The influence of perceptions of fairness on performance appraisal reactions

Journal of Labor Research

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 735-754

  Jawahar, I M ^a  

^a ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Agent system justice model; Perceptions of fairness; Performance appraisal reactions; Two factor justice model

Indexed keywords

EID: 36249023711     PISSN: 01953613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12122-007-9014-1     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Adams S (1965) Inequity in social exchange. In: Berkowitz L (ed) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Academic, New York, p. 267-299
2. Ambrose ML (2002) Contemporary justice research: a new look at familiar questions. Org Behav Human Decis Process 89:803-812
3. Anderson J, Gerbing D (1998) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 103:411-423
4. Arbuckle J (1997) Amos users' guide (version 3.6). Small-Waters Corporation, Chicago, IL
5. Ashford SJ (1986) Feedback-seeking in individual adaptation: a resource perspective. Acad Manage J 29:465-487, September
6. Balzer WK, Sulsky LM (1990) Performance appraisal effectiveness. In: Murphy KR, Saal FE (eds) Psychology in organizations: integrating science and practice. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 133-156
7. Banks CG, Murphy KR (1985) Toward narrowing the research-practice gap in performance appraisal, Pers Psychol 38: 335-345
8. Bentler PM (1990) Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychol Bull 107:238-246
9. Bernardin JH, Beatty RW (1984) Performance appraisal: assessing human behavior at work. Kent, Boston
10. Bernardin JH, Villanova P (1986) Performance appraisal. In: Locke EA (ed) Generalizing from laboratory to field settings. D.C. Health, Lexington, MA, pp 43-62
11. Bernardin JH, Villanova P (2005) Research streams in rater self-efficacy. Group Organ Manage 30:61-88
12. Bies RJ (2001) Interactional in (justice): the sacred and the profane. In: Greenberg J, Cropanzano R (eds) Advances in organizational justice. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp 89-118
13. Bies RJ, Moag JS (1986) Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness. In: Lewicki RJ, Blair HS, Bazerman M (eds) Research on negotiation in organization. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT. pp 43-55
14. Brockner J, Greenberg J (1990) The impact of layoffs on survivors: insights from procedural and distributive justice. In: Carroll JS (ed) Applied social psychology and organizational settings. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 45-75
15. Browne MW, Cudeck R (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS (eds) Testing structural equation models. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 136-142
16. Burke RJ, Wilcox DS (1969) Characteristics of effective employee performance review and development interviews, Pers Psychol 22:291-305
17. Cardy RL, Dobbins GH (1994) Performance appraisal: alternative perspectives. South-Western, Cincinnati, OH
18. Carroll SJ, Schneier CE (1982) Performance appraisal and review systems: the identification, measurement and development of performance in organizations. Scott, Foresman, Glenview, IL
19. Cederblom D (1982) The performance appraisal interview: a review, implications, and suggestions. Acad Manage Rev 7:219-27
20. Colquitt JA (2001) On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. J Appl Psychol 86:386-400
21. Colquitt JA, Conlon DE, Wesson MJ, Porter C, Ng KY (2001) Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. J Appl Psychol 86:425-445
22. Cropanzano R, Prehar CA (1999) Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice, Paper presented at the 14th annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, GA
23. Decotiis T, Petit A (1978) The performance appraisal process: a model and some testable propositions. Acad Manage Rev 3:635-646
24. Dipboye RL, de Pontriand R (1981) Correlates of employee reactions to performance appraisal systems. J Appl Psychol 66: 248-251
25. Dorfman PW, Stephan WG, Loveland J (1986) Performance appraisal behavior: supervisor perceptions and subordinate reactions. Pers Psychol 39: 579-598
26. Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison process. Hum Relat 7:117-140
27. Folger R, Konovsky MA (1989) Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Acad Manage J 32:115-130
28. Giles WF, Mossholder KW (1990) Employee reactions to contextual and session components of performance appraisal. J Appl Psychol 75:371-377
29. Gilliland SW (1994) Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to a selection system. J Appl Psychol 79: 691-701
30. Greenberg J (1986) Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. J Appl Psychol 71:340-342
31. Greenberg J (1988) Equity and workplace status: a field experiment. J Appl Psychol 73:606-613
32. Greenberg J (1993) The social side of fairness: interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In: Cropanzano R (ed) Justice in the workplace: approaching fairness in human resource management, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 79-103
33. Greenberg J (1994) Using socially fair treatment to promote acceptance of a work site smoking ban. J Appl Psychol 79:288-297
34. Greenberg J (2001) The seven loose can(n)ons of organizational justice. In: Greenberg J, Cropanzano R (eds) Advances in organizational justice. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp 245-271
35. Halperin K, Snyder CR, Shenkel RJ, Houston BK (1976) Effect of source status and message favorability on acceptance of personality feedback. J Appl Psychol 61:85-88
36. Ilgen DR, Hamstra BW (1972) Performance satisfaction as a function of the difference between expected and reported performance at five levels of reported performance. Organ Behav Hum Perform 7:359-370
37. Ilgen DR, Fisher CD, Taylor SM (1979) Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. J Appl Psychol 64:349-371
38. Ilgen DR, Barnes-Farell JJ, McKellin DB (1993) Performance appraisal process research in the 1980s: what has it contributed to appraisals in use? Org Behav Human Decis Process 54:321-368
39. Ilgen DR, Peterson RB, Martin BA, Boeschen DA (1981) Supervisor and subordinate reactions to performance appraisal sessions. Organ Behav Hum Perform 28:311-330
40. Jawahar IM (2005) Rater behaviors, ratee's reactions and performance. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, Honolulu, HI, August
41. Jawahar IM (2006) Correlates of satisfaction with performance appraisal feedback. J Labor Res 27:213-234
42. Jawahar IM, Williams C (1997) Where all the children are above average: the performance appraisal purpose effect. Pers Psychol 50: 905-925
43. Jordan JL, Jordan DN (1993) Satisfaction with performance appraisal ratings. Psychol Rep 72:1222
44. Joreskog KG, Sorbom D (1993) LISREL 8: structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
45. Joreskog KG, Wold H (1982) The ML and PLS techniques for modeling with latent variables: historical and comparative aspects. In: Joreskog KG, Wold H (eds) Systems under indirect observation: causality, structure, and prediction. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 263-270
46. Kacmar MK, Wayne SJ, Wright PM (1996) Subordinate reactions to the use of impression management tactics and feedback by the supervisor. J Manag Issue 8:35-53
47. Keeping LM, Levy PE (2000) Performance appraisal reactions: measurement, modeling, and method bias. J Appl Psychol 85:708-723
48. Klein HK, Snell SA, Wexley KN (1987) Systems model of the performance appraisal interview process. Ind Relat 26:267-280
49. Kluger AN, DeNisi A (1996) The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, meta-analysis and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull 119:254-284
50. Landy FJ, Farr JL (1983) The measurement of work performance. Academic, New York
51. Larson JR (1984) The performance feedback process: a preliminary model. Organ Behav Hum Perform 33:42-76
52. Lawler EE (1994) Motivation in work organizations. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
53. Leventhal GS (1980) What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In: Gergen K, Greenberg M, Willis R (eds) Social Exchange: Advances in theory and research. Springer, New York, pp 27-55
54. Lind AE (1995) Justice and authority relations in organizations. In: RS Cropanzano, Kacmar KM (eds) Organizational politics, justice and support: managing the social climate of the workplace. Quorum Books, Westport, CT, p. 83-96
55. Maier NRF (1958) The appraisal interview: objective methods and skills. Wiley, London
56. Masterson SS, Lewis K, Goldman BM, Taylor SM (2000) Integrating justice and social exchange: the differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Acad Manage J 43:738-748
57. McEvoy GM, Buller PF (1987) User acceptance of peer appraisals in an industrial setting. Pers Psychol 40:785-797
58. McFarlin DB, Sweeney PD (1992) Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Acad Manage J 35:626-637
59. Meyer HH, Walker WB (1961) A study of factors relating to the effectiveness of a performance appraisal program. Pers Psychol 14:291-298
60. Morran KD, Stockton RA (1980) Effect of self-concept on group member reception of positive and negative feedback, J Couns Psychol 27:260-267
61. Moye NA, Masterson SS, and Bartol KM (1997) Differentiating antecedents and consequences of procedural and interactional justice: empirical evidence in support of separate constructs. Paper presented at the 56th annual meetings of the Academy of Management Meetings, Boston, MA
62. Murphy KR, Cleveland JN (1995) Understanding performance appraisal: social, organizational and goal-based perspectives. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
63. Nadler DA (1977) Feedback and organizational development: using data based methods. Addision-Wesley, Reading, MA
64. Nathan BD, Mohrman AM, Milliman J (1991) Interpersonal relations as a context for the effects of appraisal interviews on performance and satisfaction: a longitudinal study. Acad Manage J 34:352-369
65. Organ DW (1988) A restatement of the satisfaction-performance hypothesis. J Manage 14:547-557
66. Podsakoff PM, Farh J-L (1989) Effects of feedback sign and credibility on goal setting and task performance. Org Behav Human Decis Process 44:45-67
67. Pooyan A, Eberhardt BJ (1989) Correlates of performance appraisal satisfaction among supervisory and non-supervisory employees. J Bus Res 19:215-226
68. Russell JS, Goode DL (1988) An analysis of managers' reactions to their own performance appraisal feedback. J Appl Psychol 73:63-67
69. Schrauger SJ (1975) Responses to evaluation as a function of initial self-perceptions. Psychol Bull 82:581-596
70. Smither JW (1988) Lessons learned: research implications for performance appraisal and management practice. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
71. Sweeney PD, McFarlin DB (1993) Workers' evaluations of the ends and means: an examination of four models of distributive and procedural justice, Org Behav Human Decis Process 55:23-40
72. Taylor SM, Fisher CD, Ilgen DR (1984) Individuals' reactions to performance feedback in organizations: a control theory perspective. In: Rowland KM, Ferris GR (eds) Research in personnel and human resources management. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp 81-124
73. Taylor SM, Tracy KB, Renard MK, Harrison JK, Carroll SJ (1995) Due process in performance appraisal: a quasi-experiment in procedural justice. Adm Sci Q 40:495-523
74. Thibaut J, Walker L (1975) Procedural justice: a psychological analysis. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
75. Tyler TR (1999) Why people cooperate with organizations: an identity-based perspective. In: Staw BM, Sutton R (eds) Research in organizational behavior. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp 201-246
76. Tyler TR, Blader SL (2000) Cooperation in groups: procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Psychology Press, Philadelphia, PA
77. Tyler TR, Lind AE (1992) A relational model of authority in groups. In: Zanna, MP (ed) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol 25, pp 115-191
78. Tziner A, Murphy KR (1999) Additional evidence of attitudinal influences in performance appraisal, J Bus Psychol 13: 407-419
79. Villanova P, Bernardin J, Dahmus SA, Sims RL (1993) Rater leniency and performance appraisal discomfort. Educ Psychol Meas 53:789-799
80. Vroom VH (1964) Work and motivation. Wiley, New York
81. Williams LJ (1995) Covariance structure modeling in organizational research: problems with the method versus applications of the method. J Organ Behav 16:225-233
82. Williams LJ, Anderson SE (1994) An alternative approach to method effects using latent-variable models: applications in organizational behavior research. J Appl Psychol 79:323-331