SOME FOUNDATIONAL AND GUIDING QUESTIONS FOR MULTI-LEVEL CONSTRUCT VALIDATION

Research in Multi-Level Issues

Volumn 3, Issue , 2004, Pages 305-315

  Hofmann, David A ^a   Jones, Lisa M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36148978963     PISSN: 14759144     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1475-9144(04)03014-0     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. M.R. Barrick G.L. Stewart M.J. Neubert M.K. Mount Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness Journal of Applied Psychology 83 1998 377 391
2. B. Barry G.L. Stewart Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality Journal of Applied Psychology 82 1997 62 78
3. Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In: K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds), Multi-level Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. D. Chan Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models Journal of Applied Psychology 83 1998 234 246
5. DeShon, R. P., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Schmidt, A. M., Milner, K. R., & Wiechmann, D. (2003). A level, multiple goal model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance in training . Manuscript under review.
6. Firebaugh, G. (1980). Groups as contexts and frogponds. In: K. H. Roberts & L. Burstein (Eds), Issues in Aggregation (pp. 43–52). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. J.M. George L.R. James Personality, affect, and behavior in groups revisited: Comment on aggregation, levels of analysis, and a recent application of within and between analysis Journal of Applied Psychology 78 1993 798 804
8. Hofmann, D. A. (2002). Issues in level research: Theory development, measurement and analysis. In: S. Rogelberg (Ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Industrial and Organizational Psychology . Oxford: Blackwell.
9. Hofmann, D. A., & Jones, L. M. (2003). Culture of personality: Leadership, collective personality, and organizational performance . Manuscript submitted for publication.
10. House, R., Rousseau, D. M., & Thomas-Hunt, M. (1995). The meso paradigm: A framework for the integration of micro and macro organizational behavior. In: L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 17, pp. 71–114). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
11. B.L. Kirkman B. Rosen Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment Academy of Management Journal 42 1999 58 74
12. K.J. Klein F. Dansereau R.J. Hall Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis Academy of Management Journal 19 1994 195 229
13. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A level approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In: K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds), Multi-level Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations (pp. 3–90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. J.E. Mathieu S.S. Kohler A cross-level examination of group absence influences on individual absence Journal of Applied Psychology 75 1990 217 220
15. F.P. Morgeson D.A. Hofmann The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for research and theory development Academy of Management Review 24 1999 249 265
16. G.A. Neuman S.H. Wagner N.D. Christiansen The relationship between work-team personality composition and the job performance of teams Group & Organization Management 24 1999 28 45
17. B.M. Staw L.E. Sandelands J.E. Dutton Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multi-level analysis Administrative Science Quarterly 26 1981 501 524
18. J.P. Walsh G.R. Ungson Organizational memory Academy of Management Review 16 1991 57 91