The impact of informative tutoring feedback and self-efficacy on motivation and achievement in concept learning

Experimental Psychology

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 214-228

  Narciss, Susanne ^a  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Achievement; Informative tutoring feedback; Motivation

Indexed keywords

ACHIEVEMENT; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MOTIVATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT; TEACHER;

ACHIEVEMENT; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MENTORS; MOTIVATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF EFFICACY;

EID: 3142579907     PISSN: 16183169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.51.3.214     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Albacete, P., & VanLehn, K. (2000). Evaluating the effectiveness of a cognitive tutor for fundamental physics concepts [Electronic version]. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 22. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Anderson, R. C., Kulhayy, R. W., & Andre, T. (1971). Feedback procedures in programmed instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 62(2), 148-156.
3. Annett, J. (1969). Feedback and human behaviour. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
4. Azevedo, R., & Bernard, R. M. (1995). A meta-analysis of feedback in computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13, 11-127.
5. Balzer, W. K., Doherty, M. E., & O'Connor, R. (1989). Effects of cognitive feedback on performance. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 410-433.
6. Bandura, A. (1977). Self efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
7. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
9. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. T. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213-238.
10. Birenbaum, M. & Tatsuoka, K. K. (1987). Effects of "online" test feedback on the seriousness of subsequent errors. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24, 145-155.
11. Bong, M. (1996). Problems in academic motivation research and advantages and disadvantages of their solutions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20(2), 149-165.
12. Bong, M. (2001). Between- and within-domain relations of academic motivation among middle and high school students: Self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 23-34.
13. Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Adacemic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1-40.
14. Bourne, L. E. (1963). Longterm effects of misinformation feedback upon concept identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(2), 139-147.
15. Bourne, L. E. (1974). Stimulus selection and memory strategies in concept problems. Memory & Cognition, 2(2), 270-274.
16. Bourne, L. E., Ekstrand, B. R., & Montgomery, B. (1969). Concept learning as a function of the conceptual rule and the availability of positive and negative instances. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 82(3), 538-544.
17. Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G. A. (1956). A study of thinking. New York: Wiley.
18. Butler, D., & Winne, P. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245-281.
19. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
20. Hancock, T. E., Stock, W. A., & Kulhavy, R. W. (1992). Predicting feedback effects from response-certitude estimates. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30(2), 173-176.
21. Heckhausen, H. (1975). Fear of failure as a self-reinforcing motive system. In I. G. Sarason, & C. Spielberger (Eds.), Stress and anxiety (pp. 117-128). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
22. Heckhausen, H. (1989). Motivation und Handeln [Motivation and action]. Berlin: Springer.
23. Hoska, D. M. (1993). Motivating learners through CBI feedback: Developing a positive learner perspective. In J. V. Dempsey, & G. C. Sales (Eds.), Interactive Instruction and Feedback (pp. 105-132). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
24. Huth, K., & Narciss, S. (2003). Effects of bug-related tutoring feedback on achievement and motivation in a computer-based training. Manuscript submitted for publication.
25. Johansen, K. J., & Tennyson, R. D. (1983). Effect of adaptive advisement on perception in learner-controlled, computer-based instruction using a rule-learning task. Education Communication & Technology Journal, 31, 226-236.
26. Joo, Y. J., Bong, M., & Choi, H. J. (2000). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and Internet self-efficacy in Web-based instruction. Educational Technology Research & Development, 48(2), 5-18.
27. Karl, K. A., O'Leary-Kelly, A. M., & Martocchio, J. J. (1993). The impact of feedback and self-efficacy on performance in training. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 379-394.
28. Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp.383-436). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Keller, J. M. (1987). Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Performance and Instruction, 26(8), 1-7.
30. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254-284.
31. Kulhavy, R. W., & Stock, W. A. (1989). Feedback in written Instruction: The place of response certitude. Educational Psychology Review, 1(4), 279-308.
32. Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1988). Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research, 58(1), 79-97.
33. Lepper, M. R., & Chabay, R. W. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and instruction: Conflicting views on the role of motivational processes in computer-based education. Educational Psychologist, Special Issue: Computers in Education, 20(4), 217-230.
34. Mason, B. J., & Bruning, R. (2001). Providing feedback in computer-based instruction: What the research tells us. Retrieved July 7, 2001, from http://dwb.unl.edu/Edit/MB/MasonBruning.html.
35. McKendree, J. (1990). Effective feedback content for tutoring complex skills. Human-computer interaction, 5, 381-413.
36. McDonald, J. L., & MacWhinney, B. (1991). Levels of learning: A comparison of concept formation and language acquisition. Journal of Memory & Language, 30(4), 407-430.
37. Merrill, J. (1987). Levels of questioning and forms of feedback: Instructional factors in courseware design. Journal of Computer-based Instruction, 14, 43-50.
38. Merrill, C. D., Reiser, B. J., Merrill, S. K., & Landes, S. (1995). Tutoring: Guided learning by doing. Cognition & Instruction, 13(3), 315-372.
39. Merrill, C. D., Reiser, B. J., Ranney, M., & Trafton, J. G. (1992). Effective tutoring techniques: A comparison of human tutors and intelligent tutoring systems. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 201, 277-305.
40. Morin, R. E. (1955). Factors influencing rate and extent of learning in the presence of misinformative feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 343-351.
41. Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Gopalakrishnan, M., & Casey, J. (1995). The effects of feedback and incentives on achievement in computer-based instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 32-50.
42. Mory, E. H. (1994). Adaptive feedback in computer-based instruction: Effects of response certitude on performance, feedback-study time, and efficiency. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11, 263-290.
43. Mory, E. H. (1996). Feedback research. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 919-956). New York: Simon & Schuster Maxmillan.
44. Nagata, N. (1993). Intelligent computer feedback for second language instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 77(3), 330-339.
45. Nagata, N., & Swisher, M. V. (1995). A study of consciousness-raising by computer: The effect of metalinguistic feedback. Foreign Language Annals, 28 (3), 337-347.
46. Narciss, S., & Huth, K. (2004). How to design informative tutoring feedback for multimedia learning. In H. M. Niegemann, D. Leutner & R. Brünken (Eds.), Instructional design for multimedia learning (pp. 181-195). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
47. Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In A. Wigfield & J. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 250-284). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
48. Pishkin, V (1960). Effects of probability of misinformation and number of irrelevant dimensions upon concept identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 371-378.
49. Schimmel, B. J. (1988). Providing meaningful feedback in courseware. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Instructional designs for microcomputer courseware (pp. 183-195). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
50. Schunk, D. (1981). Modeling and attributional feedback on children's perceived self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 93-105.
51. Schunk, D. (1982). Effects of effort attributional feedback on children's perceived self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 548-556.
52. Schunk, D. (1983). Ability versus effort attributional feedback: Differential effects on self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(6), 848-856.
53. Schunk, D. (1995). Self-efficacy and education and instruction. In J. E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application (pp. 281-303). New York: Plenum Press.
54. Schunk, D., & Pajares, F. (2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. In A. Wigfield, & J. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 15-31). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
55. Schunk, D. H., & Swartz, C. W. (1993). Goals and progress feedback: Effects on self-efficacy and writing achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 337-354.
56. Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (1993). Designing instructional feedback for different learning outcomes. In J. V. Dempsey & G. C. Sales (Eds.) Interactive instruction and feedback, (pp. 105-132). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
57. Steinberg, E. (1977). Review of student control of learning in computer-based instruction. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 3, 84-90.
58. Steinberg, E. (1989). Cognition and learner control: A literature review, 1977-1989. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 16, 117-121.
59. Tennyson, C. L., Tennyson, R. D., & Rothen, W. (1980). Content structure and instructional control strategies as design variables in concept acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(4), 499-505.
60. Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation: Metaphors, theories, and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
61. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
62. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (Eds.) (2002). Development of achievement motivation. San Diego: Academic Press.