NYU3T: Teaching, Technology, Teamwork. A Model for Interprofessional Education Scalability and Sustainability

Nursing Clinics of North America

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 333-346

  Djukic, Maja ^a   Fulmer, Terry ^b   Adams, Jennifer G ^a,c   Lee, Sabrina ^c   Triola, Marc M ^c  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

E learning; Interprofessional education; Medical students; Nursing students; Simulation; Virtual patients

Indexed keywords

AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL MODEL; GERIATRICS; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERDISCIPLINARY EDUCATION; INTERNET; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; NURSING EDUCATION; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SAFETY; PUBLIC RELATIONS; REVIEW; TEACHING; UNITED STATES;

COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; EDUCATION, NURSING; GERIATRICS; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES; INTERNET; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; MANIKINS; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; NEW YORK CITY; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PATIENT SAFETY; PROGRAM EVALUATION;

EID: 84865433896     PISSN: 00296465     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cnur.2012.05.003     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Center for the Advancement of Interpersonal Education. Defining IPE. 2011. Available at: Accessed June 23, 2011. http://www.caipe.org.uk/about-us/defining-ipe/.
2. Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: report of an expert panel 2011, Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel, Interprofessional Education Collaborative, Washington, DC.
3. Zwarenstein M., Goldman J., Reeves S., et al. Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009, (4). [review], CD002213.
4. Pollard K., Miers M.E. From students to professionals: results of a longitudinal study of attitudes to pre-qualifying collaborative learning and working in health and social care in the United Kingdom. J Interprof Care 2008, 22(4):399-416.
5. San Martin-Rodriguez L., Beaulieu M.D., D'Amour D., et al. The determinants of successful collaboration: a review of theoretical and empirical studies. J Interprof Care 2005, 19(S1):132-147.
6. D'Amour D., Oandasan I. Interprofessionality as the field of interprofessional practice and interprofessional education: an emerging concept. J Interprof Care 2005, 19(s1):8-20.
7. Zwarenstein M., Goldman J., Reeves S. Interprofessional collaboration: effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009, (3). CD000072.
8. Hammick M., Freeth D., Koppel I., et al. A best evidence systematic review of interprofessional education: BEME guide no. 9. Med Teach 2007, 29(8):735-751.
9. Thibault G. Interprofessional education: an essential strategy to accomplish the future of nursing goals. J Nurs Educ 2011, 50(6):313-317.
10. Institute of Medicine Executive summary. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century 2001, The National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
11. Institute of Medicine Executive summary. Health professions education: a bridge to quality 2003, The National Academy Press, Washington, DC. A.C. Greiner, E. Knebel (Eds.).
12. Rep. Charles Rangel. H.R. 3590: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; 2010.
13. Health Professions Network Nursing and Midwifery Office Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice 2010, WHO Press, World Health Organization, Geneva (Switzerland).
14. The Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation. Our priorities. 2011. Available at: Accessed July 16, 2011. http://www.josiahmacyfoundation.org/priorities.
15. Robertson J., Bandali K. Bridging the gap: enhancing interprofessional education using simulation. J Interprof Care 2008, 22(5):499-508.
16. Casimiro L., MacDonald C.J., Thompson T.L., et al. Grounding theories of W(e)Learn: a framework for online interprofessional education. J Interprof Care 2009, 23(4):390-400.
17. Cook D., Erwin P.J., Triola M.M. Computerized virtual patients in health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med 2010, 85(10):1589-1602.
18. Cook D., Hatala R., Brydges R., et al. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education. JAMA 2011, 306(9):978-988.
19. The John A. Hartford Foundation. Geriatric interdisciplinary team training (GITT) program. 2011. Available at: Accessed June 17, 2011. http://www.gittprogram.org/.
20. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. TeamSTEPPS. 2011. Available at: Accessed June 17, 2011. http://teamstepps.ahrq.gov/.
21. Thistlethwaite J., Moran M. Learning outcomes for interprofessional education (IPE): literature review and synthesis. J Interprof Care 2010, 24(5):503-513.
22. Reeves S., Goldman J., Burton A., et al. Synthesis of systematic review evidence of interprofessional education. J Allied Health 2010, 39(3,2):198-203.
23. Reeves S., Goldman J., Gilbet J., et al. A scoping review to improve conceptual clarity of interprofessional interventions. J Interprof Care 2011, 25(3):167-174.
24. Oandasan I., Reeves S. Key elements for interprofessional education. Part 1: the learner, the educator, and the learning context. J Interprof Care 2005, 19(S1):21-38.
25. Oandasan I., Reeves S. Key elements of interprofessional education. Part 2: factors, processes and outcomes. J Interprof Care 2005, 19(S1):39-48.
26. Gillan C., Lovrics E., Halpern E., et al. The evaluation of learner outcomes in interprofessional continuing education: a literature review and an analysis of survey instruments. Med Teach 2011, 33(9):e461-e470.
27. Thannhauser J., Russel-Mayhew S., Scott C. Measures of interprofessional education and collaboration. J Interprof Care 2010, 24(4):336-349.
28. McPherson K., Headrick L., Moss F. Working and learning together: good quality care depends on it, but how can we achieve it?. Qual Health Care 2001, 10(S2):ii46-ii53.
29. Bridges D.R., Davidson R.A., Odegard P.S., et al. Interprofessional collaboration: three best practice models of interprofessional education. Med Educ Online 2011, 16. 10.3402/meo.v16i0.6035.
30. Cronenwett L., Sherwood G., Barnsteiner J., et al. Quality and safety education for nurses. Nurs Outlook 2007, 55(3):122-131.
31. Cameron A., Rennie S., DiProspero L., et al. An introduction to teamwork: findings from an evaluation of an interprofessional education experience for 1000 first-year health science students. J Allied Health 2009, 38(4):220-226.
32. Reese C., Jeffries P., Engum S. Learning together: using simulations to develop nursing and medical student collaboration. Nurs Educ Perspect 2010, 31(1):33-37.
33. Dillon P., Noble K., Kaplan L. Simulation as a means to foster collaborative interdisciplinary education. Nurs Educ Perspect 2009, 30(2):87-90.
34. Baker C., Pulling C., McGraw R., et al. Simulation in interprofessional education for patient-centred collaborative care. J Adv Nurs 2008, 64(4):372-379.
35. Stewart M., Kennedy N., Cuene-Grandidier H. Undergraduate interprofessional education using high-fidelity paediatric simulation. Clin Teach 2010, 7(2):90-96.
36. Carbonaro M., King S., Taylor E., et al. Integration of e-learning technologies in an interprofessional health science course. Med Teach 2008, 30(1):25-33.
37. Curran V., Sharpe D., Forristall J., et al. Student satisfaction and perceptions of small group process in case-based interprofessional learning. Med Teach 2008, 30(4):431-433.
38. Solomon P., Baptiste S., Hall P., et al. Students' perceptions of interprofessional learning through facilitated online learning modules. Med Teach 2010, 32(9):E391-E398.
39. Robertson B., Kaplan B., Atallah H., et al. The use of simulation and a modified TeamSTEPPS curriculum for medical and nursing student team training. Simul Healthc 2010, 5(6):332-337.
40. Hobgood C., Sherwood G., Frush K., et al. Teamwork training with nursing and medical students: does the method matter? Results of an interinstitutional, interdisciplinary collaboration. Qual Saf Health Care 2010, 19(6):1.
41. Margalit R., Thompson S., Visovsky C., et al. From professional silos to interprofessional education: campuswide focus on quality of care. Qual Manag Health Care 2009, 18(3):165-173.
42. American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). Nursing faculty shortage. 2011. Available at: Accessed September 5, 2011. http://www.aacn.nche.edu/media-relations/fact-sheets/nursing-faculty-shortage.
43. Cook D., Triola M.M. Virtual patients: a critical literature review and proposed next steps. Med Educ 2009, 43:303-311.
44. Jeffries P.R., McNelis A.M., Wheeler C.A. Simulation as a vehicle for enhancing collaborative practice models. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 2008, 20(4):471-480.
45. Jeffries P.R. A framework for designing, implementing, and evaluating simulations used as teaching strategies in nursing. Nurs Educ Perspect 2005, 26(2):96-103.
46. Tsukuda R.A. Focused instruments. Team performance in health care: assessment and development 2002, 123-168. Kluwer/Plenum, New York. G.D. Heinemann, A.M. Zeiss (Eds.).
47. Siegler E.L., Hyer K., Fulmer T., et al. Core measures for the GITT program. Geriatric interdisciplinary team training 1998, 259-277. Springer, New York. E.L. Siegler, K. Hyer, T. Fulmer (Eds.).
48. Duncan T.G., McKeachie W.J. The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educ Psychol 2005, 40(2):117-128.
49. Cook D.A., Beckman T.J., Thomas K.G., et al. Measuring motivational characteristics of courses: applying Keller's instructional materials motivation survey to a web-based course. Acad Med 2009, 84(11):1505-1509.
50. National League for Nursing (NLN). The simulation design scale (student version). 2005. Available at: Accessed August 17, 2011. http://www.nln.org/research/nln_laerdal/instruments.htm.
51. NYU3T: teaching, technology, teamwork. 2011. Available at: Accessed September 5, 2011. http://dei.med.nyu.edu/research/nyu3t.