of Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering (Annual Autumn Conference), pp. 170-176.
29. Cho, Y.H. and Choe, K.Y., 2002, Development of a measuring method for dynamic contact forces between a pantograph and a contact wire. Proceedings of Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering (Annual Spring Conference), pp. 281-285.