Peer assessment: Judging the quality of students work by comments rather than marks

Innovations in Education and Teaching International

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 69-82

  Davies, Phil ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLAMORGAN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 32944458781     PISSN: 13558005     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14703290500467566     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Ballantyne, R., Hughes, K. & Mylonas, A. (2002) Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), 427-441.
2. Bhalerao, A. & Ward, A. (2001) Towards electronically assisted peer assessment: a case study, ALT-J, 9(1), 26-37.
3. Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998) Assessment and classroom learning, Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74.
4. Boud, D., Cohen, R. & Sampson, J. (1999) Peer learning and assessment, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), 413-426.
5. Brown, S., Race, P. & Smith, B. (1997) 500 tips on assessment (London, Kogan Page).
6. Davies, P. (2000) Computerised peer assessment, Innovations in Education and Training International, 37(4), 346-355.
7. Davies, P. (2002) Using student reflective self-assessment for awarding degree classifications, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(4), 307-319.
8. Davies, P (2003a) Closing the communications loop on the computerised peer-assessment of essays, ALT-J, 11(1), 41-54.
9. Davies, P. (2003b) Peer-assessment: no marks required, just feedback? Evaluating the quality of computerised peer-feedback compared with computerised peer-marking, in: J. Cook & D. McConnell (Eds) Research Proceedings of the 10th ALT Conference, Sepember 2003, (The Association for Learning Technology), 143-156.
10. Davies, P. (2004) Don't write, just mark: the validity of assessing student ability via their computerized peer-marking of an essay rather than their creation of an essay, ALT-J, 12(3), 261-278.
11. Falchikov, N. (1995) Peer feedback marking: developing peer assessment, Innovations in Education and Training International, 32(2), 175-187.
12. Hanrahan, S. J. & Isaacs, G. (2001) Assessing self- and peer-assessment: the student's views, Higher Education Research & Development, 20(1), 53-68.
13. Higgins, R., Hartley, P. & Skelton, A. (2002) The conscientious consumer: reconsidering the role of assessment in student learning, Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 53-64.
14. Holroyd, C. (2000) Are assessors professional? Student assessment and the professionalism of academics, Active Learning in Higher Education, 1(1), 28-44.
15. Lin, S. S. J., Liu, E. S. F. & Yuan, S. M. (2001) Web-based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking-styles, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 430-432.
16. Mutch, A. (2003) Exploring the practice of feedback to students, Active Learning in Higher Education, 4(1), 24-38.
17. Rada, R. & Hu, K. (2002) Patterns in student-student commenting, IEEE Transactions on Education, 45(3), 262-267.
18. Robinson, J. (2002) In search of fairness: an application of multi-reviewer anonymous peer review in a large class, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 26 (2), 183-192.
19. Russell, T. (1998) Effective feedback skills (2nd edn) (London, Kogan Page).
20. Stefani, L. A. J. (1994) Peer, self and tutor assessment: relative reliabilities, Studies in Higher Education, 19(1), 69-75.
21. Stefani, L. A. J. (1998) Assessment in partnership with learners, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(4), 339-350.