A history of small group research

Handbook of the History of Social Psychology

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 383-405

  Levine, John M ^a   Moreland, Richard L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875002458     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203808498-27     Document Type: Chapter

References (262)

1. Aberson, C. L., Healy, M., & Romero, V. (2000). Ingroup bias and self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 157-173.
2. Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (1988). Comments on the motivational status of self esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 317-334.
3. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequality in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York, NY: Academic Press.
4. Allen, V. L. (1965). Situational factors in conformity. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 133-175). New York, NY: Academic Press.
5. Allport, F. H. (1924). Social psychology. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
6. Allport, G. W. (1954). The historical background of modern social psychology. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 3-56). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
7. Amrine, M., & Sanford, F. H. (1956). In the matter of juries, democracy, science, truth, senators, and bugs. American Psychologist, 11, 54-60.
8. Aronson, E., & Mills, J. (1959). The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 77-181
9. Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development, and adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men (pp. 177-190). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie.
11. Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70 (Whole No. 416).
12. Austin, J. R. (2003). Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 866-878.
13. Avolio, B. J., Walumba, F. O., & Weber, T. J. (2009). Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 421-449.
14. Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
15. Bales, R. F., & Borgatta, E. F. (1955). Size of group as a factor in the interaction profile. In A. P. Hare, E. F. Borgatta, & R. F. Bales (Eds.), Small groups: Studies in social interaction (pp. 369-413). New York, NY: Knopf.
16. Bales, R. F., Cohen, P., & Williamson, S. A. (1979). SYMLOG: A system for the multiple level observation of groups. New York, NY: Free Press.
17. Bales, R. F., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1951). Phases in group problem solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 485-495.
18. Bales, R. F., Strodtbeck, F. L., Mills, T. M., & Roseborough, M. E. (1951). Channels of communication in small groups. American Sociological Review, 16, 461-468.
19. Bar-Tal, D. (1990). Group beliefs: A conception for analyzing group structure, processes, and behavior. New York, NY: Springer.
20. Baruah, J., & Paulus, P. B. (2008). Effects of training on idea generation in groups. Small Group Research, 39, 523-541.
21. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
22. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 396-403.
23. Bavelas, A. (1950). Communication patterns on task-oriented groups. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22, 725-730.
24. Bazerman, M. H., Mannix, E. A., & Thompson, L. (1988). Groups as mixed-motive negotiations. In E. J. Lawler & B. Markovsky (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 5, pp. 195-216). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
25. Becker, H. S. (1958). Problems of inference and proof in participant observations. American Sociological Review, 23, 652-660.
26. Berger, W. J., Cohen, B. P., & Zelditch, M. (1966). Status characteristics and expectation states. In W. J. Berger, M. Zelditch, & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (Vol. 1, pp. 29-46). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
27. Bettencourt, A., Charlton, K., Dorr, N., & Hume, D. (2001). Status differences and ingroup bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 520-542.
28. Boldry, J. G., Gaertner, L., & Quinn, J. (2007). Measuring the measures: A meta-analytic investigation of the measures of outgroup homogeneity. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 10, 157-178.
29. Bond, C. F. (1982). Social facilitation: A self-presentational view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1042-1050.
30. Borgatta, E. F., & Bales, R. F. (1953). Interaction of individuals in reconstituted groups. Sociometry, 16, 302-320.
31. Borgatta, E. F., Bales, R. F., & Couch, A. S. (1954). Some findings regarding the Great Man theory of leadership. American Sociological Review, 19, 755-759.
32. Borgatta, E. F., & Cottrell, L. S. (1955). On the classification of groups. Sociometry, 18, 409-422.
33. Borgatta, E. F., Cottrell, L. S., & Meyer, H. J. (1955). On the dimensions of group behavior. Sociometry, 19, 223-240.
34. Bornstein, G., Crum, L., Wittenbraker, J., Harring, K., Insko, C. A., & Thibaut, J. (2006). On the measurement of social orientation in the minimal group paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 321-350.
35. Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.
36. Brown, R. (2000). Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems, and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 745-778.
37. Brown, V., Tumeo, M., Larey, T. S., & Paulus, P. B. (1998). Modeling cognitive interactions during group brainstorming. Small Group Research, 29, 495-526.
38. Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18, 1-21.
39. Burnstein, E., & Vinokur, A. (1977). Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 315-322.
40. Buys, C. J. (1978). Humans would do better without groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 123-125.
41. Calder, B. (1977). An attribution theory of leadership. In B. M. Staw & G. R. Salancik (Eds.), New directions in organizational behavior (pp. 179-204). Chicago, IL: St. Clair Press.
42. Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3, 14-25.
43. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In N. J. Castellan, Jr. (Ed.), Individual and group decision making: Current issues (pp. 221-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
44. Cartwright, D. (1959). A field theoretical conception of power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 183-220). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
45. Cartwright, D. (1971). Risk taking by individuals and groups: An assessment of research employing choice dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20, 361-378.
46. Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. (Eds.) (1968). Group dynamics: Research and theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
47. Castano, E. (2004). In case of death, cling to the ingroup. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 375-384.
48. Castano, E., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Bourguignon, D. (2003). We are one and I like it: The impact of ingroup entitativity on ingroup identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 735-754.
49. Collins, B. E., & Raven, B. H. (1969). Group structure: Attraction, coalitions, communication, and power. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.). The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 102-204). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
50. Correll, J., & Park, B. (2005). A model of the ingroup as a social resource. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 347-359.
51. Crano, W. D. (2010). Majority/minority influence in attitude formation and attitude change: Context/categorization-leniency contract theory. In R. Martin & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Minority influence and innovation: Antecedents, processes and consequences (pp. 53-77). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
52. Crisp, R. J., & Hewstone, M. (2007). Multiple social categorization. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 39, pp. 163-254). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
53. Davis, J. H. (1973). Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. Psychological Review, 80, 97-125.
54. Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169-193.
55. DeChurch, L. A., & Mesmer-Magnus, J. R. (2010). The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 32-53.
56. De Dreu, C. K. W. (2010). Social conflict: The emergence and consequences of struggle and negotiation. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 983-1023). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
57. DeLamater, J. (1974). A definition of “group.” Small Group Research, 5, 30-44.
58. Dennis, A. R., & Williams, M. L. (2005). A meta-analysis of group size effects in electronic brainstorming: More heads are better than one. International Journal of e-collaboration, 1, 24-42.
59. De Rosa, D. M., Smith, C. L., & Hantula, D. A. (2007). The medium matters: Mining the long-promised merit of group interaction in creative idea generation tasks in a meta-analysis of the electronic group brainstorming literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1549-1581.
60. Deutsch, M. (1949). An experimental study of the effects of cooperation and competition upon group process. Human Relations, 2, 199-232.
61. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.
62. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 487-509.
63. Dion, K. L., Baron, R. S., & Miller, N. (1970). Why do groups make riskier decisions than individuals? In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 306-377). New York, NY: Academic Press.
64. Durkheim, E. (1895 / 1966). The rules of sociological method (S. Solovay & J. Mueller, trans). New York, NY: Free Press. (Original work published 1895.)
65. Ellemers, N., de Gilder, D., & Haslam, A. S. (2004) Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Academy of Management Review, 29, 459-478.
66. Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271-282.
67. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
68. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.
69. Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. W. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
70. Festinger, L., & Thibaut, J. (1951). Interpersonal communication in small groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 92-99.
71. Fiedler, F. E. (1964). A contingency model of leadership effectiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 149-190). New York, NY: Academic Press.
72. Fiske, S. T., & Berdahl, J. (2007). Social power. In A. E. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 678-715). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
73. French, J. R. P., Jr., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
74. Freud, S. (1922/1959). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego (J. Strachey, trans). New York, NY: W. W. Norton. (Original work published 1922.)
75. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
76. Gaertner, L., Iuzzini, J., Witt, M., & Orifia, M. M. (2006). Us without them: Evidence for an intragroup origin of positive ingroup regard. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 426-439.
77. Grier, S. A., & McGill, A. L. (2000). How we explain depends on whom we explain: The impact of social category on the selection of causal comparisons and causal explanations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 545-566.
78. Hackman, J. R., & Katz, N. (2010). Group behavior and performance. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 1208-1251). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
79. Hamilton, D. L. (Ed.). (1981). Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
80. Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 336-355.
81. Hare, A. P., Borgatta, E. F., & Bales, R. F. (Eds.) (1955). Small groups: Studies in social interaction. New York, NY: Knopf.
82. Hartstone, M., & Augoustinos, M. (1995). The minimal group paradigm: Categorization into two versus three groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 179-193.
83. Hertel, G., Kerr, N. L., & Messe, L. A. (2000). Motivation gains in performance groups: Paradigmatic and theoretical developments in the Kohler effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 580-601.
84. Hinsz, V., Tindale, S., & Vollrath, D. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43-64.
85. Hoffman, L. R. (1965). Group problem solving. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 99-132). New York, NY: Academic Press.
86. Hogg, M. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity. London, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
87. Hogg, M. A. (2007). Uncertainty identity theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 39, pp. 69-126). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
88. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1993). Toward a single-process uncertainty reduction model of social motivation in groups. In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 173-190). London, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
89. Hogg, M. A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2003). Social identity and leadership processes in groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 1-52). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
90. Homans, G. C. (1950). The human group. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.
91. Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597-606.
92. Hornsey, M. J. (2008). Social identity theory and self-categorization theory: A historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 204-222.
93. Ingham, A. G., Levinger, G., Graves, J., & Peckham, V. (1974). The Ringelmann effect: Studies of group size and group performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 371-384.
94. Isenberg, D. J. (1986). Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1141-1151.
95. Jackson, M., & Moreland, R. L. (2009). Transactive memory in the classroom. Small Group Research, 40, 508-534.
96. Jacobs, R. C., & Campbell, D. T. (1961). The perpetuation of an arbitrary tradition through several generations of a laboratory microculture. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 649-658.
97. Jones, E. E. (1985). Major developments in social psychology during the past five decades. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 47-107). New York, NY: Random House.
98. Jones, E. E., Wood, G. C., & Quattrone, G. A. (1981). Perceived variability of personal characteristics of ingroups and outgroups: The role of knowledge and evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 523-528.
99. Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 755-758.
100. Kameda, T., Takezawa, M., & Hastie, R. (2003). The logic of social sharing: An evolutionary game analysis of adaptive norm development. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 2-19.
101. Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: Wiley.
102. Kelly, J. R., & Barsade, S. (2001). Emotion in small groups and work teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 99-130.
103. Kerr, N. L. (1981). Social transition schemes: Charting the group’s road to agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 684-702.
104. Kerr, N. L. (1983). Motivation losses in small groups: A social dilemma analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 819-828.
105. Kerr, N. L., & Kaufman-Gilliland, C. (1994). Communication, commitment, and cooperation in social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 513-529.
106. Kerr, N. L., & Park, E. S. (2001). Group performance in collaborative and social dilemma tasks: Progress and prospects. In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 107-138). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
107. Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, R. (1994). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20, 403-437.
108. Komorita, S. S. (1984). Coalition bargaining. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 183-245). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
109. Komorita, S. S., & Parks, C. D. (1994). Social dilemmas. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
110. Komorita, S. S., & Parks, C. D. (1995). Interpersonal relations: Mixedmotive interaction. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 183-207.
111. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7, 77-124.
112. Kravitz, D. A., & Martin, B. (1986). Ringelmann rediscovered: The original article. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 936-941.
113. Kruglanski, A., & Mackie, D. M. (1990). Majority and minority influence: A judgmental process analysis. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Advances in European social psychology (pp. 229-261). London, UK: Wiley.
114. Kruglanski, A. W., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., & DeGrada, E. (2006). Groups as epistemic providers: Need for closure and the unfolding of group-centrism. Psychological Review, 113, 84-100.
115. Lamm, H., & Myers, D. G. (1978). Group-induced polarization of attitudes and behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 145-195). New York, NY: Academic Press.
116. Lamm, H., & Trommsdorff, G. (1973). Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming): A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 361-388.
117. Larson, J. R. (2010). In search of synergy in small group performance. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
118. Larson, J. R., & Christensen, C. (1993). Groups as problem-solving units: Toward a new meaning of social cognition. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 5-30.
119. Larson, J. R., Foster-Fishman, P. G., & Keys, C. B. (1994). Discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 446-461.
120. Latane, B., Williams, K. D., & Harkins, S. G. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822-832.
121. Latane, B., & Wolf, S. (1981). The social impact of majorities and minorities. Psychological Review, 88, 438-453.
122. Laughlin, P. R. (1999). Collective induction: Twelve postulates. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80, 50-69.
123. Laughlin, P. R., & Ellis, A. L. (1986). Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 177-189.
124. Leavitt, H. J. (1951). Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 38-50.
125. Le Bon, G. (1895/1969). The crowd: A study of the popular mind. New York, NY: Viking Press. (Original work published 1895.)
126. Levine, J. M. (1989). Reaction to opinion deviance in small groups. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 187-231). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
127. Levine, J. M. (1999). Solomon Asch’s legacy for group research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 358-364.
128. Levine, J. M., & Choi, H-S. (2010). Newcomers as change agents: Minority influence in task groups. In R. Martin & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Minority influence and innovation: Antecedents, processes, and consequences (pp. 229-262). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
129. Levine, J. M., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Shared reality and social influence in groups and organizations. In F. Butera & G. Mugny (Eds.), Social influence in social reality: Promoting individual and social change (pp. 33-52). Bern, Switzerland: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
130. Levine, J. M., & Kaarbo, J. (2001). Minority influence in political decision-making groups. In C. K. W. De Dreu & N. K. De Vries (Eds.), Group consensus and minority influence: Implications for innovation (pp. 229-257). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
131. Levine, J. M., Moreland, R. L., & Hausmann, L. R. M. (2005). Managing group composition: Inclusive and exclusive role transitions. In D. Abrams, M. A. Hogg, & J. M. Marques (Eds.), The social psychology of inclusion and exclusion (pp. 137-160). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
132. Levine, J. M., Resnick, L. B., & Higgins, E. T. (1993). Social foundations of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 585-612.
133. Levine, J. M., & Russo, E. M. (1987). Majority and minority influence. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Group processes. (Vol. 8, pp. 13-54). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
134. Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created social climates. Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271-301.
135. Lewis, K., Lange, D., & Gillis, L. (2005). Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning transfer. Organization Science, 16, 581-598.
136. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York, NY: Plenum.
137. Litchfield, R. C. (2008). Brainstorming reconsidered: A goal-based view. Academy of Management Review, 33, 649-668.
138. Maass, A., Salvi, D., Arcuri, L., & Semin, G. (1989). Language use in intergroup contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 981-993.
139. Mackie, D. M. (1986). Social identity effects in group polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 720-728.
140. Mackie, D. M., & Goethals, G. R. (1987). Individual and group goals. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Group processes (Vol. 8, pp. 144-166). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
141. Marques, J. M. & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (1988). The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members in inter- and intra-group situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 287-292.
142. Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (2003). Social-influence processes of control and change: Conformity, obedience to authority, and innovation. In M. A. Hogg & J. Cooper (Eds.), Sage handbook of social psychology (pp. 347-366). London, UK: Sage.
143. Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (2008). Majority versus minority influence, message processing and attitude change: The source-context-elaboration model. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 40, pp. 237-326). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
144. Mayo, E. (1949). Hawthorne and the Western Electric Company: The social problems of industrial civilization. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
145. McCall, J. G., & Simmons, J. L. (Eds.). (1988). Issues in participant observation. New York, NY: Random House.
146. McDougall, W. (1920). The group mind: A sketch of the principles of collective psychology. Chicago, IL: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
147. McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
148. McGrath, J. E. (1997). Small group research, that once and future field: An interpretation of the past with an eye to the future. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 7-27.
149. McGrath, J. E., & Altman, I. (1966). Small group research: A synthesis and critique of the field. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
150. McGrath, J. E., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1994). Groups interacting with technology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
151. McGrath, J. E., & Kelly, J. R. (1986). Time and human interaction. New York, NY: Guilford.
152. McKenna, K. Y. A., & Green, A. S. (2002). Virtual group dynamics. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 116-127.
153. Messick, D. M., & Brewer, M. B. (1983). Solving social dilemmas: A review. In L. Wheeler & P. Shaver (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 11-44). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
154. Mills, T. M. (1953). Power relations in three-person groups. American Sociological Review, 18, 351-357.
155. Mills, T. M. (1954). The coalition pattern in three-person groups. American Sociological Review, 1, 657-667.
156. Mills, T. M. (1958). Some hypotheses on small groups from Simmel. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 642-650.
157. Moreland, R. L. (1987). The formation of small groups. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Group processes (Vol. 8, pp. 80-110). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
158. Moreland, R. L. (1996). Lewin’s legacy for small-groups research. Systems Practice and Action Research, 9, 7-26.
159. Moreland, R. L. (1999). Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. In L. L. Thompson, J. M. Levine, & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 3-31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
160. Moreland, R. L. (2010). Are dyads really groups? Small Group Research, 41, 251-267.
161. Moreland, R. L., Fetterman, J. D., Flagg, J. J., & Swanenburg, K. L. (2010). Behavioral assessment practices among social psychologists who study small groups. In C. R. Agnew et al. (Eds.), Then a miracle occurs: Focusing on behavior in social psychological theory and research (pp. 28-56). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
162. Moreland, R. L., Hogg, M. A., & Hains, S. (1994). Back to the future: Social psychological research on groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 527-555.
163. Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1992). The composition of small groups. In E. J. Lawler et al. (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 9, pp. 237-280). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
164. Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (2000). Socialization in organizations and work groups. In M. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (p. 69-112). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
165. Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (2009). Building bridges to improve theory and research on small groups. In E. Salas, J. Goodwin, & C. S. Burke (Eds.), Team effectiveness in complex organizations and systems: Cross-disciplinary perspectives and approaches (pp. 17-38). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
166. Morgan, P. M., & Tindale, R. S. (2002). Group vs. individual performance in mixed-motive situations: Exploring an inconsistency. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 44-65.
167. Moscovici, S. (1976). Social influence and social change. London, UK: Academic Press.
168. Moscovici, S. (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 209-239). New York, NY: Academic Press.
169. Moscovici, S. (1981). On social representations. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Social cognition: Perspectives on everyday understanding (pp. 181-209). London, UK: Academic Press.
170. Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969). The group as a polarizer of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 125-135.
171. Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103-122.
172. Mullen, B., & Goethals, G. R. (Eds.). (1987). Theories of group behavior. New York, NY: Springer.
173. Mullen, B., & Hu, L-T. (1989). Perceptions of ingroup and outgroup variability: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 233-252.
174. Mullen, B., Johnson, C., & Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic investigation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 3-23.
175. Mummendey, A., & Otten, S. (1998). Positive-negative asymmetry in social discrimination. European Review of Social Psychology, 9, 107-143.
176. Nemeth, C. (1972). A critical analysis of research utilizing the Prisoner’s Dilemma paradigm for the study of bargaining. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 203-234). New York, NY: Academic Press.
177. Nemeth, C. J. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93, 23-32.
178. Newcomb, T. M. (1943). Personality and social change: Attitude formation in a student community. New York, NY: Dryden Press.
179. Newcomb, T. M., Koenig, K. E., Flacks, R., & Warwick, D. P. (1967). Persistence and change: Bennington College and its students after twenty-five years. New York, NY: Wiley.
180. Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2006). How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 186-213.
181. Noel, J. G., Wann, D. L., & Branscombe, N. R. (1995). Peripheral ingroup membership and public negativity toward outgroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 127-137.
182. Nye, J. L., & Brower, A. M. (Eds.). (1996). What’s social about social cognition? Research on socially shared cognition in small groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
183. Offner, A. K., Kramer, T. J., & Winter, J. P. (1996). The effects of facilitation, recording, and pauses on group brainstorming. Small Group Research, 27, 283-298.
184. Orbell, J. M., & Dawes, R. M. (1981). Social dilemmas. In G. Stephenson & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Progress in applied social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 37-66). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
185. Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied imagination. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
186. Oxley, N. L., Dzindolet, M. T., & Paulus, P. B. (1998). The effects of facilitators on the performance of brainstorming groups. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 633-646.
187. Palazzolo, E. T. (2005). Organizing for information retrieval in transactive memory systems. Communication Research, 32, 726-761.
188. Patnoe, S. (1988). A narrative history of experimental social psychology: The Lewin tradition. New York, NY: Springer.
189. Paulus, P. B., & Brown, V. R. (2003). Enhancing ideational creativity in groups: Lessons from research on brainstorming. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 110-136). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
190. Paulus, P. B., & Dzindolet, M. T. (1993). Social influence processes in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 575-586.
191. Paulus, P. B., & Yang, H-C. (2000). Idea generation in groups: A basis for creativity in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 76-87.
192. Peters, L. H., Hartke, D. D., & Pohlmann, J. T. (1983). Fiedler’s contingency theory of leadership: An application of the metaanalysis procedure of Schmidt and Hunter. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 274-285.
193. Postmes, T., & Jetten, J. (Eds.). (2006). Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
194. Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (1998). Deindividuation and anti-normative behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 238-259.
195. Prislin, R. (2010). Dynamics of change: Minority influence makes the world go around. In R. Martin & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Minority influence and innovation: Antecedents, processes, and consequences (pp. 285-312). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
196. Pruitt, D. G., & Carnevale, P. J. (1993). Negotiation in social conflict. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
197. Pruitt, D. G., & Kimmel, M. J. (1977). Twenty years of experimental gaming: Critique, synthesis, and suggestions for the future. Annual Review of Psychology, 28, 363-392.
198. Reicher, S. D. (1987). Crowd behavior as social action. In J. C. Turner et al. (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 171-202). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
199. Reicher, S. D., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 161-198.
200. Ross, L., Lepper, M., & Ward, A. (2010). History of social psychology: Insights, challenges, and contributions to theory and application. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 3-50). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
201. Rothbart, M., Fulero, S., Jensen, C., Howard, J., & Burrell, P. (1978). From individual to group impressions: Availability heuristics in stereotype formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 237-255.
202. Rubin, M., & Hewstone, M. (1998). Social identity theory’s selfesteem hypothesis: A review and some suggestions for clarification. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 40-62.
203. Samuelson, C. D., Messick, D. M., Rutte, C. G., & Wilke, H. (1984). Individual and structural solutions to resource dilemmas in two cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 94-104.
204. Sanna, L. J., & Parks, C. D. (1997). Group research trends in social and organizational psychology: Whatever happened to intragroup research? Psychological Science, 8, 261-267.
205. Schachter, S. (1951). Deviation, rejection, and communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 190-207.
206. Schiffmann, R., & Wicklund, R. A. (1992). The minimal group paradigm and its minimal psychology: On equating social identity with arbitrary group membership. Theory and Psychology, 2, 24-50.
207. Schopler, J., & Insko, C. A. (1992). The discontinuity effect in interpersonal and intergroup situations: Generality and mediation. European Review of Social Psychology, 3, 121-151.
208. Shaw, M. E. (1964). Communication networks. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 111-147). New York, NY: Academic Press.
209. Sherif, M. (1935). A study of some social factors in perception. Archives of Psychology, 27 (Whole No. 187).
210. Singer, E. (1981). Reference groups and social evaluations. In M. Rosenberg & R. H. Turner (Eds.), Social psychology: Sociological perspectives (pp. 66-93). New York, NY: Basic Books.
211. Stasser, G. (1999). The uncertain role of unshared information in collective choice. In L. L. Thompson, J. M. Levine, & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 49-69). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
212. Stasser, G., & Davis, J. (1981). Group decision making and social influence: A social interaction sequence model. Psychological Review, 88, 523-551.
213. Stasser, G., Kerr, N. L., & Davis, J. H. (1989). Influence processes and consensus models in decision-making groups. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 279-326). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
214. Stasser, G., & Stewart, D. (1992). Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 426-434.
215. Stasser, G., Stewart, D. D., & Wittenbaum, G. M. (1995). Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 244-265.
216. Steinel, W., De Dreu, C. K. W., Ouwehand, E., & Ramirez-Marin, J. Y. (2009). When the constituency speaks in multiple tongues: The relative persuasiveness of hawkish minorities in representative negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109, 67-78.
217. Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York, NY: Academic Press.
218. Steiner, I. D. (1974). Whatever happened to the group in social psychology? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 94-108.
219. Steiner, I. D. (1983). Whatever happened to the touted revival of the group? In H. Blumberg, A. Hare, V. Kent, & M. Davies (Eds.), Small groups and social interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 539-548). New York, NY: Wiley.
220. Steiner, I. D. (1986). Paradigms and groups. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 251-289). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
221. Stoner, J. A. F. (1961). A comparison of individual and group decisions involving risk. Unpublished master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, School of Industrial Management.
222. Strodtbeck, F. L., James, R. M., & Hawkins, C. (1957). Social status in jury deliberations. American Sociological Review, 22, 713-719.
223. Strodtbeck, F. L., & Mann, R. D. (1956). Sex role differentiation in jury deliberations. Sociometry, 19, 3-11.
224. Stroebe, W. (2010). Majority and minority influence and information processing: A theoretical and methodological analysis. In R. Martin & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Minority influence and innovation: Antecedents, processes, and consequences (pp. 201-225). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
225. Strube, M. (2005). What did Triplett really find? A contemporary analysis of the first experiment in social psychology. American Journal of Psychology, 118, 271-286.
226. Sutton, R. I., & Hargadon, A. (1996). Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 685-718.
227. Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178.
228. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
229. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York, NY: Wiley.
230. Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
231. Thompson, L. L., Mannix, E. A., & Bazerman, M. H. (1988). Group negotiation: Effects of decision rule, agenda, and aspiration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 86-95.
232. Thompson, L. L., Medvec, V. H., Seiden, V., & Kopelman, S. (2001). Poker face, smiley face, and rant ʼn rave: Myths and realities about emotion in negotiation. In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 139-163). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
233. Thompson, L. L., Peterson, E., & Brodt, S. E. (1996). Team negotiation: An examination of integrative and distributive bargaining. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 66-78.
234. Tindale, R. S., Meisenhelder, H. M., Dykema-Engblade, A. A., & Hogg, M. A. (2001). Shared cognition in small groups. In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 1-30). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
235. Triplett, N. (1898). The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. American Journal of Psychology, 9, 507-533.
236. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (Eds.). (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A selfcategorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
237. Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
238. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). New York, NY: Academic Press.
239. Van Beest, I., & Van Dijk, E. (2007). Self-interest and fairness in coalition formation: A social utility approach to understanding partner selection and payoffallocations in groups. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 132-174.
240. van Knippenberg, D. (2000). Work motivation and performance: A social identity perspective. Applied Psychology, 49, 357-371.
241. Van Vugt, M. (2006). Evolutionary origins of leadership and followership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 354-371.
242. Van Vugt, M., & Hart, C. M. (2004). Social identity as social glue: The origins of group loyalty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 585-598.
243. Van Vugt, M., Van Lange, P. A. M., & Meertens, R. M. (1996). Commuting by car or public transportation? A social dilemma analysis of travel mode judgments. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 373-395.
244. Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
245. Warriner, C. K. (1956). Groups are real: A reaffirmation. American Sociological Review, 21, 549-554.
246. Wegge, J., & Haslam, S. A. (2005). Improving work motivation and performance in brainstorming groups: The effects of three group goal-setting strategies. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14, 400-430.
247. Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185-208). New York, NY: Springer.
248. Weingart, L. R., Brett, J. M., Olekalns, M., & Smith, P. L. (2007). Conflicting social motives in negotiating groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 994-1010.
249. Whyte, W. F. (1943). Street corner society: The social structure of an Italian slum. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
250. Wilder, D. A. (1986). Social categorization: Implications for creation and reduction of intergroup bias. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 291-355). New York, NY: Academic Press.
251. Wilder, D. A. (1990). Some determinants of the persuasive power of in-groups and out-groups: Organization of information and attributions of independence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1202-1213.
252. Wildschut, T., & Insko, C. A. (2007). Explanations of interindividual-intergroup discontinuity: A review of the evidence. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 175-211.
253. Wildschut, T., Pinter, B., Vevea, J. L., Insko, C. A., & Schopler, J. (2003). Beyond the group mind: A quantitative review of the interindividual-intergroup discontinuity effect. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 698-722.
254. Williams, K. D., & Karau, S. L. (1991). Social loafing and social compensation: The effects of expectations of coworker performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 570-581.
255. Williams, K. D., & Karau, S. L. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681-706.
256. Wittenbaum, G. M., & Moreland, R. L. (2008). Small-group research in social psychology: Topics and trends over time. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 187-203.
257. Wittenbaum, G. M., Vaughan, S. I., & Stasser, G. (1998). Coordination in task-performing groups. In R. S. Tindale et al. (Eds.), Theory and research on small groups (pp. 177-204). New York, NY: Plenum.
258. Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J. A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 323-345.
259. Worchel, S., Rothberger, H., Day, E. A., Hart, D., & Butemeyer, J. (1998). Social identity and productivity within groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 389-413.
260. Yamagishi, T. (1986). The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 110-116.
261. Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269-274.
262. Zander, A. (1979). The study of group behavior during four decades. Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences, 15, 272-282.