Group Performance in Collaborative and Social Dilemma Tasks: Progress and Prospects

Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 107-138

  Kerr, Norbert L ^a   Park, Ernest S ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Group performance; Productivity; Social facilitation; Work groups

Indexed keywords

EID: 84954097137     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470998458.ch5     Document Type: Chapter

References (183)

1. Aiello, J. R., & Kolb, K. J. (1995). Electronic performance monitoring and social context: Impact on productivity and stress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 339-353.
2. Aiello, J. R., & Svec, C. M. (1993). Computer monitoring of work performance: Extending the social facilitation framework to electronic presence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23,537-548.
3. Allison, S. T., & Kerr, N. L. (1994). Group correspondence biases and the provision of public goods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 688-698.
4. Au, W., Chen, X., & Komorita, S. S. (1998). A probabilistic model of criticality in a sequential public good dilemma. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75, 274-293.
5. Axelrod, R. (1984). Evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
6. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7. Baron, J. (1996). Do no harm. In D. Messick (Ed.), Codes of conduct: Behavioral research into business ethics (pp. 197-213). New York: Sage.
8. Baron, R. S. (1986). Distraction-conflict theory: Progress and problems. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 1-40). New York: Academic Press.
9. Baron, R. S., Kerr, N. L., & Miller, N. (1992). Group process, group decision, group action. Bristol,PA: Open University Press.
10. Batson, C. D., Ahmad, N., Yin, J., Bedell, S. J., Johnson, J. W., Templin, C. M., & Whiteside,A. (1999). Two threats to the common good: Self-interested egoism and empathy and empathy-induced altruism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 3-16.
11. Batson, C. D., Batson, J. G., Todd, R. M., & Brummett, B. H. (1995). Empathy and the collec-tive good: Caring for one of the others in a social dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 619-631.
12. Bell, P. A., Petersen, T. R., & Hautaluoma, J. E. (1989). The effect of punishment probability on overconsumption and stealing in a simulated commons. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 1483-1495.
13. Blount-White, S. (1994). Testing an economic approach to resource dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 428-456.
14. Bond, C. F., Jr. (1982). Social facilitation: A self-presentational view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1042-1050.
15. Boone, R. T., & Macy, M. W. (1999). Unlocking the doors of the Prisoner's Dilemma: Depen-dence, selectivity, and cooperation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62, 32-52.
16. Boster, F. J., & Butler, E. J. (1999). A review of the effectiveness of electronic brainstorming groups.Unpublished manuscript, Department of Communication, Michigan State University.
17. Bouas, K. S., & Komorita, S. S. (1996). Group discussion and cooperation in social dilemmas.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1144-1150.
18. Brewer, M. B., & Kramer, R. M. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 543-549.
19. Budescu, D. V., Rapoport, A., & Suleiman, R. (1992). Simultaneous vs. sequential requests in resource dilemmas with incomplete information. Acta Psychologica, 80, 297-310.
20. Budescu, D. V., Rapoport, A., & Suleiman, R. (1995). Common pools dilemmas under uncer-tainty: Qualitative tests of equilibrium solutions. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 171-201.
21. Camacho, L. M., & Paulus, P. B. (1995). The role of social anxiousness in group brainstorming.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1071-1080.
22. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
23. Chen, X. (1996). The group based binding pledge as a solution to public goods problems. Orga-nizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66, 192-202.
24. Chen, X., Au, T., & Komorita, S. S. (1996). Sequential choice in a step-level public goods dilemma:The effects of criticality and uncertainty. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 37-47.
25. Chen, X., & Komorita, S. S. (1994). The effects of communication and commitment in a public goods social dilemma. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60, 367-386.
26. Connolly, T., Routhieaux, R. L., & Schneider, S. K. (1993). On the effectiveness of group brain-storming: Test of one underlying cognitive mechanism. Small Group Research, 24, 490-503.
27. Cottrell, N. B. (1972). Social facilitation. In C. G. McClintock (Ed.), Experimental social psychol-ogy (pp. 185-236). New York: Holt.
28. Davis, J. H., & Kerr, N. L. (1986). Thought experiments and the problem of sparse data in small-group performance research. In P. Goodman (Ed.), Designing effective work groups. New York:Jossey-Bass.
29. Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169-193.
30. Dawes, R. M., McTavish, J., & Shaklee, H. (1977). Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 1-11.
31. de Dreu, C. K., & McCusker, C. (1997). Gain loss frames and cooperation in two person social dilemmas: A transformational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1093-1106.
32. de Heus, P. (in press). Do reciprocal strategies work in social dilemmas? Comment on Parks and Komorita (1997). Personality and Social Psychology Review.
33. Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S. (1993). Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one.Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 531-537.
34. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497-509.
35. Eek, D. (1999). Distributive justice and cooperation in real-life social dilemmas. Doctoral disserta-tion, University of Goteborg, Sweden.
36. Foddy, M., Smithson, M., Schneider, S., & Hogg, M. (1999). Resolving social dilemmas: Dynamic,structural, and intergroup aspects. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.
37. Gallupe, R. B., Cooper, W. H., Grise, M. L., & Bastianutti, L. M. (1994). Blocking electronic brainstorms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 77-86.
38. Guerin, B. (1993). Social facilitation. Paris, France: Cambridge Press.
39. Gärling, T, Gustafsson, M., & Biel, A. (1999). Managing uncertain common resources. In M.Foddy, M. Smithson, M. Hogg, & S. Schneider (Eds.), Resolving social dilemmas. Philadelphia,PA: Psychology Press.
40. Gustafsson, M. (1999). The role of asymmetric information in sequential resource dilemmas with unknown resource size. Paper delivered at the 8th International Conference on Social Dilemmas. Zichron Yaacov, Israel; July 12-16, 1999.
41. Gustafsson, M., Biel, A., & Gärling, T. (in press). Overharvesting of resources of unknown size.Acta Psychologica.
42. Harkins, S. G., & Petty, R. E. (1982). Effects of task difficulty and task uniqueness on social loa?ng. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1213-1229.
43. Hayashi, N., & Yamagishi, T. (1999). Selective play: Choosing partners in an uncertain world.Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 276-289.
44. Hertel, G. (1999). Mood effects in social dilemmas: What we know so far. In M. Foddy, M. Smith-son, S. Schneider, & M. Hogg (Eds.), Resolving social dilemmas. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
45. Hertel, G., Kerr, N. L., & Messé, L. A. (1999). Motivation gains in task groups: Paradigmatic and theoretical developments on the Köhler effect. Unpublished manuscript under editorial review,Michigan State University.
46. Hertel, G., Neuhof, J., Theuer, T., & Kerr. N. L. (in press). Mood effects on cooperation in small groups: Does positive mood simply lead to more cooperation? Motivation and Emotion.
47. Hessing, D. J. (1992). The social dilemma of organ donation: Opting in or opting out - is that the question? In J. Shanteau & R. J. Harris (Eds.), Organ donation and transplantation: Psychological and behavioral factors (pp. 71-82). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
48. Hine, D. W., & Gifford, R. (1996). Individual restraint and group ef?cacy in commons dilem-mas: The effects of two types of environmental uncertainty. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,26, 993-1009.
49. Hayashi, N., & Yamagishi, T. (1998). Selective play: Choosing partners in an uncertain world.Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 276-289.
50. Ingham, A. G., Levinger, G., Graves, J., & Peckham, V. (1974). The Ringelmann effect: Studies of group size and group performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 371-384.
51. Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loading: A meta-analytic review and theoretical inte-gration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681-706.
52. Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1997). The effects of group cohesiveness on social loading and social compensation. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 156-168.
53. Kaufman, C. M., & Kerr, N. L. (1993). Small wins: Perceptual focus, efficacy, and cooperation in stage conjunctive social dilemma. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 3-20.
54. Kerr, N. L. (1983). Motivation losses in small groups: A social dilemma analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 819-828.
55. Kerr, N. L. (1989). Illusions of efficacy: The effects of group size on perceived efficacy in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 287-313.
56. Kerr, N. L. (1990). Applied perspectives on social and temporal dilemmas: An introduction. Social Behaviour, 5, 201-206.
57. Kerr, N. L. (1992). Efficacy as a causal and moderating variable in social dilemmas. In W. Liebrand,D. Messick, & H. Wilke (Eds.), A social psychological approach to social dilemmas. New York:Pergamon.
58. Kerr, N. L. (1996). "Does my contribution really matter" Efficacy in social dilemmas. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 7). Chichester, UK:Wiley.
59. Kerr, N. L. (1999a). Social exclusion and control in social dilemmas. Paper delivered at the 8th International Conference on Social Dilemmas. Zichron Yaacov, Israel, July 12-16.
60. Kerr, N. L. (1999b). Annonymity and social control in social dilemmas. In M. Foddy, M. Smith-son, S. Schneider, & M. Hogg (Eds.), Resolving social dilemmas. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
61. Kerr, N. L., Garst, J., Lewandowski, D. A., & Harris, S. E. (1997). That still, small voice: Com-mitment to cooperate as an internalized versus a social norm. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1300-1311.
62. Kerr, N. L., & Harris, S. (1996). Why do "cooperators" cooperate? Efficacy as a moderating vari-able in social dilemmas. In W. Liebrand & D. Messick (Eds.), Frontiers in social dilemma research.New York: Springer-Verlag.
63. Kerr, N. L., & Kaufman-Gilliland, C. M. (1994). Communication, commitment, and coopera-tion in social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 349-363.
64. Kerr, N. L., & Kaufman-Gilliland, C. M. (1997). ". . . and besides, I probably couldn't have made a difference anyway": Justification of social dilemma defection via perceived self-inefflcacy.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 211-230.
65. Kiesler, S., Sproull, L., & Waters, K. (1996). A prisoner's dilemma experiment on cooperation with people and human-like computers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 47-65.
66. Knapp, A., & Clark, M. (1991). Some detrimental effects of negative mood on individuals' ability to solve resource dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 678-688.
67. Köhler, O. (1926). Kraftleistungen bei Einzel- und Gruppenabeit [Physical performance in indi-vidual and group situations]. Industrielle Psychotechnik, 3, 274-282.
68. Köhler, O. (1927). über den Gruppenwirkungsgrad der menschlichen Körperarbeit und die Bedin-gung optimaler Kollektivkraftreaktion [On group efficiency of physical labor and the conditions of optimal collective performance]. Industrielle Psychotechnik, 4, 209-226.
69. Komorita, S. S., Chan, D. K., & Parks, C. D. (1993). The effects of reward structure and reci-procity in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 29, 252-267.
70. Komorita, S. S., Hilty, J. A., & Parks, C. D. (1991). Reciprocity and cooperation in social dilem-mas. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35, 494-518.
71. Komorita, S. S., & Parks, C. D. (1994). Social dilemmas. Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark.
72. Komorita, S. S., & Parks, C. D. (1995). Interpersonal relations: Mixed-motive interaction. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 183-207.
73. Komorita, S. S., & Parks, C. D. (1999). Reciprocity and cooperation in social dilemmas: Review and future directions. In D. V. Budescu et al. (Eds.), Games and human behavior: Essays in honor of Amnon Rapoport (pp. 315-330). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
74. Komorita, S. S., Parks, C. D., & Hulbert, L. G. (1992). Reciprocity and the induction of co-operation in social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 607-617.
75. Kramer, M. W., Kuo, C. L., & Dailey, J. C. (1997). The impact of brainstorming techniques on subsequent group processes: Beyond generating ideas. Small Group Research, 28, 218-242.
76. Kravitz, D. A., & Martin, B. (1986). Ringelmann rediscovered: The original article. Journal of Per-sonality and Social Psychology, 50, 936-941.
77. Kuhlman, D. M., & Marshello, A. (1975). Individual differences in game motivation as modera-tors of preprogrammed strategic effects in prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 992-931.
78. Larrick, R. P., & Blount, S. (1997). The claiming effect: Why players are more generous in social dilemmas than in ultimatum games. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 810-825.
79. Laughlin, P. R. (1996). Group decision making and collective induction. In E. Witte & J. H. Davis(Eds.), Understanding group behavior: Consensual action by small groups (Vol. 1., pp. 61-80).Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
80. Laughlin, P. R., Bonner, B. L., & Altermatt, T. W. (1998). Collective versus individual induction with single versus multiple hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1481-1489.
81. Laughlin, P. R., & Ellis, A. L. (1986). Demonstrability and social combination processes on math-ematical intellective tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 17-189.
82. Laughlin, P. R., VanderStoep, S. W., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1991). Collective versus individual induction: Recognition of truth, rejection of error, and collective information processing.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 50-67.
83. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585-634.
84. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1998). Small groups. In D. Gilbert, G. Lindzey, & S. Fiske(Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th Ed., pp. 415-469). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
85. Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created "social climates." Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271-299.
86. Liebrand, W. B. G., Jansen, R., Rijken, V., & Suhre, C. (1986). Might over morality: The inter-action between social values and the interpretation of decision-making in experimental games.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 203-215.
87. Liebrand, W. B. G., & Messick, D. M. (1996). Frontiers in social dilemma research. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
88. Liebrand, W. B. G., Messick, D. M., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1992). Social dilemmas: Theoretical issuesand research findings. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
89. Liebrand, W. B. G., & van Run, G. J. (1985). The effect of social motives across two cultures on behavior in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 86-102.
90. Manstead, A. S. R., & Semin, G. R. (1980). Social facilitation effects: Mere enhancement of dominant responses? British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 119-136.
91. McGrath, J. E., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1994). Groups interacting with technology. Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage.
92. Messick, D. M. (1999). Opening remarks. Presentation to the 8th International Conference on Social Dilemmas, Zichron Yaakov, Israel, July 12, 1999.
93. Messick, D. M., & Brewer, M. B. (1993). Solving social dilemmas: A review. Review of Personal-ity and Social Psychology, 4, 11-44.
94. Messick, D. M., & Liebrand, W. B. G. (1995). Individual heuristics and the dynamics of co-operation in large groups. Psychological Review, 102, 131-145.
95. Messick, D. M., & Liebrand, W. B. G. (1997). Levels of analysis and the explanation of the costs and benefits of cooperation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 129-139.
96. Messick, D. M., & McClelland, C. L. (1983). Social traps and temporal traps. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 105-110.
97. Messick, D. M., & McClintock, C. G. (1968). Motivational basis of choice in experimental games.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1-25.
98. Mullen, B., Johnson, C., & Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 3-23.
99. Nijstad, B. A., Stroebe, W., & Lodewijkx, H. F. M. (1999). Persistence of brainstorming groups: How do people know when to stop? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35,165-185.
100. Novak, A., Szamrej, J., & Latané, B. (1990). From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. Psychological Review, 97, 362-376.
101. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.
102. Orbell, J. M., & Dawes, R. M. (1981). Social dilemmas. In G. Stephenson & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Progress in applied social psychology (Vol. 1). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
103. Orbell, J. M., & Dawes, R. M. (1993). Social welfare, cooperators' advantage, and the option of not playing the game. American Sociological Review, 58, 787-800.
104. Orbell, J., & Dawes, R., & van de Kragt, A. (1988). Explaining discussion induced cooperation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 811-819.
105. Osborne, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
106. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
107. Oxley, N. L., Dzindolet, M. T., & Paulus, P. B. (1996). The effects of facilitators on the perfor-mance of brainstorming groups. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 633-646.
108. Parks, C. D. (1994). The predictive ability of social values in resource dilemmas and public goods games. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 431-438.
109. Parks, C. D., & Hulbert, L. G. (1995). High and low trusters' responses to fear in a payoff matrix.Journal of Conflict Resolution, 39, 718-730.
110. Parks, C. D., & Komorita, S. S. (1997). Reciprocal strategies for large groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 314-322.
111. Parks, C. D., Menager, R. F., & Scamahorn, S. D. (1996). Trust and reactions to messages of intent in social dilemmas. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 40, 134-151.
112. Parks, C. D., & Sanna, L. J. (1999). Group performance and interaction. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
113. Parks, C. D., & Vu, A. D. (1994). Social dilemma behavior of individuals from highly individu-alist and collectivist cultures. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 38, 708-718.
114. Parnes, S. J., & Meadows, A. (1959). Effects of "brainstorming" instructions on creative problem solving by trained and untrained subjects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 171-176.
115. Patchen, M. (1987). Strategies for eliciting cooperation from an adversary: Laboratory and inter-nation findings. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31, 164-185.
116. Paulus, P. B. (1998). Developing consensus about groupthink after all these years. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73, 362-374.
117. Paulus, P. B., & Dzindolet, M. T. (1993). Social in?uence processes in group brainstorming.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 575-586.
118. Paulus, P. B., Dzindolet, M. T., Poletes, G., & Camacho, L. M. (1993). Perception of performance in group brainstorming: The illusion of group productivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 78-89.
119. Probst, T., Carnevale, P. J., & Triandis, H. C. (1999). Cultural values in intergroup and single-group social dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77, 171-191.
120. Pruitt, D. G., & Kimmel, M. J. (1977). Twenty years of experimental gaming: Critique, synthe-sis, and suggestions for the future. Annual Review of Psychology, 28, 363-392.
121. Rapoport, A. (1988). Provision of step-level public goods: Effects of inequality in resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 432-440.
122. Rapoport, A., Bornstein, G., & Erev, I. (1989). Intergroup competition for public goods: Effects of unequal resources and relative group size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 748-756.
123. Ringelman, M. (1913). Research on animate sources of power: The work of man. Annales de l'Institut National Agronomique, 2e serietome, XII, 1-40.
124. Rocco, E., & Warglein, M. (1995). Computer-assisted communication and the emergence of electronic opportunism. Sistemi-Intelligenti, 7, 393-420.
125. Roch, S. G., & Samuelson, C. D. (1997). Effects of environmental uncertainty and social value orientation in resource dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 221-235.
126. Ruess, M. (1992). Auddauerleistung in Dyaden: Eine Untersuchung zum Köhler-Effekt [Persistence in dyads: A study of the Köhler effect]. Unpublished diploma thesis. University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
127. Rutte, C. G., & Wilke, H. A. (1985). Preference for decision structures in a social dilemma situa-tion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 367-370.
128. Sally, D. (1995). Conversation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis. Rationality and Society, 7, 58-92.
129. Samuelson, C. D., & Messick, D. M. (1995a). Let's make some new rules: Social factors that make freedom unattractive. In R. Kramer & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Negotiation as a social process: New trends in theory and research (pp. 48-68). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
130. Samuelson, C. D., & Messick, D. M. (1995b). When do people want to change the rules for allocating shared resources? In D. Schroeder (Ed.), Social dilemmas: Perspectives on individuals and groups (pp. 143-162). Westport, CT: Praeger.
131. Sattler, D., & Kerr, N. L. (1991). Might vs. morality explored: Motivational and cognitive bases for social motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 756-765.
132. Schroeder, D. A. (1995). Social dilemmas: Perspectives on individuals and groups (pp. 143-162). Westport, CT: Praeger.
133. Schwartz-Shea, P., & Simmons, R. T. (1995). Social dilemmas and perceptions: Experiments on framing and inconsequentiality. In D. Schroeder (Ed.), Social dilemmas: Perspectives on individ-uals and groups (pp. 143-162). Westport, CT: Praeger.
134. Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1996). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In E. T. Higgins and A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: A handbook of basic principles. New York: Guilford Press.
135. Sell, J., Griffith, W. I., & Wilson, R. K. (1993). Are women more cooperative than men in social dilemmas? Social Psychology Quarterly, 56, 211-222.
136. Sell, J., & Son, Y. (1997). Comparing public goods with common pool resources: Three experi-ments. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 118-137.
137. Shaw, M. E. (1932). Comparison of individuals and small groups in the rational solution of complex problems. American Journal of Psychology, 44, 491-504.
138. Shepperd, J. A., (1993). Productive loss in performance groups: A motivational analysis. Psycho-logical Bulletin, 113, 67-81.
139. Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper and Row.
140. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
141. Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
142. Steiner, I. D. (1974). Whatever happened to the group in social psychology? Journal of Experi-mental Social Psychology, 10, 94-108.
143. Steiner, I. D. (1986). Paradigms and groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 251-289.
144. Stroebe, W., Diehl, M., & Abakoumkin, G. (1992). The illusion of group effectivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 643-650.
145. Stroebe, W., Diehl, M., & Abakoumkin, G. (1996). Social compensation and the Köhler effect:Toward a theoretical explanation of motivation gains in group productivity. In E. Witte & J. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior: Small group processes and interpersonal relations(Vol. 2, pp. 37-65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
146. Stroebe, W., Diehl, M., Abakoumkin, G., & Arnscheid, R. (1990). The Köhler effect: Motivation gains in group performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Experimental
147. Suleiman, R., & Budescu, D. V. (1999). Common pool resource (CPR) dilemma with incom-plete information. In D. V. Budescu & I. Erev (Eds.), Games and human behavior: Essays in honor of Amnon Rapoport (pp. 387-410). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
148. Swanson, D., Messé, L. A., & Kerr, N. L. (2000). Social stigma and social compensation. Unpub-lished manuscript, Michigan State University.
149. Takagi, E. (1999). Solving social dilemmas is easy in a communal society: A computer simulation analysis. In M. Foddy, M. Smithson, S. Schneider, & M. Hogg (Eds.), Resolving social dilem-mas (pp. 33-54). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
150. Tenbrunsel, A. E., Wade-Benzoni, K. A., Messick, D. M., & Bazerman, M. H. (1997). The dys-functional aspects of environmental standards. In M. H. Bazerman & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Environment, ethics, and behavior: The psychology of environmental valuation and degradation (pp. 105-121). San Francisco, CA: The New Lexington Press/Jossey-Bass.
151. Triplett, N. (1898). The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. Journal of Psychology, 9, 507-533.
152. Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
153. Tyler, T. R., & Degoey, P. (1995). Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social identification effects on support for authorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 482-497.
154. Valacich, J. S., Dennis, A. R., & Connolly, T. (1994). Idea generation in computer-based groups:A new ending to an old story. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 448-467.
155. van de Kragt, A., Orbell, J., & Dawes. R. (1983). The minimal contributing set as a solution to public goods problems. American Political Science Review, 77, 112-122.
156. van Dijk, E., & Wilke, H. (1997). Is it mine or is it ours? Framing property rights and decision making in social dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71, 195-209.
157. van Dijk, E., & Wilke, H. (1995). Coordination rules in asymmetric social dilemmas: A com-parison between public good dilemmas and resource dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 1-27.
158. van Dijk, E., Wilke, H., Wilke, M., & Metman, L. (1999). What information do we use in social dilemmas? Environmental uncertainty and the employment of coordination rules. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 109-135.
159. van Lange, P. A. M., & Kuhlman, D. M. (1994). Social value orientations and impressions of partner's honesty and intelligence: A test of the might versus morality effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 126-141.
160. van Lange, P. A. M., Liebrand, W. B. G., Messick, D. M., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1992). Introduc-tion and literature review. In W. Liebrand, D. Messick, & H. Wilke (Eds.), Social dilemmas:Theoretical issues and research findings. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
161. van Lange, P. A. M., & Semin-Goossens, A. (1998). The boundaries of reciprocal cooperation.European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 847-854.
162. van Lange, P. A. M., van Vugt, M., & Meertens, R. M. (1998). A social dilemma analysis of commuting preferences: The roles of social value orientation and trust. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 796-820.
163. van Lange, P. A. M., van Vugt, M., Meertens, R. M., & Ruiter, R. A. C. (1998). A social dilemma analysis of commuting preferences: The roles of social value orientation and trust. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 796-820.
164. van Vugt, M. (1997). Concerns about the privatization of public goods: A social dilemma analy-sis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 355-367.
165. van Vugt, M. (1999). Solving natural resource dilemmas through structural change: The social psychology of metering water use. In M. Foddy, M. Smithson, S. Schneider, & M. Hogg (Eds.),Resolving social dilemmas. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
166. van Vugt, M., & De Cremer, D. (1999). Leadership in social dilemmas: The effects of group identification on collective actions to provide public goods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 587-599.
167. van Vugt, M., Meertens, R. M., & van Lange, P. A. M. (1995). Car versus public transportation? The role of social value orientation in a real-life social dilemma. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 258-278.
168. van Vugt, M., van Lange, P. A. M., & Meertens, R. M. (1996). Commuting by car or public trans-portation? A social dilemma analysis of travel mode judgments. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 373-395.
169. van Vugt, M., van Lange, P. A. M., Meertens, R. M., & Joireman, J. A. (1996). How a structural solution to a real-world social dilemma failed: A field experiment on the first carpool lane in Europe. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 364-374.
170. van Vugt, M., Snyder, M., Tyler, T., & Biel, A. (in press). Co-operation in modern society: Promot-ing the welfare of communities, states and organizations. London: Routledge.
171. Watanabe, Y., & Yamagishi, T. (1999). Emergence of strategies in a selective play environment with geographic mobility: A computer simulation. In M. Foddy, M. Smithson, S. Schneider, & M. Hogg (Eds.), Resolving social dilemmas. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
172. Webb, A., & Wheeler, S. II. (1998). A social dilemma perspective on cooperative behavior in orga-nizations: The effect of scarcity, communication, and unequal access on the use of a shared resource. Group and Organization Management, 23, 509-524.
173. Williams, K. D., Harkins, S., & Latané, B. (1981). Identiliability as a deterrent to social loafing: Two cheering experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 303-311.
174. Williams, K. D., & Karau, S. J. (1991). Social loafing and social compensation: The effects of expectations of co-worker performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 570-581.
175. Wilke, H., Messick, D., & Rutte, C. (1986), Experimental social dilemmas. Frankfurt am Main: P. Lang.
176. Wit, A., & Wilke, H. (1998). Public good provision under environmental social uncertainty. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 249-256.
177. Witte, E. H. (1989). Koehler rediscovered: The anti-Ringelmann effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 147-154.
178. Yamagishi, T. (1986). The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. Journal of Person-ality and Social Psychology, 51, 110-116.
179. Yamagishi, T., & Cook, K. S. (1993). Generalized exchange and social dilemmas. Social Psychol-ogy Quarterly, 56, 235-248.
180. Yamagishi, T., Cook, K. S., & Watabe, M. (1998). Uncertainty, trust, and commitment formation in the United States and Japan. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 165-194.
181. Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan.Motivation and Emotion, 18, 129-166.
182. Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269-274.
183. Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Compresence. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group in?uence (pp. 35-60).Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.