Team Negotiation: An Examination of Integrative and Distributive Bargaining

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 66-78

  Thompson, Leigh ^a,c   Peterson, Erika ^a   Brodt, Susan E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030536405     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.66     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Asch, S. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 19, 31-35.
2. Bazerman, M., Mannix, E., & Thompson, L. (1988). Groups as mixed-motive negotiations. In E. J. Lawler & B. Markovsky (Eds.), Advances in group processes: Theory and research (pp. 195-216). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
3. Bazerman, M., & Neale, M. (1992). Negotiating rationally. New York: Free Press.
4. Bazerman, M. H., & Neale, M. A. (1983). Heuristics in negotiation: Limitations to effective dispute resolution. In M. H. Bazerman & R. J. Lewicki (Eds.), Negotiating in Organizations (pp. 51-67). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5. Burnstein, E., & Vinokur, A. (1975). What a person thinks upon learning that he has chosen differently from others. Nice evidence for the persuasive-arguments explanations of choice shifts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 412-426.
6. Campbell, J. D., & Fairey, P. J. (1989). Informational and normative routes to conformity: The effect of faction size as a function of norm extremity and attention to the stimulus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 457-468.
7. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influence upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.
8. Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271-282.
9. Fleming, J. & Darley, J. (1991). Mixed messages: The multiple audience problem and strategic communication. Social Cognition, 9, 25-46.
10. Follett, M. P. (1942). Constructive conflict. In H. C. Metcalf & L. Urwick (Eds.), Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett (pp. 30-49). New York: Harper.
11. Froman, L. A., & Cohen, M. D. (1970). Compromise and logroll: Comparing the efficiency of two bargaining processes. Behavioral Science, 30, 180-183.
12. Fry, W. R., Firestone, I., & Williams, D. (1983). Negotiation process and outcome of stranger dyads and dating couples: Do lovers lose? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 4, 1-16.
13. Hastie, R. (1986). Experimental evidence on group accuracy. In B. Grofman & G. Owen (Eds.), Decision research (pp. 129-157). Greenwich, CT: JAI press.
14. Hill, G. W. (1982). Group versus individual performance: Are N+1 heads better than one? Psychological Bulletin, 91, 517-539.
15. Hogg, M. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity. New York: New York University Press.
16. Huber, V., & Neale, M. (1986). Effects of cognitive heuristics and goals on negotiator performance and subsequent goal setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 40, 342-365.
17. Insko, C., & Schopler, J. (1987). Categorization, competition, and collectivity. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 8; 213-251).
18. Latane, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36, 343-356.
19. Mannix, E., Thompson, L., & Bazerman, M. (1989). Negotiation in small groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 508-517.
20. McGrath, J. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
21. Michaelson, L. K., Watson, W. E., & Black, R. H. (1989). A realistic test of individual versus group consensus decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 834-839.
22. Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210-227.
23. Mullen, B., Johnson, C, & Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 3-24.
24. Neale, M. A., & Bazerman, M. H. (1991). Cognition and rationality in negotiation. New York: Free Press.
25. Neale, M. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Earley, P. C. (1990). The joint effects of goal setting and expertise on negotiator performance. Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University.
26. Paulus, P. B., Dzindolet, M. T., Poletes, G., & Camacho, L. M. (1993). Perception of performance in group brainstorming: The illusion of group productivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 78-89.
27. Pruitt, D., & Lewis, S. A. (1975). Development of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 621-630.
28. Pruitt, D., & Rubin, J. (1986). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. New York: Random House.
29. Raiffa, H. (1982). The art and science of negotiation. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
30. Sheppard, J. A. (1993). Productivity loss in performance groups: A motivation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 67-81.
31. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467-1478.
32. Stasson, M., Bradshaw, S., Alexander-Forti, D., & Lakey, W. (1993). The effectiveness of group and individual idea generation and idea selection. Paper presented at the Society for Judgment and Decision Making, Washington, DC.
33. Steiner, I. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
34. Thompson, L. (1991). Information exchange in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 161-179.
35. Thompson, L., & DeHarpport, T. (1993). Personal relationships, schemas, and task expectancies in negotiations. Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University.
36. Thompson, L., & Hastie, R. (1990). Social perception in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 98-123.
37. Thompson, L., Peterson, E., & Kray, L. (1995). Social context in negotiations: An information-processing perspective. In R. Kramer & D. Messick (Eds.), Negotiations as a social process (pp. 5-36). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
38. Walton, R. E., & McKersie, R. B. (1965). A behavioral theory of labor relations. New York: McGraw-Hill.