Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 82, Issue 973, 2009, Pages 35-40

  Roberts, J A ^a   Drage, N A ^b   Davies, J ^c   Thomas, D W ^a  

^a VELINDRE CANCER CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY DENTAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c GUY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LITHIUM FLUORIDE; MAGNESIUM; TITANIUM;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CANCER RISK; CHILD; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTISTRY; HEAD; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; IONIZATION CHAMBER; JAW; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; PHANTOM; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION PROTECTION; THERMOLUMINESCENCE DOSIMETER; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; UNITED KINGDOM; X RAY;

CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HEAD; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; JAW; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY;

EID: 58849163662     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/31419627     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Guerrero ME, Jacobs R, Loubele M, Schutyser F, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D, et al. State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement. Clin Oral Investig 2006;10:1-7.
2. Heiland M, Schulze D, Rother U, Schmelzle R, Heiland M, Schulze D, et al. Postoperative imaging of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures using digital volume tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:1387-91.
3. Ziegler CM, Woertche R, Brief J, Hassfeld S, Ziegler CM, Woertche R, et al. Clinical indications for digital volume tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Dento-maxillofac Radiol 2002;31:126-30.
4. Cevidanes LH, et al. Superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models of orthognathic surgery patients. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005;34:369-75.
5. Cevidanes LH, et al. Three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography for assessment of mandibular changes after orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:44-50.
6. Cevidanes LH, Franco AA, Gerig G, Proffit WR, Slice DE, Enlow DH, et al. Comparison of relative mandibular growth vectors with high-resolution 3-dimensional imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:27-34.
7. Holberg C, Steinhauser S, Geis P, Rudzki-Janson I. Cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics: benefits and limitations. J Orofac Orthop 2005;66:434-44.
8. Kau CH, Richmond S, Palomo JM, Hans MG. Three-dimensional cone beam computerized tomography in orthodontics. J Orthod 2005;32:282-93.
9. Mah J, Enciso R, Jorgensen M. Management of impacted cuspids using 3-D volumetric imaging. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003;31:835-41.
10. Sukovic P. Cone beam computed tomography in craniofa-cial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res 2003; discussion 6 Suppl 1 179-182;31-36.
11. Wortche R, Hassfeld S, Lux CJ, Müssig E, Hensley FW, Krempien R, et al. Clinical application of cone beam digital volume tomography in children with cleft lip and palate. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35:88-94.
12. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003;32:229-34.
13. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35:219-26.
14. Iwai K, Arai Y, Hashimoto K, Nishizawa K. Estimation of effective dose from limited cone beam x-ray CT examination. Dent Radiol 2000;40:251-9.
15. Tsiklakis K, Donta C, Gavala S, Karayianni K, Kamenopoulou V, Hourdakis CJ. Dose reduction in max-illofacial imaging using low dose cone beam CT. Eur J Radiol 2005;56:413-7.
16. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP 37. Elsevier, 2007.
17. International Commission on Radiological Protection. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Ann ICRP 21. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, 1991.
18. Hiles P, Mackenzie A, Scally A, Wall B. Recommended standards for the routine performance testing of diagnostic X-ray imaging systems. IPEM Report No. 91. York, UK: Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine, 2005.
19. National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB). Living with radiation. National Radiological Protection Board. Didcot, UK: NRPB, 1998.
20. Martin CJ. Effective dose: how should it be applied to medical exposures? Br J Radiol 2007;80:639-47.
21. Nakajima A, Sameshima GT, Arai Y, Homme Y, Shimizu N, Dougherty H Sr. Two- and three-dimensional orthodontic imaging using limited cone beam-computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2005;75:895-903.
22. Mah JK, Danforth RA, Bumann A, Hatcher D. Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96:508-13.
23. Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, Dunn M. Doses from computed tomography (CT) examinations in the UK - 2003 Review. Report No. NRPB-W67. Chilton, UK: NRPB, 2005.
24. Isaacson KG, Thom AR. Orthodontic Radiographs - Guidelines. London, UK: British Orthodontic Society, 2001.
25. Pendlebury ME, Horner K, Eaton KA. Selection Criteria for Dental Radiography. 2nd edn. London, UK: Faculty of General Dental Practitioners, 2004.
26. National Radiological Protection Board. Occupational, Public and Medical Exposure. Documents of the NRPB. Didcot, UK: NRPB, 1993;4.