Shared and configural justice: A social network model of justice in teams

Academy of Management Review

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 595-607

  Roberson, Quinetta M ^a,c   Colquitt, Jason A ^b  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c and History   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22544453307     PISSN: 03637425     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2005.17293715     Document Type: Review

References (86)

1. Adams, J. S. 1965. Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 2: 267-299. New York: Academic Press.
2. Armstrong, D. J., & Cole, P. 1995. In S. E. Jackson & M. N. Ruderman (Eds.), Diversity in work teams: Research paradigms for a changing workplace: 187-218. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3. Arrow, H., & McGrath, J. E. 1995. Membership dynamics in groups at work: A theoretical analysis. Research in Organizational Behavior, 17: 373-411.
4. Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. F. 1986. Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations, vol. 1: 43-55. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
5. Boudreau, M., Loch, K., Robey, D., & Straub, D. 1998. Going global: Using information technology to advance the competitiveness of the virtual transnational organization. Academy of Management Executive, 12(4): 120-128.
6. Brass, D. J. 1984. Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 518-539.
7. Brass, D. J. 1995. A social network perspective on human resources management. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management, vol. 13: 39-79. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
8. Burkhardt, M. E. 1994. Social interaction effects following technological change: A longitudinal investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 869-898.
9. Burt, R. S. 1982. Toward a structural theory of action. New York: Academic Press.
10. Burt, R. S. 1983. Distinguishing relational contents. In R. S. Burt & M. J. Minor (Eds.), Applied social network analysis: 35-74. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11. Burt, R. S. 1987. Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, 92: 1287-1335.
12. Burt, R. S. 2000. The network structure of social capital, Research in Organizational Behavior, 22: 345-423.
13. Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, C. A. 1993. Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46: 823-850.
14. Campion, M. A., Papper, E. M., & Medsker, G. J. 1996. Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 49: 429-452.
15. Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. 1997. What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23: 239-290.
16. Colquitt, J. A. 2001. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 386-400.
17. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O., & Ng, K. Y. 2001. Justice at the millenium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 425-445.
18. Colquitt, J. A., Noe, R. A., & Jackson, C. L. 2002. Justice in teams: Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 55: 83-109.
19. Devine, D. J., Clayton, L. D., Philips, J. L., Dunford, B. B., & Melner, S. B. 1999. Teams in organizations: Prevalence, characteristics, and effectiveness. Small Group Research, 30:678-711.
20. Erickson, B. H. 1988. The relational basis of attitudes. In B. Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social structures: 99-121. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Festinger, L. 1950. Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57: 271-282.
22. Galaskiewicz, J., & Burt, R. S. 1991. Interorganization contagion in corporate philanthropy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 88-105.
23. Gladstein, D. L. 1984. Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 499-517.
24. Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. 1987. Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing, Research in Organizational Behavior, 9: 175-208.
25. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. 1995. Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6: 219-247.
26. Greenberg, J. 1990. Employee theft as a reaction to under-payment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 561-568.
27. Hackman, J. R. 1987. The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior: 315-342. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
28. Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. 1975. Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimenta] social psychology: 45-99. New York: Academic Press.
29. Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. 1998. Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 96-107.
30. Hedlund, J., Ilgen, D. R., & Hollenbeck, J. R. 1998. Decision accuracy in computer-mediated versus face-to-face decision-making teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76: 30-47.
31. Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. 1997. The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121: 43-64.
32. Hulin, C. L. 1991. Adaptation, persistence, and commitment in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, vol. 2: 445-506. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
33. Jackson, S. E., & Ruderman, M. N. 1995. Diversity in work teams: Research paradigms for a changing workplace. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
34. Janz, B. D., Colquitt, J. A., & Noe, R. A. 1997. Knowledge worker team effectiveness: The role of autonomy, interdependence, team development, and contextual support variables. Personnel Psychology. 50: 877-904.
35. Jarvenpaa, S., Knoll, K., & Leidner, D. 1998. Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(4): 29-64.
36. Kawakami, K., & Dion, K. L. 1995. Social identity and affect as determinants of collective action: Toward an integration of relative deprivation and social identity theories. Theory and Psychology, 5: 551-577.
37. Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. 1992. Group decision making and communication technology. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52: 96-123.
38. Kirkman, B. L., Jones, R. G., & Shapiro, D. L. 2000. Why do employees resist teams? Examining the "resistance barrier" to work team effectiveness. International Journal of Conflict Management, 11: 74-92.
39. Kirkman, B. L., Shapiro, D. L., Novelli, L., Jr., & Brett, J. M. 1996. Employee concerns regarding self-managing work teams: A multidimensional justice perspective. Social Justice Research. 9: 47-67.
40. Konovsky, M. 2000. Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations. Journal of Management, 26: 489-511.
41. Korsgaard, M. A., Schweiger, D. M., & Sapienza, H. J. 1995. Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 60-84.
42. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. 2000: A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: 3-90. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
43. Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. 1998. Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23: 325-340.
44. LePine, J. A., Hanson, M. A., Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. 2000. Contextual performance and teamwork: Implications for staffing. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management, vol. 19: 53-90. New York: Elsevier Science.
45. Leventhal, G. S. 1980. What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research: 27-55. New York: Plenum Press.
46. Lincoln, J. R., & Miller, J. 1979. Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative analysis of relational networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24: 181-199.
47. Lind, E. A. 2001. Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice: 56-88. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
48. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. 1988. The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
49. Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D. L., & Weingart, L. R. 2001. Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communication perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 779-793.
50. Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P., Jr. 1987. Leading workers to lead themselves: The external leadership of self-managing work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32: 106-128.
51. Marsden, P. V., & Friedkin, N. E. 1994. Network studies of social influence. In S. Wasserman & J. Galaskiewicz (Eds.), Advances in social network analysis: 3-25. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52. McGrath, J. 1991. Time, interaction and performance (TIP): A theory of small groups. Small Group Research, 22: 147-174.
53. Meyer, G. W. 1994. Social information processing and social networks: A test of social influence mechanisms. Human Relations, 47: 1013-1047.
54. Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. 1996. Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21: 402-433.
55. Montoya-Weiss, M. M., Massey, A. P., & Song, M. 2001. Getting it together: Temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 1251-1262.
56. Mossholder, K. W., Bennett, N., & Martin, C. L. 1998. A multilevel analysis of procedural justice context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19: 131-141.
57. Naumann, S. E., & Bennett, N. 2000. A case for procedural justice climate: Development and test of a multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 881-889.
58. O'Reilly, C. A., III, Caldwell, D. F., & Barnett, W. P. 1989. Work group demography, social integration, and turnover, Administrative Science Quarterly, 34: 21-37.
59. Organ, D. W. 1990. The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12: 43-72.
60. Phillips, J. M., Douthitt, E. A., & Hyland, M. H. 2001. The role of justice in team member satisfaction with the leader and attachment to the team. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 316-325.
61. Rice, R. E., & Aydin, C. 1991. Attitudes toward new organizational technology: Network proximity as a mechanism for social information processing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 219-244.
62. Saavedra, R., Earley, P. C., & Van Dyne, L. 1993. Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 61-72.
63. Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. 1978. A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23: 224-253.
64. Schein, E. 1985. Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
65. Schneider, B., & Reichers, A. 1983. On the etiology of climates. Personnel Psychology, 36: 19-40.
66. Shapiro, D. L., & Kirkman, B. L. 1999. Employees' reaction to the change to work teams: The influence of "anticipatory" injustice. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12: 51-66.
67. Shapiro, D. L., & Kirkman, B. L. 2001. Anticipatory injustice: The consequences of expecting injustice in the workplace. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice: 152-178. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
68. Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R. 1997. Retaliation in the workplace: The role of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 434443.
69. Skarlicki, D. P., & Latham, G. P. 1996. Increasing citizenship behavior within a labor union: A test of organizational justice theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81: 161-169.
70. Skarlicki, D. P., & Latham, G. P. 1997. Leadership training in organizational justice to increase citizenship behavior within a labor union: A replication. Personnel Psychology, 50: 617-633.
71. Steiner, I. D. 1972. Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
72. Sundstrom, E., De Meuse, K. P., & Futrell, D. 1990. Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist 45: 120-133.
73. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. 1975. Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
74. Thompson, J. D. 1967. Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
75. Tosi, H. L. 1992. The environment/organization/person contingency mode: A meso approach to the study of organizations. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
76. Triandis, H. C. 1960. Cognitive similarity and communication in a dyad. Human Relations, 13: 175-183.
77. Tsui, A. S., Xin, K. R., & Egan, T. D. 1995. Relational demography: The missing link in vertical dyad linkage. In S. E. Jackson & M. N. Ruderman (Eds.), Diversity in work teams: Research paradigms for a changing workplace: 97-129. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
78. Turner, J. C. 1991. Social influence. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
79. Tyler, T. R., & Degoey, P. 1995. Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social identification effects on support for authorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69: 482-497.
80. Tyler, T. R., Degoey, P., & Smith, H. 1996. Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70: 913-930.
81. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. 1992. A relational model of authority in groups. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 25: 115-191. New York: Academic Press.
82. Van den Bos, K. 2001. Fairness heuristic theory: Assessing the information to which people are reacting has a pivotal role in understanding organizational justice. In S. Gilliland, D. Steiner, & D. Skarlicki (Eds.), Theoretical and cultural perspectives on organizational justice: 63-84. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
83. Wall, T. D., Kemp, N. J., Jackson, P. R., & Clegg, C. W. 1986. Outcomes of autonomous workgroups: A long-term field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 29: 280-304.
84. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
85. Wellman, B. 1988. Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. In B. Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social structures: 19-61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
86. Williams, K. Y., & O' Reilly, C. A., III. 1998. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20: 77-140.