Influence of track irregularities in the catenary-pantograph dynamic interaction

Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2012, Pages

  Carnicero, A ^a   Jimenez Octavio, J R ^a   Sanchez Rebollo, C ^a   Ramos, A ^b   Such, M ^c  

^a ICAI School of Engineering   (Spain)

^b Enusa Industrias Avanzadas SA   (Spain)

^c EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLETE SYSTEM; CONTACT FORCES; DEVELOPED MODEL; DYNAMIC INTERACTION; TRACK IRREGULARITY; TRACK PROFILE; VERTICAL DYNAMICS;

DYNAMICS; MECHANICAL ENGINEERING;

RAILROAD TRACKS;

EID: 84864375795     PISSN: 15551415     EISSN: 15551423     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1115/1.4006735     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Poetsch, G., Evans, J., Meisinger, R., Baldauf, W., Veitl, A., and Wallaschek, J., 1997, Pantograph/Catenary Dynamics and Control, Veh. Syst. Dyn., 28, pp. 159-195. doi 10.1080/00423119708969353 (Pubitemid 127567896)
2. Shabana, A., and San, J., 2001, A Survey of Rail Vehicle Track Simulations and Flexible Multibody Dynamics, Nonlinear Dyn., 26, pp. 179-210. doi 10.1023/A:1012976302105 (Pubitemid 34058438)
3. Collina, A., and Bruni, S., 2002, Numerical Simulation of Pantograph-Overhead Equipment Interaction, Veh. Syst. Dyn., 38 (4), pp. 261-291. doi 10.1076/vesd.38.4.261.8286
4. Wu, T., and Brennan, M., 1999, Dynamic Stiffness of a Railway Overhead Wire System and Its Effect on Pantographcatenary System Dynamics, J. Sound Vib., 219 (3), pp. 483-502. doi 10.1006/jsvi.1998.1869 (Pubitemid 129550245)
5. Lopez-Garcia, O., Carnicero, A., and Marono, J., 2007, Influence of Stiffness and Contact Modelling on Catenary Pantograph System Dynamics, J. Sound Vib., 299, pp. 806-821. doi 10.1016/j.jsv.2006.07.018 (Pubitemid 44692289)
6. Arnold, M., and Simeon, B., 2000, Pantograph and Catenary Dynamics: A Benchmark Problem and Its Numerical Solution, Appl. Numer. Math., 34 (4), pp. 345-362. doi 10.1016/S0168-9274(99)00038-0
7. Olsson, M., 1985, Finite Element, Modal Co-ordinate Analysis of Structures Subjected to Moving Loads, J. Sound Vib., 99, pp. 1-12. doi 10.1016/0022-460X(85)90440-7 (Pubitemid 15509123)
8. Koh, C., Ong, J., Chua, D., and Feng, J., 2003, Moving Element Method for Train-Track Dynamics, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 56, pp. 1549-1567. doi 10.1002/nme.624 (Pubitemid 36374957)
9. Lou, P., and Zeng, Q., 2005, Formulation of Equations of Motion of Finite Element Form for Vehicle-Track-Bridge Interaction System With Two Types of Vehicle Model, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 62, pp. 435-474. doi 10.1002/nme.1207 (Pubitemid 40102680)
10. Lou, P., 2005, Vertical Dynamic Responses of a Simply Supported Bridge Subjected to a Moving Train With Two-Wheel Set Vehicles Using Modal Analysis Method, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 64, pp. 1207-1235. doi 10.1002/nme.1426 (Pubitemid 41555895)
11. Zhai, W., Wang, K., and Cai, C., 2009, Fundamentals of Vehicle-Track Coupled Dynamics, Veh. Syst. Dyn., 47 (11), pp. 1349-1376. doi 10.1080/00423110802621561
12. Pombo, J., Ambrosio, J., and Silva, M., 2007, A New Wheel-Rail Contact Model for Railway Dynamics, Veh. Syst. Dyn., 45.
13. Pombo, J., Ambrosio, J., Pereira, M., Verardi, R., Ariaudo, C., and Kuka, N., 2011, Influence of Track Conditions and Wheel Wear State on the Loads Imposed on the Infrastructure by Railway Vehicles, Comput. Struct., 89, pp. 1882-1894. doi 10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.05.009
14. Seo, J., Sugiyama, H., and Shabana, A., 2005, Three-Dimensional Large Deformation Analysis of the Multibody Pantograph/Catenary Systems, Nonlinear Dyn., 42, pp. 199-215. doi 10.1007/s11071-005-2789-9 (Pubitemid 41456074)
15. Zhai, W., and Cai, C., 1998, Effect of Locomotive Vibration on Pantograph-Catenary System Dynamics, Veh. Syst. Dyn. Suppl., 28, pp. 47-58. doi 10.1080/00423119808969551 (Pubitemid 128649927)
16. Carnicero, A., Lopez-Garcia, O., Torres, V., and Jimenez-Octavio, J., 2006, An Algorithm Based on Finite Element Method and Catenary Equation to Compute the Initial Equilibrium of Railway Overhead, Eighth International Conference on Computational Structures Technology, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (España), Sept. 12-15.
17. Such, M., Jimenez-Octavio, J., Carnicero, A., and Lopez-Garcia, O., 2009, An Approach Based on the Catenary Equation to Deal With Static Analysis of Three Dimensional Cable Structures, Eng. Struct., 31, pp. 2162-2170. doi 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.03.018
18. Crisfield, M., 1997. Non-linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures, Vol. 1, Wiley, New York.
19. Crisfield, M., 1997, Non-linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures, Vol. 2, Wiley, New York.
20. Kiessling, F., Puschmann, R., Schmieder, A., and Schneider, E., 2009, Contact Lines for Electric Railways. Publicis Publishing, Erlangen.
21. CENELEC, 2002. EN50318:2002, Railway Applications. Current Collection Systems. Validation of Simulation of the Dynamic Interaction Between Pantograph and Overhead Contact Line, July ed. European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization, Brussels.
22. Melis, M., 2008, Dinamica Vertical de la Via, Catedra de Ferrocarriles (in Spanish), ETSICCyP, Madrid.
23. Gabaldon, F., Riquelme, F., Goicolea, J., and Arribas, J., 2005, Dynamic Analysis of Structures Under High Speed Train Loads: Case Studies in Spain. Dynamics of High-Speed Railway Bridges, Advanced Course, Porto, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, London.
24. Früba, L., 1996, Dynamics of Railway Bridges, Thomas Telford.
25. Hilber, H. M., Hughes, T. R., and Talor, R. L., 1977, Improved Numerical Dissipation for Time Integration Algorithms in Structural Dynamics, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 5, pp. 282-292. doi 10.1002/eqe.4290050306