Evaluating the quality of e-learning at the degree level in the student experience of blended learning

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 652-663

  Ginns, Paul ^a   Ellis, Rob A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLENDED LEARNING; HIGHER EDUCATION; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES; RAPID DEVELOPMENT; RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY; STUDENT LEARNING; TEACHING EVALUATION; UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS;

E-LEARNING; INTERNET; MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS; QUALITY ASSURANCE; STUDENTS; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

TEACHING;

EID: 67249134020     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00861.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bangert, A. W. (2004). The seven principles of good practice: a framework for evaluating on-line teaching. Internet and Higher Education, 7, 217 232.
2. Barrie, S. Ginns, P. (2007). The linking of institutional performance indicators to improvements in teaching and learning in classrooms. Quality in Higher Education, 13, 275 286.
3. Barrie, S., Ginns, P. Prosser, M. (2005). Early impact and outcomes of an institutionally aligned, student focused learning perspective on teaching quality assurance. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 641 656. (Pubitemid 41430058)
4. Bell, M., Bush, D., Nicholson, P., O'Brien, D. Tran, T. (1999). Universities online: a survey of online education and services in Australia. Canberra, Australia : DEST.
5. Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university. Maidenhead : Open University Press.
6. Biggs, J., Kember, D. Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133 149.
7. Boomsma, A. Hoogland, J. J. (2001). The robustness of LISREL modeling revisited. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit D. Sörbom (Eds Structural equation modeling: Present and future (pp. 139 168). Lincolnwood, IL : Scientific Software International.
8. Brew, A. Ginns, P. (in press). The relationship between engagement in the scholarship of teaching and learning and students' course experiences. Assessment and Evaluation. Higher Education.
9. Burke, M. J. Dunlap, W. P. (2002). Estimating interrater agreement with the average deviation index: a user's guide. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 159 172.
10. Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: a typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234 246.
11. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 35, 297 334.
13. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: the classroom use of technology since 1920. New York : Teachers College Press.
14. HEFCE (Higher Education Funding Council of England) (2005). HEFCE strategy for e-learning. Retrieved October 26, 2007, from http://www.hefce.ac. uk/pubs/hefce/2005/05-12/
15. Entwistle, N. J. McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories, Educational Psychology Review, 16, 325 345. (Pubitemid 40976014)
16. Entwistle, N. J. Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London : Croom Helm.
17. Fan, X. Thompson, B. (2001). Confidence intervals around score reliability coefficients, please: an EPM guidelines editorial. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 61, 517 531.
18. Ginns, P. Ellis, R. (2007). Quality in blended learning: Exploring the relations between on-line and face-to-face teaching and learning. Internet and Higher Education, 10, 53 64. (Pubitemid 46349798)
19. Ginns, P., Prosser, M. Barrie, S. (2007). Students' perceptions of teaching quality in higher education: the perspective of currently enrolled students. Studies in Higher Education, 32, 603 615.
20. Goodyear, P., Jones, C., Asensio, M., Hodgson, V. Steeples, C. (2005). Networked learning in higher education: students' expectations and experiences. Higher Education, 50, 473 508. (Pubitemid 41374329)
21. Hawkins, B. Rudy, J. A. (2004). EDUCAUSE Core Data Service 2003 Summary Report. Retrieved April 23, 2008, from http://connect.educause.edu/library/ abstract/EDUCAUSECoreDataServ/43038
22. Hawkins, B. Rudy, J. A. (2007). EDUCAUSE Core Data Service: Fiscal Year 2006 Summary Report. Retrieved April 23, 2008, from http://connect.educause.edu/ library/abstract/EDUCAUSECoreDataServ/45236
23. Jochems, W., van Merriënboer, J. Koper, R. (2004). An introduction to integrated e-learning. In W. Jochems, J. van Merriënboer R. Koper (Eds Integrated e-learning: Implications for pedagogy, technology and organization (pp. 1 12). London : RoutledgeFalmer.
24. Jöreskog, K. G. Sörbom, D. (2001). LISREL 8 user's reference guide. Lincolnwood, IL : Scientific Software International.
25. Katz, R. N. (1999). Dancing with the devil: information technology and the new competition in higher education. San Francisco, CA : Jossey Bass.
26. Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: a framework for the effective use of educational technology (2nd ed London : Routledge.
27. Lawless, C. J. Richardson, J. T. E. (2002). Approaches to study and perceptions of academic quality in distance education. Higher Education, 44, 257 282. (Pubitemid 37132856)
28. Prosser, M. Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: the experience in higher education. Buckingham : Open University Press.
29. Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: the Course Experience Questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 16, 129 150.
30. Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education. London : Routledge.
31. Raykov, T. Marcoulides, G. A. (2000). A first course in structural equation modelling. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Richardson, J. T. E. (2005). Instruments for obtaining student feedback: a review of the literature. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 387 415.
33. Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8, 350 353.
34. Spector, P. (2001). Research methods in industrial and organisational psychology: data collection and data analysis with special consideration to international issues. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil C. Viswesvaran (Eds Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology (pp. 10 26). London : Sage.
35. Wilson, K. L., Lizzio, A. Ramsden, P. (1997). The development, validation and application of the Course Experience Questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 22, 33 53.
36. Zastrocky, M., Harris, M. Lowendahl, J. (2007). E-learning for higher education: course management systems. Stanford, CA : Gartner Research.