Multisite phosphorylation provides an effective and flexible mechanism for switch-like protein degradation

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 12, 2010, Pages

  Varedi, Marjan K S ^a   Ventura, Alejandra C ^a   Merajver, Sofia D ^a   Lin, Xiaoxia Nina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL PROTEIN; PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE; PROTEIN SIC1; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; MICHAELIS MENTEN KINETICS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PREDICTION; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; REGULATORY MECHANISM; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ANIMALS; BINDING SITES; CELL CYCLE; CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASE INHIBITOR PROTEINS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HUMANS; KINETICS; MAP KINASE SIGNALING SYSTEM; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN BINDING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 78650788495     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014029     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Cohen P (2000) The regulation of protein function by multisite phosphorylation-a 25 year update. TIBS 25: 596-600.
2. Patwardhan P, Miller WT (2007) Processive phosphorylation: Mechanism and biological importance. Cell Signal 19: 2218-2226.
3. Skowyra D, Craig KL, Tyers M, Elledge SJ, Harper JW (1997) F-box proteins are receptors that recruit phosphorylated substrates to the SCF ubiquitin-ligase complex. Cell 91: 209-219.
4. Patton EE, Willems AR, Tyers M (1998) Combinatorial control in ubiquitindependent proteolysis: don't Skp the F-box hypothesis. TIG 14(6): 236-243.
5. Deshaies RJ (1997) Phosphoryation and proteolysis: partners in the regulation of cell division in budding yeast. Curr Opin Genetics Dev 7: 7-16.
6. Ang XL, Harper JW (2005) SCF-mediated protein degradation and cell cycle control. Oncogene 24: 2860-2870.
7. Hunter T (2007) The age of crosstalk: phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and beyond. Mol Cell 28: 730-738.
8. Verma R, Annan RS, Huddleston MJ, Carr SA, Reynard G, et al. (1997) Phosphorylation of Sic1p by G1 Cdk required for its degradation and entry into S phase. Science 278: 455-460.
9. Nash P, Tang X, Orlicky S, Chen Q, et al. (2001) multisite phosphorylation of a CDK inhibitor sets a thresholdfor the onset of DNA replication. Nature 414(29): 514-521.
10. Vlach J, Hennecke S, Amati B (1997) Phosphorylation-dependent degradation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27Kip1. EMBO J 16(17): 5334-5344.
11. Tsvetkov LM, Yeh KH, Lee SJ, Sun H, Zhang Hui (1999) p27Kip1 ubiquitination and degradation is regulated by the SCFSkp2 complex through phosphorylated Thr187 in p27. Curr Biol 9(2): 661-664.
12. Chu I, Arnaout A, Kahn H, Hanna W, Narod S, et al. (2007) p27 Phosphorylation by Src regulates inhibition of cyclin E-Cdk2. Cell 128: 281-294.
13. Roach PJ (1991) Multisite and hierarchal protein phosphorylation. J Biol Chem 266(22): 14139-14142.
14. Buchkovich K, Duffy LA, Harlow E (1989) The retinoblastoma protein is phosphorylated during specific phases of the cell cycle. Cell 58: 1097-1105.
15. Knudsen ES, Wang JY (1996) Differential regulation of retinoblastoma protein function by specific Cdk phosphorylation sites. J Biol Chem 271(14): 8313-8320.
16. Ezhevsky SA, Ho A, Becker-Hapak M, Davis PK, Dowdy SF (2001) Differential regulation of retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein by G1 cyclin-dependent kinase complexes in vivo. Mol Cell Biol 21(14): 4773-4784.
17. Kim SY, Song EJ, Lee KJ, Ferrell JE Jr. (2005) Multisite M-phase phosphorylation of Xenopus Wee1A. Mol Cell Biol 25: 10580-10590.
18. Nugroho TT, Mendenhall MD (1994) An inhibitor of yeast cyclin-dependent protein kinase plays an important role in ensuring the genomic integrity of daughter cells. Mol Cell Bio 14: 3320-3228.
19. Lengronne A, Schwob E (2002) The yeast CDK inhibitor Sic1 prevents genomic instability by promoting replication origin licensing in late G1. Mol Cell 9: 1067-1078.
20. Cross FR, Schroeder L, Bean JM (2007) Phosphorylation of the Sic1 inhibitor of B-type cyclins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is not essential but contributes to cell cycle robustness. Genetics 176: 1541-1555.
21. Schwob E, Bohm T, Mendenhall MD, Nasmyth K (1994) The B-type, cyclin kinase inhibitor p40SIC1 controls the G1 to S transition in S. cerevisiae. Cell 79: 233-244.
22. Klein P, Pawson T, Tyers M (2003) Mathematical modeling suggests cooperative interactions between a disordered polyvalent ligand and a single receptor site. Curr Biol 13: 1669-1678.
23. Borg M, Mittag T, Pawson T, Tyers M, Forman-Kay JD, et al. (2007) Polyelectrostatic interactions of disordered ligands suggest a physical basis for ultrasensitivity. PNAS 104: 9650-9655.
24. Mittag T, Orlicky S, Choy WY, Tang X, Lin H, et al. (2008) Dynamic equilibrium engagement of a polyvalent ligand with a single-site receptor. PNAS 105: 17772-17777.
25. Mittag T, Marsh J, Grishaev A, Orlicky S, Lin H, et al. (2010) Structure/ function implications in a dynamic complex of the intrinsically disordered Sic1 with the Cdc4 subunit of an SCF ubiquitin ligase. Structure 18: 494-506.
26. Deshaies RJ, Ferrell JE (2001) Multisite Phosphorylation and the countdown to S phase. Cell 107: 819-822.
27. Hill A (1910) The possible effects of the aggregation of the molecule of haemoglobin on its dissociation curves. J Physiol 40: iv-vii.
28. Chock PB, Stadtman ER (1977) Superiority of interconvertible enzyme cascades in metabolic regulation: Analysis of multicyclic systems. PNAS 74(7): 2766-2770.
29. Koshland DE, Goldbeter A, Stock JB (1982) Amplification and adaptation in regulatory and sensory systems. Science 217: 220-225.
30. Goldbeter A, Koshland DE (1984) Ultrasensitivity in biochemical systems controlled by covalent modification. Interplay between zero-order and multistep effects. J Biol Chem 259(23): 14441-14447.
31. Goldbeter A, Koshland DE (1981) An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems. PNAS 78: 6840-1981.
32. Qian H, Cooper JA (2008) Temporal cooperativity and sensitivity amplification in biological signal transduction. Biochemistry 47: 2211-2220.
33. Thron CD (1997) Bistable biochemical switching and the control of the events of the cell cycle. Oncogene 15: 317-325.
34. Bhalla US, Iyengar R (1999) Emergent properties of networks of biological signaling pathways. Science 283: 381-387.
35. Ferrell JE, Xiong W (2001) Bistability in cell signaling: How to make continuous processes discontinuous, and reversible processes irreversible. Chaos 11: 227-236.
36. Xiong W, Ferrell JE (2003) A positive-feedback-based bistable 'memory module' that governs a cell fate decision. Nature 426: 460-465.
37. Brown GC, Hoek JB, Kholodenko BN (1997) Why do protein kinase cascades have more than one level. Trends Biochem Sci 22(8): 288.
38. Ferrell JE (1997) How responses get more switch-like as you move down a protein kinase cascade. Trends Biochem Sci 22(8): 288-289.
39. Hooshangi S, Thiberge S, Weiss R (2005) Ultrasensitivity and noise propagation in a synthetic transcriptional cascade. PNAS 102: 3581-3586.
40. Gunawardena J (2005) Multisite protein phosphorylation makes a good threshold but can be a poor switch. PNAS 102(41): 14617-14622.
41. Salazar C, Hofer T (2003) Allosteric regulation of the transcription factor NFAT1 by multiple phosphorylation sites: a mathematical analysis. JMB 327: 31-45. Salazar03.
42. Salazar C, Hofer T (2007) Versatile regulation of multisite protein phosphorylation by the order of phosphate processing and protein-protein interactions. FEBS J 274: 1046-1061.
43. Krishnamurthy S, Smith E, Krakauer D, Fontana W (2007) The stochastic behavior of a molecular switching circuit with feedback. Biology Direct 2: 13-30.
44. Liu X, Bardwell L, Nie Q (2010) A combination of multisite phosphorylation and substrate sequestration produces switchlike responses. Biophys J 98(8): 1396-407.
45. Kim SY, Ferrell JE (2007) Substrate competition as a source of ultrasensitivity in the inactivation of Wee1. Cell 128: 1133-1145.
46. Chen KC, Csikasz-Nagy A, Gyorffy B, Val J, Novak B, et al. (2000) Kinetic analysis of a molecular model of the budding yeast cell cycle. Mol Biol Cell 11: 369-391.
47. Cross FR, Archambault V, Miller M, Klovstad M (2002) Testing a mathematical model of the yeast cell cycle. Mol Biol Cell 13: 52-70.
48. Chen KC, Galzone L, Csikasz-Nagy A, Cross FR, Novak B, et al. (2004) Integrative analysis of cell cycle control in budding yeast. Mol Biol Cell 15: 3841-3862.
49. Barberis M, Klipp E, Vanoni M, Alberghina L (2007) Cell size at S phase initiation: an emergent property of the G1/S network. PLOS Comp Biol 3(4): e64.
50. Liu C, Li Y, Semenov M, Han C, et al. (2002) Control of b-catenin phosphorylation/degradation by a dual-kinase mechanism. Cell 108(6): 837-847.
51. Bean JM, Siggia ED, Cross FR (2006) Coherence and timing of cell cycle start examination at single cell resolution. Mol Cell 21: 3-14.
52. Jeffery DA, Springer M, King DS, OÕShea EK (2001) multisite phosphorylation of Pho4 by the cyclin-CDK Pho80-Pho85 is semi-processive with site preference. J Mol Biol 306: 997-1010.
53. Pierce NW, Kleiger G, Shan SO, Deshaies RJ (2009) Detection of sequential polyubiquitylation on a millisecond timescale. Nature 462(7273): 615-619.
54. Marino S, Hogue IB, Ray CJ, Kirschner DE (2008) A methodology for performing global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in systems biology. J Theor Biol 254(1): 178-196.
55. Markevich NI, Hoek JB, Kholodenko BN (2004) Signaling Switches and Bistability Arising from Multisite Phosphorylation in Protein Kinase Cascades. JCB 164(3): 353-359.
56. Benito J, Mart'n-Castellanos C, Moreno S (1998) Regulation of the G1 phase of the cell cycle by periodic stabilization and degradation of the p25rum1 CDK inhibitor. EMBO J 17(2): 482-497.
57. Wang S, Zhang Y, Soosairajah J, Kraft AS (2007) Regulation of RUNX1/ AML1 during the G2/M transition. Leuk Res 31(6): 839-851.
58. Bao MZ, Shock TR, Madhani HD (2010) Multisite phosphorylation of the S. cerevisiae filamentous growth regulator Tec1 is required for its recognition by the E3 ubiquitin ligase adaptor Cdc4 and its subsequent destruction in vivo. Eukaryot Cell 9(1): 31-36.
59. Park HJ, Ding L, Dai M, Lin R, Wang H (2008) Multisite phosphorylation of Arabidopsis HFR1 by casein kinase II and a plausible role in regulating its degradation rate. J Biol Chem 283(34): 23264-23273.
60. Nishizawa M, Kawasumi M, Fujino M, Toh E A (1998) Phosphorylation of Sic1, a cyclin-dependnet kinase (Cdk) inhibitor, by Cdk including Pho85 kinase is required for its prompt degradation. Mol Biol Cell 9: 2393-2405.
61. Wysocki R, Javaheri A, Kristjansdottir K, Sha F, Kron SJ (2006) CDK Pho85 tergets CDK inhibitor Sic1 to relieve yeast G1 checkpoint arrest after DNA damage. Nature Struct & Mol Biol 13(10): 908-914.
62. Coccetti P, Zinzalla V, Tedeschi G, Russo GL, Fantinato S, et al. (2006) Sic1 is phosphorylated by CK2 on Ser201 in budding yeast cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 346: 786-93.
63. Sedgwick C, Rawluk M, Decesare J, Raithatha S, Wohlschlegel J, et al. (2006) Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ime2 phosphorylates Sic1 at multiple PXS/T sites but is insufficient to trigger Sic1 degradation. Biochem J 399: 151-160.
64. Escote X, Zapater M, Clotet J, Posas F (2004) Hog1 mediates cell-cycle arrest in G1 phase by the dual targeting of Sic1. Nature Cell Biotech 6(10): 997-1002.
65. Olsen JV, Blagoev B, Gnad F, Macek B, Kumar C, et al. (2006) Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell 127: 635-648.
66. Dueber JE, Mirsky EA, Lim WA (2007) Engineering synthetic signaling proteins with ultrasensitive input/output control. Nature Biotech 25(6): 660-662.
67. Elsasser S, Chi Y, Yang P, Campbell JL (1999) Phosphorylation controls timing of Cdc6p destruction: A biochemical analysis. Mol Biol Cell 10(10): 3263-3277.
68. Lanker S, Valdivieso MH, Wittenberg C (1996) Rapid Degradation of the G1 Cyclin Cln2 Induced by CDK-Dependent Phosphorylation. Science 271(5255): 1597-1601.
69. Jallepalli PV, Brown GW, Muzi-Falconi M, Tien D, Kelly TJ (1997) Regulation of the replication initiator protein p65cdc18 by CDK phosphorylation. Genes Dev 11(21): 2767-2779.
70. Welcker M, Singer J, Loeb KR, Grim J, Bloecher A, et al. (2003) Multisite phosphorylation by Cdk2 and GSK3 controls cyclin E degradation. Mol Cell 12: 381-392.
71. Hao B, Oehlmann S, Sowa ME, Harper JW, Pavletich NP (2007) Structure of a Fbw7-Skp1-Cyclin E complex: Multisite-phosphorylated substrate recognition by SCF ubiquitin ligases. Mol Cell 26: 131-143.
72. Jin J, Shirogane T, Xu L, Nalepa G, Qin J, et al. (2003) SCFb-TRCP links Chk1 signaling to degradation of the Cdc25A protein phosphatase. Genes Dev 17(24): 3062-3074.
73. Hansen DV, Loktev AV, Ban KH, Jackson PK (2004) Plk1 regulates activation of the anaphase promoting complex by phosphorylating and triggering SCFbTrCP-dependent destruction of the APC Inhibitor Emi1. Mol Biol Cell 15(12): 5623-5634.
74. Chi Y, Huddleston MJ, Zhang X, Young RA, Annan RS, et al. (2001) Negative regulation of Gcn4 and Msn2 transcription factors by Srb10 cyclin-dependent kinase. Genes Dev 15(9): 1045-1050.
75. Hübner A, Barrett T, Flavell RA, Davis RJ (2008) Multisite phosphorylation regulates Bim stability and apoptotic activity. Mol Cell 30(4): 415-425.