Fixed- and Random-Effects Models in Meta-Analysis

Psychological Methods

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 486-504

  Hedges, Larry V ^c   Vevea, Jack L ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032271151     PISSN: 1082989X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.486     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Camilli, G. (1990). The test of homogeneity for 2 × 2 contingency tables: A review of and some personal opinions on the controversy. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 135-145.
2. Chang, L. (1992). A power analysis of the test of homogeneity in effect size meta-analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
3. DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986). Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials, 7, 177-188.
4. Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass's estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 106-128.
5. Hedges, L. V. (1983). A random effects model for effect sizes. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 388-395.
6. Hedges, L. V. (1992). Meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 17, 279-296.
7. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1983). Clustering estimates of effect magnitude from independent studies. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 563-573.
8. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.
9. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10. Hyde, J. S. (1981). How large are cognitive gender differences: A meta-analysis using omega and d. American Psychologist, 36, 892-901.
11. Olkin, I., & Sampson, A. (1998). Comparison of meta-analysis versus analysis of variance of individual patient data. Biometrics, 54, 272-277.
12. 2- and F-distributions and their applications. Biometrika, 36, 202-232.
13. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (1985). Empirical Bayes meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 10, 75-98.
14. Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1982). Comparing effect sizes of independent studies. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 500-504.
15. SAS 6.12 [Computer software]. (1996). Cary, NC: The SAS Institute.
16. Schmidt, F. L. (1992). What do data really mean? Research findings, meta-analysis, and cumulative knowledge in psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 1173-1181.
17. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. (1977). Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 643-661.
18. SPSS 8.0 for Windows [Computer software]. (1998). Chicago: SPSS Inc.