Effects of multiple enzyme-substrate interactions in basic units of cellular signal processing

Physical Biology

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2012, Pages

  Krishnan, J ^a   Seaton, D D ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOCATALYSIS; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; HUMAN; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BIOCATALYSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84864939949     PISSN: 14783967     EISSN: 14783975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1478-3975/9/4/045009     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Goldbeter A and Koshland D E Jr 1981 An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78 6840-4 (Pubitemid 12216857)
2. Huang C Y and Ferrell J E Jr 1996 Ultrasensitivity in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93 10078-83 (Pubitemid 26314577)
3. Ferrell J E 1996 Tripping the switch fantastic: how a protein kinase cascade can convert graded inputs into switch-like outputs Trends Biochem. Sci. 21 460-6 (Pubitemid 27018812)
4. Kholodenko B N 2000 Negative feedback and ultrasensitivity can bring about oscillations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades Eur. J. Biochem. 267 1583-8 (Pubitemid 30165509)
5. Salazar C and Hfer T 2006 Kinetic models of phosphorylation cycles: a systematic approach using the rapid-equilibrium approximation for protein-protein interactions Biosystems 83 195-206 (Pubitemid 43199820)
6. Rape M, Reddy S K and Kirschner M W 2006 The processivity of multiubiquitination by the APC determines the order of substrate degradation Cell 124 89-103 (Pubitemid 43069312)
7. Ciliberto A, Capuani F and Tyson J J 2007 Modeling networks of coupled enzymatic reactions using the total quasi-steady state approximation PLoS Comput. Biol. 3 e45 (Pubitemid 46535738)
8. Kim S Y and Ferrell J E Jr 2007 Substrate competition as a source of ultrasensitivity in the inactivation of Wee1 Cell 128 1133-45 (Pubitemid 46437260)
9. Del Vecchio D, Ninfa A J and Sontag E D 2008 Modular cell biology: retroactivity and insulation Mol. Syst. Biol. 4 161 (Pubitemid 351253202)
10. Kim Y, Coppey M, Grossman R, Ajuria L, Jiménez G, Paroush Z and Shvartsman S Y 2010 MAPK substrate competition integrates patterning signals in the drosophila embryo Curr. Biol. 20 446-51
11. Seaton D D and Krishnan J 2011 The coupling of pathways and processes through shared components BMC Syst. Biol. 5 103
12. Bhattacharyya R P, Reményi A, Yeh B J and Lim W A 2006 Domains, motifs, and scaffolds: the role of modular interactions in the evolution and wiring of cell signaling circuits Annu. Rev. Biochem. 75 655-80 (Pubitemid 44118047)
13. Goldsmith E J, Akella R, Min X, Zhou T and Humphreys J M 2007 Substrate and docking interactions in serine/threonine protein kinases Chem. Rev. 107 5065-81 (Pubitemid 350225869)
14. Endicott J A, Noble M E M and Johnson L N 2012 The structural basis for control of eukaryotic protein kinases Annu. Rev. Biochem. 81 1-27
15. Goodey N M and Benkovic S J 2008 Allosteric regulation and catalysis emerge via a common route Nature Chem. Biol. 4 474-82 (Pubitemid 352019763)
16. Canals M, Sexton P M and Christopoulos A 2011 Allostery in GPCRS: MWC revisited Trends Biochem. Sci. 36 663-72
17. Seco J, Ferrer-Costa C, Campanera J M, Soliva R and Barril X 2012 Allosteric regulation of PKCθ: understanding multistep phosphorylation and priming by ligands in AGC kinases Proteins 80 269-80
18. Narayanan A and Jacobson M P 2009 Computational studies of protein regulation by post-translational phosphorylation Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 19 156-63
19. Pawson T and Kofler M 2009 Kinome signaling through regulated protein-protein interactions in normal and cancer cells Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 21 147-53
20. Chen C, Nott T J, Jin J and Pawson T 2011 Deciphering arginine methylation: Tudor tells the tale Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12 629-42
21. Huynh Q K and Pagratis N 2011 Kinetic mechanisms of Ca2+/calmodulin dependent protein kinases Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 506 130-6
22. Schindler J F et al 2002 Examination of the kinetic mechanism of mitogen-activated protein kinase activated protein kinase-2 Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1598 88-97 (Pubitemid 41128026)
23. Huynh Q K and McKinsey T A 2006 Protein kinase D directly phosphorylates histone deacetylase 5 via a random sequential kinetic mechanism Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 450 141-8 (Pubitemid 43849620)
24. Lin L, Czerwinski R, Kelleher K, Siegel M M, Wu P, Kriz R, Aulabaugh A and Stahl M 2009 Activation loop phosphorylation modulates brutons tyrosine kinase (Btk) kinase domain activity Biochemistry 48 2021-32
25. Steichen J M, Iyer G H, Li S, Saldanha S A, Deal M S, Woods V L Jr and Taylor S S 2010 Global consequences of activation loop phosphorylation on protein kinase a J. Biol. Chem. 285 3825-32
26. Figuera-Losada M and LoGrasso P V 2012 Enzyme kinetics and interaction studies for human JNK1β1 and substrates activating transcription factor 2 (ATF2) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (c-Jun) J. Biol. Chem. 287 13291-302
27. Kornev A P, Haste N M, Taylor S S and Ten Eyck L F 2006 Surface comparison of active and inactive protein kinases identifies a conserved activation mechanism Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103 17783-8 (Pubitemid 44852237)
28. Taylor S S and Kornev A P 2011 Protein kinases: evolution of dynamic regulatory proteins Trends Biochem. Sci. 36 65-77
29. Cohen P 2000 The regulation of protein function by multisite phosphorylation - a 25 year update Trends Biochem. Sci. 25 596-601
30. Sun L and Chen Z J 2004 The novel functions of ubiquitination in signaling Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 16 119-26 (Pubitemid 38757287)
31. Gunawardena J 2005 Multisite protein phosphorylation makes a good threshold but can be a poor switch Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102 14617-22 (Pubitemid 41457106)
32. Thomson M and Gunawardena J 2009 Unlimited multistability in multisite phosphorylation systems Nature 460 274-7
33. Varedi K S M, Ventura A C, Merajver S D and Lin X N 2010 Multisite phosphorylation provides an effective and flexible mechanism for switch-like protein degradation PLoS One 5 e14029
34. Salazar C, Brümmer A, Alberghina L and Höfer T 2010 Timing control in regulatory networks by multisite protein modifications Trends Cell Biol. 20 634-41
35. Yang J and Hlavacek W S 2011 Scaffold-mediated nucleation of protein signaling complexes: elementary principles Math. Biosci. 232 164-73
36. Levchenko A, Bruck J and Sternberg P W 2000 Scaffold proteins may biphasically affect the levels of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling and reduce its threshold properties Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97 5818-23 (Pubitemid 30367482)
37. Locasale J W, Shaw A S and Chakraborty A K 2007 Scaffold proteins confer diverse regulatory properties to protein kinase cascades Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104 13307-12 (Pubitemid 47293941)
38. Chapman S A and Asthagiri A R 2009 Quantitative effect of scaffold abundance on signal propagation Mol. Syst. Biol. 5 313
39. Thalhauser C J and Komarova N L 2010 Signal response sensitivity in the yeast mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade PLoS One 5 e11568
40. Good M C, Zalatan J G and Lim W A 2011 Scaffold proteins: hubs for controlling the flow of cellular information Science 332 680-6
41. OShaughnessy E C, Palani S, Collins J J and Sarkar C A 2011 Tunable signal processing in synthetic MAP kinase cascades Cell 144 119-31
42. Chung Y-D, Sinzinger M D, Bovee-Geurts P, Krause M, Dinkla S, Joosten I, Koopman W J, Adjobo-Hermans M J W and Brock R 2011 Analyzing the homeostasis of signaling proteins by a combination of western blot and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy Biophys. J. 101 2807-15
43. Markevich N I, Hoek J B and Kholodenko B N 2004 Signaling switches and bistability arising from multisite phosphorylation in protein kinase cascades J. Cell Biol. 164 353-9 (Pubitemid 38174763)
44. Kholodenko B N, Hancock J F and Kolch W 2010 Signalling ballet in space and time Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11 414-26
45. Bardwell L, Cook J G, Chang E C, Cairns B R, Thorner J, Bardwell L E E, Cook J G, Chang E C and Cairns B R 1996 Signaling in the yeast pheromone response pathway: specific and high-affinity interaction of the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases Kss1 and Fus3 with the upstream MAP kinase kinase Ste7 Mol. Cell. Biol. 16 3637-50
46. Huynh N, Ma C-T, Giang N, Hagopian J, Ngo J, Adams J and Ghosh G 2009 Allosteric interactions direct binding and phosphorylation of asf/sf2 by srpk1 Biochemistry 48 11432-40
47. Bae J H, Lew E D, Yuzawa S, Tomé F, Lax I and Schlessinger J 2009 The selectivity of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling is controlled by a secondary SH2 domain binding site Cell 138 514-24
48. Jones R B, Gordus A, Krall J A and MacBeath G 2006 A quantitative protein interaction network for the ErbB receptors using protein microarrays Nature 439 168-74 (Pubitemid 43083134)
49. Köhn M et al 2007 A microarray strategy for mapping the substrate specificity of protein tyrosine phosphatase Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46 7700-3 (Pubitemid 47557030)
50. Gordus A, Krall J A, Beyer E M, Kaushansky A, Wolf-Yadlin A, Sevecka M, Chang B H, Rush J and MacBeath G 2009 Linear combinations of docking affinities explain quantitative differences in RTK signaling Mol. Syst. Biol. 5 235
51. Wolf-Yadlin A, Sevecka M and MacBeath G 2009 Dissecting protein function and signaling using protein microarrays Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 13 398-405
52. Lee C W, Ferreon J C, Ferreon A C M, Arai M and Wright P E 2010 Graded enhancement of p53 binding to creb-binding protein (CBP) by multisite phosphorylation Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107 19290-5
53. Kim D, Kwon Y-K and Cho K-H 2008 The biphasic behavior of incoherent feed-forward loops in biomolecular regulatory networks Bioessays 30 1204-11
54. Kaplan S, Bren A, Dekel E and Alon U 2008 The incoherent feed-forward loop can generate non-monotonic input functions for genes Mol. Syst. Biol. 4 203 (Pubitemid 352001262)
55. Buchler N E and Louis M 2008 Molecular titration and ultrasensitivity in regulatory networks J. Mol. Biol. 384 1106-19
56. Krishnan J 2011 Effects of saturation and enzyme limitation in feedforward adaptive signal transduction IET Syst. Biol. 5 208-19
57. Legewie S, Schoeberl B, Blüthgen N and Herzel H 2007 Competing docking interactions can bring about bistability in the MAPK cascade Biophys. J. 93 2279-88 (Pubitemid 47511127)
58. Buchler N E and Cross F R 2009 Protein sequestration generates a flexible ultrasensitive response in a genetic network Mol. Syst. Biol. 5 272
59. de Ronde W, Tostevin F and ten Wolde P R 2011 Multiplexing biochemical signals Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 048101
60. Ortega F, Acerenza L, Westerhoff H V, Mas F and Cascante M 2002 Product dependence and bifunctionality compromise the ultrasensitivity of signal transduction cascades Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99 1170-5 (Pubitemid 34136465)
61. Szomolay B and Shahrezaei V 2012 Bell-shaped and ultrasensitive dose-response in phosphorylation-dephosphorylation cycles: the role of kinase-phosphatase complex formation BMC Syst. Biol. 6 26