Employee satisfaction with performance appraisals and appraisers: The role of perceived appraisal use

Human Resource Development Quarterly

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 283-299

  Boswell, Wendy R ^a   Boudreau, John W ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b and History   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2942527730     PISSN: 10448004     EISSN: 15321096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1532-1096(200023)11:3<283::AID-HRDQ6>3.0.CO;2-3     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Antonioni, D. (1996). Designing an effective 360-degree appraisal feedback process. Organizational Dynamics, 25 24-38.
2. Ash, A. (1994). Participants' reactions to subordinate appraisal of managers: Results of a pilot. Public Personnel Management, 23 237-256.
3. Balzer, W.K., & Sulsky, L.M. (1990). Performance appraisal effectiveness and productivity. In K. Murphy & F. Saal (Eds.), Psychology in organizations: Integrating science and practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Bernardin, H.J., & Abbott, J. (1985). Predicting (and preventing) differences between self and supervisory appraisals. Personnel Administrator, 30 151-157.
5. Bernardin, H.J., & Orban, J.A. (1990). Leniency effect as a function of rating format, purpose for appraisal, and rater individual differences. Journal of Business and Psychology, 5 197-211.
6. Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
7. Bretz, R.D., Jr., Milkovich, G.T., & Read, W. (1992). The current state of performance appraisal research and practice: Concerns, directions, and implication. Journal of Management, 18 321-352.
8. Burke, R.J., Deszca, G., & Weitzel, W. (1982). Subordinate expectations and satisfaction with the performance appraisal interview. Journal of Psychology, 111 41-49.
9. Cleveland, J.N., Murphy, K.R., & Williams, R.E. (1989). Multiple uses of performance appraisal: Prevalence and correlates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74 130-135.
10. Dessler, G. (1999). How to earn your employees' commitment. Academy of Management Executive, 13 58-67.
11. Dipboye, R.L., & de Pontbriand, R. (1981). Correlates of employee reactions to performance appraisals and appraisal systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66 248-251.
12. Drenth, P.J.D. (1984). Personnel appraisal. In P.J.D. Drenth, H.K. Thierry, P.J. Williams, & C.J. de Wolff (Eds.), Handbook of work and organizational psychology. New York: Wiley.
13. Fulk, J., Brief, A.P., & Barr, S.H. (1985). Trust-in-supervisor and perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluations. Journal of Business Research, 13 301-313.
14. Gaines, H. (1994). Employees get satisfaction, but only when properly motivated. Industrial Management, 36 2-3.
15. Goodson, J.R., & McGee, G.W. (1991). Enhancing individual perceptions of objectivity in performance appraisal. Journal of Business Research, 22 293-303.
16. Gosselin, A., Werner, J.M., & Halle, N. (1997). Ratee preferences concerning performance management and appraisal. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 8 315-333.
17. Greller, M.M. (1978). The nature of subordinate participation in the appraisal interview. Academy of Management Journal, 21 646-658.
18. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., Peterson, R., & Capwell, D. (1955). Job attitudes: Review of research and opinion. Pittsburgh: Psychology Service of Pittsburgh.
19. Jawahar, I.M., & Williams, C.R. (1997). Where all the children are above average: The performance appraisal purpose effect. Personnel Psychology, 50 905-925.
20. Jones, A., Bruni, J., & Sells, S.B. (1977). Black-white differences in work environment perceptions and job satisfaction and its correlates. Personnel Psychology, 63 5-16.
21. Jordan, J.L., & Nasis, D.B. (1992). Preference for performance appraisal based on method used, type of rater, and purpose of evaluation. Psychological Reports, 70 963-969.
22. Klein, H.J., Snell, S.A., & Wexley, K.N. (1987). Systems model of the performance appraisal interview process. Industrial Relations, 26 267-280.
23. Lowery, C.M., Petty, M.M., & Thompson, J.W. (1995). Employee perceptions of effectiveness of a performance-based pay program in a large public utility. Public Personnel Management, 24 475-492.
24. Martin, T.N. (1992). Predictors of turnover for inbound and outbound employees. Telemarketing Magazine, 10 60-64.
25. McEvoy, G. (1990). Public sector managers' reactions to appraisals by subordinates. Public Personnel Management, 19 201-212.
26. McEvoy, G.M., Buller, P.F., & Roghaar, S.R. (1988). A jury of one's peers. Personnel Administrator, 33 94-101.
27. McNerney, D.J. (1995). Improved performance appraisals: Process of elimination. HRFocus, 72 4-5.
28. Meyer, H.H., Kay, E., & French, J.R.P., Jr. (1965). Split roles in performance appraisal. Harvard Business Review, 43 123-129.
29. Miceli, M.P., Jung, I., Near, J.P., & Greenberger, D.B. (1991). Predictors and outcomes of reactions to pay-for-performance plans. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76 508-521.
30. Milkovich, G.T., & Boudreau, J.W. (1997). Human resource management. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.
31. Murphy, K., & Cleveland, J.N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Murphy, K., Garcia, M., Kerkar, S., Martin, C., & Balzer, W. (1982). The relationship between observational accuracy and accuracy in evaluating performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67 320-325.
33. Ostroff, C. (1993). Rater perceptions, satisfaction and performance ratings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66 345-356.
34. Prince, J.B., & Lawler, E.E. (1986). Does salary discussion hurt the developmental performance appraisal? Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Decision Processes, 37 357-375.
35. Russell, J.S., & Goode, D.L. (1988). An analysis of manager's reactions to their own performance appraisal feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73 63-67.
36. Sheppard, H.L., & Herrick, N.Q. (1972). Where have all the robots gone? New York: Free Press.
37. Shore, T.H., Adams, J.S., & Tashchian, A. (1998). Effects of self-appraisal information, appraisal purpose, and feedback target on performance appraisal ratings. Journal of Business and Psychology, 12 283-298.
38. Smith, P.C., Kendall, L.M., & Hulin, C.L. (1969). The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement: A strategy for the study of attitudes. Skokie, IL: Rand McNally.
39. Smither, J.W., Reilly, R.R., Millsap, R.E., Pearlman, K., & Stoffey, R.W. (1993). Applicant reaction to selection procedures. Personnel Psychology, 46 49-96.
40. Stein, T. (1996). Treat workers like partners. Success, 43 6.
41. Williams, K.J., DeNisi, A.S., Blencoe, A.G., & Cafferty, T.P. (1985). The role of appraisal purposes: Effects of purpose on information acquisition and utilization. Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Decision Processes, 35 314-339.
42. Yaney, J.P. (1988). Motivation and the organization. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 1 46-57.
43. Zedeck, S., & Cascio, W.F. (1982). Performance appraisal decisions as a function of rater training and purpose of the appraisal Journal of Applied Psychology, 67 752-758.