Correction to Just the two of us: Misalignment of theory and methods in examining dyadic phenomena [Journal of Applied Psychology (2012)] DOI:10.1037/a0027962;Just the Two of Us: Misalignment of Theory and Methods in Examining Dyadic Phenomena

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 97, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 739-757

  Krasikova, Dina V ^a   LeBreton, James M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Actor partner interdependence model; Dyadic analysis; One with many model.

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEADERSHIP; TEACHER; THEORETICAL MODEL; WORKPLACE;

HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; LEADERSHIP; MENTORS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NEGOTIATING; WORKPLACE;

EID: 84868671857     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0028700     Document Type: Erratum

References (97)

1. Adair, W. L., Okumura, T., & Brett, J. M. (2001). Negotiation behavior when cultures collide: The United States and Japan. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 371-385. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.371
2. Allison, P. D. (2003). Missing data techniques for structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 545-557. doi:10.1037/ 0021-843X.112.4.545
3. Anderson, S. E., & Williams, L. J. (1996). Interpersonal, job, and individual factors related to helping processes at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 282-296. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.3.282
4. Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24, 452-471.
5. Aquino, K., & Lamertz, K. (2004). A relational model of workplace victimization: Social roles and patterns of victimization in workplace dyadic relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1023-1034. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1023
6. Avery, D. R., Richeson, J. A., Hebl, M. R., & Ambady, N. (2009). It does not have to be uncomfortable: The role of behavioral scripts in Black- White interracial interactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1382- 1393. doi:10.1037/a0016208
7. Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., & May, D. R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 801-823. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.003
8. Bakker, A. B. (2005). Flow among music teachers and their students: The crossover of peak experiences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 26-44. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2003.11.001
9. Baldwin, S. A., Wampold, B. E., & Imel, Z. E. (2007). Untangling the alliance-outcome correlation: Exploring the relative importance of therapist and patient variability in the alliance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 842-852. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.75.6.842
10. Balkundi, P., & Kilduff, M. (2006). The ties that lead: A social network approach to leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 419 - 439. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.01.001
11. Barry, B., & Fulmer, I. S. (2004). The medium and the message: The adaptive use of communication media in dyadic influence. Academy of Management Review, 29, 272-292.
12. Bazerman, M. H., Curhan, J. R., Moore, D. A., & Valley, K. L. (2000). Negotiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 279-314.
13. Bearden, W. O., Sharma, S., & Teel, J. E. (1982). Sample size effects onchi-square and other statistics used in evaluating causal models. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 425-430.
14. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
15. Berscheid, E. (1999). The greening of relationship science. American Psychologist, 54, 260-266. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.4.260
16. Bliese, P. D., & Hanges, P. J. (2004). Being both too liberal and too conservative: The perils of treating grouped data as though they were independent. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 400 - 417. doi: 10.1177/1094428104268542
17. Bowles, H. R., & Flynn, F. (2010). Gender and persistence in negotiation: A dyadic perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 769-787. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2010.52814595
18. Brower, H. H., Lester, S. W., Korsgaard, M. A., & Dineen, B. R. (2009). A closer look at trust between managers and subordinates: Understanding the effects of both trusting and being trusted on subordinate outcomes. Journal of Management, 35, 327-347. doi:10.1177/0149206307312511
19. Brower, H. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Tan, H. H. (2000). A model of relational leadership: The integration of trust and leader-member exchange. Leadership Quarterly, 11, 227-250. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00040-0
20. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21. Campbell, L., & Kashy, D. A. (2002). Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC MIXED and HLM: A user-friendly guide. Personal Relationships, 9, 327-342. doi:10.1111/ 1475-6811.00023
22. Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234-246. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.234
23. Cheng, B., Jiang, D., & Riley, J. H. (2003). Organizational commitment, supervisory commitment, and employee outcomes in the Chinese context: Proximal hypothesis or global hypothesis? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 313-334. doi:10.1002/job.190
24. Cook, W. L., & Kenny, D. A. (2005). The actor-partner interdependence model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 101-109. doi:10.1080/ 01650250444000405
25. Coyle-Shapiro, J. A.-M., & Shore, L. M. (2007). The employee- organization relationship: Where do we go from here? Human Resource Management Review, 17, 166-179. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.03.008
26. Dabos, G. E., & Rousseau, D. (2004). Mutuality and reciprocity in the psychological contracts of employees and employers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 52-72. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.52
27. Duncan, S., Jr., Kanki, B. G., Mokros, H., & Fiske, D. W. (1984). Pseudounilaterality, simple-rate variables, and other ills to which interaction research is heir. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1335-1348. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.6.1335
28. Eberly, M. B., Holley, E. C., Johnson, M. D., & Mitchell, T. R. (2011). Beyond internal and external: A dyadic theory of relational attributions. Academy of Management Review, 36, 731-753.
29. Edwards, J. R. (1994). The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and proposed alternative. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 51-100. doi:10.1006/obhd.1994.1029
30. Edwards, J. R. (2002). Alternatives to difference scores: Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology. In F. Drasgow & N. W. Schmitt (Eds.), Advances in measurement and data analysis (pp. 350-400). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31. Ferrin, D. L., Bligh, M. C., & Kohles, J. C. (2008). It takes two to tango: An interdependence analysis of the spiraling of perceived trustworthiness and cooperation in interpersonal and intergroup relationships. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107, 161-178. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.02.012
32. Ferris, G. R., Liden, R. C., Munyon, T. P., Summers, J. K., Basik, K. J., & Buckley, M. R. (2009). Relationships at work: Toward a multidimensional conceptualization of dyadic work relationships. Journal of Management, 35, 1379-1403. doi:10.1177/0149206309344741
33. Ferris, G. R., Munyon, T. P., Basik, K., & Buckley, M. R. (2008). The performance evaluation context: Social, emotional, cognitive, political, and relationship components. Human Resource Management Review, 18, 146-163. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.07.006
34. Flynn, F. J. (2003). How much should I give and how often? The effects of generosity and frequency of favor exchange on social status and productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 539-553. doi: 10.2307/30040648
35. Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader- member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 827-844. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.827
36. Gibbons, D. E. (2004). Friendship and advice networks in the context of changing professional values. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 238-262.
37. Gino, F., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2008). Blinded by anger or feeling the love: How emotions influence advice taking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1165-1173. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1165
38. Glomb, T. M., & Liao, H. (2003). Interpersonal aggression in work groups: Social influence, reciprocal, and individual effects. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 486-496. doi:10.2307/30040640
39. Gonzalez, R., & Griffin, D. (1999). The correlational analysis of dyad-level data in the distinguishable case. Personal Relationships, 6, 449-469. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00203.x
40. Gonzalez, R., & Griffin, D. (2002). Modeling the personality of dyads and groups. Journal of Personality, 70, 901-924. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.05027
41. Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Association, 25, 161-178.
42. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219 -247. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
43. Hershcovis, S. M., & Barling, J. (2010). Towards a multi-foci approach to workplace aggression: A meta-analytic review of outcomes from different perpetrators. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 24-44. doi: 10.1002/job.621
44. Hofmann, D. A., Griffin, M. A., & Gavin, M. B. (2000). The application of hierarchal linear modeling to organizational research. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions and new directions (pp. 467- 511). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
45. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
46. James, L. R.,&Singh, B. K. (1978). An introduction to the logic, assumptions, and basic analytic procedures of two-stage least squares. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1104-1122. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.5.1104
47. Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL (Version 8.80) [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
48. Jung, D., Yammarino, F. J., & Lee, J. K. (2009). Moderating role of subordinates' attitudes on transformational leadership and effectiveness: A multi-cultural and multi-level perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 586-603. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.011
49. Kabanoff, B. (1985). Potential influence structures as sources of interpersonal conflict in groups and organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 113-141. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(85)90023-8
50. Kenny, D. A. (1996). The design and analysis of social-interaction research. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 59 - 86. doi:10.1146/ annurev.psych.47.1.59
51. Kenny, D. A., & Cook, W. (1999). Partner effects in relationship research:Conceptual issues, analytic difficulties, and illustrations. Personal Relationships, 6, 433-448. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00202.x
52. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
53. Kivlighan, D. M., Jr. (2007). Where is the relationship in research on the alliance? Two methods for analyzing dyadic data. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54, 423-433. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.54.4.423
54. Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J. (1994). Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19, 195-229.
55. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
56. Korsgaard, M. A., Jeong, S. S., Mahony, D. M., & Pitariu, A. H. (2008). A multilevel view of intragroup conflict. Journal of Management, 34, 1222-1252. doi:10.1177/0149206308325124
57. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3-90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
58. Kurland, N. B., & Pelled, L. H. (2000). Passing the word: Toward a model of gossip and power in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 25, 428-438.
59. LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 815-852. doi:10.1177/1094428106296642
60. Liao, H., & Chuang, A. (2007). Transforming service employees and climate: A multilevel, multisource examination of transformational leadership in building long-term service relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1006-1019. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1006
61. Livi, S., Kenny, D. A., Albright, L., & Pierro, A. (2008). A social relations analysis of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 235-248. doi:10.1016/ j.leaqua.2008.01.003
62. Marcus, D. K., Kashy, D. A., & Baldwin, S. A. (2009). Studying psychotherapy using the one-with-many design: The therapeutic alliance as an exemplar. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 537-548. doi:10.1037/a0017291
63. Maslyn, J. M., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2001). Leader-member exchange and its dimensions: Effects of self-report and other's effort on relationship quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 697-708. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.697
64. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.
65. McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24-59. doi:10.2307/256727
66. Milton, L. P., & Westphal, J. D. (2005). Identity confirmation networks and cooperation in work groups. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 191-212. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2005.16928393
67. Nahrgang, J. D., Morgeson, F. P., & Ilies, R. (2009). The development of leader-member exchanges: Exploring how personality and performance influence leader and member relationships over time. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 256-266. doi:10.1016/ j.obhdp.2008.09.002
68. Olsen, J. A., & Kenny, D. A. (2006). Structural equation modeling with interchangeable dyads. Psychological Methods, 11, 127-141. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.127
69. Overbeck, J. R., Neale, M. A., & Govan, C. L. (2010). I feel, therefore you act: Intrapersonal and interpersonal effects of emotion on negotiation as a function of social power. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 112, 126-139. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.02.004
70. Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., & Schroeder, D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365-392. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070141
71. Pierce, C. A., Byrne, D., & Aguinis, H. (1996). Attraction to organizations: A model of workplace romance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 5-32. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199601)17:1<5::AIDJOB734>3.0.CO;2-E
72. Ployhart, R. E., & Oswald, F. L. (2004). Applications of mean and covariance structure analysis: Integrating correlational and experimental approaches. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 27-65. doi:10.1177/ 1094428103259554
73. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
74. Raudenbush, S. W., Brennan, R. T., & Barnett, R. C. (1995). A multivariate hierarchical model for studying psychological change within married couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 161-174. doi:10.1037/ 0893-3200.9.2.161
75. Reis, H. T. (2007). Steps toward the ripening of relationship science. Personal Relationships, 14, 1-23. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00139.x
76. Reis, H. T., & Collins, W. A. (2004). Relationships, human behavior, and psychological science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 233-237. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00315.x
77. Rousseau, D. (1985). Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 1-37). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
78. Sacco, J. M., Scheu, C. R., Ryan, A. M., & Schmitt, N. (2003). An investigation of race and sex similarity effects in interviews: A multilevel approach to relational demography. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 852-865. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.852
79. Schmitt, N., & Bedeian, A. G. (1982). A comparison of LISREL and two-stage least squares analysis of a hypothesized life-job satisfaction reciprocal relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 806-817. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.67.6.806
80. Schriesheim, C. A., Castro, S. L., & Coglister, C. C. (1999). Leader- member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 63-113. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(99)80009-5
81. Schriesheim, C. A., Castro, S. L., Zhou, X., & Yammarino, F. J. (2001). The folly of theorizing "A" but testing "B": A selective level-of-analysis review of the field and a detailed leader-member exchange illustration. Leadership Quarterly, 12, 515-551. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00095-9
82. Settoon, R. P., & Mossholder, K. W. (2002). Relationship quality and relationship context as antecedents of person- and task-focused interpersonal citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 255-267. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.255
83. Sherony, K. M., & Green, S. G. (2002). Coworker exchange: Relationships between coworkers, leader-member exchange, and work attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 542-548. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.542
84. Sin, H. P., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2009). Understanding why they don't see eye to eye: An examination of leader-member exchange (LMX) agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1048-1057. doi:10.1037/a0014827
85. Sluss, D. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2007). Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review, 32, 9-32.
86. Song, Z., Foo, M., & Uy, M. A. (2008). Mood spillover and crossover among dual-earner couples: A cell-phone event sampling study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 443-452. doi:1037/0021-9010.93.2.443
87. Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27-43.
88. Tangirala, S., Green, S. G., & Ramanujam, R. (2007). In the shadow of the boss's boss: Effects of supervisors' upward exchange relationships onemployees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 309-320. doi:10.1037/ 0021-9010.92.2.309
89. Tekleab, A. G., & Taylor, M. S. (2003). Aren't there two parties in an employment relationship? Antecedents and consequences of organization-employee agreement on contract obligations and violations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 585-608. doi:10.1002/ job.204
90. Thompson, L. (1990). Negotiation behavior and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 515-532. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.515
91. Tse, H. H. M., Dasborough, M. T., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2008). A multi-level analysis of team climate and interpersonal exchange relationships at work. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 195-211. doi:10.1016/ j.leaqua.2008.01.005
92. Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4-70. doi:10.1177/109442810031002
93. Venkataramani, V., & Dalal, R. S. (2007). Who helps and harms whom? Relational antecedents of interpersonal helping and harming in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 952-966. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.952
94. Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., Bommer, W. H., & Tetrick, L. E. (2002). The role of fair treatment and rewards in perceptions of organizational support and leader-member exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 590-598. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.590
95. Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1994). An alternative approach to method effects by using latent-variable models: Applications in organizational behavior research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 323-331. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.3.323
96. Yakovleva, M., Reilly, R. R., & Werko, R. (2010). Why do we trust? Moving beyond individual to dyadic perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 79-91. doi:10.1037/a0017102
97. Young, A. M., & Perrewe, P. L. (2000). The exchange relationship between mentors and protégés: The development of a framework. Human Resource Management Review, 10, 177-209. doi:10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00045-5