Understanding the effectiveness of online peer assessment: A path model

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 313-333

  Lu, Jingyan ^a   Zhang, Zhidong ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT BROWNSVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862577938     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: 15414140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/EC.46.3.f     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Andrade, H. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13-18.
2. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C.-L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 213-238. doi: 10.3102/00346543061002213
3. Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multi-variate Software, Inc.
4. Bostock, S. (2000). Student peer assessment. Retrieved May 5, 2010, from http://www.palatine.ac.uk/files/994.pdf
5. Brindley, C., & Scoffield, S. (1998). Peer assessment in undergraduate programmes. Teaching in Higher Education, 3(1), 79-90.
6. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Cho, K., Schunn, C. D., & Charney, D. (2006). Commenting on writing: Typology and perceived helpfulness of comments from novice peer reviewers and subject matter experts. Written Communication, 23(3), 260-294.
8. Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 438.
9. Davies, P. (2006). Peer assessment: Judging the quality of students' work by comments rather than marks. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 43(1), 69-82. doi: 10.1080/14703290500467566
10. Ellman, N. (1975). Peer evaluation and peer grading. The English Journal, 64(3), 79-80.
11. Falchikov, N. (1986). Product comparisons and process benefits of collaborative peer group and self assessments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 11(2), 146-166.
12. Falchikov, N., & Blythman, M. (2001). Learning together: Peer tutoring in higher education (1st ed.). New York: Routledge.
13. Ferris, D. R. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 315-339.
14. Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 304-315. doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007
15. Goodrich, H. (1997). Understanding rubrics. Educational Leadership, 54(4), 14-17.
16. Goodrich, H. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13-18.
17. Hafner, J. C., & Hafner, P. M. (2003). Quantitative analysis of the rubric as an assessment tool: An empirical study of student peer-group rating. International Journal of Science Education, 25(12), 1509-1528.
18. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
19. Henderlong, J., & Lepper, M. R. (2002). The effects of praise on children's intrinsic motivation: A review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 128(5), 774-795.
20. Hughes, I. E. (1995). Peer assessment. Capability, 1, 39-43.
21. Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130-144. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002
22. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
23. Law, N. W. Y., Lee, Y., van Aalst, J., Chan, C. K. K., Kwan, A., Lu, J., et al. (2009). Using Web 2.0 technology to support learning, teaching and assessment in the NSS Liberal Studies subject. Hong Kong Teachers' Centre Journal, 8, 43-51.
24. Li, L., Liu, X., & Steckelberg, A. L. (2010). Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 525-536.
25. Lin, S., Liu, E., & Yuan, S. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(4), 420-432.
26. Liu, E. Z. F., Lin, S. S. J., Chiu, C. H., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web-based peer review: The learner as both adapter and reviewer. IEEE Transactions on Education, 44(3), 246-251.
27. Liu, N.-F., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279-290.
28. Moskal, B. M. (2000). Scoring rubrics: What, when and how. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=3
29. Mueller, R. O. (1996). Basic principles of structural equation modeling: An introduction to LISREL and EQS. New York: Springer-Verlag.
30. Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instructional Science, 37(4), 375-401.
31. Olson, V. L. B. (1990). The revising processes of sixth-grade writers with and without peer feedback. Journal of Educational Research, 84(1), 22.
32. Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (1996). The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(3), 239-250.
33. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis method (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34. Rowntree, D. (1987). Assessing students: How shall we know them? London: Kogan Page.
35. Saddler, B., & Andrade, H. (2004). The writing rubric. Educational Leadership, 62(2), 48-52.
36. Sadler, P. M., & Good, E. (2006). The impact of self-and peer-grading on student learning. Educational Assessment, 11(1), 1-31.
37. Sluijsmans, D., Brand-Gruwel, S., van Merriënboer, J., & Martens, R. (2004). Training teachers in peer-assessment skills: Effects on performance and perceptions. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(1), 59-78.
38. Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(2), 173-180.
39. Straub, R. (1997). Students' reactions to teacher comments: An exploratory study. Research in the Teaching of English, 31(1), 91-119.
40. Sung, Y. T., Lin, C. S., Lee, C. L., & Chang, K. E. (2003). Evaluating proposals for experiments: An application of web-based self-assessment and peer-assessment. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 331-334.
41. Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-277.
42. Topping, K. J., & Ehly, S. W. (2001). Peer assisted learning: A framework for consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 12(2), 113-132.
43. Topping, K. J., Smith, E. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2), 149-169.
44. Tsai, C.-C. (2009). Internet-based peer assessment in high school settings. In L. T. W. Hin & R. Subramaniam (Eds.), Handbook of research on new media literacy at the K-12 level: Issues and challenges (pp. 743-754). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
45. Tsai, C.-C., & Liang, J.-C. (2009). The development of science activities via online peer assessment: The role of scientific epistemological views. Instructional Science, 37(3), 293-310.
46. Tsai, C.-C., Lin, S. S. J., & Yuan, S.-M. (2001). Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system. Computers & Education, 38(1-3), 241-252.
47. Tseng, S. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2007). Online peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1161-1174.
48. Van Lehn, K. A., Chi, M. T. H., Baggett, W., & Murray, R. C. (1995). Progress report: Towards a theory of learning during tutoring. Pittsburgh, PA: Learning Research and Development Centre, University of Pittsburgh.
49. van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & van Merriënboer, J. (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 270-279.
50. Wen, M. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2006). University students' perceptions of and attitudes toward (online) peer assessment. Higher Education, 51(1), 27-44.
51. Xiao, Y., & Lucking, R. (2008). The impact of two types of peer assessment on students' performance and satisfaction within a Wiki environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), 186-193.
52. Yang, Y.-F. (2011). A reciprocal peer review system to support college students' writing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 687-700. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535. 2010.01059.x
53. Yu, F. Y., Liu, Y. H., & Chan, T. W. (2005). A web-based learning system for question-posting and peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42, 337-348.