Fairness at the Collective Level: A Meta-Analytic Examination of the Consequences and Boundary Conditions of Organizational Justice Climate

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 97, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 776-791

  Whitman, Daniel S ^a   Caleo, Suzette ^b   Carpenter, Nichelle C ^c   Horner, Margaret T ^c   Bernerth, Jeremy B ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate; Justice; Meta analysis; Performance; Unit level

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSUMER; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; META ANALYSIS; ORGANIZATION; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PRODUCTIVITY; SOCIAL JUSTICE;

CONSUMER SATISFACTION; DECISION MAKING; EFFICIENCY; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL JUSTICE;

EID: 84868638029     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0028021     Document Type: Article

References (133)

1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York, NY: Academic Press.
2. *Agars, M. (2000). A multilevel examination of factors affecting women's attitudes, career perceptions, and turnover intentions in work organizations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University.
3. *Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., & Byrne, J. C. (2010). Procedural justice climate in new product development teams: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27, 1096-1111. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00773.x
4. Ambrose, M. L., & Schminke, M. (2001). Are flexible organizations the death knell for the future of procedural justice? In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: From theory to practice (pp. 229-244). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Ambrose, M. L., & Schminke, M. (2009). The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research: A test of mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 491-500. doi:10.1037/a0013203
6. Bashshur, M. R., Rupp, D. E., & Christopher, J. (2004, August). Theoretically-based strategies for defining and measuring justice climate: Implications for multilevel research in organizational justice. Paper presented at the 64th annual meeting of the Academy of Management, New Orleans, LA.
7. Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J., & McLendon, C. L. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 989-1004. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989
8. Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (pp. 43-55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
9. Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2005). How can theories of organizational justice explain the impact of fairness? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 329-354). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York, NY: Wiley.
11. Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions and new directions (pp. 349- 381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12. *Brown, M., Treviño, L., & Harrison, D. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117-134. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002
13. Cameron, K. S. (1986). A study of organizational effectiveness and its predictors. Management Science, 32, 87-112. doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.1.87
14. Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234-246. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.234
15. *Chen, X.-P., Lam, S. S. K., Naumann, S., & Schaubroeck, J. (2005). Group citizenship behavior: Conceptualization and preliminary tests of its antecedents and consequences. Management and Organization Review, 1, 273-300. doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2005.00012.x
16. Chiaburu, D. S., Oh, I., Berry, C. M., Li, N., & Gardner, R. G. (2011). The five-factor model of personality traits and organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1140- 1166. doi:10.1037/a0024004
17. *Cho, J. (2007). Psychological processes underlying the relationship between transformational leadership and multi-foci organizational citizenship behaviors: A multilevel approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.
18. Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290. doi:10.1177/014920639702300303
19. Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278-321. doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2958
20. Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386-400. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386
21. Colquitt, J. A. (2004). Does the justice of the one interact with the justice of the many? Reactions to procedural justice in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 633-646. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.633
22. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425-445. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425
23. Colquitt, J. A., Greenberg, J., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2005). What is organizational justice? A historical overview. In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 3-56). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. *Colquitt, J. A., Noe, R. A., & Jackson, C. L. (2002). Justice in teams: Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 55, 83-109. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00104.x
25. Colquitt, J. A., Zapata-Phelan, C. P., & Roberson, Q. M. (2005). Justice in teams: A review of fairness effects in collective contexts. In J. J. Martocchio (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (pp. 53-94). Maryland Heights, MO: Elsevier Science/JAI Press. doi:10.1016/S0742-7301(05)24002-1
26. Cropanzano, R., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 317-372). New York, NY: Wiley.
27. *Dayan, M., Di Benedetto, C. A., & Colak, M. (2009). Managerial trust in new product development projects: Its antecedents and consequences. R&D Management, 39, 21-37. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2008.00538.x
28. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A metaanalysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741-749. doi:10.1037/ 0021-9010.88.4.741
29. *Deery, S. J., & Iverson, R. D. (2005). Labor-management cooperation: Antecedents and impact on organizational performance. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 58, 588-609.
30. Degoey, P. (2000). Contagious justice: Exploring the social construction of justice in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 51- 102. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22003-0
31. Deutsch, M. (1983). Current social psychological perspectives on justice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 305-319. doi:10.1002/ ejsp.2420130308
32. Devine, D. J., Clayton, L. D., Phillips, J. L., Dunford, B. B., & Melner, S. B. (1999). Teams in organizations: Prevalence, characteristics, and effectiveness. Small Group Research, 30, 678 -711. doi:10.1177/ 104649649903000602
33. *Dietz, J., Robinson, S., Folger, R., Baron, R., & Schulz, M. (2003). The impact of community violence and an organization's procedural justice climate on workplace aggression. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 317-326. doi:10.2307/30040625
34. *Ehrhart, M. G. (2002). Leadership and procedural justice climate as antecedents of unit-level organizational citizenship behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, San Diego State University.
35. Ehrhart, M. G., & Naumann, S. E. (2004). Organizational citizenship behavior in work groups: A group norms approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 960-974. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.960
36. *Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. (2010). Differentiated leader-member exchanges: The buffering role of justice climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1104-1120. doi:10.1037/a0020578
37. Erdogan, B., & Liden, R. C. (2006). Collectivism as a moderator of responses to organizational justice: Implications for leader-member exchange and ingratiation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 1-17. doi:10.1002/job.365
38. Erickson, B. H. (1988). The relational basis of attitudes. In B. Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social structures (pp. 99-121). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
39. *Fedor, D. B., Caldwell, S., & Herold, D. M. (2006). The effects of organizational changes on employee commitment: A multilevel investigation. Personnel Psychology, 59, 1-29. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00852.x
40. Folger, R. (1986). Relative deprivation and referent cognitions: Distributive and procedural justice effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 531-546. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(86)90049-1
41. Folger, R. (1993). Reactions to mistreatment at work. In J. K. Murnighan (Ed.), Social psychology in organizations: Advances in theory and research (pp. 161-183). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
42. Gilliland, S. W., & Chan, D. (2001). Justice in organizations: Theory, methods, and applications. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology (pp. 143-165). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43. Glick, W. H. (1985). Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls in multilevel research. Academy of Management Review, 10, 601-616.
44. González-Romá, V., Fortes-Ferreira, L., & Peiró, J. M. (2009). Team climate, climate strength and team performance: A longitudinal study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 511-536. doi:10.1348/096317908X370025
45. González-Romá, V., Peiró, J. M., & Tordera, N. (2002). An examination of the antecedents and moderator influences of climate strength. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 465-473. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.465
46. *Griffin, B. (2010). Multilevel relationships between organizational-level incivility, justice, and intention to stay. Work & Stress, 24, 309-323. doi:10.1080/02678373.2010.531186
47. Guy, S. (2007). Organizational justice perceptions in Virginia high schools: A study of its relationship to school climate and faculty trust. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, College of William and Mary.
48. *Hakonen, M., & Lipponen, J. (2008). Procedural justice identification with virtual teams: The moderating role of face-to-face meetings and geographical dispersion. Social Justice Research, 21, 164-178. doi: 10.1007/s11211-008-0070-3
49. Hammer, T. H., Bayazit, M., & Wazeter, D. L. (2009). Union leadership and member attitudes: A multi-level analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 392-410. doi:10.1037/a0013613
50. Hausknecht, J., & Trevor, C. (2011). Collective turnover at the group, unit and organizational levels: Evidence, issues and implications. Journal of Management, 37, 352-388. doi:10.1177/0149206310383910
51. Hofmann, D. A., & Jones, L. M. (2004). Some foundational and guiding questions for multilevel construct validation. In F. J. Yammarino & F. Dansereau (Eds.), Multilevel issues in organizational behavior and processes (Vol. 3, pp. 305-316). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/S1475-9144(04)03014-0
52. Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. (2005). What we know about leadership? Review of General Psychology, 9, 169-180. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.169
53. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London, England: Routledge.
54. Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121-140.
55. Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.
56. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57. Jackson, S. E., & Ruderman, M. N. (Eds.). (1995). Diversity in work teams: Research paradigms for a changing workplace. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10189-000
58. James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 219-229. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.67.2.219
59. Johanson, J. E. (2000). Intraorganizational influence. Management Communication Quarterly, 13, 393-425. doi:10.1177/0893318900133002
60. *Johnson, J., Korgsgaard, M., & Sapienza, H. (2002). Perceived fairness, decision control, and commitment in international joint venture management teams. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 1141-1160. doi: 10.1002/smj.277
61. Kim, W., & Mauborgne, R. (1993). Effectively conceiving and executing multinationals' worldwide strategies. Journal of International Business Studies, 24, 419-448. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490239
62. Konovsky, M. A. (2000). Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations. Journal of Management, 26, 489-511. doi: 10.1177/014920630002600306
63. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions and new directions (pp. 3-90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
64. Kroon, B., Van de Voorde, K., & Van Veldhoven, M. (2009). Cross-level effects of high-performance work practices and burnout. Personnel Review, 38, 509-525. doi:10.1108/00483480910978027
65. Leventhal, G. S. (1976). The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. In L. Berkowitz & W. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 91-131). New York, NY: Academic Press.
66. Li, A., & Cropanzano, R. (2009). Fairness at the group level: Justice climate and intraunit justice climate. Journal of Management, 35, 564- 599. doi:10.1177/0149206308330557
67. *Li, A., Cropanzano, R., & Benson, L. (2007, August). Intraunit justice climate: Explication and validation of a new construct. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, Philadelphia, PA.
68. *Li, N., Liang, J., & Crant, J. M. (2010). The role of proactive personality in job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior: A relational perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 395-404. doi:10.1037/ a0018079
69. *Liao, H., & Rupp, D. E. (2005). The impact of justice climate and justice orientation on work outcomes: A cross-level multifoci framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 242-256. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.242
70. *Liden, R., Wayne, S., Renata, J., & Bennett, N. (2004). Social loafing: A field investigation. Journal of Management, 30, 285-304. doi:10.1016/ j.jm.2003.02.002
71. *Lin, S.-P., Tang, T.-W., Li, C.-H., Wu, C.-M., & Lin, H.-H. (2007). Mediating effect of cooperative norm in predicting organizational citizenship behaviors from procedural justice climate. Psychological Reports, 101, 67-78.
72. Lind, E. A. (1995). Social conflict and social justice: Some lessons from the social psychology of justice. Leiden, the Netherlands: Leiden University Press.
73. Lind, E. A. (2001). Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 56-88). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
74. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
75. *Lipponen, J., & Wisse, B. (2010). Shared perceptions of perceived justice as a predictor of externally rated departmental level academic performance. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 1065-1074. doi:10.1348/096317909X479727
76. Luo, Y. (2008). Procedural fairness and interfirm cooperation in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 27- 46. doi:10.1002/ smj.646
77. *Luria, G., & Yagil, D. (2008). Procedural justice, ethical climate, and service outcomes in restaurants. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27, 276-283. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2007.07.022
78. Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., & Taylor, M. S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 738-748. doi:10.2307/1556364
79. *Mayer, D. (2004). Are you in or out? A group-level examination of the effects of LMX on justice and customer satisfaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland.
80. Mayer, D., & Kuenzi, M. (2010). Exploring the "black box" of justice climate: What mechanisms link justice climate and outcomes? In B. Mannix, M. Neal, & E. Mullen (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams: Fairness and groups (pp. 331-346). Bingley, England: JAI Emerald.
81. Meyer, G. W. (1994). Social information processing and social networks: A test of social influence mechanisms. Human Relations, 47, 1013- 1047. doi:10.1177/001872679404700901
82. Miller, D. (1982). Evolution and revolution: A quantum view of structural change in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 19, 131-151. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1982.tb00064.x
83. Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80, 252-283. doi:10.1037/ h0035002
84. *Moliner, C., Martinez-Tur, V., Peiró, J. M., Ramos, J., & Cropanzano, R. (2005). Relationships between organizational justice and burnout at the work-unit level. International Journal of Stress Management, 12, 99- 116. doi:10.1037/1072-5245.12.2.99
85. Morgeson, F. P., & Hofmann, D. A. (1999). The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Academy of Management Review, 24, 249-265.
86. Mossholder, K. W., Bennett, N., & Martin, C. L. (1998). A multilevel analysis of procedural justice context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 131-141. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199803)19:2_131:: AID-JOB878_3.0.CO;2-P
87. Naumann, S. E., & Bennett, N. (2000). A case for procedural justice climate: Development and test of a multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 881-889. doi:10.2307/1556416
88. *Naumann, S. E., & Bennett, N. (2002). The effects of procedural justice climate on work group performance. Small Group Research, 33, 361- 377. doi:10.1177/10496402033003004
89. Neal, A., & Hesketh, B. (2001). Productivity in organisations. In N. Anderson, D. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), International handbook of work and organisational psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 7-24). London, England: Sage.
90. Oh, I. S., Wang, G., & Mount, M. K. (2011). Validity of observer ratings of the five-factor model of personality traits: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 762-773. doi:10.1037/a0021832
91. Ostroff, C., & Bowen, D. E. (2000). Moving HR to a higher level: HR practices and organizational effectiveness. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multi-level theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 211-266). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
92. *Phillips, J. M. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice perceptions in hierarchical decision-making teams. Small Group Research, 33, 32-64. doi:10.1177/104649640203300102
93. *Price, K. H., Harrison, D. A., & Gavin, J. H. (2006). Withholding inputs in team contexts: Member composition, interaction processes, evaluation structure, and social loafing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1375- 1384. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1375
94. Raju, N. S., & Brand, P. A. (2003). Determining the significance of correlations corrected for unreliability and range restriction. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 52-71. doi:10.1177/ 0146621602239476
95. *Raver, J., & Ehrhart, M. (2006, August). Interpersonally fair teams: Linking justice climate, affective tone, and team citizenship behaviors. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, Atlanta, GA.
96. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
97. Roberson, Q. M. (2006a). Justice in teams: The activation and role of sensemaking in the emergence of justice climates. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 177-192. doi:10.1016/ j.obhdp.2006.02.006
98. Roberson, Q. M. (2006b). Justice in teams: The effects of interdependence and identification on referent choice and justice climate strength. Social Justice Research, 19, 323-344. doi:10.1007/s11211-006-0010-z
99. Roberson, Q. M., & Colquitt, J. A. (2005). Shared and configural justice: A social network model of justice in teams. Academy of Management Review, 30, 595-607. doi:10.5465/AMR.2005.17293715
100. Roberson, Q. M., & Williamson, I. O. (in press). Justice in self-managing teams: The role of social networks in the emergence of procedural justice climates. Academy of Management Journal.
101. Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15, 351-357. doi:10.2307/ 2087176
102. Rousseau, D. M. (1985). Issues of level in organizational research: Multilevel and cross-level perspectives. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 1-37.
103. Rupp, D., Bashshur, M., & Liao, H. (2007). Justice climate past, present, and future: Models of structure and emergence. In F. Dansereau & F. J. Yammarino (Eds.), Research in multilevel issues (Vol. 6, pp. 357-396). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
104. Rupp, D. E., & Paddock, E. L. (2010). From justice events to justice climate: A multilevel temporal model of information aggregation and judgment. In B. Mannix, M. Neal, & E. Mullen (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams: Fairness and groups (pp. 239-267). Bingley, England: JAI Emerald.
105. Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224-253. doi:10.2307/2392563
106. Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437-453. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00609.x
107. Schneider, B., & Reichers, A. E. (1983). On the etiology of climates. Personnel Psychology, 36, 19 -39. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1983.tb00500.x
108. Schneider, B., Salvaggio, A. N., & Subirats, M. (2002). Climate strength: A new direction for climate research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 220-229. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.220
109. Sherony, K. M., & Green, S. G. (2002). Coworker exchange: Relationships between coworkers, leader-member exchange, and work attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 542-548. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.542
110. *Simons, T., & Roberson, Q. M. (2003). Why managers should care about fairness: The effects of aggregate justice perceptions on organizational outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 432-443. doi:10.1037/ 0021-9010.88.3.432
111. Skarlicki, D. P., & Latham, G. P. (1996). Increasing citizenship behavior within a labor union: A test of organizational justice theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 161-169. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.2.161
112. Skarlicki, D. P., & Latham, G. P. (1997). Leadership training in organizational justice to increase citizenship behavior within a labor union: A replication. Personnel Psychology, 50, 617-633. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00707.x
113. *Spell, C., & Arnold, T. (2007). A multi-level analysis of organizational justice climate, structure, and employee mental health. Journal of Management, 33, 724-751. doi:10.1177/0149206307305560
114. Steel, P. D., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2002). Comparing meta-analytic moderator estimation techniques under realistic conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 96-111. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.96
115. Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178-190. doi:10.2307/1556375
116. Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
117. *Trevor, C., & Nyberg, A. (2008). Keeping your headcount when all about you are losing theirs: Downsizing, voluntary turnover rates, and the moderating role of HR practices. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 259-276. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2008.31767250
118. Tyler, T. R. (1994). Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 850-863. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.5.850
119. Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
120. Tyler, T. R., & Degoey, P. (1995). Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social identification effects on support for authorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 482-497. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.482
121. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). New York, NY: Academic Press.
122. Van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2002). Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 1-60). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
123. Van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2004). Fairness heuristic theory is an empirical framework: A reply to Á rnadóttir. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 45, 265-268. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2004.00404.x
124. Van den Bos, K., Lind, E. A., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1997). How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1034-1046. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1034
125. Van den Bos, K., & Van Prooijen, J. W. (2001). Referent cognitions theory: The psychology of voice depends on closeness of reference points. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 616-626. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.616
126. Van den Bos, K., Wilke, H. A. M., Lind, E. A., & Vermunt, R. (1998). Evaluating outcomes by means of the fair process effect: Evidence for different processes in fairness and satisfaction judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1493-1503. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1493
127. *Van Rooy, D. L. (2005). The employee satisfaction-performance link: A unit level analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida International University.
128. *Wallace, J., Edwards, B., Mondore, S., & Finch, D. (2008). Employee discrimination claims and employee-initiated lawsuits: Does procedural justice climate moderate the claims-dispute relationship? Journal of Managerial Issues, 20, 313-326.
129. Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
130. Walumbwa, F. O., Hartnell, C. A., & Oke, A. (2010). Servant leadership, procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: A cross-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 517-529. doi:10.1037/a0018867
131. Walumbwa, F. O., Wu, C., & Orwa, B. (2008). Contingent reward transactional leadership, work attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of procedural justice climate perceptions and strength. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 251-265. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.03.004
132. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. London, England: Sage.
133. Whitman, D. S., Van Rooy, D. L., & Viswesvaran, C. (2010). Satisfaction, citizenship behaviors, and performance in work units: A meta-analysis of collective construct relations. Personnel Psychology, 63, 41-81. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01162.x