Who delivers justice? Source perceptions of procedural fairness

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 27, Issue 12, 1997, Pages 1021-1040

  Cobb, Anthony T ^a   Vest, Mike ^b   Hills, Fred ^b  

^a PAMPLIN COLLEGE OF BUSINESS   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031574920     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00284.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bies, R. J. (1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 289-319). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
2. Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1988). Voice and justification: Their influence on procedural fairness judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 676-685.
3. Bies, R. J., & Tyler, T. R. (1993). The "litigation mentality" in organizations: A test of alternative psychological explanations. Organization Science, 4, 352-366.
4. Blalock, H. M., Jr. (1960). Social statistics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
5. Brockner, J. (1988). The effects of work layoffs on survivors: Research, theory, and practice. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 213-255). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
6. Cobb, A. T., & Frey, F. M. (1996). The effects of leader fairness and pay outcomes on superior/subordinate relations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1401-1426.
7. Cobb, A. T., Wooten, K., & Folger, R. (1995). Justice in the making: Toward understanding the theory and practice of justice in organizational change and development. In W. A. Pasmore & R. W. Woodman (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 8, pp. 243-295). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
8. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlational analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Dipboye, R. L., & de Pontbraind, R. (1981). Correlates of employee reactions to performance appraisals and appraisal systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 248-251.
10. Earley, P. C., & Lind, E. A. (1987). Procedural justice and participation in task selection: The role of control in mediating justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1148-1160.
11. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
12. Folger, R., & Greenberg, J. (1985). Procedural justice: An interpretative analysis of personnel systems. In K. Rowland & G. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 3, pp. 141-183). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
13. Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115-130.
14. Greenberg, J. (1986a). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 340-342.
15. Greenberg, J. (1986b). Organizational performance appraisal procedures: What makes them fair? In R. Lewicki, B. Sheppard, & M. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 25-42). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
16. Greenberg, J. (1990a). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 561-568.
17. Greenberg, J. (1990b). Looking fair vs. being fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice. In B. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 12, pp. 111-157). Greenwich CT: JAI.
18. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
19. Landy, F. J., Barnes, J. L., & Murphy, K. R. (1978). Correlates of perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 751-754.
20. Lawler, E., & Bacharach, S. B. (1983). Political action and alignment in organizations. In S. B. Bacharach (Ed.), Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 2, pp. 83-107). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
21. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55). New York, NY: Plenum.
22. Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., & Earley, P. C. (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952-959.
23. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York, NY: Plenum.
24. Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845-855.
25. Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107-142.
26. Ray, D. F., & Schnake, M. E. (Eds.). (1991). Proceedings of the Southern Management Association (pp. 278-280). Mississippi State, MS: Mississippi State.
27. Schein, E. (1980). Organizational psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
28. Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
29. Stevenson, W., Pearce, J., & Porter, L. (1985). The concept of coalition in organization theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 10, 256-268.
30. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Tyler, T. R., & Bies, R. J. (1990). Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justice. In J. S. Carroll (Ed.), Applied social psychology and organizational settings (pp. 77-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). New York, NY: Academic.