The coupling of pathways and processes through shared components

BMC Systems Biology

Volumn 5, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Seaton, Daniel D ^a   Krishnan, J ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SIGNAL PEPTIDE;

ALLOSTERISM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ALLOSTERIC REGULATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 79959652892     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17520509     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-5-103     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Padrick SB, Rosen MK. Physical mechanisms of signal integration by WASP family proteins. Annu Rev Biochem 79:707-35.
2. Beene DL, Scott JD. A-kinase anchoring proteins take shape. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2007, 19(2):192-8. 10.1016/j.ceb.2007.02.011, 17317140.
3. Prehoda KE, Lim WA. How signaling proteins integrate multiple inputs: a comparison of N-WASP and Cdk2. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2002, 14(2):149-54. 10.1016/S0955-0674(02)00307-1, 11891112.
4. Philip F, et al. Synergistic activation of phospholipase C-beta3 by Galpha(q) and Gbetagamma describes a simple two-state coincidence detector. Curr Biol 2010, 20(15):1327-35. 10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.013, 2918712, 20579885.
5. Kim Y, et al. Substrate-dependent control of MAPK phosphorylation in vivo. Mol Syst Biol 2011, 7:467. 3063690, 21283143.
6. Kim Y, et al. MAPK substrate competition integrates patterning signals in the Drosophila embryo. Curr Biol 2010, 20(5):446-51. 10.1016/j.cub.2010.01.019, 2846708, 20171100.
7. Copley SD. Enzymes with extra talents: moonlighting functions and catalytic promiscuity. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2003, 7(2):265-72. 10.1016/S1367-5931(03)00032-2, 12714060.
8. Hult K, Berglund P. Enzyme promiscuity: mechanism and applications. Trends Biotechnol 2007, 25(5):231-8. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.03.002, 17379338.
9. Nobeli I, Favia AD, Thornton JM. Protein promiscuity and its implications for biotechnology. Nat Biotechnol 2009, 27(2):157-67. 10.1038/nbt1519, 19204698.
10. Bloom J, Cross FR. Multiple levels of cyclin specificity in cell-cycle control. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007, 8(2):149-60. 10.1038/nrm2105, 17245415.
11. Csikasz-Nagy A, et al. Cell cycle regulation by feed-forward loops coupling transcription and phosphorylation. Mol Syst Biol 2009, 5:236. 2644172, 19156128.
12. Peters JM. The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome: a machine designed to destroy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006, 7(9):644-56. 10.1038/nrm1988, 16896351.
13. Lavin MF, Gueven N. The complexity of p53 stabilization and activation. Cell Death Differ 2006, 13(6):941-50. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401925, 16601750.
14. Dhanasekaran DN, et al. Scaffold proteins of MAP-kinase modules. Oncogene 2007, 26(22):3185-202. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210411, 17496915.
15. Huh WK, et al. Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature 2003, 425(6959):686-91. 10.1038/nature02026, 14562095.
16. Del Vecchio D, Ninfa AJ, Sontag ED. Modular cell biology: retroactivity and insulation. Mol Syst Biol 2008, 4:161. 2267736, 18277378.
17. Bardwell L. Mechanisms of MAPK signalling specificity. Biochem Soc Trans 2006, 34(Pt 5):837-41. 3017501, 17052210.
18. Bardwell L, et al. Mathematical models of specificity in cell signaling. Biophys J 2007, 92(10):3425-41. 10.1529/biophysj.106.090084, 1853162, 17325015.
19. Haney S, Bardwell L, Nie Q. Ultrasensitive responses and specificity in cell signaling. BMC Syst Biol 2010, 4:119. 10.1186/1752-0509-4-119, 2940771, 20735856.
20. Georgi AB, Stukenberg PT, Kirschner MW. Timing of events in mitosis. Curr Biol 2002, 12(2):105-14. 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00662-5, 11818060.
21. Kalir S, et al. Ordering genes in a flagella pathway by analysis of expression kinetics from living bacteria. Science 2001, 292(5524):2080-3. 10.1126/science.1058758, 11408658.
22. Borghans JA, de Boer RJ, Segel LA. Extending the quasi-steady state approximation by changing variables. Bull Math Biol 1996, 58(1):43-63. 10.1007/BF02458281, 8819753.
23. Segel LA. On the Validity of the Steady-State Assumption of Enzyme-Kinetics. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 1988, 50(6):579-593.
24. Ciliberto A, Tyson F, Capuani JJ. Modeling networks of coupled enzymatic reactions using the total quasi-steady state approximation. PLoS Comput Biol 2007, 3(3):e45. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030045, 1828705, 17367203.
25. Sabouri-Ghomi M, et al. Antagonism and bistability in protein interaction networks. Journal of Theoretical Biology 2008, 250(1):209-18. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.09.001, 17950756.
26. Gunawardena J. Multisite protein phosphorylation makes a good threshold but can be a poor switch. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102(41):14617-22. 10.1073/pnas.0507322102, 1253599, 16195377.
27. Thomson M, Gunawardena J. Unlimited multistability in multisite phosphorylation systems. Nature 2009, 460(7252):274-7. 10.1038/nature08102, 2859978, 19536158.
28. Buchler NE, Louis M. Molecular titration and ultrasensitivity in regulatory networks. J Mol Biol 2008, 384(5):1106-19. 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.09.079, 18938177.
29. Buchler NE, Cross FR. Protein sequestration generates a flexible ultrasensitive response in a genetic network. Mol Syst Biol 2009, 5:272. 2694680, 19455136.
30. Rabiller M, et al. Proteus in the world of proteins: conformational changes in protein kinases. Arch Pharm (Weinheim) 2010, 343(4):193-206.
31. Cross FR, et al. Testing a mathematical model of the yeast cell cycle. Mol Biol Cell 2002, 13(1):52-70. 10.1091/mbc.01-05-0265, 65072, 11809822.
32. Goldbeter A, Koshland DE. An Amplified Sensitivity Arising from Covalent Modification in Biological-Systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America-Biological Sciences 1981, 78(11):6840-6844.
33. Liu X, Bardwell L, Nie Q. A combination of multisite phosphorylation and substrate sequestration produces switchlike responses. Biophys J 2010, 98(8):1396-407. 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.12.4307, 2856190, 20409458.
34. Markevich NI, Hoek JB, Kholodenko BN. Signaling switches and bistability arising from multisite phosphorylation in protein kinase cascades. J Cell Biol 2004, 164(3):353-9. 10.1083/jcb.200308060, 2172246, 14744999.
35. Krishnan J. Effects of saturation and enzyme limitation in feedforward adaptive signal transduction. IET Syst Biol 2011, 5(3):208. 10.1049/iet-syb.2010.0048, 21639593.
36. Rape M, Reddy SK, Kirschner MW. The processivity of multiubiquitination by the APC determines the order of substrate degradation. Cell 2006, 124(1):89-103. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.10.032, 16413484.
37. Keizer-Gunnink I, Kortholt A, Van Haastert PJ. Chemoattractants and chemorepellents act by inducing opposite polarity in phospholipase C and PI3-kinase signaling. J Cell Biol 2007, 177(4):579-85. 10.1083/jcb.200611046, 2064204, 17517960.
38. Vavouri T, et al. Intrinsic protein disorder and interaction promiscuity are widely associated with dosage sensitivity. Cell 2009, 138(1):198-208. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.029, 19596244.
39. Oberdorf R, Kortemme T. Complex topology rather than complex membership is a determinant of protein dosage sensitivity. Mol Syst Biol 2009, 5:253. 2671925, 19293832.
40. Veitia RA, Bottani S, Birchler JA. Cellular reactions to gene dosage imbalance: genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic effects. Trends Genet 2008, 24(8):390-7. 10.1016/j.tig.2008.05.005, 18585818.
41. Seaton D, Krishnan J. Modular systems approach to understanding the interaction of adaptive and monostable and bistable threshold processes. IET Syst Biol 2011, 5(2):81-94. 10.1049/iet-syb.2009.0061, 21405196.