New Insights into Mechanisms of Stem Cell Daughter Fate Determination in Regenerative Tissues

International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology

Volumn 300, Issue , 2013, Pages 1-50

  Sada, Aiko ^a   Tumbar, Tudorita ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

Asymmetric division; Cell niche; Neutral drift; Slow cycling; Stochastic fate determination; Symmetric division; Tissue stem cells

Indexed keywords

JANUS KINASE; NOTCH RECEPTOR; STAT PROTEIN; WNT PROTEIN;

APOPTOSIS; ARTICLE; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL DIVISION; CELL FUNCTION; CELL LOSS; CELL PROLIFERATION; DAUGHTER CELL; DROSOPHILA; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; GENE EXPRESSION; HAIR FOLLICLE; HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL; HOMEOSTASIS; HUMAN; INTESTINE CELL; MUSCLE CELL; NEURAL STEM CELL; NEUROBLAST; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKIN CELL; SPERMATOGONIUM; STEM CELL; STOCHASTIC MODEL; TISSUE REGENERATION;

EID: 84871684612     PISSN: 19376448     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-405210-9.00001-1     Document Type: Chapter

References (215)

1. Ahmed S. The culture of neural stem cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 2009, 106:1-6.
2. Altman J., Das G.D. Autoradiographic and histological evidence of postnatal hippocampal neurogenesis in rats. J. Comp. Neurol. 1965, 124:319-335.
3. Ambler C.A., Maatta A. Epidermal stem cells: location, potential and contribution to cancer. J. Pathol. 2009, 217:206-216.
4. Bardin A.J., et al. Asymmetric localization and function of cell-fate determinants: a fly's view. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2004, 14:6-14.
5. Barker N., et al. Identification of stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene Lgr5. Nature 2007, 449:1003-1007.
6. Barker N., et al. The intestinal stem cell. Genes Dev. 2008, 22:1856-1864.
7. Barrandon Y., Green H. Three clonal types of keratinocyte with different capacities for multiplication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1987, 84:2302-2306.
8. Barroca V., et al. Mouse differentiating spermatogonia can generate germinal stem cells in vivo. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11:190-196.
9. Baye L.M., Link B.A. Interkinetic nuclear migration and the selection of neurogenic cell divisions during vertebrate retinogenesis. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:10143-10152.
10. Baye L.M., Link B.A. Nuclear migration during retinal development. Brain Res. 2008, 1192:29-36.
11. Betschinger J., Knoblich J.A. Dare to be different: asymmetric cell division in Drosophila, C. elegans and vertebrates. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14:R674-R685.
12. Bianco P., et al. Osteoprogenitors and the hematopoietic microenvironment. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Haematol. 2011, 24:37-47.
13. Bickenbach J.R. Identification and behavior of label-retaining cells in oral mucosa and skin. J. Dent. Res. 1981, 60 Spec No C:1611-1620.
14. Blanpain C., Fuchs E. Epidermal stem cells of the skin. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2006, 22:339-373.
15. Blanpain C., Fuchs E. Epidermal homeostasis: a balancing act of stem cells in the skin. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10:207-217.
16. Bonaguidi M.A., et al. In vivo clonal analysis reveals self-renewing and multipotent adult neural stem cell characteristics. Cell 2011, 145:1142-1155.
17. Brawley C., Matunis E. Regeneration of male germline stem cells by spermatogonial dedifferentiation in vivo. Science 2004, 304:1331-1334.
18. Brownell I., et al. Nerve-derived sonic hedgehog defines a niche for hair follicle stem cells capable of becoming epidermal stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2011, 8:552-565.
19. Bryder D., et al. Hematopoietic stem cells: the paradigmatic tissue-specific stem cell. Am. J. Pathol. 2006, 169:338-346.
20. Buckingham M., Montarras D. Skeletal muscle stem cells. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2008, 18:330-336.
21. Cairns J. Mutation selection and the natural history of cancer. Nature 1975, 255:197-200.
22. Calegari F., et al. Selective lengthening of the cell cycle in the neurogenic subpopulation of neural progenitor cells during mouse brain development. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25:6533-6538.
23. Calegari F., Huttner W.B. An inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinases that lengthens, but does not arrest, neuroepithelial cell cycle induces premature neurogenesis. J. Cell Sci. 2003, 116:4947-4955.
24. Chang H.H., et al. Transcriptome-wide noise controls lineage choice in mammalian progenitor cells. Nature 2008, 453:544-547.
25. Chia W., et al. Drosophila neuroblast asymmetric divisions: cell cycle regulators, asymmetric protein localization, and tumorigenesis. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 180:267-272.
26. Cinquin O., et al. Progression from a stem cell-like state to early differentiation in the C. elegans germ line. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107:2048-2053.
27. Claudinot S., et al. Long-term renewal of hair follicles from clonogenic multipotent stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102:14677-14682.
28. Clayton E., et al. A single type of progenitor cell maintains normal epidermis. Nature 2007, 446:185-189.
29. Cohen A.R., et al. Computational prediction of neural progenitor cell fates. Nat. Methods 2010, 7:213-218.
30. Conboy M.J., et al. High incidence of non-random template strand segregation and asymmetric fate determination in dividing stem cells and their progeny. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5:e102.
31. Cotsarelis G. Epithelial stem cells: a folliculocentric view. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2006, 126:1459-1468.
32. Cotsarelis G., et al. Label-retaining cells reside in the bulge area of pilosebaceous unit: implications for follicular stem cells, hair cycle, and skin carcinogenesis. Cell 1990, 61:1329-1337.
33. Crittenden S.L., et al. Cellular analyses of the mitotic region in the Caenorhabditis elegans adult germ line. Mol. Biol. Cell 2006, 17:3051-3061.
34. de la Cova C., et al. Drosophila Myc regulates organ size by inducing cell competition. Cell 2004, 117:107-116.
35. de Navascues J., et al. Drosophila midgut homeostasis involves neutral competition between symmetrically dividing intestinal stem cells. EMBO J. 2012, 31:2473-2485.
36. de Rooij D.G. Stem cells in the testis. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 1998, 79:67-80.
37. de Rooij D.G. Proliferation and differentiation of spermatogonial stem cells. Reproduction 2001, 121:347-354.
38. de Rooij D.G., Grootegoed J.A. Spermatogonial stem cells. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1998, 10:694-701.
39. de Rooij D.G., Russell L.D. All you wanted to know about spermatogonia but were afraid to ask. J. Androl. 2000, 21:776-798.
40. Del Bene F., et al. Regulation of neurogenesis by interkinetic nuclear migration through an apical-basal notch gradient. Cell 2008, 134:1055-1065.
41. Dhaliwal J., Lagace D.C. Visualization and genetic manipulation of adult neurogenesis using transgenic mice. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2011, 33:1025-1036.
42. Doe C.Q. Neural stem cells: balancing self-renewal with differentiation. Development 2008, 135:1575-1587.
43. Doupe D.P., et al. The ordered architecture of murine ear epidermis is maintained by progenitor cells with random fate. Dev. Cell 2010, 18:317-323.
44. Encinas J.M., et al. Division-coupled astrocytic differentiation and age-related depletion of neural stem cells in the adult hippocampus. Cell Stem Cell 2010, 8:566-579.
45. Farkas L.M., Huttner W.B. The cell biology of neural stem and progenitor cells and its significance for their proliferation versus differentiation during mammalian brain development. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2008, 20:707-715.
46. Festa E., et al. Adipocyte lineage cells contribute to the skin stem cell niche to drive hair cycling. Cell 2011, 146:761-771.
47. Foudi A., et al. Analysis of histone 2B-GFP retention reveals slowly cycling hematopoietic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2009, 27:84-90.
48. Fuchs E. Scratching the surface of skin development. Nature 2007, 445:834-842.
49. Fuchs E. The tortoise and the hair: slow-cycling cells in the stem cell race. Cell 2009, 137:811-819.
50. Fuchs E., Horsley V. More than one way to skin. Genes Dev. 2008, 22:976-985.
51. Fuchs E., et al. Socializing with the neighbors: stem cells and their niche. Cell 2004, 116:769-778.
52. Fuller M.T., Spradling A.C. Male and female Drosophila germline stem cells: two versions of immortality. Science 2007, 316:402-404.
53. Furuyama K., et al. Continuous cell supply from a Sox9-expressing progenitor zone in adult liver, exocrine pancreas and intestine. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43:34-41.
54. Gilboa L., Lehmann R. How different is Venus from Mars? The genetics of germ-line stem cells in Drosophila females and males. Development 2004, 131:4895-4905.
55. Goldstein B., Macara I.G. The PAR proteins: fundamental players in animal cell polarization. Dev. Cell 2007, 13:609-622.
56. Gotz M., Huttner W.B. The cell biology of neurogenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 6:777-788.
57. Grisanti L., et al. Identification of spermatogonial stem cell subsets by morphological analysis and prospective isolation. Stem Cells 2009, 27:3043-3052.
58. Gupta P.B., et al. Stochastic state transitions give rise to phenotypic equilibrium in populations of cancer cells. Cell 2011, 146:633-644.
59. Halevy O., et al. Pattern of Pax7 expression during myogenesis in the posthatch chicken establishes a model for satellite cell differentiation and renewal. Dev. Dyn. 2004, 231:489-502.
60. Ho A.D. Kinetics and symmetry of divisions of hematopoietic stem cells. Exp. Hematol. 2005, 33:1-8.
61. Ho A.D., Wagner W. The beauty of asymmetry: asymmetric divisions and self-renewal in the haematopoietic system. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 2007, 14:330-336.
62. Hodge R.D., et al. Insulin-like growth factor-I accelerates the cell cycle by decreasing G1 phase length and increases cell cycle reentry in the embryonic cerebral cortex. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24:10201-10210.
63. Hsu Y.C., et al. Dynamics between stem cells, niche, and progeny in the hair follicle. Cell 2011, 144:92-105.
64. Hubbard E.J. Caenorhabditis elegans germ line: a model for stem cell biology. Dev. Dyn. 2007, 236:3343-3357.
65. Huckins C. The spermatogonial stem cell population in adult rats. II. A radioautographic analysis of their cell cycle properties. Cell Tissue Kinet. 1971, 4:313-334.
66. Huttner W.B., Kosodo Y. Symmetric versus asymmetric cell division during neurogenesis in the developing vertebrate central nervous system. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2005, 17:648-657.
67. Issigonis M., et al. JAK-STAT signal inhibition regulates competition in the Drosophila testis stem cell niche. Science 2009, 326:153-156.
68. Ito M., et al. Stem cells in the hair follicle bulge contribute to wound repair but not to homeostasis of the epidermis. Nat. Med. 2005, 11:1351-1354.
69. Itzkovitz S., et al. Single-molecule transcript counting of stem-cell markers in the mouse intestine. Nat. Cell Biol. 2012, 14:106-114.
70. Jaks V., et al. Lgr5 marks cycling, yet long-lived, hair follicle stem cells. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40:1291-1299.
71. Jaks V., et al. The hair follicle-a stem cell zoo. Exp. Cell Res. 2010, 316:1422-1428.
72. Janes S.M., et al. Epidermal stem cells. J. Pathol. 2002, 197:479-491.
73. Janich P., et al. The circadian molecular clock creates epidermal stem cell heterogeneity. Nature 2011, 480:209-214.
74. Jaramillo-Lambert A., et al. Differential timing of S phases, X chromosome replication, and meiotic prophase in the C. elegans germ line. Dev. Biol. 2007, 308:206-221.
75. Jin Z., et al. Differentiation-defective stem cells outcompete normal stem cells for niche occupancy in the Drosophila ovary. Cell Stem Cell 2008, 2:39-49.
76. Jones D.L., Wagers A.J. No place like home: anatomy and function of the stem cell niche. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9:11-21.
77. Jones P., Simons B.D. Epidermal homeostasis: do committed progenitors work while stem cells sleep?. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9:82-88.
78. Jones P.H. Stem cell fate in proliferating tissues: equal odds in a game of chance. Dev. Cell 2010, 19:489-490.
79. Jones P.H., et al. Sic transit gloria: farewell to the epidermal transit amplifying cell?. Cell Stem Cell 2007, 1:371-381.
80. Joshi P.M., et al. Caenorhabditis elegans as a model for stem cell biology. Dev. Dyn. 2010, 239:1539-1554.
81. Kai T., Spradling A. Differentiating germ cells can revert into functional stem cells in Drosophila melanogaster ovaries. Nature 2004, 428:564-569.
82. Kalmar T., et al. Regulated fluctuations in nanog expression mediate cell fate decisions in embryonic stem cells. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7. e1000149.
83. Kameda T., et al. Analysis of the cellular heterogeneity in the basal layer of mouse ear epidermis: an approach from partial decomposition in vitro and retroviral cell marking in vivo. Exp. Cell Res. 2003, 283:167-183.
84. Karpowicz P., et al. Support for the immortal strand hypothesis: neural stem cells partition DNA asymmetrically in vitro. J. Cell Biol. 2005, 170:721-732.
85. Kaur P. Interfollicular epidermal stem cells: identification, challenges, potential. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2006, 126:1450-1458.
86. Kemp R., et al. Elimination of background recombination: somatic induction of Cre by combined transcriptional regulation and hormone binding affinity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32. e92.
87. Kempermann G. The pessimist's and optimist's views of adult neurogenesis. Cell 2011, 145:1009-1011.
88. Kiel M.J., et al. Haematopoietic stem cells do not asymmetrically segregate chromosomes or retain BrdU. Nature 2007, 449:238-242.
89. Kiger A.A., et al. Stem cell self-renewal specified by JAK-STAT activation in response to a support cell cue. Science 2001, 294:2542-2545.
90. Kim T.H., et al. Intact function of Lgr5 receptor-expressing intestinal stem cells in the absence of Paneth cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109:3932-3937.
91. Kimble J., Crittenden S.L. Controls of germline stem cells, entry into meiosis, and the sperm/oocyte decision in Caenorhabditis elegans. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2007, 23:405-433.
92. Klein A.M., et al. Mouse germ line stem cells undergo rapid and stochastic turnover. Cell Stem Cell 2010, 7:214-224.
93. Klein A.M., Simons B.D. Universal patterns of stem cell fate in cycling adult tissues. Development 2011, 138:3103-3111.
94. Knoblich J.A. Mechanisms of asymmetric stem cell division. Cell 2008, 132:583-597.
95. Kobayashi T., Kageyama R. Hes1 oscillation: making variable choices for stem cell differentiation. Cell Cycle 2010, 9:207-208.
96. Kobayashi T., et al. The cyclic gene Hes1 contributes to diverse differentiation responses of embryonic stem cells. Genes Dev. 2009, 23:1870-1875.
97. Konno D., et al. Neuroepithelial progenitors undergo LGN-dependent planar divisions to maintain self-renewability during mammalian neurogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10:93-101.
98. Kosodo Y., et al. Asymmetric distribution of the apical plasma membrane during neurogenic divisions of mammalian neuroepithelial cells. EMBO J. 2004, 23:2314-2324.
99. Kuang S., et al. Niche regulation of muscle satellite cell self-renewal and differentiation. Cell Stem Cell 2008, 2:22-31.
100. Kuang S., et al. Asymmetric self-renewal and commitment of satellite stem cells in muscle. Cell 2007, 129:999-1010.
101. Lansdorp P.M. Immortal strands? Give me a break. Cell 2007, 129:1244-1247.
102. Lechler T., Fuchs E. Asymmetric cell divisions promote stratification and differentiation of mammalian skin. Nature 2005, 437:275-280.
103. Levy V., et al. Epidermal stem cells arise from the hair follicle after wounding. FASEB J. 2007, 21:1358-1366.
104. Li L., Clevers H. Coexistence of quiescent and active adult stem cells in mammals. Science 2010, 327:542-545.
105. Livet J., et al. Transgenic strategies for combinatorial expression of fluorescent proteins in the nervous system. Nature 2007, 450:56-62.
106. Lo Celso C., et al. Live-animal tracking of individual haematopoietic stem/progenitor cells in their niche. Nature 2009, 457:92-96.
107. Lopez-Garcia C., et al. Intestinal stem cell replacement follows a pattern of neutral drift. Science 2010, 330:822-825.
108. Lugert S., et al. Quiescent and active hippocampal neural stem cells with distinct morphologies respond selectively to physiological and pathological stimuli and aging. Cell Stem Cell 2010, 6:445-456.
109. Lugert S., Taylor V. Neural stem cells: disposable, end-state glia?. Cell Stem Cell 2011, 8:464-465.
110. Ma D.K., et al. Adult neural stem cells in the mammalian central nervous system. Cell Res. 2009, 19:672-682.
111. Maciejowski J., et al. Quantitative analysis of germline mitosis in adult C. elegans. Dev. Biol. 2006, 292:142-151.
112. Macre G., et al. Distinct contribution of stem an progenitor cells to the epidermal maintenance. Nature 2012, 489(7415):257-262.
113. Mendez-Ferrer S., et al. Mesenchymal and haematopoietic stem cells form a unique bone marrow niche. Nature 2010, 466:829-834.
114. Meng X., et al. Regulation of cell fate decision of undifferentiated spermatogonia by GDNF. Science 2000, 287:1489-1493.
115. Ming G.L., Song H. Adult neurogenesis in the mammalian brain: significant answers and significant questions. Neuron 2011, 70:687-702.
116. Montgomery R.K., et al. Mouse telomerase reverse transcriptase (mTert) expression marks slowly cycling intestinal stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 108:179-184.
117. Moreno E., et al. Cells compete for decapentaplegic survival factor to prevent apoptosis in Drosophila wing development. Nature 2002, 416:755-759.
118. Morin X., Bellaiche Y. Mitotic spindle orientation in asymmetric and symmetric cell divisions during animal development. Dev. Cell 2011, 21:102-119.
119. Morris R.J., et al. Capturing and profiling adult hair follicle stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2004, 22:411-417.
120. Morrison S.J., Kimble J. Asymmetric and symmetric stem-cell divisions in development and cancer. Nature 2006, 441:1068-1074.
121. Morrison S.J., Spradling A.C. Stem cells and niches: mechanisms that promote stem cell maintenance throughout life. Cell 2008, 132:598-611.
122. Muller-Rover S., et al. A comprehensive guide for the accurate classification of murine hair follicles in distinct hair cycle stages. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2001, 117:3-15.
123. Murciano A., et al. Interkinetic nuclear movement may provide spatial clues to the regulation of neurogenesis. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2002, 21:285-300.
124. Nakagawa T., et al. Functional identification of the actual and potential stem cell compartments in mouse spermatogenesis. Dev. Cell 2007, 12:195-206.
125. Nakagawa T., et al. Functional hierarchy and reversibility within the murine spermatogenic stem cell compartment. Science 2010, 328:62-67.
126. Naughton C.K., et al. Glial cell-line derived neurotrophic factor-mediated RET signaling regulates spermatogonial stem cell fate. Biol. Reprod. 2006, 74:314-321.
127. Oakberg E.F. Spermatogonial stem-cell renewal in the mouse. Anat. Rec. 1971, 169:515-531.
128. Oatley J.M., Brinster R.L. Spermatogonial stem cells. Methods Enzymol. 2006, 419:259-282.
129. Oatley J.M., Brinster R.L. Regulation of spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal in mammals. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2008, 24:263-286.
130. Olguin H.C., Olwin B.B. Pax-7 up-regulation inhibits myogenesis and cell cycle progression in satellite cells: a potential mechanism for self-renewal. Dev Biol 2004, 275:375-388.
131. Orkin S.H., Zon L.I. Hematopoiesis: an evolving paradigm for stem cell biology. Cell 2008, 132:631-644.
132. Pilaz L.J., et al. Forced G1-phase reduction alters mode of division, neuron number, and laminar phenotype in the cerebral cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:21924-21929.
133. Plikus M.V., et al. Cyclic dermal BMP signalling regulates stem cell activation during hair regeneration. Nature 2008, 451:340-344.
134. Plikus M.V., et al. Self-organizing and stochastic behaviors during the regeneration of hair stem cells. Science 2011, 332:586-589.
135. Potten C.S., et al. Continuous labelling studies on mouse skin and intestine. Cell Tissue Kinet. 1974, 7:271-283.
136. Potten C.S., et al. Intestinal stem cells protect their genome by selective segregation of template DNA strands. J. Cell Sci. 2002, 115:2381-2388.
137. Potten C.S., Loeffler M. Stem cells: attributes, cycles, spirals, pitfalls and uncertainties. Lessons for and from the crypt. Development 1990, 110:1001-1020.
138. Poulson N.D., Lechler T. Robust control of mitotic spindle orientation in the developing epidermis. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 191:915-922.
139. Prehoda K.E. Polarization of Drosophila neuroblasts during asymmetric division. Cold Spring Harb Perspect. Biol. 2009, 1. a001388.
140. Purton L.E., Scadden D.T. Limiting factors in murine hematopoietic stem cell assays. Cell Stem Cell 2007, 1:263-270.
141. Quyn A.J., et al. Spindle orientation bias in gut epithelial stem cell compartments is lost in precancerous tissue. Cell Stem Cell 2010, 6:175-181.
142. Raaijmakers M.H., Scadden D.T. Divided within: heterogeneity within adult stem cell pools. Cell 2008, 135:1006-1008.
143. Rando T.A. The immortal strand hypothesis: segregation and reconstruction. Cell 2007, 129:1239-1243.
144. Ray S., Lechler T. Regulation of asymmetric cell division in the epidermis. Cell Div. 2011, 6:12.
145. Reichert H. Drosophila neural stem cells: cell cycle control of self-renewal, differentiation, and termination in brain development. Results Probl. Cell Differ. 2011, 53:529-546.
146. Relaix F., Marcelle C. Muscle stem cells. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2009, 21:748-753.
147. Reya T., et al. Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells. Nature 2001, 414:105-111.
148. Rhiner C., et al. Persistent competition among stem cells and their daughters in the Drosophila ovary germline niche. Development 2009, 136:995-1006.
149. Riquelme P.A., et al. Brain micro-ecologies: neural stem cell niches in the adult mammalian brain. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2008, 363:123-137.
150. Ro S., Rannala B. A stop-EGFP transgenic mouse to detect clonal cell lineages generated by mutation. EMBO Rep. 2004, 5:914-920.
151. Ro S., Rannala B. Evidence from the stop-EGFP mouse supports a niche-sharing model of epidermal proliferative units. Exp. Dermatol. 2005, 14:838-843.
152. Rocheteau P., et al. A subpopulation of adult skeletal muscle stem cells retains all template DNA strands after cell division. Cell 2012, 148:112-125.
153. Roegiers F., Jan Y.N. Asymmetric cell division. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2004, 16:195-205.
154. Russell L., Ettlin R., Sinha Hikim A., Clegg E. Histological and Histopathological Evaluation of the Testis 1990, Cache River Press, Clearwater, FL.
155. Sada A., et al. The RNA-binding protein NANOS2 is required to maintain murine spermatogonial stem cells. Science 2009, 325:1394-1398.
156. Sangiorgi E., Capecchi M.R. Bmi1 is expressed in vivo in intestinal stem cells. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40:915-920.
157. Sato T., et al. Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature 2009, 459:262-265.
158. Sato T., et al. Paneth cells constitute the niche for Lgr5 stem cells in intestinal crypts. Nature 2011, 469:415-418.
159. Saunders T.L. Inducible transgenic mouse models. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011, 693:103-115.
160. Scadden D.T. The stem-cell niche as an entity of action. Nature 2006, 441:1075-1079.
161. Schenk J., et al. Myosin II is required for interkinetic nuclear migration of neural progenitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:16487-16492.
162. Schepers A.G., et al. Lgr5 intestinal stem cells have high telomerase activity and randomly segregate their chromosomes. EMBO J. 2011, 30:1104-1109.
163. Schluter H., et al. Functional characterization of quiescent keratinocyte stem cells and their progeny reveals a hierarchical organization in human skin epidermis. Stem Cells 2011, 29:1256-1268.
164. Schofield R. The relationship between the spleen colony-forming cell and the haemopoietic stem cell. Blood Cells 1978, 4:7-25.
165. Schroeder T. Long-term single-cell imaging of mammalian stem cells. Nat. Methods 2011, 8:S30-S35.
166. Sheng X.R., et al. Dedifferentiating spermatogonia outcompete somatic stem cells for niche occupancy in the Drosophila testis. Cell Stem Cell 2009, 5:191-203.
167. Sheng X.R., Matunis E. Live imaging of the Drosophila spermatogonial stem cell niche reveals novel mechanisms regulating germline stem cell output. Development 2011, 138:3367-3376.
168. Shinin V., et al. Asymmetric division and cosegregation of template DNA strands in adult muscle satellite cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8:677-687.
169. Siller K.H., Doe C.Q. Spindle orientation during asymmetric cell division. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11:365-374.
170. Smith G.H. Label-retaining epithelial cells in mouse mammary gland divide asymmetrically and retain their template DNA strands. Development 2005, 132:681-687.
171. Snippert H.J., et al. Intestinal crypt homeostasis results from neutral competition between symmetrically dividing Lgr5 stem cells. Cell. 2010, 143:134-144.
172. Sotiropoulou P.A., et al. The majority of multipotent epidermal stem cells do not protect their genome by asymmetrical chromosome segregation. Stem Cells 2008, 26:2964-2973.
173. Spradling A., et al. Stem cells find their niche. Nature 2001, 414:98-104.
174. Strachan L.R., Ghadially R. Tiers of clonal organization in the epidermis: the epidermal proliferation unit revisited. Stem Cell Rev. 2008, 4:149-157.
175. Suzuki A., Ohno S. The PAR-aPKC system: lessons in polarity. J. Cell Sci. 2006, 119:979-987.
176. Suzuki H., et al. The heterogeneity of spermatogonia is revealed by their topology and expression of marker proteins including the germ cell-specific proteins Nanos2 and Nanos3. Dev. Biol. 2009, 336:222-231.
177. Tajbakhsh S. Stem cell identity and template DNA strand segregation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2008, 20:716-722.
178. Takahashi T., et al. Cell cycle parameters and patterns of nuclear movement in the neocortical proliferative zone of the fetal mouse. J. Neurosci. 1993, 13:820-833.
179. Takahashi T., et al. The cell cycle of the pseudostratified ventricular epithelium of the embryonic murine cerebral wall. J. Neurosci. 1995, 15:6046-6057.
180. Takeda N., et al. Interconversion between intestinal stem cell populations in distinct niches. Science 2011, 334:1420-1424.
181. Taverna E., Huttner W.B. Neural progenitor nuclei IN motion. Neuron 2010, 67:906-914.
182. Tian H., et al. A reserve stem cell population in small intestine renders Lgr5-positive cells dispensable. Nature 2011, 478:255-259.
183. Tian J.P., et al. Mathematical model for two germline stem cells competing for niche occupancy. Bull. Math. Biol. 2012, 74:1207-1225.
184. Tokuda M., et al. CDH1 is a specific marker for undifferentiated spermatogonia in mouse testes. Biol. Reprod. 2007, 76:130-141.
185. Tulina N., Matunis E. Control of stem cell self-renewal in Drosophila spermatogenesis by JAK-STAT signaling. Science 2001, 294:2546-2549.
186. Tumbar T. Epithelial skin stem cells. Methods Enzymol. 2006, 419:73-99.
187. Tumbar T. Ontogeny and homeostasis of adult epithelial skin stem cells. Stem Cell Rev. 2012, 8:561-576.
188. Tumbar T., et al. Defining the epithelial stem cell niche in skin. Science 2004, 303:359-363.
189. Vermeulen L., et al. Cancer stem cells-old concepts, new insights. Cell Death Differ. 2008, 15:947-958.
190. Waghmare S.K., et al. Quantitative proliferation dynamics and random chromosome segregation of hair follicle stem cells. EMBO J. 2008, 27:1309-1320.
191. Wang Y.Z., et al. Concise review: quiescent and active states of endogenous adult neural stem cells: identification and characterization. Stem Cells 2011, 29:907-912.
192. Weissman I.L., et al. Stem and progenitor cells: origins, phenotypes, lineage commitments, and transdifferentiations. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2001, 17:387-403.
193. Weissman I.L., Shizuru J.A. The origins of the identification and isolation of hematopoietic stem cells, and their capability to induce donor-specific transplantation tolerance and treat autoimmune diseases. Blood 2008, 112:3543-3553.
194. Willardsen M.I., Link B.A. Cell biological regulation of division fate in vertebrate neuroepithelial cells. Dev. Dyn. 2011, 240:1865-1879.
195. Williams S.E., et al. Asymmetric cell divisions promote Notch-dependent epidermal differentiation. Nature 2011, 470:353-358.
196. Wilson A., et al. Hematopoietic stem cells reversibly switch from dormancy to self-renewal during homeostasis and repair. Cell 2008, 135:1118-1129.
197. Winton D.J., Ponder B.A. Stem-cell organization in mouse small intestine. Proc. Biol. Sci. 1990, 241:13-18.
198. Wu M., et al. Imaging hematopoietic precursor division in real time. Cell Stem Cell 2007, 1:541-554.
199. Wu Z., et al. Capacity for stochastic self-renewal and differentiation in mammalian spermatogonial stem cells. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 187:513-524.
200. Xie T., Spradling A.C. A niche maintaining germ line stem cells in the Drosophila ovary. Science 2000, 290:328-330.
201. Xie Y., et al. Detection of functional haematopoietic stem cell niche using real-time imaging. Nature 2009, 457:97-101.
202. Yamashita Y.M. The centrosome and asymmetric cell division. Prion 2009, 3:84-88.
203. Yamashita Y.M., et al. Signaling in stem cell niches: lessons from the Drosophila germline. J. Cell Sci. 2005, 118:665-672.
204. Yoshida S. Casting back to stem cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11:118-120.
205. Yoshida S. Stem cells in mammalian spermatogenesis. Dev. Growth Differ. 2010, 52:311-317.
206. Yoshida S., et al. Stem cell heterogeneity: actual and potential stem cell compartments in the mouse spermatogenesis. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2007, 1120:47-58.
207. Yoshida S., et al. A vasculature-associated niche for undifferentiated spermatogonia in the mouse testis. Science 2007, 317:1722-1726.
208. Zammit P.S., et al. Muscle satellite cells adopt divergent fates: a mechanism for self-renewal?. J. Cell Biol. 2004, 166:347-357.
209. Zhang Y.V., et al. Distinct self-renewal and differentiation phases in the niche of infrequently dividing hair follicle stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2009, 5:267-278.
210. Zhang Y.V., et al. Stem cell dynamics in mouse hair follicles: a story from cell division counting and single cell lineage tracing. Cell Cycle 2010, 9:1504-1510.
211. Zhao C., et al. Mechanisms and functional implications of adult neurogenesis. Cell 2008, 132:645-660.
212. Zhao R., Xi R. Stem cell competition for niche occupancy: emerging themes and mechanisms. Stem Cell Rev. 2010, 6:345-350.
213. Zheng K., et al. The pluripotency factor LIN28 marks undifferentiated spermatogonia in mouse. BMC Dev. Biol. 2009, 9:38.
214. Zhong W., Chia W. Neurogenesis and asymmetric cell division. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2008, 18:4-11.
215. Zhu L., et al. Prominin 1 marks intestinal stem cells that are susceptible to neoplastic transformation. Nature 2009, 457:603-607.