Investigating relationships between features of learning designs and student learning outcomes

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 271-286

  McNaught, Carmel ^a   Lam, Paul ^a   Cheng, Kin Fai ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Assessment; Learning design; Student learning outcomes; Student perceptions; Web environment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859102867     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: 15566501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-011-9226-1     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Agostinho, S., Oliver, R., Harper, B., Hedberg, J., & Wills, S. (2002). A tool to evaluate the potential for an ICT-based learning design to foster 'high-quality learning'. In A. Williamson, C. Gunn, A. Young, & T. Clear (Eds.), Winds of change in the sea of learning (pp. 29-38). Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE 2002), Auckland New Zealand. Retrieved December 28, 2010, from http://www. ascilite. org. au/conferences/auckland02/proceedings/papers/164. pdf.
2. Bennett, N., Dunne, E., & Carre, C. (1999). Patterns of core and generic skill provision in higher education. Higher Education, 37(1), 71-93.
3. Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
4. Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.
5. Davies, J., & Graff, M. (2005). Performance in e-learning: On-line participation and student grades. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 657-663.
6. Ginns, P., & Ellis, R. (2007). Quality in blended learning: Exploring the relationships between on-line and face-to-face teaching and learning. Internet and Higher Education, 10, 53-64.
7. Hannafin, M. J., Hannafin, K. M., Hooper, S. R., Rieber, L. R., & Kini, A. S. (1996). Research on and research with emerging technologies. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 378-402). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
8. Johnson, S. D., Aragon, S. R., Shaik, N., & Palma-Rivas, N. (2000). Comparative analysis of learner satisfaction and learning outcomes in online and face-to-face-learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning research, 11(1), 29-49.
9. Kember, D., McNaught, C., Chong, F. C. Y., Lam, P., & Cheng, K. F. (2010). Understanding the ways in which design features of educational websites impact upon student learning outcomes in blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55, 1183-1192.
10. Levin, J., Fox, J. A., & Forde, D. R. (2010). Elementary statistics in social research (11th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon Pearson.
11. Lim, D. H., Morris, M. L., & Kupritz, V. W. (2007). Online vs. blended learning: Differences in instructional outcomes and learner satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), 27-42.
12. Lam, C., Lo, J., Yeung, A., & McNaught, C. (2010). Examining diffusion and sustainability of e-learning strategies through weblog data. International Journal of E-Adoption, 2(3), 39-52.
13. Lockyer, L., Bennett, S., Agostinho, S., & Harper, B. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects: Issues, applications and technologies. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
14. Macdonald, J. (2003). Assessing online collaborative learning: Process and product. Computers & Education, 40, 377-391.
15. McConnell, D. (2002). The experience of collaborative assessment in e-learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 24(1), 73-92.
16. McNaught, C. (2011). The best of both worlds: Effective hybrid learning designs in higher education in Hong Kong. In R. Kwan, E. Young, & B. White (Eds.). ICHL 2011, LNCS 6837 (pp. 1-9). Heidelberg: Springer. Publication of Keynote address at the International Conference on Hybrid Learning 2011. 10-12 August 2011, Hong Kong.
17. McNaught, C., P., & Cheng, K. F. (2009). Using expert reviews to enhance learning designs. In L. Lockyer, S. Bennett, S. Agostinho, & B. Harper (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects: Issues, applications and technologies (pp. 243-262). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
18. McNaught, C., Lam, P., Chan, E., Yuen, S., & Ho, E. (in press). Cultural aspects of adoption of innovation: A case study with implementing a lecture-recording system in a university in Hong Kong. Journal of the NUS Teaching Academy (JNUSTA).
19. Nightingale, P., Te Wiata, I., Toohey, S., Ryan, G., Hughes, C., & Magin, D. (1996). Assessing learning in universities. Sydney: Professional Development Centre, University of New South Wales.
20. Oliver, R., Harper, B., Hedberg, J., Wills, S., & Agostinho, S. (2002). Formalising the description of learning designs. In A. Goody, J. Herrington, & M. Northcote (Eds.), Quality conversations: Research and Development in Higher Education (Vol. 25, pp. 496-504). Jamison, ACT: HERDSA.
21. Oliver, R., & McLoughlin, C. (2001). Exploring the practice and development of generic skills through web-based learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10(3), 207-225.
22. McNaught, C., Phillips, P., Rossiter, D., & Winn, J. (2000). Developing a framework for a usable and useful inventory of computer-facilitated learning and support materials in Australian universities. Evaluations and Investigations Program report 99/11. Canberra: Higher Education Division Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Australia. Retrieved August 2, 2011, from http://www. dest. gov. au/highered/eippubs1999. htm.
23. Reeves, T. C. (1999). A model to guide the integration of the WWW as a cognitive tool in K-12 education. American Educational Research Association (AERA) annual meeting. Montreal, 19-23 April 1999. Retrieved August 2, 2011, from http://it. coe. uga. edu/~treeves/AERA99Web. pdf.
24. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.