Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology

Volumn 113, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 817-826

  Tyndall, Donald A ^a   Price, Jeffery B ^b   Tetradis, Sotirios ^c   Ganz, Scott D ^d   Hildebolt, Charles ^e   Scarfe, William C ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^c UCLA SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^d Maxillofacial Prosthetics and Implant Dentistry   (United States)

^e WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862561981     PISSN: 22124403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2012.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Tyndall DA, Brooks SL. Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;89:630-7.
2. Tetradis S, White SC. A decade of cone beam computed tomography. J Calif Dent Assoc 2010;38:24-6.
3. Ganz SD. Cone beam computed tomography-assisted treatment planning concepts. Dent Clin North Am 2011;55:515-36.
4. Angelopoulos C, Aghaloo T. Imaging technology in implant diagnosis. Dent Clin North Am 2011;55:141-58.
5. Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2008.
6. Tardieu PB, Rosenfeld AL, editors. The art of computer-guided implantology. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publishing; 2009.
7. Ganz S. CT scan technology-an evolving tool for predictable implant placement and restoration. Int Mag Oral Implantol 2001;1:6-13.
8. Ganz SD. Presurgical planning with CT-derived fabrication of surgical guides. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:59-71. (Pubitemid 41205523)
9. Ganz SD. Advanced case planning with SimPlant. In: Tardieu PB, Rosenfeld AL, editors. The art of computer-guided implantology. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 2009. p. 193-210.
10. Ganz SD. Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing applications using CT and cone beam CT scanning technology. Dent Clin North Am 2008;52:777-808.
11. Hatcher DC, Dial C, Mayorga C. Cone beam CT for pre-surgical assessment of implant sites. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003;31:825-34.
12. Kraut RA. Interactive CT diagnostics, planning and preparation for dental implants. Implant Dent 1998;7:19-25. (Pubitemid 128495898)
13. Mupparapu M, Singer SR. Implant imaging for the dentist. J Can Dent Assoc 2004;70:32a-g.
14. Sethi A, Kaus T. Practical implant dentistry: diagnostic, surgical, restorative and technical aspects of aesthetic and functional Harmony. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 2005. p. 288.
15. Spector L. Computer-aided dental implant planning. Dent Clin North Am 2008;52:761-75, vi.
16. Babbush CA, Hahn JA, Krauser JT, Rosenlicht JL. Dental implants: the art and science. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 2010. p. 544.
17. Rosenfeld AL, Mandelaris GA, Tardieu PB. Prosthetically directed implant placement using computer software to ensure precise placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part 1: diagnostics, imaging, and collaborative accountability. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26:215-21. (Pubitemid 43944179)
18. Guerrero ME, Jacobs R, Loubele M, Schutyser F, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D. State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement. Clin Oral Investig 2006;10:1-7. (Pubitemid 43309103)
19. Carter L, Farman AG, Geist J, Scarfe WC, Angelopoulos C, Nair MK, et al. American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology executive opinion statement on performing and interpreting diagnostic cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:561-2.
20. Jacobs R, Adriansens A, Naert I, Quirynen M, Hermans R, Van Steenberghe D. Predictability of reformatted computed tomography for pre-operative planning of endosseous implants. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999;28:37-41.
21. Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L. Impact of conventional tomography on prediction of the appropriate implant size. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;92:458-63. (Pubitemid 33601747)
22. Diniz AF, Mendonça EF, Leles CR, Guilherme AS, Cavalcante MP, Silva MA. Changes in the pre-surgical treatment planning using conventional spiral tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:249-53.
23. Frei C, Buser D, Dula K. Study on the necessity for cross-section imaging of the posterior mandible for treatment planning of standard cases in implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:490-7. (Pubitemid 40115777)
24. Vazquez L, Saulacic N, Belser U, Bernard JP. Efficacy of panoramic radiographs in the preoperative planning of posterior mandibular implants: a prospective clinical study of 1527 consecutively treated patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:81-5.
25. Schropp L, Stavropoulos A, Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A. Comparison of panoramic and conventional cross-sectional tomography for preoperative selection of implant size. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:424-9.
26. Norton MR, Ganeles J, Ganz SD, Stumpel LJ, Schmidt JM. Guidelines of the academy of osseointegration for the provision of dental implants and associated patient Care. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;2010:620-7.
27. Dawson A, Chen S, Buser D, Cordaro L, Martin W, Belser U. The SAC classification in implant dentistry. Berlin: Quintessence Publishing; 2009.
28. Misch K, Wang HL. Implant surgery complications: etiology and treatment. Implant Dent 2008;17:159-68.
29. Greenstein G, Cavallaro J, Romanos G, Tarnow D. Clinical recommendations for avoiding and managing surgical complications associated with implant dentistry: a review. J Periodontol 2008;79:1317-29.
30. Ganz SD. Implant complications associated with two- and threedimensional diagnostic imaging technologies. In: Froum S, editor. Dental implant complications. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. p. 71-99.
31. Ardekian L, Dodson TB. Complications associated with the placement of dental implants. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2003;15:243-50.
32. The Faculty of General Dental Practice (UK), the Royal College of Surgeons of England. Training standards in implant dentistry for general dental practitioners. Available at: http://www.fgdp.org.uk/pdf/training-stds-imp-dent- guide-2008.pdf. Accessed January 23, 2012.
33. Academy of General Dentistry. Educational objectives for the provision of dental implant therapy by dentists Chicago, IL. p. 1- 4. Available at: http://www.agd.org/files/education/pace/ educationalobjectives.pdf. Accessed January 23, 2012.
34. Buser D, Belser UC, Wismeijer D, editors. Implant therapy in the esthetic zone: single-tooth replacements. Berlin: Quintessence Publishing; 2007.
35. Dreiseidler T, Mischkowski RA, Neugebauer J, Ritter L, Zöller JE. Comparison of cone-beam imaging with orthopantomography and computerized tomography for assessment in presurgical implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24: 216-25.
36. Mraiwa N, Jacobs R, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Sanderink G, Schutyser F, Suetens P, et al. The nasopalatine canal revisited using 2D and 3D CT imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:396-402. (Pubitemid 40278848)
37. Romanos GE, Greenstein G. The incisive canal. Considerations during implant placement: case report and literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:740-5.
38. Asaumi R, Kawai T, Sato I, Yoshida S, Yosue T. Three-dimensional observations of the incisive canal and the surrounding bone using cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Radiol 2010;26:20-8.
39. Neugebauer J, Ritter L, Mischkowski RA, Dreiseidler T, Scherer P, Ketterle M, et al. Evaluation of maxillary sinus anatomy by cone-beam CT prior to sinus floor elevation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:258-65.
40. Misch CE. Density of bone: effect on surgical approach, and healing. In: Misch CE, editor. Contemporary implant dentistry. St Louis: Mosby; 1999. p. 371-84.
41. Ekfeldt A, Christiansson U, Eriksson T, Lindén U, Lundqvist S, Rundcrantz T, et al. A retrospective analysis of factors associated with multiple implant failures in maxillae. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:462-7. (Pubitemid 33723182)
42. Tagaya A, Matsuda Y, Nakajima K, Seki K, Okano T. Assessment of the blood supply to the lingual surface of the mandible for reduction of bleeding during implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:351-5.
43. Rosano G, Taschieri S, Gaudy JF, Testori T, Del Fabbro M, Galeazzi V. Anatomic assessment of the anterior mandible and relative hemorrhage risk in implant dentistry: a cadaveric study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:791-5.
44. Katakami K, Mishima A, Kuribayashi A, Shimoda S, Hamada Y, Kobayashi K. Anatomical characteristics of the mandibular lingual foramina observed on limited cone-beam CT images. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:386-90.
45. Kuzmanovic DV, Payne AG, Kieser JA, Dias GJ. Anterior loop of the mental nerve: a morphological and radiographic study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:464-71. (Pubitemid 37485602)
46. Tepper G, Hofschneider UB, Gahleitner A, Ulm C. Computed tomographic diagnosis and localization of bone canals in the mandibular interforaminal region for prevention of bleeding complications during implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:68-72. (Pubitemid 33674643)
47. Quirynen M, Mraiwa N, van Steenberghe D, Jacobs R. Morphology and dimensions of the mandibular jaw bone in the interforaminal region in patients requiring implants in the distal areas. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:280-5. (Pubitemid 37465528)
48. Angelopoulos C, Thomas SL, Hechler S, Parissis N, Hlavacek M. Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66:2130-5.
49. Bolin A, Eliasson S, von Beetzen M, Jansson L. Radiographic evaluation of mandibular posterior implant sites; correlation between panoramic and tomographic determinations. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:354-9. (Pubitemid 126670552)
50. Klinge B, Petersson A, Maly P. Location of the mandibular canal: comparison of macroscopic findings, conventional radiography, and computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:327-32.
51. Sonick M, Abrahams J, Faiella R. A comparison of the accuracy of periapical, panoramic, and computerized tomographic radiographs in locating the mandibular canal. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:455-60.
52. Wakoh M, Harada T, Otonari T, Otonari-Yamamoto M, Ohkubo M, Kousuge Y, et al. Reliability of linear distance measurement for dental implant length with standardized periapical radiographs. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 2006;47:105-15.
53. Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D. Imaging procedures for pre-operative assessment. In: Radiographic planning and assessment of endosseous oral implants. 1st ed. Berlin,: Springer-Verlag; 1998. p. 7-20.
54. Verhoeven JW, Cune MS. Oblique lateral cephalometric radiographs of the mandible in implantology: usefulness and accuracy of the technique in height measurements of mandibular bone in vivo. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:39-43.
55. Langland OE, Langlais RP, McDavid WD, DelBalso AM. Panoramic radiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1989.
56. Benson BW, Shetty V. Dental implants. In: White SC, Pharoah MJ, editors. Oral radiology: principles and interpretation. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2009. p. 597-612.
57. Frederiksen NL. Diagnostic imaging in dental implantology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995;80: 540-54.
58. Benson B. Presurgical radiographic planning for dental implants. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2001;13:751-62.
59. Loubele M, Guerrero ME, Jacobs R, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D. A comparison of jaw dimensional and quality assessments of bone characteristics with cone-beam CT, spiral tomography, and multi-slice spiral CT. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22:446-54.
60. Nickenig HJ, Eitner S. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2007; 35:207-11. (Pubitemid 47400214)
61. Vercruyssen M, Jacobs R, Van Assche N, van Steenberghe D. The use of CT scan based planning for oral rehabilitation by means of implants and its transfer to the surgical field: a critical review on accuracy. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:454-74.
62. Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:571-7. (Pubitemid 37162392)
63. Ekestubbe A, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG. The use of tomography for dental implant planning. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997;26: 206-13. (Pubitemid 127494947)
64. Perez LA, Brooks SL, Wang HL, Eber RM. Comparison of linear tomography and direct ridge mapping for the determination of edentulous ridge dimensions in human cadavers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;99:748-54. (Pubitemid 40719337)
65. Peker I, Alkurt MT, Michcioglu T. The use of 3 different imaging methods for the localization of the mandibular canal in dental implant planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23:463-70.
66. Kassebaum DK, Nummikoski PV, Triplett RG, Langlais RP. Cross-sectional radiography for implant site assessment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990;70:674-8. (Pubitemid 20383332)
67. Scarfe WC. A common sense approach to TMJ and implant imaging. Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg 1998;14:48-61.
68. Seeram E. Computed tomography: physical principles, clinical applications, and quality control. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Saunders Elsevier; 2009.
69. Commean PK, Kennedy JA, Bahow KA, Hildebolt CF, Liu L, Smith KE, et al. Volumetric quantitative computed tomography measurement precision for volumes and densities of tarsal and metatarsal bones. J Clin Densitom 2011;14:313-20.
70. Kalender WA. Computed tomography: fundamentals, system technology, image quality, applications 2nd ed. Erlangen: Publicis Corporate Publishing; 2005. p. 69.
71. Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am 2008;52:707-30.
72. Fortin T, Bosson JL, Coudert JL, Isidori M. Reliability of preoperative planning of an image-guided system for oral implant placement based on 3-dimensional images: an in vivo study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:886-93. (Pubitemid 38032652)
73. Balshi S, Wolfinger G, Balshi T. Surgical planning and prosthesis construction using computed tomography, CAD/CAM technology, and the Internet for immediate loading of dental implants. J Esthet Restor Dent 2006;18:312-25.
74. Chaushu G, Taicher S, Halamish-Shani T, Givol N. Medicolegal aspects of altered sensation following implant placement in the mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:413-5.
75. Curley A, Hatcher DC. Cone beam CT-anatomic assessment and legal issues: the new standards of care. J Calif Dent Assoc 2009;37:653-62.
76. Givol N, Taicher S, Halamish-Shani T, Chaushu G. Risk management aspects of implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:258-62.
77. Chau AC, Fung K. Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107:559-65.
78. Gray CF, Redpath TW, Smith FW. Low-field magnetic resonance imaging for implant dentistry. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998;27:225-9. (Pubitemid 128499473)
79. Gray CF, Redpath TW, Smith FW, Staff RT. Advanced imaging: magnetic resonance imaging in implant dentistry: a review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:18-27. (Pubitemid 37490586)
80. Aguiar MF, Marques AP, Carvalho AC, Cavalcanti MG. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging compared with computed tomography for implant planning. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:362-5.
81. Horner K, Islam M, Flygare L, Tsiklakis K, Whaites E. Basic principles for use of dental cone beam computed tomography: consensus guidelines of the European Academy of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009;38: 187-95.
82. Valentin J. The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. Publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007;37:1-332.
83. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003;32:229-34. (Pubitemid 40288494)
84. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35:219-26. (Pubitemid 44076876)
85. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, White SC. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:1237-43.
86. Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E, Pauwels R, Vanheusden S, Suetens P, et al. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol 2009;71:461-8.
87. Cohnen M, Kemper J, Möbes O, Pawelzik J, Mödder U. Radiation dose in dental radiology. Eur Radiol 2002;12:634-7. (Pubitemid 36940109)
88. Roberts JA, Drage NA, Davies J, Thomas DW. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry. Br J Radiol 2009;82:35-40.
89. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106: 106-14.
90. Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, Theodorakou C, Rogers J, Walker A, et al. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:267-71ed.
91. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: Branemark PI, Zarb G, Albrektsson T, editors. Tissue integrated prostheses. Osteointegration in clinical dentistry. 3rd ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 1985. p. 199-209.
92. Ribeiro-Rotta RF, Lindh C, Rohlin M. Efficacy of clinical methods to assess jawbone tissue prior to and during endosseous dental implant placement: a systematic literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:289-300.