The social context of performance appraisal and appraisal reactions: A meta-analysis

Human Resource Management

Volumn 51, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 709-732

  Pichler, Shaun ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Performance assessment; Supervisor subordinate relations

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866788662     PISSN: 00904848     EISSN: 1099050X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hrm.21499     Document Type: Article

References (132)

1. The references indicated by asterisks are the ones included in the quantitative review.
2. Atwater, L. E., & Brett, J. F. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of reactions to developmental 360° feedback. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 532-548.
3. Avery, D. R., McKay, P. F., Wilson, D. C., Volpone, S. D., & Killham, E. A. (2001). Does voice go flat? How tenure diminishes the impact of voice. Human Resource Management, 50, 147-158.
4. Balzer, W. K., & Sulsky, L. M. (1990). Performance appraisal effectiveness. In K. R. Murphy & F. E. Saal (Eds.), Psychology in organizations: Integrating science and practice (pp. 133-156). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Banks, C. G., & Murphy, K. R. (1985). Toward narrowing the research-practice gap in performance appraisal. Personnel Psychology, 38, 335-345.
6. *Bartol, K. M., Durham, C. C., & Poon, J. M. L. (2001). Influence of performance evaluation rating segmentation on motivation and fairness perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1106-1119.
7. Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., Sanchez, R. J., Craig, J. M., Ferrera, P., & Campion, M. (2001). Applicant reactions to selection: Development of the selection procedural justice scale. Personnel Psychology, 54, 387-419.
8. *Bonness, B., & Macan, T. (2006). Reactions to the performance appraisal process: Effects of self-appraisals. Paper presented at the Society for Industrial-Organizational Psychology conference.
9. *Boswell, W. R., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000). Employee satisfaction with performance appraisals and appraisers: The role of perceived appraisal use. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11, 283-299.
10. *Brown, M., & Benson, J. (2003). Rated to exhaustion? Reactions to performance appraisal processes. Industrial Relations Journal, 34(1), 67-81.
11. *Buehler, L. M. (2006). Due process dimensions of performance appraisal, perceptions of organizational justice, and some outcomes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). DePaul University, Chicago, IL.
12. *Burke, R. J., & Wilcox, D. S. (1969). Characteristics of effective employee performance review and development interviews. Personnel Psychology, 22, 291-305.
13. *Burke, R. J., Weitzel, W., & Weir, T. (1978). Characteristics of effective employee performance review and development interviews: Replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 31, 903-919.
14. *Bustamante, C., & Dickinson, T. L. (1996). Some determinants of employee attitudes about the performance appraisal process. Paper presented at the 11th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.
15. Caplan, R. D., Cobb, S., French, J. R. P., Harrison, R. V., & Pinneau, S. R., Jr. (1975). Job demands and worker health. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
16. Cawley, B. D., Keeping, L. M., & Levy, P. E. (1998). Participation in the performance appraisal process and employee reactions: A meta-analytic review of field investigations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 615-633.
17. Cleveland, N. J., & Murphy, K. R. (1992). Analysis of performance appraisal as goal-directed behavior. In G. Ferris & K. Rowland (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resource management (Vol. 10, pp. 121-185). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
18. *Cobb, A. T., Vest, M., & Hills, F. (1997). Who delivers justice? Source perceptions of procedural fairness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1021-1040.
19. Cogliser, C. C., Schriesheim, C. A., Scandura, T. A., & Gardner, W. L. (2009). Balance in leader and follower perceptions of leader-member exchange: Relationships with performance and work attitudes. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 452-465.
20. Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278-321.
21. Colquitt, J. A., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., Conlon, D. E., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425-446.
22. Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31, 874-900.
23. Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46-78.
24. Day, D. D., & Crain, E. C. (1992). The role of affect and ability in initial exchange quality perceptions. Group and Organization Management, 17, 380-397.
25. DeNisi, A., & Gonzalez, J. A. (2000). Performance appraisal. In E. Locke (Ed.), A handbook of principles of organizational behavior (pp. 60-72). London, UK: Blackwell.
26. DeShon, R. (2002). A generalizability theory perspective on measurement error corrections in validity generalization. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.). Validity generalization: A critical review (pp. 365-402). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. *Dipboye, R. L., & de Pontbriand, R. (1981). Correlates of employee reactions to performance appraisals and appraisal systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 248-251.
28. *Dobbins, G. H., Cardy, R. L., & Platz-Vieno, S. J. (1990). A contingency approach to appraisal satisfaction: An initial investigation of the joint effects of organizational variables and appraisal characteristics. Journal of Management, 3, 619-632.
29. *Dobbins, G. H., Platz, S. J., & Houston, J. (1993). Relationship between trust in appraisal and appraisal effectiveness: A field study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 7, 309-322.
30. *Dorfman, P. W., Stephan, W. G., & Loveland, J. (1986). Performance appraisal behaviors: Supervisor perceptions and subordinate reactions. Personnel Psychology, 39, 579-597.
31. *Dulebohn, J. H., & Ferris, G. R. (1999). The role of influence tactics in perceptions of performance evaluation's fairness. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 288-303.
32. *Elicker, J. D. (2000). An organizational justice explanation of feedback reactions in different leader-member exchange relationships (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Akron, Akron, OH.
33. Elicker, J. D., Levy, P. E., & Hall, R. J. (2006). The role of leader-member exchange in the performance appraisal process. Journal of Management, 32, 531-551.
34. Erdogan, B. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of justice perceptions in performance appraisals. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 555-578.
35. *Evans, E. M., & McShane, S. L. (1988). Employee perceptions of performance appraisal fairness in two organizations. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 20, 177-191.
36. Fassina, N. E., Jones, D. A., & Uggerslev, K. L. (2008). Relationship clean-up time: Using meta-analysis and structural equation modeling to clarify the relations between job satisfaction, perceived fairness, and citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 34, 161-188.
37. Ferris, G. R., Munyon, T. P., Basik, K., & Buckley, M. R. (2008). The performance evaluation context: Social, emotional, cognitive, political, and relationship components. Human Resource Management Review, 18, 146-116.
38. *Feys, M., Libbrecht, N., Anseel, F., & Lievens, F. (2009). A closer look at the relationship between justice perceptions and feedback reactions: The role of the quality of the relationship with supervisor. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
39. Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of "voice" and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108-119
40. *Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115-130.
41. Fox, A. (2009). Curing what ails performance reviews. HR Magazine, 54(1), 52-56.
42. *French, J. P., Kay, E., & Meyer, H. H. (1966). Participation and the appraisal system. Human Relations, 19(3), 3-20.
43. *Gaby, S. H. (2004). Summarizing and measuring participants' perceptions related to performance appraisal effectiveness (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, TN.
44. Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 827-844.
45. *Giles, W. F., Findley, H. M., & Field, H. S. (1997). Procedural fairness in performance appraisal: Beyond the review session. Journal of Business and Psychology, 11, 493-506.
46. *Giles, W. F., & Mossholder, K. W. (1990). Employee reactions to contextual and session components of performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 371-377.
47. Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161-178.
48. Graen, G., Novak, M. A., & Sommerkamp, P. (1982). The effects of leader-member exchange and job design on productivity and job satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30, 109-131.
49. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219-247.
50. Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16, 399-432.
51. *Greller, M. M. (1975). Subordinate participation and reactions to the appraisal interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 544-549.
52. Hassebrauck, M., & Fehr, B. (2002). Dimensions of relationship quality. Personal Relationships, 9, 253-270.
53. Hawkins, A. J., Blanchard, V. L., Baldwin, S. A., & Fawcett, E. B. (2008). Does marriage and relationship education work? A meta-analytic study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 723-734.
54. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
55. Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998). Fixed and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3, 486-504.
56. *Hillery, J. M., & Wexley, K. N. (1974). Participation effects in appraisal interviews conducted in a training session. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 168-171.
57. *Horner, M. T., Cook, A. L., & Payne, S. C. (2008). When does affect relate to performance appraisal reactions? The moderating role of situational constraints. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial Organizational Psychology, San Francisco, CA.
58. *Hubbell, A. P., & Chory-Assad, R. M. (2005). Motivating factors: Perceptions of justice and their relationship with managerial and organizational trust. Communication Studies, 56(1), 47-70.
59. *Hurd, B., Byrne, Z. S., & Gross, M. A. (2009). Moderation of communication medium richness on reactions to task feedback. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA.
60. *Igoumenopolous, K. (2001). Factors relating to performance appraisal satisfaction and acceptance of lower-level employees (Unpublished master's thesis). San Jose State University, San Jose, CA.
61. Ilgen, D. R., Barnes-Farrell, J. L., & McKellin, D. B. (1993). Performance appraisal process research in the 1980's: What has it contributed to appraisals in use? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 321-368.
62. *Ilgen, D. R., Peterson, R. B., Martin, B. A., & Boeschen, D. A. (1981). Supervisor and subordinate reactions to performance appraisal sessions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28, 311-330.
63. *Inderrieden, E. J., Allen, R. E., & Keaveny, T. J. (1992). An investigation of the antecedents and consequences of voluntary self-ratings in a performance appraisal system. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Academy of Management, Las Vegas, NV.
64. *Inderrieden, E. J., Allen, R. E., & Keaveny, T. J. (2004). Managerial discretion in the use of self-ratings in an appraisal system: The antecedents and consequences. Journal of Managerial Issues, 16, 460-482.
65. *Inderrieden, E. J., Keaveny, T. J., & Allen, R. E. (1988). Predictors of employee satisfaction with the performance appraisal process. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2, 306-310.
66. *Jawahar, I. M. (2006). An investigation of potential consequences of satisfaction with appraisal feedback. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 13(2), 14-28.
67. *Jawahar, I. M. (2007). The influences of perceptions of fairness on performance appraisal reactions. Journal of Labor Research, 28, 735-754.
68. *Johnson, J. S. (2003). Employees' justice perceptions of performance appraisal systems: Attitudinal, behavioral, and performance consequences (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Portland State University, Portland, OR.
69. *Kacmar, K. M., Wayne, S. J., & Wright, P. M. (1996). Subordinate reactions to the use of impression management tactics and feedback by the supervisor. Journal of Managerial Issues, 8(1), 35-53.
70. Kacmar, K. M., Witt, L. A., Zivnuska, S., & Gully, S. M. (2003). The interactive effects of leader-member exchange and communication frequency on performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 764-772.
71. *Kamer, B. (2006). Key factors contributing to effectiveness in the performance appraisals of military cadres. Paper presented at the International Military Testing Association Conference.
72. *Kavanagh, P., Benson, J., & Brown, M. (2007). Understanding performance appraisal fairness. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 45, 132-150.
73. *Keeping, L. M. (2000). The frustration effect and self-ratings: Do explanations and individual differences matter? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Akron, Akron, OH.
74. Keeping, L. M., & Levy, P. E. (2000). Performance appraisal reactions: Measurement, modeling, and method bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 708-723.
75. *Kinicki, A. J., Prussia, G. E., Wu, B., & McKee-Ryan, F. M. (2004). A covariance structure analysis of employees' response to performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1057-1069.
76. *Klein, H. J., & Snell, S. (1994). The impact of interview process and context on performance appraisal interview effectiveness. Journal of Managerial Issues, 6, 160-175.
77. Klein, H. J., Snell, S. A., & Wexley, K. N. (1987). Systems model of the performance appraisal interview process. Industrial Relations, 26, 267-280.
78. Konovsky, M. A. (2000). Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations. Journal of Management, 26, 489-512.
79. *Korsgaard, M. A., & Roberson, L. (1995). Procedural justice in performance evaluation: The role of instrumental and non-instrumental voice in performance appraisal discussions. Journal of Management, 21, 657-669.
80. *Korsgaard, M. A., Roberson, L., & Rymph, R. D. (1998). What motivates fairness? The role of subordinate assertive behavior on manager's interactional fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 731-744.
81. Kossek, E. E., Pichler, S., Bodner, T., & Hammer, L. (2011). Workplace social support and work-family conflict: A meta-analysis clarifying the influence of general and work-family-specific supervisor and organizational support. Personnel Psychology, 64, 289-313.
82. *Landy, F. J., Barnes, J. L., & Murphy, K. R. (1978). Correlates of perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 751-754.
83. *Lee, M., & Son, B. (1998). The effects of appraisal review content on employees' reactions and performance. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9, 203-214.
84. Lefkowitz, J. (2000). The role of interpersonal affective regard in supervisory performance ratings: A literature review and causal model. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 67-85.
85. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
86. *Levy, P. E., Cawley, B. D., & Foti, R. (1998). Reactions to appraisal discrepancies: Performance ratings and attributions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 12, 437-455.
87. *Levy, P. E., & Williams, J. R. (1998). The role of perceived system knowledge in predicting appraisal reactions, job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 53-65.
88. Levy, P. E., & Williams, J. R. (2004). The social context of performance appraisal. Journal of Management, 30, 881-905.
89. Liden, R. C., & Graen, G. (1980). Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 451-464.
90. Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24, 43-72.
91. Liden, R. C., Sparrowe, R. T., & Wayne, S. J. (1997). Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 15, 47-119.
92. Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., & Earley, P. C. (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952-959.
93. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York, NY: Plenum.
94. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta analysis. Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 49. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
95. Maslyn, J. M., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2001). LMX and its dimensions: Effects of self effort and other's effort on relationship quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 697-708.
96. Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., & Taylor, M. S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: the differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 738-748.
97. Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (1999). The effect of performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 123-136.
98. McFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 626-637.
99. Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
100. *Nathan, B. R., Mohrman, A. M., & Milliman, J. (1991). Interpersonal relations as a context for the effects of appraisal interviews on performance and satisfaction: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 352-369.
101. *Nemeroff, W. F., & Wexley, K. N. (1979). An exploration of the relationships between performance feedback interview characteristics and interview outcomes as perceived by managers and subordinates. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 52, 25-34.
102. Noe, R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2000). Human resource management: Gaining a competitive advantage. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
103. Norris-Watts, C., & Levy, P. (2004). The mediating role of affective commitment in the relation of the feedback environment to work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 351-365.
104. *Payne, S. C., Horner, M. T., Boswell, W. R., Wolf, A. N., & Stine-Cheyen, K. J. (2008). Comparison of online and traditional performance appraisal systems. Paper presented at the Society for Industrial-Organizational Psychology Conference, San Francisco, CA.
105. Pettijohn, C. E., Pettijohn, L. S., & d'Amico, M. (2001). Characteristics of performance appraisals and their impact on sales force satisfaction. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12, 127-146.
106. *Pooyan, A., & Eberhardt, B. J. (1989). Correlates of performance appraisal satisfaction among supervisory and non-supervisor employees. Journal of Business Research, 19, 215-226.
107. *Prince, J. B., & Lawler, E. E. (1986). Does salary discussion hurt the developmental performance appraisal? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 357-374.
108. *Roberson, L., Torkel, S., Korsgaard, A., Klein, D., & Diddams, M. (1993). Self-appraisal and perceptions of the appraisal discussion: A field experiment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 129-142.
109. Roberts, K. H., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1974). Measuring organizational communication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 321-326.
110. *Russell, J. S., & Goode, D. L. (1988). An analysis of managers' reactions to their own performance appraisal feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 63-67.
111. Scandura, T. A., Graen, G. B., & Novak, M. A. (1986). When managers decide not to decide autocratically: An investigation of leader-member exchange and decision influence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 579-584.
112. *Secunda, M. D. (1984). Employee perceptions of performance appraisal systems: Causal determinants of fairness, accuracy, and acceptability (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA.
113. Shadish, W. R., Jr. (1996). Meta-analysis and the exploration of causal mediation processes: A primer of examples, methods, and issues. Psychological Methods, 1, 47-65.
114. *Silverman, S. B., & Wexley, K. N. (1984). Reaction of employees to performance appraisal interviews as a function of their participation in rating scale development. Personnel Psychology, 37, 703-710.
115. *Simmons, P. R. (1986). Organizational effects of several appraisal approaches (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
116. Smith, P. C., Kendall, L. M., & Hulin, C. L. (1969). The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
117. *Tang, T. L. P., & Sarsfield-Baldwin, L. J. (1996). Distributive and procedural justice as related to satisfaction and commitment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southwestern Psychological Association, Houston, TX.
118. *Taylor, M. S., Tracy, K. B., Renard, M. K., Harrison, J. K., & Carroll, S. J. (1995). Due process in performance appraisal: A quasi-experiment in procedural justice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 495-523.
119. *Taylor, R. L., & Zawacki, R. A. (1978). Collaborative goal setting in performance appraisal: A field experiment. Public Personnel Management, 7(3), 162-170.
120. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
121. *Thurston, P. W. (2001). Clarifying the structure of justice using fairness perceptions of performance appraisal practices (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY.
122. Tripp, T. M., Sondak, H., & Bies, R. J. (1995). Justice as rationality: A relational perspective on fairness in negotiations. In R. J. Bies, R. J. Lewicki & B. H. Sheppard (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organization (5th ed., pp. 45-64). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
123. Tyler, T. R. (1987). Conditions leading to value-expressive effects in judgments of procedural justice: A test of four models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 333-344.
124. Tyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group values model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 830-838.
125. Tyler, T. R. (1994). Psychological models of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 850-863.
126. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115-191.
127. van den Bos, K., Lind, E. A., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1997). How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1034-1046.
128. van den Bos, K., Wilke, H. A. M., & Lind, E. A. (1998). When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1449-1458.
129. Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., Bommer, W. H., & Tetrick, L. E. (2002). The role of fair treatment and rewards in perceptions of organizational support and leader-member exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 590-598.
130. Werner, J. M., & Bolino, M. C. (1997). Explaining U.S. courts of appeals decisions involving performance appraisal. Personnel Psychology, 50, 1-24.
131. Wexley, K. N., & Klimoski, R. (1984). Performance appraisal: An update. In K. M. Rowland & G. R. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 2, pp. 23-79). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
132. *Wright, R. P. (2004). Mapping cognitions to better understand attitudinal and behavioral responses in appraisal research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 339-374.